Zoning Board Meeting

we have on our matters we have proof of legal publication for all items here call for attendance Jim here Mr here Mr here again mrco we all stand for theedge there are two matters

1599 Bridge Ro till this month the applicant has requested to table this matter till May 14th board meeting um all those in favor and um additionally um item number two on our scheduled matters Willow Lane accessory structure look at 671 will Lan um is also being tabled until the U May 14th uh zoning all those all those in favor color Drive on a. AC

parel number3 located in an R3 it a little about your I have a question so the application said to remove the tree what you're trying to do I saw the picture of the treeh I like great I saw

this elevation here and so it's not of the tree is just extending the roof of the tree y okay gotta okay and then my other question plan this is the that 14 unfortunately I was

not some sheds already on the property is that frame shed and there's is that yeah the previous owner any questions comments from the board correct be any more on property than there is right now basically converting The Treehouse to the with

a to speak with you but I did peek over the fence around yeah um lot of you going take down any trees no around any coms V on Seeker resolution make a motion for Action under secet NCR section

6175 of the environmental code Drive [Music] um it's not a detriment to any of located not going to be even in the line of site of anyer not achieve by any other method the structure is already there any physical or environmental it's going to be primarily open space within just the enclosed cavana area that's currently just an enclosed Treehouse and um be as ASB are

concerned no anything else to add to it I'll make a motion to Grant an area variant to allow assciation of the existing treeh house and move to um up against the pool with additional and a 2.0 acre withl number 07810 d123 located in an R3 single family resal District try and run through thiss permits and construction complete one year one year

one thanks apprciate iscc located in an single family res how's it going

higher to control a

for our I know you already mentioned your wife believe you mentioned your wife's name you could just mention your name

situation with neighbor your next neighbor toay for the the theer owner issued AAL use permit many years ago for a major home occupation um and within the past I'd say eight or nine months or so the town began receiving complaints from ad joining neighbors um based upon the Phil activity and the loss of vation that was once there

we do have an act open of the recreational vehicles and we are going to be exploring um bringing the uh owner 941 Gravel Road P for this board to re revie um the special permit and the conditions that were imposed require that all of the equipment associated with the business be stored uh in the numerous out buildings that are on the property um so it it was heard earlier this month in court it was adjourned to next month the owner indicated they um but again we are exploring the um original conditions imposed on the home occupation permit and bringing it back to the board next month for further consideration there wasn't any code violations with respect to striking the

education um no there were no violations associated with that [Music] term with respect to the joined property even if it comes into compliance the visual that we're seeing now up on the screen remains correct that indidual that don't know that we ever received noise complaints but but all of the screen that made the business there was

quite a bit of it yeah been as

or our as well Neighbors on one hand 10 foot fence is a big fence but there's there's a 24 30 in he difference between your property and the neighbor's property um but special use variant um is definitely a component of this right they weren't using that for specially use home occupancy variants um they wouldn't have

the trucks there they wouldn't have all that traffic in and out and if I was you i' be standing in your situation as well um on another not it's not your not following special use between 541 goup measure just to get a height my own mind um and the difference between the grade of the property at 541 G Andor on gravel is at least 2et 36 in 35 to 37

and even if the equipment goes away the lot has been filled with a bunch of construction debris and a bunch of garbage in ashal scraping B pylons and I don't think there and while a 10 foot fence is obviously quite tall it'll it'll buffer the at least not see all of the garage sitting next to the city don't there's just a lot of construction debris old tires and so separate from I think the fence is the only thing

that's going to screen it at this point in time nothing will grow there to plant it to Shield it just the imper surface that's behind St agree that a fence would help 10 fence and things solution to situ

questions from the board anybody from the public U I got 2 um and he I know comp

his still perit and not and so anyway my have mon Mons

thank you never property when you look at the properties I came here tonight to

speak I had a neighbor on a li at one point and very pleas resp you might tell us why see I know nothing about my name is all particular

neighb yeah this is all light I know for myself and I believe for the rest of the board as of recently we're we're working through it at this point I mean you're the they P to offense for something that he's doing but unfortunately his application is not in front of us this even only my only um

now okay as I said thanks to the some the new people that came on seems to moving I know is aspects about I

need to come back in front of this court so we will have a public hearing to come back in front of this permits are Grant we came and we talked about um elevation and effect and as well as all the is already there right right you got to D that's their responsibility actually I came and allow to do it that so

responsibility and we have we have our steps that we will end up having to take as well so I can't talk for Bo I know 2013 if I remember correctly was is part of that I understand I will say I appreciate everything You' said and very to this meeting trying to

understand what was happening we have we have our triggers that we're able toze to Josh Josh has been doing phenomenal job as well all I can say is we are we are moving forward we are trying to only thank you any other questions

I CL

for all in favor you guys think I will throw one additional comment to the board as as we think about M forward um because of the situation um with the

neighbor for defense um I I suggest or like important to consider um maybe putting a duration on the limitation of the fence even being out there which I believe is what you mentioned that you were planning on building typically has a 15 plus or minus year lifp once that fence RS out that dis varience ends up going away and theuse of changing and the special use notary in that particular area anymore that and fence isn't necessary but if it is then another variance could be sought at that point I'm almost wondering do we put a

I was trying to find something specific he didn't know state but typically um um there's covenants that can be you know affirmative or restrictive associated with the easement a covenant a b time that can't and they do exist I've never I haven't had issue you know I think the context of the potential pru permit what goes on with that property there may come a time point in time when

current looking at find exper thanish time limit there was a need to reconstruct the they would need to would need to come back in front of the board way theit be agreable to that my Forward Thinking is off is expensive and 20 years from now it's going to be even more cost prohibitive if there's no longer a need for it I can't imagine that the homeowner would want to replace it if if there was no longer a need to Black might just kill itself the good news is the D will be here

I don't know if the board is considered and I don't know if the proposal includes that wraps around and ends at two point as opposed to buffer more of a buffer than than a fence per se there's a fence that wraps all the way around the pool is this contemplating buffer to that i' say it's about property one I believe it was yeah it's at least 5 also mention the existing fence to the property doesn't really do too much

that's to you know screen The View but [Music] natural don't know same one

I said typically runs with the land and it's there for all time to come my origal another Ty of fence needs to come before higher than

will ESP sale but if you even if you look at your neighbor's face a year but you're never going to be able to catch up no absolutely not if you have a problem p no we have not I don't even know how to

um neighborhood there was a fence back there but the fing the fence that was on the other owner property but it's taller accept the neighbor at 545 who in favor of it um so as far as the detriment to the one end of it wones in there by any other method I is going to improve quickly enough that there's any other method besides offense to block the dealing with um as far as envir adverse environmental or physical impacts to the CER to the neighborhood I think this is actually remedying environmental impact that was created by

a situation done by the neighbor to the rear but the fence is not my opinion is certainly not going to impact um the water table or where the water's moving it's really not going to impct any um in this case I'm is not self created because you would not need the fents if it weren't for the difficulty that was created by someone else behind you and this will be able change and that it's going to at least hide the view of the dumop but if not I will make privacy loated the [Music] line privacy fence on the lot

line on parcel number 08.12 d23 loated Earth three single family residential district right um You have your variance for 10 tall fence so we we are going to condition it um defense be valid for the life of the fence um once the fence RS out you need a 10 fence again you're going have to reapply well situation so um you have one year to complete the project a building permit to do so good

luck comply with the drawing that as part of the application thank you good luck guys thank you next up have 1178 Jackson Heights loated

my on this um 3 asking for 3 addition back up to our commercial District um yeah that's Prett questions from the board just for argument sake there is currently a there right yes there's currently actually fit inside of theint of the existing back so will

not issu for that deck 20% counts but because of where the fenes with L and the buffer space it's not going to look like it's really to close to the anybody else on the board questions comments

comments to make a motion for a type two action under Seeker pursuing to NYC section 6 enal Heights Heights all those in favor standards um i' say this area this request is not necessarily out of character uh commercial site and far enough back and this will not be uh visible from Street there's not really going to be a there's not going to be a detriment to any of the nearby properties um because of the commercial District then other residential districts are real properties are actually set forward of this this property um benefit is not achievable by

any other method other than shopping down a fairly substantial very beautiful trade last time I was out there um there's no environmental impacts actually it's less environmental impacts not um ret treat um it's not really going to any or anything else in the area um difficulty is um not self created through the way property is Tre is located and the way house is situated U this won't be a um this will be a desirable change to to the house square footage and property into the is significant impact no objection

a96 foot room addition on a77 acre parcel having number d232 located R3 single family residential uh District under section 35-2 of the code Town web all those in favor you have uh you have your have building code or building permit um in that time to be able to do the construction um good luck thanks everybody okay

Jam the comp officer please accept this report as my favorable res to Main the remainder of the 5 period was my first yes so the original approval states that U it was a maximum of six hens a one year evaluation of the April 2024 filing board meeting the possibility ofing I Wasing Tove we got e

thought I haven't tried to purchase from country mxs thank you but I thought they were six as well but I could be wrong and where is the coup on the on the um have a garage touching you so it's it's a long narrow that really now it's long

lot straight back this picture and it's almost the wi of the there so it's just so is it directly behind or is it to the of the based on the yes so is it next to the garage or behind the garage popular design that they Rec like wa you going back again you're out or no here's my

suggestion you're going to leave it the way it is and then that's the end of the review if the board is comfortable with increasing the number in exchange having back another time and see whether the number has affected board's concerns what's that next I'm good I'm good with uh five at home car you said right y you're changing the original amend it make a motion to amend it and put it out another year I'll make a motion to am

VAR to from allowing six to a maximum of um this property is located in um we asked to come back in follow see how your neighbors um a dozen doing the the egl Sal years right okay um I have a second okay all those in favor see you in one year thank you thank you [Music]

no have the approval of so I will make a motion I 12 202 in favor so down that're not I have three other VES well those other three have been there

okay I'll make a motion to approve the February 13th minutes sorry and the January minutes I make a motion to approve those have the right yes inor no uh with that I conclude the uh is it April 16th um board of appeals thank you everybody