Board of Education Regular Business Meeting
School Board Attachment 2025.04.22

EAF Part II.docx (1).pdf

April 22, 2025 · 3 min read · extracted text · View original

PART II—ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Lead Agency) A.​ DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE 1 THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR PART 617.4? If Yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. ​

□ Yes​

X No

B.​WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? If No, negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. ​

□ YES​

X No

C.​COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) Cl.​Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems, Explain briefly: None C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: None C3 Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: None C4. A community’s existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain Briefly. None C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. None C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C5? Explain briefly. None C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. None D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CEA? ​

□ Yes​

X No

E.​ IS THERE OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ​

□ Yes​

X No​ It Yes, explain briefly

PART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be Completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS:​ For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part II was checked yes, the determination and significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. □ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.

x Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination:

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Board of Education of the Webster Central School District​ ​ ​ Name of Lead Agency ​

Janice Richardson____________________________________ Print or Type name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency

President of Board of Education Title of Responsible Officer

​

​

________________________________________​ Signature of Responsible Office in Lead Agency ​

_______________________________________ Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible

officer)

​

​

​ ​

________ Date

​

End of document