Town Board Meeting
Town Board Minutes 2026.09.03

Minutes

September 3, 2026 · 27 min read · extracted text · View original

Webster Town Board

September 3, 2026

A regular meeting of the Webster Town Board was called to order by Supervisor Scialdone at

7:30 p.m. at the Webster Town Board Meeting Room, 1002 Ridge Road, Webster, New York,

with the following officials present:

Supervisor ........................................................................ Alexander B. Scialdone

Councilman ....................................................................................... John J. Cahill

Councilman .............................................................................. Nicholas E. Hunter

Councilman ................................................................................ Garrett J. Wagner

Attorney for the Town .................................................................... John DeMarco

Town Clerk .................................................................................. Danene M. Marr

Absent:

Councilwoman .......................................................................... Jennifer S. Wright

Department Heads Present:

Finance Director.................................................................................. Paul Adams

Communications Director .............................................................. Bridget Harvey

Town Engineer .............................................................................. Keith Mortimer

***

Supervisor Scialdone led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

***

The meeting was open to the floor for public comment and the following Webster residents

appeared before the Town Board.

Vivian Stoch, a Webster resident, spoke to the Board about her background as a brain cancer

survivor, sharing that she underwent surgery and over a year of treatment beginning at age seven.

She noted that although she has recovered significantly, she continues to face lasting challenges,

including difficulty processing information and expressing her thoughts. Miss Stoch stated that

as she has grown older, her Christian faith has become an important part of her identity and

values.

Miss Stoch explained that she has felt uncomfortable with the frequency of Pride and

LGBTQ-related messages displayed at her school, including instances of teachers wearing Pride

shirts and related messages written on sidewalks. She emphasized that she respects others’

beliefs and is not asking for her own beliefs to be prioritized but hopes that her religious views

will be given equal respect and consideration. She encouraged the Board to support a learning

environment where all students can feel they belong and are treated respectfully without feeling

that any one set of personal beliefs is being promoted. She thanked the Board for listening to her

perspective.

Mark Stoch, a Webster resident, addressed the Board to speak about the importance of humility

in leadership. He emphasized that humility involves acknowledging that even experienced

leaders may overlook certain perspectives and should remain open to considering how decisions

affect others. He referenced comments shared at a previous meeting regarding the removal of

1

09-03-2026

Webster Town Board

the Pride flag and noted that while he views the role of government differently, the concerns

raised demonstrated how actions can be perceived in ways leaders may not anticipate. Mr. Stoch

stated that once a government displays a symbol recognizing a specific group, expectations are

created, and both raising and removing such a symbol inevitably carry meaning.

Mr. Stoch reiterated his belief that government recognition should be applied consistently and

fairly to all groups and expressed that the American flag serves as an inclusive symbol for every

resident. He suggested that leaders must consider precedent, unintended consequences, and

differing perspectives when making decisions. He stated that humility strengthens leadership by

encouraging reflection on how decisions impact the entire community. Mr. Stoch concluded by

thanking the Board for their time and service and expressed his intention to continue the

conversation in future meetings.

Dorothy Fait, a Webster resident, addressed the Board regarding the Webster Transportation

Infrastructure Project, urging the Board not to issue a negative declaration under the State

Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR). Ms. Fait stated that the Environmental Assessment

Form (EAF) identifies significant adverse environmental impacts, particularly related to the

proposed Chiyoda Drive extension. Concerns raised included the removal of a wooded parcel

that functions as a wildlife corridor, the culverting and diversion of a Mill Creek tributary, and

the potential environmental consequences of altering a compromised stream. Ms. Fait noted that

these impacts appear minimized in the EAF and argued that this portion of the project should be

evaluated individually to ensure proper environmental review.

Ms. Fait further explained that SEQR requires full consideration of cumulative impacts and

connected actions. She expressed concern that the proposed intersection at Route 250 may

increase risks for pedestrians using nearby trails and questioned whether the new connection is

necessary given existing road infrastructure. Ms. Fait concluded that the identified impacts meet

the threshold for a positive declaration and the preparation of an environmental impact statement.

She emphasized that a positive declaration would not halt the project but would ensure the

review of alternatives, mitigation measures, and public input before moving forward.

Bruce Winters, a Webster resident, asked the Board whether any recent action had been taken

regarding the legalization of recreational marijuana in the Town. Supervisor Scialdone stated for

the record that Webster has not opted in and has no intention of bringing the matter forward.

The resident, a retired pharmacist and former U.S. Public Health Service officer, requested that if

the issue arises in the future, the Board consider two questions: how legalization would affect the

moral character of the community and what socially redeeming value it would provide.

Monica Gorlick, a Webster resident, addressed the Board by reporting that they recently toured

the Wastewater Treatment Plant and recommended that others, including students, take the tour.

She noted that the facility’s anaerobic digesters produce excess biogas, which is currently burned

off, and referenced a previously proposed renewable natural gas project intended to capture and

sell this gas. Ms. Gorlick stated that the project was discontinued due to concerns regarding a

vendor contract and was ultimately voted down 3–2, despite its potential environmental and

financial benefits.

2

09-03-2026

Webster Town Board

Ms. Gorlick expressed concern that rejecting the project was shortsighted and that taxpayers may

have supported it had they been more informed. She emphasized the importance of considering

long-term benefits to the Town when making decisions and asked the Board to revisit the

renewable natural gas project. Ms. Gorlick concluded by requesting that the board reconsider

the initiative and support it unanimously if it comes before them again.

The following comments came from emails or online form submitted by the individuals:

Kevin Lockhart, Webster resident: I am submitting this statement to formally object to the

creation and enforcement of an ad hoc policy restricting my ability to identify myself during

public comment as a candidate for Webster Town Supervisor.

I recognize that the Town Board has legitimate authority to maintain order, establish reasonable

time limits, and regulate public comment through neutral rules. I am not requesting an

exemption from those rules, additional speaking time, or preferential treatment because I am a

candidate.

I am asking for something much simpler: equal treatment under established, uniformly applied

rules.

The New York State Committee on Open Government has repeatedly advised that although the

Open Meetings Law does not itself require a public body to provide a public-comment period,

when a public body chooses to permit public participation, it should operate under reasonable

rules that treat members of the public equally. The Committee has further recognized that a

public body’s authority to regulate its proceedings is not unlimited. (Department of State)

Accordingly, a restriction should not simply materialize from the chair in response to the

identity, status, or speech of a particular resident.

The First Amendment principles discussed in People v. Albra, 13 Misc. 3d 64 (App. Term 2d

Dept 2006), are also instructive. The majority recognized government’s substantial interest in

maintaining orderly meetings and restricting speakers to the subject matter properly before the

body. At the same time, the decision recognized the important distinction between regulating

speech because it is irrelevant or disruptive and stopping a speaker because the presiding official

disagrees with the speaker’s viewpoint. (New York Courts)

The dissent in Albra went further, emphasizing that speech concerning public business is

protected against arbitrary, content-based restrictions and “ad hoc parliamentary rulings” by

presiding officials. (Justia Law) While that portion of Albra is a dissent and therefore should not

be represented as the controlling holding of the case, the constitutional concern it identifies is

directly relevant here: public-comment rules should not be invented or selectively modified in

response to a particular speaker.

My candidacy for Town Supervisor is a matter of public record and public concern. Simply

identifying myself truthfully as a candidate is materially different from demanding that the Town

provide me with a platform for campaign advocacy.

If the Town believes that identifying oneself as a candidate constitutes prohibited campaign

activity, I respectfully request that the Town Board identify:

3

09-03-2026

Webster Town Board

1.

2.

3.

4. The specific written rule or policy establishing that restriction;

The date and manner in which the rule was adopted;

The legal authority upon which the Town relies;

Whether the restriction applies to all candidates, elected officials, political-party

representatives, advocacy organizations, and other speakers identifying their affiliations;

and

5. The objective standards that will be used to enforce the restriction uniformly.

If no such previously established rule exists, I respectfully request that the Supervisor

discontinue enforcing an ad hoc restriction against me.

This is not a request that the Town Board endorse my candidacy. In fact, it is precisely the

opposite. Town government should remain neutral.

The government should neither promote a candidate nor create special restrictions for one.

Every resident appearing before this Board should know the rules before approaching the

microphone, and those rules should remain the same regardless of the speaker’s identity, political

affiliation, candidacy, criticism of Town government, or viewpoint.

I will continue to respect reasonable and lawfully established rules governing decorum, speaking

time, and the orderly conduct of Town Board meetings. I ask the Town Board to provide me

with the same assurance in return: that the rules governing my participation will be established

objectively and applied to me on the same terms as everyone else.

I therefore respectfully request that the Town Board reject the use of speaker-specific ad hoc

restrictions and ensure that all public-comment policies are written, reasonable, viewpointneutral, and uniformly enforced.

Respectfully submitted,

Kevin L. Lockhart

***

Resolution No. 290: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

approve the August 20, 2026 Town Board Workshop Meeting Minutes as submitted by the Town

Clerk.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Cahill ........... Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Councilman Wagner ......... Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

***

Resolution No. 291: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

approve the bills as submitted in Warrant #0926 by the Director of Finance.

Fund

General (A,B) #3081-3295

Highway (C,D)

Sewer (G)

Library (L)

4

Inside

87,163.50

68,071.10

44,263.12

50,055.66

Outside

65,966.25

8,337.74

64,920.85

6,786.83

Card/ACH

3,528.23

7,312.35

386.30

149.68

Total

156,657.98

83,721.19

109,570.27

56,992.17

09-03-2026

Webster Town Board

Drainage Districts (M)

Park Districts (P)

Fund

Special Districts (N,Q,S)

Trust & Agency (T/A, N/SF, T/T, WEMS)

Capital Projects (H) #069-074

H231 WWTP Upgrade Phase II

H237 Highway Garage Building

H238 Boulter Ind Parkway Rd Ext

TOTAL

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

150.00

3,585.00

Inside

0.00

0.00

0.00

83.18

Outside

3,798.77

217,477.00

0.00

0.00

Card/ACH

0.00

0.00

150.00

3,668.18

Total

3,798.77

217,477.00

1,151,266.81

5,659.31

61,279.62

1,471,494.12

0.00

0.00

0.00

367,370.62

0.00

0.00

0.00

11,376.56

1,151,266.81

5,659.31

61,279.62

1,850,241.30

Councilman Cahill ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner ......... Aye

***

Resolution No. 292: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

approve the prepaid vouchers included in Warrant #0926 by the Director of Finance in the

amount of $367,370.62. [Included in the summary of vouchers approved in Resolution #291]

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Cahill ........... Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Councilman Wagner ......... Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

***

Resolution No. 293: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

approve purchase orders as submitted by the Director of Finance.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Cahill ........... Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Councilman Wagner ......... Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

***

Resolution No. 294: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

approve the 2026 Budget Expenditure Transfers as submitted by the Finance Director.

Expenditure Budget Transfer Journal Entry #2

Effective Date 09/03/2026 – created 08/25/2026

Line

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

5

Account Code

A1310.40007

A1310.40035

A1310.10023

A1325.40032

A1325.40043

A1325.40262

A1910.40070

A1910.40068

Department

Previous

Director of Finance

6,000.00

Director of Finance

1,600.00

Director of Finance

24,812.00

Technology Admin. & Maint.

400.00

Technology Admin. & Maint.

250.00

Technology Admin. & Maint. 16,000.00

Insurance

636,000.00

Insurance

5,000.00

Changed

530.00

1,800.00

(2,330.00)

110.00

320.00

(430.00)

900.00

(900.00)

Amended

6,530.00

3,400.00

22,482.00

510.00

570.00

15,570.00

636,900.00

4,100.00

09-03-2026

Webster Town Board

9.

10. Line

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

40.

41.

42.

43.

44.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.

51.

52.

53.

54.

6

A1931.40036

A1990.40091

Account Code

A3120.10051

A3120.20029

A3120.20032

A3120.40124

A3129.20050

A19910.40091

A3120.10036

A3510.10075

A3510.40235

A3510.40162

A5010.10039

A5010.40128

A5010.40752

A3510.10076

A7020.10094

A7020.10096

A7020.40035

A7110.10031

A7110.20011

A7020.40246

A7020.40247

A7110.10030

A7110.40239

A7020.40140

A7110.10104

A8989.40007

A8989.40140

A8989.40213

A8989.20000

A8090.40140

A8090.40260

A8540.10039

A8540.10116

B1490.10010

B1490.10116

B1490.10111

B1490.40067

B1490.40754

B3620.10010

B3620.10072

B3620.10117

B3620.40024

B3620.40026

D5110.10072

Judgements & Claims

Contingency

Department

Law Enforcement

Law Enforcement

Law Enforcement

Law Enforcement

Crime Proceeds

Contingency

Law Enforcement

Animal Control

Animal Control

Animal Control

Highway Superintendent

Highway Superintendent

Highway Superintendent

Animal Control

Recreation

Recreation

Recreation

Park Department

Park Department

Recreation

Recreation

Park Department

Park Department

Recreation

Park Department

Communications

Communications

Communications

Communications

Conservation Board

Conservation Board

Drainage

Drainage

Public Works

Public Works

Public Works

Public Works

Public Works

Building Department

Building Department

Building Department

Building Department

Building Department

General Repairs

15,000.00

41,000.00

Previous

10,000.00

45,000.00

135,000.00

45,000.00

100,641.00

41,000.00

3,892,795.00

25,000.00

4,000.00

1,000.00

8,600.00

2,100.00

40,000.00

30,000.00

18,500.00

11,000.00

1,000.00

8,500.00

760.00

3,500.00

5,000.00

3,700.00

8,500.00

71,000.00

271,590.00

200.00

0.00

0.00

5,000.00

0.00

800.00

0.00

70,504.00

18,900.00

0.00

329,893.00

20,000.00

31,400.00

35,771.00

900.00

63,142.00

500.00

20,000.00

29,483.00

14,750.00

29,750.00

(14,750.00)

26,250.00

Changed

Amended

1,000.00

11,000.00

2,700.00

47,700.00

18,300.00

153,300.00

18,100.00

63,100.00

12,300.00

112,941.00

(26,250.00)

14,750.00

(26,150.00) 3,866,645.00

8,300.00

33,300.00

1,650.00

5,650.00

(650.00)

350.00

1,000.00

9,600.00

1,200.00

3,300.00

(2,200.00)

37,800.00

(9,300.00)

20,700.00

600.00

19,100.00

5,100.00

16,100.00

700.00

1,700.00

3,000.00

11,500.00

10.00

770.00

700.00

4,200.00

1,100.00

6,100.00

1,200.00

4,900.00

600.00

9,100.00

(6,010.00)

64,990.00

(7,000.00) 264,590.00

15.00

215.00

260.00

260.00

265.00

265.00

(540.00)

4,460.00

150.00

150.00

(150.00)

650.00

100.00

100.00

(100.00)

70,404.00

17,500.00

36,400.00

200.00

200.00

(17,600.00) 312,293.00

50.00

20,050.00

(50.00)

31,350.00

36,750.00

72,521.00

850.00

1,750.00

(28,100.00)

35,042.00

3,900.00

4,400.00

(13,500.00)

6,500.00

9,000.00

38,483.00

09-03-2026

Webster Town Board

55. D5110.40310

General Repairs

695,000.00

2,800.00

697,800.00

56. D5112.10143

Permanent Improvements

1,582.00

800.00

2,382.00

Line Account Code

Department

Previous

Changed

Amended

57. D5110.10133

General Repairs

542,126.00

(12,600.00) 529,526.00

58. D5148.10141

Services for Other Govt’s

8,371.00

4,800.00

13,171.00

59. D5148.10140

Services for Other Govt’s 220,050.00

(4,800.00) 215,250.00

60. D9050.80018

Unemployment Insurance

7,000.00

3,000.00

10,000.00

61. D9060.10200

Hospitalization

7,000.00

5,000.00

12,000.00

62. D9060.80028

Hospitalization

25,000.00

(4,000.00)

21,000.00

63. D9060.80022

Hospitalization

490,000.00

(4,000.00) 486,000.00

64. G8110.40023

Sewer Administration

8,000.00

1,000.00

9,000.00

65. G8110.40113

Sewer Administration

120.00

300.00

420.00

66. G8110.40332

Sewer Administration

15,000.00

(1,300.00)

13,700.00

67. G8120.40358

Sanitary Sewer

4,900.00

600.00

5,500.00

68. G8120.40354

Sanitary Sewer

22,600.00

(600.00)

22,000.00

69. G8130.20000

Sewage Treatment/Disposal 432,918.06

14,000.00

446,918.06

70. G8130.20011

Sewage Treatment/Disposal

8,000.00

1,000.00

9,000.00

71. G8130.20094

Sewage Treatment/Disposal 31,000.00

(15,000.00)

16,000.00

72. G8130.40213

Sewage Treatment/Disposal

0.00

500.00

500.00

73. G8130.40350

Sewage Treatment/Disposal

300.00

100.00

400.00

74. G8130.40400

Sewage Treatment/Disposal 45,000.00

5,000.00

50.000.00

75. G8130.40754

Sewage Treatment/Disposal 380,000.00

(5,600.00) 374,400.00

76. L7410.20000

Library

7,500.00

3,800.00

11,300.00

77. L7410.40100

Library

3,800.00

3,100.00

6,900.00

78. L7410.40140

Library

1,000.00

500.00

1,500.00

79. L7410.40512

Library

7,200.00

1,200.00

8,400.00

80. L7410.10153

Library

867,844.00

(8,600.00) 859,244.00

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Cahill .... Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Councilman Wagner Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

***

Resolution No. 295: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Wagner, to

approve the 2026 Budget amendments as presented by the Director of Finance.

Budget Amendments Journal Entry #3

Effective Date 08-25-2026 created on 09-03-2026

Line

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

7

Account Code

A6772.20000

A7020.20063

A7110.20063

A230.02353

A7020.40227

A210.02002

E7125.40280

Department

Previous

Changed

Amended

Program for Aging

159,000.00

17,600.00 176,600.00

Recreation

29,700.00

12,900.00

42,600.00

Park Department

57,000.00

14,900.00

71,900.00

Intergovernmental Charges

0.00

(45,400.00) (45,400.00)

Recreation

62,000.00

45,000.00 107,000.00

Departmental Income

(420,000.00) (45,000.00) (465,000.00)

Parkland Trust

1,000.00

150.00

1,150.00

09-03-2026

Webster Town Board

8. E599.40092

Appropriated Fund Balance

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

0.00

(150.00)

(150.00)

Councilman Cahil..... Aye

Councilman Wagner…Aye

***

The Board held a discussion prior to the following Resolution regarding the issuance of a SEQR

negative declaration for the Webster Transportation Infrastructure Project. The Town Engineer

reported that several questions from a Board member were received late in the afternoon and that

staff had not yet had sufficient time to prepare complete responses. He noted that no new

materials were being presented and that the project scope and findings remain consistent with

previous Parts 1 and 2 of the Environmental Assessment, which had not received public or Board

comments. He stated that the documentation continues to show no or only small impacts. A

legal question was raised regarding whether a section of the trail involved in the project

constitutes parkland subject to alienation. The Town Engineer and Attorney for the Town

indicated that additional review is required on this specific issue, though preliminary information

suggests that proceeding with a negative declaration would remain appropriate. The Attorney for

the Town added that the proposed trail realignment appears to be minor and would not likely

trigger significant parkland-related impacts.

The Town Engineer reported that the trail alignment has been reviewed with and received

concurrence from the Friends of Webster Trails, and the project intends to maintain or improve

the existing character and drainage of the trail. It was noted that project timing is important for

grant reimbursement and that SEQR must be completed in sequence to avoid delays. The

Attorney for the Town advised that issuing a negative declaration would not prejudice any future

determination regarding parkland status and that standard SEQR procedures, if followed, should

mitigate potential legal challenges. After discussion, Board members acknowledged the need to

resolve the legal nuance but expressed agreement that the SEQR determination could proceed.

Resolution No. 296: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Wagner, to

issue a Determination of Significance pursuant to SEQR for the Town of Webster Transportation

Infrastructure Project.

WHEREAS, the Town of Webster Town Board (hereinafter referred to as “Town Board”) has

determined the above referenced Action to be a Type 1 Action pursuant to Part 617 of the State

Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) Regulations; and

WHEREAS, the Town Board has reviewed and accepted the completed Full Environmental

Assessment Form Parts 1, 2, and 3 including the supporting information on the Action prepared

by Costich Engineering (hereinafter referred to as “Engineer”); and

WHEREAS, the Town Board has completed the coordinated review and public comment period

provided for under the SEQR Regulations; and

WHEREAS, the Town Board has designated itself as lead agency under the SEQR Regulations

for making the determination of significance upon said action on a separate Resolution at the

August 6, 2026 meeting; and

8

09-03-2026

Webster Town Board

WHEREAS, the Town Board has given consideration to the criteria for determining significance

as set forth in Section 617.7(c) (1) of the SEQR Regulations and the information contained in

Full Environmental Assessment Form Parts 1, 2, and 3:

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

That said Action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts based on

the review of the Full Environmental Assessment Form; and that the Town Board does hereby

make a Determination of Non-Significance on said Action, and the Town Supervisor is hereby

directed to sign the Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part 3, the Negative

Declaration, as evidence of the Town Board determination of environmental non-significance.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Hunter .................. Aye

Councilman Cahill ..............Aye

Councilman Wagner................. Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

***

Resolution No. 297: MOTION by Councilman Hunter, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

authorize the Supervisor to sign a Benefits Contract for Police Captain Mark Reed.

[Contract to be filed in Town Clerk’s Office]

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Cahill ........... Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Councilman Wagner…… . Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

***

Resolution No. 298: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

approve the following items for recycling from the Assessment Department:

• Dell Monitor

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

Asset Tag #08071

Councilman Cahill ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

***

At 8:03 p.m. Supervisor Scialdone called for an Executive Session.

Resolution No. 299: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

enter into Executive Session pursuant to New York State Public Officer’s Law §105(1)(f) to

discuss matters regarding medical, financial, credit or employment history of a particular person

or corporation, or matters leading to the appointment, employment, promotion, demotion,

discipline, suspension, dismissal, or removal of a particular person or corporation.

WHEREAS, New York State Public Officers Law provides that the Town Board may enter into

Executive Session to discuss certain subjects or matters:

9

09-03-2026

Webster Town Board

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

That the Town Board enter into an Executive Session pursuant to New York State Public

Officer’s Law §105(1)(f) to discuss matters regarding medical, financial, credit or employment

history of a particular person or corporation, or matters leading to the appointment, employment,

promotion, demotion, discipline, suspension, dismissal, or removal of a particular person or

corporation.

That the following persons were authorized to attend: John DeMarco, Attorney for the Town,

Kelsey Feeney, Personnel Director, Dennis Kohlmeier, Police Chief, and Mark Reed, Police

Captain.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Cahill ........... Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

***

Resolution No. 300: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

return to regular session at 8:46 p.m.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone ..........Aye

Councilman Cahill ........... Aye

Councilman Hunter .............Aye

Councilman Wagner…… Aye

Motion carried .....................4-0

***

There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at

8:46 p.m.

____________________________________

Danene M. Marr, Town Clerk

10

09-03-2026

End of document