Webster Town Board
July 2, 2026
A regular meeting of the Webster Town Board was called to order by Supervisor Scialdone at
7:40 p.m. at the Webster Town Board Meeting Room, 1002 Ridge Road, Webster, New York,
with the following officials present:
Supervisor ......................................................................... Alexander B. Scialdone
Councilman....................................................................................... John J. Cahill
Councilwoman...........................................................................Jennifer S. Wright
Councilman.............................................................................. Nicholas E. Hunter
Councilman................................................................................ Garrett J. Wagner
Attorney for the Town .........................................................................Kyle Taylor
Town Clerk .................................................................................. Danene M. Marr
Department Heads Present:
Community Development Director ................................................. Joshua Artuso
Communications Director ............................................................. Bridget Harvey
Town Engineer .............................................................................. Keith Mortimer
Also in attendance was Rick Kenealy, Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief Operator and Maria
Dewar, Administrative Assistant for the Director of Community Planning and Development.
***
Supervisor Scialdone led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
***
The meeting was open to the floor for public comment and the following Webster residents
appeared before the Town Board.
Chris Nacca, a Webster resident, addressed the Board and shared that, after hearing the Animal
Control Officers presentation, it seemed clear that building or renovating a shelter in Webster
would be the most effective long-term solution. Mr. Nacca felt that a local shelter aligns well
with the character of the community, noting that many Webster residents care deeply about
animals and might be willing to volunteer, pending any legal or operational limitations. He
suggested exploring whether an existing commercial property, such as the former Spirit
Halloween location, could be renovated as a potentially more affordable option than new
construction.
Mr. Nacca also expressed concern that many Webster residents are likely unaware of the Town’s
sheltering challenges and encouraged increased public communication. He expressed confidence
that, with greater awareness, the community would step up to help. Mr. Nacca concluded by
expressing trust in the Town Board to determine the solution that best serves Webster.
David Rasmussen, a Webster resident, speaking on behalf of nearby residents Daniel and Kelly
Rasmussen, expressed concern about the proposed Verizon facility on Lake Road, located very
close to their home. He stated that they support the Town’s decision to seek an independent
review of the proposal but emphasized that such a review is only meaningful if it is based on
independently collected data rather than solely on information provided by Verizon. He urged
the Board to require additional independent testing or data collection as part of the review
process.
1
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
Sean Hanna, a Webster resident, addressed the Board about ongoing concerns related to
proposed Verizon cell towers, including sites on Lake Road near the County Line and along
Route
250. He asked the Board to listen closely to residents who raise issues both at meetings
and privately, noting that past situations—such as the proposed solar project—led to litigation
when residents felt unheard. He urged the Board not to repeat that experience and to give full
consideration to public concerns and requests for independent data gathering.
Mr. Hanna then addressed the Gas Reclamation Project, expressing strong skepticism about its
financial feasibility. He noted that many aspects of the proposal rely on projections, including
grant funding, customer demand, utility rates, and construction costs, while the Town’s existing
debt—approximately $120 million—is real and growing due to required infrastructure projects.
He contrasted Webster’s situation with the Town of Perinton, which carries no General Fund
debt, and argued that Webster cannot afford to pursue the reclamation project or continue
spending money on design work for a project it cannot build. He criticized the RG&E contract
associated with the proposal, stating that it places extensive risk on the Town. He concluded by
urging Board members to act responsibly with taxpayer money and carefully consider which
path they wish to take.
Peter Elder, a Webster resident, came before the Board and noted the upcoming Fourth of July
holiday and the significance of celebrating the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of
Independence. Drawing on more than 30 years of involvement in Webster politics, he expressed
concern about recent social media comments targeting former Town Supervisors Ron Nesbitt
and Cathy Thomas. He described the online accusations as baseless and offensive, emphasized
both individuals’ long histories of dedicated service and leadership, and stated that such public
attacks should not be tolerated. He urged the community to call out misinformation and to
recognize and defend the contributions of those who have served Webster honorably.
He closed by reiterating the importance of civility in public discourse and encouraged the Board
and residents to stand up against falsehoods and harmful rhetoric. The speaker ended his
remarks by wishing everyone a happy Fourth of July.
Kevin Lockhart, a Webster resident, came before the Board emphasizing that resident
satisfaction and quality of life are his top priorities, and he expressed ongoing concerns about
what he views as excessive Town spending. Citing the Town’s high debt levels, he urged the
Board to closely scrutinize all expenditures and avoid adding unnecessary costs. He questioned
the financial justification for a potential Dog Kennel Project, arguing that the Town must fully
understand the cost per dog before committing taxpayer funds. He also raised concerns about
several Resolutions on the meeting agenda, including purchase orders submitted without
supplemental details, recent resignations from the Board of Assessment Review, and elements of
the Renewable Natural Gas Project. He asked for greater transparency, more context behind
spending decisions, and assurance that taxpayer dollars are being carefully managed.
He additionally questioned the Climate Action Grant Application, expressing concern that it could
add costs or staffing burdens and criticized the use of advisory groups not appointed by the Town
Board. Regarding the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, he asked why additional funding was being
requested when the Town has already spent $150,000 on the effort. Lastly, he referenced the
privately funded Hometown Heroes Banner Project and requested that the Town provide the
required Certificate of Insurance and documentation needed to finalize arrangements with RG&E.
2
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
Monica Gorlick, a Webster resident, came before the Board and stated they are a registered
non-party voter who evaluates candidates based on values rather than party affiliation. She
expressed concern after seeing a Town Board member post information online about alleged
criminal actions involving a candidate for Supervisor, rather than focusing on the work and
policy efforts of the current Supervisor. She criticized what she saw as a shift in behavior from
this Council member after taking office, stating that the Council member has opposed several
initiatives and has not supported the supervisor despite previously running on the same ticket.
Ms. Gorlick also raised concerns about the Council members’ presence and engagement in
community responsibilities, noting instances where the Council member did not attend meetings
or hold public forums. She questioned the Council members’ priorities and public identity,
suggesting that his conduct is inconsistent with the role of a Town Board member. She
concluded by describing this behavior as unbecoming and raising questions about his
effectiveness in representing constituents.
Emily Yang, a Penfield resident, and representative from Color Webster Green spoke in support
of the proposed Climate Action Plan Project to install native plants along Town roadsides. She
explained that native plantings help restore biodiversity, provide habitat for pollinators and
beneficial insects, and require minimal long-term maintenance because they are naturally
adapted to local conditions. While the first season may require some additional care, the group
believes maintenance needs will be low, and volunteers from their 130-member organization are
willing to assist with any necessary work.
She also shared that the group posted about the proposal on social media and received significant
positive feedback, including comments expressing strong support for the initiative and interest in
seeing Webster move in this direction. She closed by stating that Color Webster Green fully
supports the project and hopes the Town will pursue it.
Dennis Gorlick, a Webster resident, came before the Board and first suggested that if the Town
ultimately builds an animal shelter, it may be able to offset some operating costs by charging
neighboring municipalities to house their overflow animals, just as Webster currently pays other
Towns when space is needed. He noted he had not realized the extent of the regional kennel
shortage but acknowledged that it appears to be a significant, seasonal challenge.
He then voiced strong support for the native planting proposal under the Climate Action Grant,
observing that several favorable factors have aligned at once: a rare pilot grant opportunity,
growing resident complaints about overgrown right-of-way areas, and the availability of hardy,
low-maintenance native plant options. He highlighted that native species provide visual appeal
year-round, reduce mowing needs, and thrive in various conditions. He also noted that the State
already uses native seeding in some highway areas and may be able to supply seed where
appropriate. He closed by supporting the project as a low-cost initiative that could improve
aesthetics, reduce Highway Department workload, and benefit residents, and stated that Color
Webster Green is eager to assist.
3
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
The following comments came from emails or online form submitted by the individuals:
Edwin and Robert Przybylowicz, a Webster resident:
Dear Supervisor and Members of the Town Board,
We support the Town's decision to retain an independent radiofrequency (RF) engineering
consultant to assist in evaluating Verizon's proposed wireless facilities at 1222 Wildflower
Drive ("Webster North") and Lake Road/County Line Road.
After reviewing Mr. William P. Johnson's proposal, we believe he is exceptionally well
qualified to assist the Town. His extensive experience advising municipalities throughout
New York, his participation in the development of the New York State Department of State's
Planning and Design Manual for the Review of Applications for Wireless Telecommunications
Facilities, and his long history of providing objective RF engineering analyses make him an
excellent choice for this important assignment.
While we support the proposed engagement, we respectfully encourage the Town Board to
clarify several aspects of the scope of work before final approval.
Mr. Johnson's proposal candidly explains that certain services requested in the Town's
Request for Proposals—specifically independent RF propagation modeling and
independent field measurements—are not services that he performs directly. Instead, he
indicates that such work, if determined to be necessary, would be performed by qualified
outside vendors at additional cost.
Accordingly, we respectfully suggest that the Town clarify the following questions as part of
the engagement:
1. Under what circumstances would Mr. Johnson recommend obtaining independent
RF propagation modeling? For example, would such modeling be appropriate if he
concludes that Verizon's submitted propagation studies are incomplete, inconsistent, or do
not adequately support the claimed coverage or capacity deficiencies?
2. Which independent vendors would be qualified to perform such modeling, and what
is the anticipated cost range? Having this information available in advance would
help the Town understand the potential scope and budget implications should
additional technical analysis become necessary.
3. Under what circumstances would independent field testing or drive testing be recommended?
For example, would field measurements be appropriate if questions remain after review of
Verizon's documentation, or if actual network performance appears inconsistent with the
applicant's propagation predictions?
4. If during the course of his review, Mr. Johnson concludes that independent RF propagation
modeling or field measurements are necessary to adequately evaluate Verizon's applications,
would he recommend that the Town authorize that additional work before rendering a
decision on the applications?
We also respectfully request that the Board address one important procedural issue.
4
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
Mr. Johnson's proposal indicates that delivery of a preliminary report is anticipated
approximately eight weeks after execution of the agreement and receipt of the necessary
application materials. My understanding is that the Federal "shot clock" applicable to these
applications expires in August. If those timeframes overlap, it is not clear that the Town will
have sufficient time to receive Mr. Johnson's report, consider any recommendations for
additional technical work, conduct public review, and make a fully informed decision
before the current review period expires.
Accordingly, I respectfully ask the Board to discuss whether the Town intends to seek an
extension of the applicable review period, by mutual agreement with Verizon, if necessary,
so that the consultant has adequate time to complete a thorough and objective evaluation
and the Town has sufficient time to consider his findings before acting on these important
applications.
The Town has taken an important step by seeking an independent expert review. Ensuring
that both the scope of the consultant's work and the project schedule are clearly established at the
outset will help provide the Planning Board, the Town Board, and the public with confidence
that these applications will be evaluated on the basis of a complete and objective technical
record.
Thank you for your service to our community and for your thoughtful consideration of these
comments.
Respectfully submitted,
Edwin P. and Roberta L. Przybylowicz
Elliot Cave, a Webster resident writes;
Good evening, I’m submitting this virtually regarding E-Bikes and would like to make some
recommendations on how the Town can combat them. First off, the Webster PD is doing
everything they possibly can within their lawful authority granted by the NYS VTL and Webster
Town Code.
However, I believe the Town should consider passing further local laws regarding E-Bikes in
order to hold violators accountable and deter future violators.
Stats are hard to find, but according to the NYPD stats, in 2025, 16 E-Bike riders, and 4
pedestrians, died due to some sort of e-bike collision in NYC.
The current Webster Town Code is weak in regard to E-Bikes and does not provide the Webster
PD with much enforcement authority. The Town should pass local laws which outright ban the
use of E-Bikes/Scooters on any public sidewalk, ban operation of any e-bike on any public
property or roadway by those under age 16 within the Town of Webster, and not be operated in
violation of any provision of the NYS VTL. The law should provide Webster PD authority to
issue Town Code citations to violators, or to adults present and knowingly allowing violations to
be committed by minors.
5
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
The Town should pass a local law providing Webster PD the authority to impound and
temporarily seize any e-bike/scooter that is operated in violation of any Town Law or provision
of the NYS VTL. The law should require violators to pay a hefty redemption fee in order to
have the e-bike released from impound.
This sort of impoundment law is currently on the books and being enforced in the Town of
Ogden which also has jurisdiction in the Village of Spencerport. When these sort of violations
occur in Ogden, the Ogden Police Department has the lawful authority to impound an
e-bike/scooter and require the owner/adult to pay $500 to have it released if they are a first-time
offender. Repeat offenders are required to pay upwards of $2,000. This sort of local law in
Webster would provide Webster Police Department the lawful authority to seize e-bikes when
violators and/or e-bike collisions are encountered.
In theory, violators should/would be deterred from committing further offenses after they have to
such a hefty redemption fee. People might think twice to violate the law, or allow their underage
child to violate the law with an e-bike.
These sort of laws act as a deterrent to violate laws with an e-bike, will penalize those who
violate these laws, and provide public safety by preventing tragic accidents, injuries and deaths
from occurring.
I urge the Town Board to use their authority provided by the NYS General Municipal Law to
pass such local laws related E-Bikes and E-Scooters. The Town and its residents cannot wait for
the State of New York to pass state laws such as these.
***
Resolution No. 233: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve the June 18, 2026 Town Board Workshop Meeting Minutes as submitted by the Town
Clerk.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 234: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to
approve the June 18, 2026 Town Board Meeting Minutes as submitted by the Town Clerk.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 235: MOTION by Councilman Hunter, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to
approve the bills as submitted in Warrant #0726 by the Director of Finance.
6
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
Fund
General (A,B) #2231-2413
Highway (C,D)
Sewer (G)
Library (L)
Drainage Districts (M)
Park Districts (P)
Water Districts (R)(R/SW)
Special Districts (N,Q,S)
Trust & Agency (T/A,N/SF,T/T, WEMS)
Capital Projects (H) #045-048
H231 WWTP Upgrade Phase II
H232 Highway Garage Building
H238 Boulter Ind Parkway Rd Ext
TOTAL
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Inside
236,852.55
29,615.86
8,090.43
8,877.63
3,917.26
5,209.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
Outside
306,889.38
66,621.52
344,931.20
9,806.84
0.00
81.00
26,159.38
3,750.39
217,577.32
Card/ACH
1,292.47
2,230.06
195.36
201.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
545,034.40
98,467.44
353,216.99
18,885.47
3,917.26
5,290.52
26,159.38
3,750.39
217,577.32
5,325.00
18,667.11
39,854.97
356,410.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
975,817.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,918.89
5,325.00
18,667.11
39,854.97
1,336,146.25
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 236: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve the prepaid vouchers included in Warrant #0726 by the Director of Finance in the
amount of $975,817.03. [Included in the summary of vouchers approved in Resolution #215]
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 237: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve purchase orders as submitted by the Director of Finance.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 238: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to
classify the 430 Pellett Road, Tax ID No. 049.03-1-13, as an unlisted action.
WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board considered the request by applicant, Mr. Frederick
Schmitt, located at 430 Pellett Road, for a fill permit; and
WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted
Action under Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR); and
7
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board has determined that the action is subject to a single
agency review pursuant to Part 617.6(b)(1) of SEQR and that it is the most appropriate agency
for making the determination of significance; and
WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board therefore designates itself as lead agency for the proposed
action; and
WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board has given consideration to the criteria for determining
significance as set forth in Section 617.7(c)(1) of SEQR, and has considered the information
contained in the Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1, dated March 7, 2025 and
completed Parts 2 and 3 of the Environmental Assessment:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. Webster Town Board hereby determines that the proposed action will not have a significant
adverse effect on the environment for the reasons set forth in the attached Notice of
Determination of Non-Significance.
2. Webster Town Board is authorized to take all actions reasonable and necessary to file the
Negative Declaration and discharge the Webster Town Board’s responsibility as lead agency
for this action.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 239: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to
approve the issuance of a Fill Permit pursuant to Section 201 of the Webster Town Code for
property owned by Mr. Frederick Schmitt located at 430 Pellett Road. Tax ID No. 049.03-1-13
with the following conditions:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
8
All grading work is to be completed on the applicant’s property only and not alter grades
and/or drainage on adjoining properties.
If the project appears to adversely affect surrounding properties, they shall stop work and
contact the Town to reevaluate the plan.
Material brought to the site as fill is to be rough graded within 14 days of arrival.
The area must be final graded, stabilized and vegetated immediately after completion of
rough grading. Grass should be established at approximately 80% coverage within 30
days.
Maintain erosion and sediment controls; this can include but not be limited to straw
matting, silt fence, and silt socks. If additional measures are deemed necessary by the
Town, the property owner shall comply.
Comply with the Town of Webster Noise Ordinance.
Allow Town access during the project to review site and progress.
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the applicant be granted a Fill Permit at 430 Pellett Road Tax ID No. 049.03-1-13.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 240: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone,
to accept resignation of Hugh Lee and David Paine, members of the Board of Assessment
Review, both resignations effective July 1, 2026, leaving two open positions with an unexpired
term ending September 30, 2028 and September 30, 2030 respectively.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye/Nay
Councilman Cahill .... Aye/Nay
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye/Nay
Councilman Hunter ... Aye/Nay
Councilman Wagner………Aye/Nay
Motion carried/denied 0-0
***
Resolution No. 241: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to
reschedule to the July 16, 2026 Town Board Meeting to authorize the Supervisor to sign the
School Resource Officer Agreement for the 2026-2027 school year.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Rick Kenealy, Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief Operator, reviewed the status of the
Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) Project with Board members, focusing on whether to cease all
payments and effectively end the project. Mr. Kenealy confirmed that if payments stop, the
Town will still receive the engineering drawings completed to date and will retain ownership of
them. They also clarified the financials: the Town authorized $348,000 for engineering work, of
which approximately $87,000 has been billed so far, with remaining invoices halted after the
directive to suspend work.
The Board held an extensive discussion outlining differing viewpoints. Council members who
supported continuing the project emphasized the potential long-term benefits, including reducing
gas flaring, creating revenue through the sale of energy credits, and supporting infrastructure
needs. Others raised concerns about major financial and operational risks, specifically the
one-sided RG&E contract that places all liability on the Town, significant increases in projected
operating costs, uncertainty around tax credit eligibility, incomplete cost information, and the
possibility of multimillion-dollar losses. Several members noted that project deadlines,
incomplete data, and delays from consultants left too little time for responsible evaluation.
Councilman Wagner asked who would lead communications with Navitas if the current project
effort were halted, noting the need to minimize difficulties and determine what funds could be
9
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
recovered. It was stated that Navitas had stopped work upon the Board’s direction and was
standing by a previously provided figure of $165,474. Mr. Kenealy confirmed he would take the
lead in working with Navitas and clarified that certain funds referenced were client savings
rather than contingency funds. He noted that the Board had already approved the use of
contingency funds for other treatment plant-related needs and that efforts would continue to
identify and complete additional projects that had been removed during value engineering.
Ultimately, the consensus emerged that the lack of reliable information, high financial exposure,
and unfavorable contractual terms made continuing imprudent. The Board proceeded to consider
a Resolution to cease all work and terminate outstanding authorization for unperformed services.
Resolution No. 242: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to
immediately cease all work performed by third party vendors related to the Town of Webster
RNG Project and rescind authorization for payment of work that has not yet been performed and
with a remaining balance of $165,474.00 to be returned to the Town.
[Contract to be filed in Town Clerk’s Office]
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Nay
Councilman Hunter................... Nay
Councilman Cahill .............. Aye
Councilman Wagner ................. Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Motion carried .......................... 3-2
***
Josh Artuso, Community Development Director, presented the following proposed Resolution
and a general discussion between Board Members ensued.
The Town contacted approximately ten consulting firms regarding the proposed wireless analysis
work and received one response. The consultant’s proposed contract and scope of work were
presented to the Board two weeks prior, prompting questions about the possibility of additional
“drive testing”. Since then, Verizon submitted a letter stating that they do not believe additional
drive testing is necessary and that they will not fund it.
Town staff consulted further with the selected consultant, Mr. Johnson, regarding the need for
supplemental testing. Based on his input, the recommendation is to proceed with the original
scope of work. Should the third-party analysis reveal ambiguities or conflicting results, Mr.
Johnson would then advise whether additional testing is warranted, which would be at the
Town’s expense. Estimated cost for drive testing, if later needed, is approximately $3,000–
$4,000.
Drive testing was described as the collection of independent signal measurements using
specialized equipment along accessible roadways, serving as a supplemental check to
propagation testing. Propagation testing, statistical modeling of signal coverage, is generally
favored by courts and would serve as the primary method of review.
Timing remains critical, as the matter has already been rescheduled multiple times. An escrow
account for Verizon’s funding has now been established. Mr. Johnson has already begun
preliminary review and stated he could provide an initial report within four weeks upon
approval. He also responded in detail to a resident’s written questions, outlining circumstances
10
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
under which additional testing may later be recommended.
The Board discussed challenges related to limited access to certain proprietary Verizon data and
noted that developing independent third-party propagation maps would cost approximately
$5,000. The Board agreed that proceeding with the original scope of work and obtaining expert
analysis is the most appropriate initial step.
Resolution No. 243: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to
authorize the Town Supervisor to sign an engagement letter with William P. Johnson, RF
Engineering Consultant, to provide an independent third-party review and analysis of two
proposed Verizon Cell Tower sites, the cost of which is to be reimbursed by Verizon Wireless.
[Contract to be filed in Town Clerk’s Office]
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill .................... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter................... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried .......................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 244: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
authorize the submission of an application for the Monroe County Community Climate Action
Fund Program.
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster is eligible for grant funding under Monroe County
Community Climate Action Fund Pilot Program Grant; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster has identified a project that meets the criteria for funding
under the Community Climate Action Fund Pilot Program; and
WHEREAS, the Town must address the need to plant native plants on town owned land; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster will apply for funding in an amount up to $10,000; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster authorizes a local match of 50% of total eligible project costs
from the Town’s Budget:
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
That Town Staff, be authorized and directed to prepare an application for Smart Growth
Community Planning Grant Funds.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the Supervisor is hereby authorized and directed to execute any and all documents
pertaining to the application and acquisition of said funding.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
11
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
Resolution No. 245: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilwoman Wright,
to authorize the submission of a grant application to update the Town of Webster Zoning Code
through the Smart Growth Community Planning Program.
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster is eligible for grant funding under NYS Department of State
(NYS DOS) Smart Growth Community Planning Program; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster has identified a project that meets the criteria for funding
under the Smart Growth Community Planning Program; and
WHEREAS, the Town must address the need to update community-wide zoning regulations to
align with a comprehensive plan update that is nearing completion; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster will apply for funding in an amount up to $150,000; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster authorizes a local match of 25% of total eligible project costs
from the Town’s Budget or through in-kind staff contributions:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That J. O’Connell and Associates, Inc., the Town’s grant consultants, be authorized and directed
to prepare an application for Smart Growth Community Planning grant funds.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the Supervisor is hereby authorized and directed to execute any and all documents
pertaining to the application and acquisition of said funding.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 246: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to
approve the re-classification of one part-time Laborer position into one part-time cleaner position
at the Town of Webster Parks and Recreation Department.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner .......... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
At 9:14 p.m. Supervisor Scialdone called for an Executive Session.
Resolution No. 247: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to
enter into Executive Session pursuant to New York State Public Officer’s Law §105(1)(f) to
discuss matters regarding medical, financial, credit or employment history of a particular person
or corporation, or matters leading to the appointment, employment, promotion, demotion,
discipline, suspension, dismissal, or removal of a particular person or corporation.
12
07-02-2026
Webster Town Board
WHEREAS, New York State Public Officers Law provides that the Town Board may enter into
Executive Session to discuss certain subjects or matters:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Town Board enter into an Executive Session pursuant to New York State Public
Officer’s Law §105(1)(f) to discuss matters regarding medical, financial, credit or employment
history of a particular person or corporation, or matters leading to the appointment, employment,
promotion, demotion, discipline, suspension, dismissal, or removal of a particular person or
corporation.
That the following persons were authorized to attend: Kyle Taylor, Attorney for the Town,
Dennis Kohlmeier, Police Chief, and Danene Marr, Town Clerk.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 248: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilwoman Wright,
to return to regular session at 9:32 p.m.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at
9:32 p.m.
____________________________________
Danene M. Marr, Town Clerk
13
07-02-2026