Webster Town Board
June 18, 2026
A regular meeting of the Webster Town Board was called to order by Supervisor Scialdone at
7:30 p.m. at the Webster Town Board Meeting Room, 1002 Ridge Road, Webster, New York,
with the following officials present:
Supervisor ......................................................................... Alexander B. Scialdone
Councilman....................................................................................... John J. Cahill
Councilwoman...........................................................................Jennifer S. Wright
Councilman.............................................................................. Nicholas E. Hunter
Councilman................................................................................ Garrett J. Wagner
Attorney for the Town .........................................................................Kyle Taylor
Town Clerk .................................................................................. Danene M. Marr
Department Heads Present:
Community Development Director ................................................. Joshua Artuso
Information Technology Director........................................................ Steve Peace
Finance Director ..................................................................................Paul Adams
Communications Director ............................................................. Bridget Harvey
Highway Superintendent ................................................................... Pat Stephens
***
Supervisor Scialdone led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
***
Resolution No. 213: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve the June 4, 2026 Town Board Workshop Meeting Minutes as submitted by the Town
Clerk.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 214: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve the June 4, 2026 Town Board Meeting Minutes as submitted by the Town Clerk.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 215: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to
approve the bills as submitted in Warrant #0626A by the Director of Finance.
1
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
Fund
General (A,B) #2019-2230
Highway (C,D)
Sewer (G)
Library (L)
Drainage Districts (M)
Park Districts (P)
Trust & Agency (T/A,N/SF,T/T, WEMS)
Capital Projects (H) #039-044
H229 Vosburg Pump Station
H231 WWTP Upgrade Phase II
H232 Highway Garage Building
H237 Coca-Cola/fairlife
H238 Boulter Ind Parkway Rd Ext
TOTAL
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Inside
163,835.70
68,545.54
17,518.17
79,189.62
14,871.61
3,350.00
0.00
Outside
290,740.97
99,778.44
110,185.48
15,582.74
2,204.99
0.00
322,344.42
Card/ACH
4,222.51
26,653.17
4,631.65
44.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
458,799.18
194,977.15
132,335.30
94,817.01
17,076.60
3,350.00
322,344.42
24,563.60
0.00
63,436.00
380.90
6,615.00
442,306.14
0.00
745.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
841,582.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
35,551.98
24,563.60
745.83
63,436.00
380.90
6,615.00
1,319,440.99
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 216: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve the prepaid vouchers included in Warrant #0626A by the Director of Finance in the
amount of $841,582.87. [Included in the summary of vouchers approved in Resolution #215]
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 217: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilwoman Wright,
to approve purchase orders as submitted by the Director of Finance.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Councilman Wagner presented the following Resolution and added that this Intergovernmental
Agreement with New York State will provide global cybersecurity from firm, CrowdStrike.
Through a statewide initiative, the company will provide cybersecurity services to all
municipalities, including Towns and Villages, at no direct cost to local governments. The
program is funded in the State budget for the next three years. Steve Peace, Director of
Information Technology, noted that the arrangement will enhance the Town’s cybersecurity
posture by adding monitoring support from the New York State Cyber Security Center. The
Town’s IT team has reviewed the agreement and reported no concerns. It was also noted that if
the State discontinues the program in the future, the Town would need to reevaluate its approach,
but implementation or removal of the software would be manageable.
2
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
Resolution No. 218: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to
authorize the Town Supervisor to sign an Intergovernmental Agreement for the Provisioning of
Endpoint Protection and Response Services with NYS Office of Information Technology and
NYS Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services.
[Copy of the Agreement to be filed in the Office of the Town Clerk]
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Pat Stephens, Highway Superintendent, discussed renewing a long-standing cooperative
agreement between the Town and Village that allows each municipality to supplement the other
with trucks, equipment, and personnel when needed for projects or emergency situations. This
arrangement helps avoid higher costs and improves service to residents. Staff noted that while
informal coordination has occurred in recent years, planned joint work was limited without a
formal agreement.
Town and Village representatives, including Village DPW representative Jake Swingley, have
historically collaborated effectively with no issues reported. Examples of successful
coordination include sidewalk replacement along Phillips Road. The agreement has been
reviewed by both municipalities' attorneys, with minor edits incorporated.
Officials emphasized that the agreement is intentionally flexible, does not obligate either party to
perform work they deem inappropriate, and requires mutual coordination before action. Both
parties expressed strong support for the agreement as a positive step demonstrating cooperation
between the Town and Village.
Resolution No. 219: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
authorize the Town Supervisor to sign an Intermunicipal Agreement between the Town of
Webster and the Village of Webster for shared equipment and services.
[Copy of the Agreement to be filed in the Office of the Town Clerk]
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 220: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilwoman Wright,
to grant limited relief from an established stormwater drainage easement at 1072 Shoemaker
Road.
WHEREAS, a stormwater drainage easement running through and on the property at 1072
Shoemaker Rd., Webster, NY 14580 is recorded in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office; and
WHEREAS, Barbary D. Spry-Joyce and Patrick Joyce are the owners (the “Owners”) of the
property located at 1072 Shoemaker Rd., Webster, NY 14580, Tax ID #064.08-2-43; and
3
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
WHEREAS, the Owners have applied to install a split rail fence, within and through the
aforesaid easement, and that in the event the placement and/or height of such monument sign is
not in such conformance, such monument sign shall not be constructed unless the proper
variance(s) is/are received from the Town of Webster Zoning Board of Appeals; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster has the authority to grant the relief requested, and the public
good will not be harmed thereby:
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1. Pursuant to application of the Owners of the property located at 1072 Shoemaker Rd.,
Webster, NY, Tax ID #064.08-2-43 and in recognition of the hardship created if the relief
sought herein is not granted, the limited detriment to the Town of Webster, and upon
consideration of all relevant factors, the Webster Town Board hereby allows the construction
of the aforesaid fence which will exist upon and encroach upon the easements affecting 1072
Shoemaker Rd., Town of Webster.
2. This Resolution in no way applies to any other encroachment, violations or relief sought by
the Owners, their successors, grantees or assigns from any other building, structure or zoning
violation which may exist on such premises.
3. This relief is granted upon the following conditions:
A. The proposed fence shall encroach upon the said easement as proposed as drawn on the
survey map prepared by Donald B. Scwartz, dated September 29, 1987.
B. The proposed fence shall not be expanded to further encroach on or in the easement, nor
will it be moved from its permitted places within the easement as shown on the
Instrument Survey Map presented to the Town Board, and as referenced above.
C. Upon the destruction or demolition of the aforesaid fence or any part of thereof, through
natural causes or otherwise, the Owners of the fence will not reconstruct it without a
specific Resolution of the Town Board authorizing its replacement or reconstruction.
D. The Owner of the fence shall be solely responsible for any damage caused by or to the
fence as a result of the Town’s maintenance of said easement, and the Owners, their
successors and assigns further agree to indemnify, defend and hold the Town harmless
from any and all loss or damage caused to or by the fence as a result of work done by the
Town as a result of reasonable and necessary work done by the Town within said
easement.
E. In the event of an emergency, or if the Town deems it necessary or imperative, the Town
will have the right to remove or take down all or any part of said monument sign, without
recourse by the Owners or their successors or assigns to such removal or taking down.
F. This Resolution shall in no way affect the rights, if any, of any other public entities or
public utilities in or to said easement.
4
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
The record Owner of the fence and the Town of Webster will enter into a licensing agreement
incorporating all the conditions of this Resolution in form and substance as approved by the
Town Attorney, and which will further provide that the Owner, at his expense, will record the
licensing agreement in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 221: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to
appoint Dwayne Hilfiker to the position of Chief Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator for the
Town of Webster, effective July 4, 2026, concurrent with the current Chief Wastewater
Treatment Plant Operator, Rick Kenealy, for the purposes for cross training and knowledge
transfer.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Pat Stephens, Highway Superintendent, spoke to the process for formal road dedication in new
developments. After homes are occupied, the Town provides limited maintenance such as snow
plowing under a temporary dedication. Full dedication occurs only after the road is constructed
to Town standards. The section of road in the below Resolution has now met those standards
and remains covered by a maintenance bond to ensure workmanship quality. With construction
complete and the area fully built out, the Town is proceeding with the legal process to accept
permanent dedication of the road.
Resolution No. 222: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Wagner, to
accept permanent dedication of the following road within the Town of Webster.
Street Name and Length:
Subdivision:
To
Alyssa Way (0.32) 1,692 feet
Westwood Sec. 3
Alyssa Way to Schlegel Rd.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 223: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to
accept resignation of Adam Prescott, member of the Zoning Board of Appeals, effective
June 8, 2026.
5
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 224: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to
appoint John Accorso to the Zoning Board of Appeals to fulfill the unexpired term of Adam
Prescott ending on December 31, 2028.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 225: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
grant limited relief from an established stormwater drainage easement and snowplow truck
turnaround easement at 1886 Tebor Road.
WHEREAS, a stormwater drainage easement and snowplow truck turnaround easement running
through and on the property at 1886 Tebor Rd., Webster, NY 14580 are recorded in the Monroe
County Clerk’s Office; and
WHEREAS, fairlife is the owner (the “Owners”) of the property located at 1886 Tebor Rd.,
Webster, NY 14580, Tax ID #066.03-1-28.001; and
WHEREAS, the Owner has applied to install a 6' tall monument sign, within and through the
aforesaid easement, and that in the event the placement and/or height of such monument sign is
not in such conformance, such monument sign shall not be constructed unless the proper
variance(s) is/are received from the Town of Webster Zoning Board of Appeals; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster has the authority to grant the relief requested, and the public
good will not be harmed thereby:
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1. Pursuant to application of the Owner of the property located at 1886 Tebor Rd., Webster,
NY, Tax ID #066.03-1-28.001 and in recognition of the hardship created if the relief sought
herein is not granted, the limited detriment to the Town of Webster, and upon consideration
of all relevant factors, the Webster Town Board hereby allows the construction of the
aforesaid monument sign which will exist upon and encroach upon the easements affecting
1886 Tebor Rd., Town of Webster.
2. This Resolution in no way applies to any other encroachment, violations or relief sought by
the owners, their successors, grantees or assigns from any other building, structure or zoning
violation which may exist on such premises.
6
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
3. This relief is granted upon the following conditions:
A. The proposed fence shall encroach upon the said easement as proposed as drawn on the
survey map prepared by SGC and dated November 15, 2013.
B. The proposed monument sign shall not be expanded to further encroach on or in the
easement, nor will it be moved from its permitted places within the easement as shown on
the Instrument Survey Map presented to the Town Board, and as referenced above.
C. Upon the destruction or demolition of the aforesaid monument sign or any part of thereof,
through natural causes or otherwise, the Owners of the monument sign will not
reconstruct it without a specific Resolution of the Town Board authorizing its
replacement or reconstruction.
D. The Owner of the monument sign shall be solely responsible for any damage caused by
or to the monument sign as a result of the Town’s maintenance of said easement, and the
Owners, their successors and assigns further agree to indemnify, defend and hold the
Town harmless from any and all loss or damage caused to or by the fence as a result of
work done by the Town as a result of reasonable and necessary work done by the Town
within said easement.
E. In the event of an emergency, or if the Town deems it necessary or imperative, the Town
will have the right to remove or take down all or any part of said monument sign, without
recourse by the Owners or their successors or assigns to such removal or taking down.
F. This Resolution shall in no way affect the rights, if any, of any other public entities or
public utilities in or to said easement.
4. The record Owner of the monument sign and the Town of Webster will enter into a licensing
agreement incorporating all the conditions of this Resolution in form and substance as
approved by the Town Attorney, and which will further provide that the Owner, at his
expense, will record the licensing agreement in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill .................... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter................... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried .......................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 226: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to
award the Polymer Solution bid for the Wastewater Treatment Plant and authorize the Town
Supervisor to execute an agreement.
WHEREAS, on May 27, 2026 bids were advertised in the Webster Herald for Polymer Solution
to be used in dewatering the sludge at the Town of Webster Wastewater Treatment Plant located
at 226 Phillips Road for a term of one (1) year with two (2) one-year extensions if agreed to by
the Town of Webster and the Supplier; and
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2026 at 11:30 a.m. two (2) sealed bids were publicly opened and read
aloud by the Town Clerk; and
7
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
WHEREAS, the following bids were received:
Polydyne Inc.
$1.775/Pound
Slack Chemical Co., Inc. NO BID
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Town of Webster awards the Polymer Solution Bid for the Wastewater Treatment Plant
to Polydyne Inc., 1 Chemical Plant Road, P.O. Box 279, Riceboro, Georgia, in the amount of
$1.775 Per Pound for the term of one (1) year with the Town having the option of renewing or
extending the terms of the Agreement for two (2) additional 1-year terms, and to authorize the
Town Supervisor to execute the Agreement.
[Agreement to be filed in the Town Clerk’s Office]
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
The Board discussed the proposal to hire an independent RF Engineer—funded by Verizon
through an escrow agreement—to evaluate the technical need for two proposed cell towers.
Josh Artuso, Director of Community Planning and Development, explained that, although ten
firms were contacted nationwide, only one qualified firm responded. The firm selected, based in
Batavia, has relevant experience and will provide an unbiased review of Verizon’s submissions.
Board members noted that the idea originated from the Planning Board Chair as a way to balance
the information provided in highly contentious tower applications. Verizon has agreed to fund
the review and to extend required timelines (“shot clock”) based on the current contract terms.
Mr. Artuso outlined limitations of the review, including the inability to access Verizon’s
proprietary data and the exclusion of RF drive testing unless separately contracted through a
third party. Board members discussed whether additional field-testing should be pursued and
how that might affect cost, scope, and Verizon’s timeline extension.
Concerns were raised about timing with upcoming Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals
meetings, as well as the potential need for a revised contract if additional services are added.
After discussion, the Board agreed to reschedule action for two weeks to obtain clarification on
costs and feasibility of optional testing, with the intention to revisit the matter at the July 2nd
meeting.
Resolution No. 227: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to
reschedule to the July 2, 2026 Town Board Meeting to authorize the Supervisor to sign an
agreement with William P. Johnson, RF Engineering Consultant, to provide an independent
third-party review and analysis of two (2) proposed Verizon cell towers, the cost of which to be
reimbursed by Verizon Wireless.
8
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 228: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Wagner, to
approve the following for recycling and/or surplus from the Highway Department:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
9
Weaver EC10: Supply & Install
6-Wheel
Lincoln AC/DC
Bldg. ONAN
Switch
Prewet Steel or Sander
Town
Glass
Town
County
Plow/Wing: Viking for Equip 4
Plow/Wing: Viking for Equipment 5
Plow/Wing: Viking for Equipment 6
Plow/Wing: Viking for Equipment 8
Plow/Wing: Viking for Equipment 12
Plow/Wing: Viking for Equipment 13
Plow/Wing: Viking for Equipment 1
Plow/Wing: Viking for Equipment 7
2 Ton Lift Standard
6-Wheel
Resurface Highway Shop Floor
Sonitrol Security System
Circulating Pedestal
Base/Repeater
APC UPS
Tenco for Vehicle 13
Improvement to Kitchen at Highway
Floor Scrubber/Stripper: Kent
For Ice Ban Spray
ComBind
ET & SIS Web Computer Program
Garage Roof
County
Dewatering Plus Hose
Motorola Pager, battery, charger, clip
Motorola Pager, battery, charger, clip
Asset Tag #1489
Asset Tag #2272
Asset Tag #2362
Asset Tag #2394
Asset Tag #2395
Asset Tag #2457
Asset Tag #2471
Asset Tag #2476
Asset Tag #2506
Asset Tag #2507
Asset Tag #2518
Asset Tag #2518 Continued
Asset Tag #2518 Continued
Asset Tag #2518 Continued
Asset Tag #2518 Continued
Asset Tag #2518 Continued
Asset Tag #2519
Asset Tag #2519 Continued
Asset Tag #2529
Asset Tag #2547
Asset Tag #4098
Asset Tag #4261
Asset Tag #4278
Asset Tag #4344
Asset Tag #4406
Asset Tag #4652
Asset Tag #4791
Asset Tag #4803
Asset Tag #4805
Asset Tag #4918
Asset Tag #5098
Asset Tag #5108
Asset Tag #5141
Asset Tag #5149
Asset Tag #5413
Asset Tag #5414
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
• Cart & Pump: Diesel Exhaust Fluid Dispensing Asset Tag #5900
• Radio: Handheld Two-Way for Road Crew
Asset Tag #6239
• Radio: Handheld Two-Way for Road Crew
Asset Tag #6240
• Radio: Handheld Two-Way for Road Crew
Asset Tag #6241
• Radio: Handheld Two-Way for Road Crew
Asset Tag #6242
• Radio: Handheld Two-Way for Road Crew
Asset Tag #6243
• Radio: Handheld Two-Way for Road Crew
Asset Tag #6244
• Radio: Handheld Two-Way for Road Crew
Asset Tag #6248
• Shredder: Swingline
Asset Tag #6540
• Plow: Frink
Asset Tag #7027
• Fire Detection System for CE Jones Bldg.
Asset Tag #7036
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 229: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to
approve the following items from the Sewer Department for recycling and trade-in:
• File Cabinet
• 2021 Ford F-150
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Asset Tag #02229
Asset Tag #05756
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 230: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone,
to approve the following item for recycling from the Parks and Recreation Department:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
10
Senior Lounge Chars (2)
Senior Lounge Love Seat
Senior Lounge Coffee Table
Senior Lounge Table & Base
Brown Chairs with Arms (6)
Foosball Table
Shuffleboard Table
Lot of 18 Chairs
Digital Wireless System
Shure Wireless Mic
Shure Wireless Mic
Couch
Pool Table
Polaroid P4000E Card Printer
Asset Tag #5584
Asset Tag #5585
Asset Tag #5587
Asset Tag #5588
Asset Tag #5589
No Asset Tag
No Asset Tag
No Asset Tag
No Asset Tag
No Asset Tag
No Asset Tag
No Asset Tag
No Asset Tag
Asset Tag #05241
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
• Monark Bike
• 3’ folding Tables
• Block Rocker Plus Speaker
• Hon Club Chair
• Hon Club Chair
• Hon Club Chair
• Hon Club Chair
• Hon Lounge Sofa
• Hon Lounge Sofa
• Hon Love Seat
• Hon Club Chair
• (4) Square Wooden End Tables
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Asset Tag #05329
No Asset Tag
Asset Tag #06776
Asset Tag #6751
Asset Tag #6752
Asset Tag #6753
Asset Tag #6754
Asset Tag #6755
Asset Tag #6756
Asset Tag #6757
Asset Tag #6760
Asset Tag #5580
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 231: MOTION by Councilman Hunter, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to
approve the following items from the Police Department for trade-in:
• Patrol Rifle Optic (15)
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Asset Tag #890158
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 232: MOTION by Councilman Hunter, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to
approve the following items from the Police Department for recycling:
• Computer
• Computer
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Asset Tag #06486
Asset Tag #05791
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
The meeting was open to the floor for public comment and noted that due to the large turnout,
instead of five minutes for each speaker, it would be three minutes, and the following Webster
residents appeared before the Town Board.
11
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
Laurie Read, a Webster resident, came before the Board to criticize the Town Supervisor for
acting unilaterally in raising the Pride flag despite being advised not to proceed. She argued that
this decision misled Pride supporters, embarrassed the Town of Webster, and demonstrated poor
leadership by creating controversy that could have been avoided with proper process. Ms. Read
emphasized that the resulting backlash affected the entire community.
Ms. Read then defended her own previous statements, stating she spoke only about fairness in
flag-raising policies and not against the Pride or LGBTQ+ communities. She described
receiving threats, harassment, and personal attacks based on a misrepresentation of her words,
using an example of a hostile email to illustrate the severity. She stated that such aggression
contradicts the ideals of unity and acceptance, urging community members to work respectfully
with one another and avoid creating division.
Kevin Lockhart, a Webster resident, came before the Board to state that personal politics are
irrelevant to him but expresses appreciation for everyone who participates and voices their
concern. He acknowledged listening to concerns but felt many opinions are not relevant to the
actual business of the Town. He apologized to the Pride activists, stating that the controversy is
largely his fault for advocating a neutral flag policy at a time when recognition was important to
activists. He stated this was naïve, and failed to anticipate the Town Board’s actions, and
understand why people feel upset or targeted.
Mr. Lockhart then shifted to broader concerns about Town operations, emphasizing the need to
refocus on quality of life and resident satisfaction. He shared frustrations about safety issues
being dismissed, including an elderly woman tripping at a meeting and slow emergency call
times from Town Hall. He outlined priorities such as air quality metrics, resolving the union
contract, and improving cybersecurity. He urged the Town Board to restore public confidence,
avoid serious mistakes, and rebuild the reputation of the Town of Webster.
Desiree Amber Moore, a Webster resident, came before the Board stating that recent events
have put Webster in the spotlight but believes the community can respond in a way that reflects
its best values. They emphasized that residents should be able to participate—attend meetings,
hold signs, and speak—without intimidation, and note that LGBTQ residents live and contribute
here. They stress, however, that the moment has become about more than just the flag; it is now
about fairness, consistency, and how the community treats one another.
They point out that other symbolic flags have been flown without controversy and that concerns
about fairness and precedent are legitimate. The speaker argues that the decision was made
without real public conversation or a chance to find common ground and urges the Town Board
to listen and reconsider. They close by asking the community to show that disagreement does
not require cruelty, and that everyone who calls Webster home deserves to be included in the
discussion.
Kate Avery, a Webster resident, came before the Board and expressed appreciation for the
opportunity to speak and emphasized the importance of constructive reflection following recent
community tensions. The speaker noted public misconceptions about flag protocol and stated
that flying a Pride flag beneath the U.S. flag is permissible. They also asserted that past
12
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
Supervisors have acknowledged community groups without requiring Board action. The speaker
criticized a newly introduced Resolution that, in their view, excludes marginalized groups and
has created unnecessary conflict, particularly compared with neighboring towns that recognized
Pride Month without issue.
The speaker raised further concerns about the timing and manner in which the Resolution was
introduced, suggesting it lacked transparency and may have been politically motivated. The
speaker urged the Board to ensure future discussions allow for open participation from all
residents and concluded by affirming that bigotry has no place in the community.
Jenna Dow, a Webster resident and recent Webster Thomas graduate, came before the Board
and spoke about their experiences in the school’s Sexuality and Gender Alliance (SAGE) and
described how visibility and support, such as the Pride flag previously displayed at Town Hall,
contribute to a sense of acceptance for LGBTQ students and community members. The speaker
stated that the removal of the flag caused them to feel less welcome in the community.
The speaker expressed concerns regarding the process used to remove the flag and introduce a
new flag-policy Resolution. They asserted that the Resolution was not listed on any agenda,
which they believe conflicts with New York State Open Meetings Law §103(e), and that the
Board did not allow sufficient time for public input despite having the option to postpone the
vote. The speaker asked the Town Board to reconsider the decision.
Morgan Schaller, a Webster resident, came before the Board and spoke about the recent
discussion surrounding the Pride flag and emphasized the importance of treating all community
members with respect regardless of personal beliefs. The speaker stated that many residents who
voiced opinions supported keeping the flag in place and expressed concern that this feedback
was not reflected in the Board’s decision.
The speaker’s primary concern was with the decision-making process, noting that the Resolution
was introduced and passed without notice or opportunity for public input. They suggested that
policy Resolutions should be introduced at one meeting and voted on at a subsequent meeting to
allow residents time to respond. They concluded by stating that Webster is a diverse community
and that residents deserved a greater role in decisions affecting Town property.
Lisa Schaller, a Webster resident, came before the Board and expressed disappointment with
how the recent flag-related decision was handled, stating that the question of what may be
displayed on the Town flagpole should have been discussed publicly. The speaker noted that
previous flags had been flown, indicating there was precedent, and stated that the recent action
appeared to be a reaction to discomfort rather than a thoughtful process.
The resident asked the Board to consider identifying public spaces that could be used to display
flags in support of community groups, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity and
transparency in future decisions.
Laura Sharp Minicucci, a Webster resident, came before the Board and spoke about concerns
regarding the Board’s handling of the Pride flag’s removal. They shared that while they have
had positive experiences with neighbors, they have not always felt fully welcome in the
community. They stated that the raising of the Pride flag on June 1st felt like an important and
positive step toward inclusion for LGBTQ residents.
13
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
The speaker expressed disappointment that the Board voted to remove the flag shortly afterward,
particularly following significant public support during the prior comment period and during a
late-night motion when many attendees had already left. They criticized the process as rushed
and inconsistently applied, asserting that it created more division than the flag itself. The
speaker asked the Board to consider the message sent to residents who may already feel
uncertain about their safety and belonging, and urged Board members to find other ways to show
support for LGBTQ individuals. They concluded by calling on the Board to demonstrate better
leadership and work collaboratively toward a more inclusive Webster.
Chris Nacca, a Webster resident, came before the Board and spoke about the recent discussions
regarding the Pride flag and expressed appreciation for the community’s turnout. The speaker
stated that, as a queer resident, they personally do not support the Pride flag being raised but
emphasized that their view is based on a belief that the American flag already represents all
people. They expressed concerns that multiple symbolic flags can create division rather than
unity.
Mr. Nacca also encouraged those who feel unwelcome in Webster to know they are accepted,
stating they hold no animosity toward anyone in the community. They closed by expressing
appreciation for the opportunity to speak and urged continued civic participation.
Rosa Eisenman, a Webster resident, came before the Board and shared that they moved to
Webster several years ago and, despite initial hesitation due to the Town’s reputation, have
generally enjoyed living in the community. They described concerns about prejudicial behavior
in their housing complex, including the removal of a small Pride flag they had displayed. The
resident expressed disappointment over the Town’s removal of the Pride flag from the municipal
flagpole and noted that the action, along with the pole being padlocked, was upsetting to them.
The speaker explained that the situation evoked negative memories from earlier life experiences
involving discrimination and urged the Board to consider the impact such actions have on
LGBTQ residents. They concluded by expressing hope for a more welcoming and supportive
environment in Webster.
Richard Barone, an Irondequoit resident and former elected official, addressed the Board
recommending that the current flag policy discussion be viewed through a legal framework
rather than personal opinion. The speaker referenced prior experience in government and court
proceedings, citing a section of the New York State Constitution that prohibits the use of
government property for private purposes. They argued that flags representing private groups or
causes may fall under this restriction.
The speaker stated that, in their view, only governmental flags—such as the U.S., State, Town,
and possibly military flags—are appropriate for display on public flagpoles. They urged the
Board to focus on their Oath of Office and ensure compliance with constitutional requirements
when making decisions, emphasizing that legal obligations should guide policy rather than
public sentiment.
David Ruiz, a Penfield resident, came before the Board and spoke in support of keeping the
Pride flag removed from the Town flagpole. They referenced a previously cited section of the
New York State Constitution regarding the use of government property, stating their belief that
14
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
public flagpoles should not display flags representing private groups or purposes. The speaker
suggested that this is why most towns have not historically flown such flags.
The speaker expressed the view that the Pride flag is divisive and not neutral, and shared
concerns about potential conflicts if other ideological or religious flags were requested for
display. They contrasted validation of individuals with what they described as compelled
affirmation and stated that no one should be forced to adopt a moral viewpoint. The speaker
concluded by sharing personal reflections on their Christian faith and encouraging others who
feel marginalized that hope and community remain available to them.
Steven Farrington, a Webster resident, addressed the Board to thank Councilwoman Wright for
recent communication and emphasized that good people can disagree on the Pride flag issue.
The speaker described their family’s desire to live in a tolerant and welcoming community and
expressed appreciation when the Pride flag was raised. They stated that while the Supervisor
may have benefited from consulting the Board beforehand, raising the flag was within executive
discretion.
The resident expressed disappointment in the Board’s subsequent decision to remove the flag,
characterizing it as harmful to the LGBTQ community and suggesting it appeared responsive to
intolerance. They encouraged the Board to follow the example of nearby municipalities that
display both the Pride flag and the U.S. flag. The speaker urged voters to support leaders who
stand against bigotry and concluded by stating that neutrality in the face of injustice is
insufficient, quoting Desmond Tutu.
Monica Gorlick, a Webster resident, requested that the Town Clerk record in the minutes her
fully submitted comments. “You three on the Board that I call the, “Gang of 3”, John , Jennifer,
and DINO Garrett had to have known that you would open a can of worms when you voted to
take down the rainbow flag at the very last minute of the last Town Board Meeting as Alex was
just about to close the meeting and after the majority of residents and speakers thanked Alex for
raising the flag. John, as you’ve done in the past, had interrupted Alex & said wait, I have
something more today. John, if you were confident in your motion to remove the flag & put a
flag policy forward, why not wait until TONIGHT’S meeting & have it on the agenda for
residents to be able to respond? I’ll tell you why, you knew the outcome would be a failure as
has been shown since the flag has been taken down. The blowback against its removal has been
remarkable. I also have a question for you Kyle. As the Town Attorney what exactly is your job
sitting up there? I would have thought you would have interjected and said that this motion
being brought forward was not on the agenda and should be placed on the next Town Board
Meeting’s agenda to be voted on, maybe schedule a Public Hearing for residents to come in,
voice their opinion, both sides, then have a vote. But instead, it appeared to me that you showed
partially and permitted it to move forward. If I have a misconception of what your job entails, I
apologize.
I researched how to amend or eliminate a policy that has been adopted. I will pass a copy to
each of your to review. I am hoping that Jennifer will reconsider her previous vote and do right
by her constituents, even though their lifestyle or views may not match hers. In the past I have
found you to be fair and thoughtful, I’m hoping you will be again. Perhaps there is a way to
display the flag to make everyone feel inclusive and heard. Regarding John and Garrett, well,
15
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
you both have your own self-serving agendas and voters won’t forget. John, Garrett you both
have displayed disrespect towards Alex time and time again and created discord within the Board
and have convinced Jennifer to follow you down a path of division rather than cohesiveness!
There seems to be a misconception regarding the Rainbow Flag and what it means. I’ve read
many statements on the ND App stating that it is a “sex” flag and/or describes sex in the
bedroom. All I can say is WOW. The ignorance behind that thought pattern boggles my mind.
It has NOTHING to do with “sex” in the bedroom or any other room or space. It stands for
diversity, unity and love… I’ll throw the term “Acceptance for all”. It amazes me how much
straight people think about gay sex more than the gays! I don’t think about any of you on the
Board or in the audience here having sex cause there is no way it is more exciting or interesting
than what goes on in my bedroom! If that is all you think about, then you all need to get a life
and do something productive other than attacking individuals that choose to love whomever they
wish. What makes you believe you are better than them. So stick to the facts and if you don’t
know them, speak to someone that can explain it to you or Google it. I don’t see things as black
and white and prefer to live my life with colors that bring brightness and joy to one’s life. When
I see a rainbow in the sky I think of a pot of gold at the end of it and when I see a Rainbow flag
flying I see a home that supports a community that is inclusive. My husband and I fly a Rainbow
COEXIST flag along with the Chevron Rainbow flag which represents inclusiveness of all
religions, races, lifestyles of all and so much more.
Time to put your close-minded views aside and get with the program… We the People stands for
EVERYONE… straight, gay, transgender, binary!
Make Antifascism Great Again!”
Mark Stoch, a combat veteran and ten-year resident of Webster, spoke before the Board and
thanked members for the opportunity to comment. He acknowledged that the topic at hand has
generated strong emotions within the community and emphasized the importance of allowing all
residents to express their views respectfully. Drawing from his military experience, he described
serving alongside individuals from diverse backgrounds and noted that shared purpose and
commitment often united people despite their differences.
Mr. Stoch discussed the symbolism of the American flag, explaining the significance of its colors
and the values they represent. He stated that the flag serves as a unifying symbol for all
Americans, transcending race, religion, political affiliation, gender, and personal beliefs. He
emphasized that in his view, the American flag’s role in government spaces is meaningful
because it represents every citizen equally and is used to honor service members, public
institutions, and national values.
He concluded by expressing his belief that government properties should focus on displaying
symbols that unite the whole community rather than symbols associated with specific political,
social, or ideological groups. Mr. Stoch clarified that his comments were not intended to
diminish anyone’s identity or beliefs but reflected his view that government’s role is to bring
people together around shared principles. He thanked the Board for their service and for the
opportunity to speak.
16
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
The following comments came from emails or online form submitted by the individuals:
Sheryl Rimore, a Webster resident stated, “I am grateful that Webster has a Pride flag. I grew
up in Webster and graduated from Webster. I didn’t come out as gay until I went to college.
Now, I live in Webster with my wife and our 2 children. I want my kids to grow up and feel
safe. I want them to not feel different from other kids. I want them to know that our family is
normal and welcome in Webster.”
Mary Dailor, a Webster resident stated, “Thank you for voting to only fly the US and NYS flags
at Town locations. No one group should be singled out for special attention. We are all
Americans”.
Hannah Lundquist, a Webster resident stated, “I am SO ashamed to have grown up in Webster
today! I cannot believe the Town "where life is worth living" thinks its appropriate to remove
the pride flag during pride month!!! Do you mean it’s not worth living for the LGBT
community? This is such a shame and embarrassing! And of course, Kevin Lockhart a local
NAZI is in the videos supporting the flag being taken down! What is wrong with y’all!!!!!!!!
Shame on you and everyone who thought that was okay!!!!! Trans people especially and the rest
of the community are experiencing a quiet genocide! How do you think this makes our
community members feel? It’s like a slap in the face that our Town doesn’t care! Everyone
should feel safe in this Town and this is a huge sign that LGBT people simply can’t feel safe or
loved or respected in the Town of Webster!!! This is un-American and cruel! If being LGBT
was wrong, why would God have made over ten percent of the population LGBT?! Shame on
you!”
Skyler Bowman, a non-Webster resident stated, “I would just like to express my displeasure of
your removal of the Pride flag from your Town Hall the very first week of pride month. It shows
a clear message to your community, “Where life is worth living…. If you’re straight”. I find it
terribly hard to believe that Jennifer Wright, Garrett Wagner and John Cahill did not have an
ulterior motive behind the motion. That ulterior motive being hatred, of course. Although I am
not a resident of Webster NY, I do work in Webster, and I’m terribly ashamed of the 3 who
voted in favor of this motion. Shame on you, someone you love may be gay or someone you
love loves a gay person. And you’ve let them down. I hope you can sleep at night knowing you
wasted your time and effort making your community more hateful and less inclusive. May you
have the day you deserve!”
Margaret Riemer, a Webster resident stated, “I saw on the news this morning that you people
voted to remove the Pride flag from Town Hall. Please know that I totally disapprove of your
decision. What in Heaven's name are you afraid of? Have you caught rumpies MAGAts?
Shame on you!!!! Put that flag back up!!!”
Kim Kummerow, an Ontario resident stated, “Pride Flag Down: SHAME!!!”
Nathan Kohlmeier, “I am appalled that the leadership voted to remove the Pride flag. It should
be re-instated immediately for the dignity of all LGBTQ people living in Webster and the
surrounding areas. Removing the flag is a huge statement of hate and prejudice that is shameful
and an embarrassment. Shame on you for choosing to side with hate”.
17
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
Millie, a Rochester resident stated, “We see where your allegiances and interests lie and it is not
with the people of Webster—gay, lesbian, trans, or otherwise”.
Micahael Bodine, a Webster resident stated, “I watched the recording of the June 4th Town
Workshop and just wanted to bring to your attention that the video has no sound for the first 5
min and 6 seconds, then lost sound again between 43:25 and 47:52. I'm not sure if something
may be going on with the recording equipment. I did watch the Town Board Meeting that
followed and only a couple brief glitches with the sound but no long breaks”.
Drew Herzig, an Irondequoit resident stated, “Those of you who voted to take down the Pride
flag should be ashamed of yourselves. I don't live in Webster, but I am a member of the
LGBTQ+ community, and you have sent a message of prejudice and bigotry that reaches far
beyond the Town borders of Webster. Thank you to Mr. Scialdone and Mr. Hunter for voting to
keep the flag. For the rest of you, you have put Webster on the map as a homophobic
community. Congratulations. Happy Pride Month!”
Anonymous, stated, “As an LGBTQ+ individual who has lived in this Town for my entire life, I
am extremely disappointed in the Webster Town Board. Identity and sexuality should never be
political. We are just people and the Pride flag on the pole that day was a symbol that we exist
and we are here and we are recognized and proud. By removing the flag you are letting the
prejudiced, close- minded people win. The American flag has never felt like a full representation
of its people, especially with the current climate of hate that we live in today. I implore you to
reconsider your decision to put the flag up again as a way to show the small but mighty
LGBTQ+ community of Webster that we are seen”.
Cobey Palermo, a Rochester resident stated, “I want to express my outrage and disappointment
regarding the decision to remove the Pride flag from Town Hall during Pride Month. This
decision was not only unnecessary, it was divisive, antagonistic, and deeply harmful to many
members of the community. What is most concerning is that this issue was brought forward at
all. Why was this even made into a problem? Who was harmed by a symbol of inclusion being
displayed at Town Hall? The Pride flag represented neighbors, taxpayers, students, families, and
young people in Webster who deserve to feel acknowledged and respected by their local
government. Instead, the Board chose to target that visibility and remove it. During a time when
LGBTQIA+ individuals continue to face discrimination, harassment, and mental health
struggles, especially among younger people, the Board chose to send a message that their
inclusion is up for debate. Whether intentional or not, that is exactly how this action is being
perceived by many residents. This was not leadership. This was political theater at the expense
of a marginalized community. A Pride flag does not threaten anyone. It does not take rights
away from anyone. It simply communicates that people belong. Removing it during Pride
Month sends the opposite message, and many people in this community are paying attention. I
would like a clear explanation as to why this decision was made, why it was prioritized, who
pushed for it, and what the Board believed would be gained by removing a symbol of inclusion
from public view. Webster deserves better than performative division and culture war politics.
Local government should focus on serving and supporting all residents, not singling out one
community for controversy”.
18
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
Nyah Krug, stated, “I have recently been informed of the Board's majority vote to remove the
Town Pride flag through friends, word of mouth, local news outlets, and social media. As I'm
sure you're aware, there are many hurt and disappointed community members who feel the need
to speak out against this decision. The motion, and the support for it, is an objective act of
discrimination. Pride Month has remained a federally recognized observance for nearly 30
years, and removing such a symbol is a regression of human rights. Put simply, the Pride flag
represents a present part of our community as well as a loaded history of the endless fight against
oppression and the resilience demonstrated by the LGBTQ+ community. On behalf of the large
number of concerned community members, I implore you to return Webster's Pride flag to its
rightful place on the flagpole. Finally, I would like to express my intense disappointment in
Garrett Wagner, Jennifer Wright, and John Cahill for failing to protect and care for their Town
and for displaying an indisputable prejudice against their own local community.”
Mark Stoch, a Webster resident stated, “Thank you so much for voting to remove this colorful
toilet paper from below the almighty American Flag. Your personal beliefs need to stay out of
your jobs. Please do not speak like "All" Town of Webster residents want this. I can assure you
that there is a lot of us that disapprove of this nonsense. Especially this Combat Veteran. Please
DO NOT EVER compare the American flag people have shed blood and died for to the mental
illness in the gay Pride flag. Worry about our streets that need to be fixed, Town policies that are
trash and oh yeah the taxes that are so outrageous that we feel there is a lot of taxation without
representation going on in this Town”.
Laura Miller, a Webster resident stated, “First, THANK YOU Alex Scialdone and Nick Hunter
for being the people who represent ALL of the Webster community. I was so proud to live here
when I saw that Webster was choosing to embrace all its citizens by flying the Pride flag. I was
just as disgusted when I saw that most of the Town Board voted to remove it. Webster touts
itself as being “Where life is worth living”. This vote is not sending that message. This resident
will continue to be an ally to the entire Webster community and will use her voice and her vote
to make sure Webster is a welcoming and supportive place for everyone who chooses to call it
home.”
Anonymous, stated, “I am absolutely disgusted by the hateful and discriminatory act of
removing the Pride flag. This set a horrible precedent and those who voted to have the flag
removed should be ashamed”.
AJ, stated, “I’m writing to let you know that me, a group of concerned citizens, and a team of
lawyers have begun work to start the process of calling for a vote of no confidence in the
Webster Town Board over the horrendous decision to spit in the face of Webster residents by
removing the Pride Flag from the Town Hall. We were actually very excited when Alex won
Town Supervisor, but now we feel based on the actions of the Board, it needs a complete
overhaul of members. Please be advised that you should be receiving mail correspondence from
our law team regarding our next steps. Should you choose to be humans again, and restore the
flag, we will stop our proceedings”.
Jaci Jackson, a non-Webster resident stated, “I, as a United States citizen, a frequenter of the
Town of Webster, and a woman part of the LGBTQ+ community am utterly appalled, disgusted,
and all around disappointed at the choice made to remove the Pride flag. All this does is show
the youth of Webster that the community’s love and care for each individual is conditional, and
19
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
not only that, but conditional according to their identity and who they are as a person. This is
textbook discrimination which has no part in a whole Town’s rules and guidelines. This also
completely disregards the Town of Webster’s slogan “Where life is worth living”. Many
LGBTQ+ children and adults are directly being told that their life is not worth living in Webster
with this horrific display of homophobia. To all the LGBTQ+ youth of Webster: we hear you,
we see you, and we are fighting for your rights as citizens of the United States to express
yourself freely as you wish, and to not be silenced by those who find discomfort in what they
don’t “agree” with”.
Michael Snyder, a Rochester resident stated, “Hi Webster Town Board. I'm very disappointed
in the decision to remove a symbol of acceptance for a community that is under attack more and
more in this country. I may live in Rochester and not Webster but I visit the area often. I don't
think your decision to remove the flag was motivated by hate but it supports the view of those
who wish to exclude so many American citizens from this country and community. I hope you
reconsider the ruling and seek more ways to support ALL of your citizens visibly”.
Dyane Stillman, from Hershey, PA stated, “Shame on you. I don't live in your Town and I'm
not LGBTQ; however, I am American. You are an embarrassment”.
Cathy Razim, a Scottsville resident stated, “How has a rainbow flag hurt you personally? Are
you as equally insulted by an Irish flag in March for St.Patty's day? The Pride flag is not
political. It's recognition of a group of people who have, and still are, persecuted and denied
rights. It is a symbol of strength and acceptance and a safe space. Are you saying you're not
safe? Pride isn't forcing anyone to take up that lifestyle. Pride is to recognize that lifestyle and
that those who question are not alone. There is at least one child in your district who feels lost
and alone. The Pride Flag can be that symbol they need to recognize who they are - even if that
answer might be straight. Pride isn't political. Politicians make it political, and it's up to us to
stop that rhetoric. I hang my Pride flag outside for most of the year. I fly it as an ally. I stand by
this flag. It was torn down and we fixed the broken clips and hung it back up the next day. It
waves outside my door to say "I'm a safe adult. I accept you for who you are." Acceptance is
love. Acceptance is human. And if only one lost soul sees it as a light in the dark, it is worth it”.
Peter Hart, a Webster resident stated, “I want to thank the three “GOP members” on the Board
who showed again… another example of what they are…worthless…You had an opportunity to
pass a beautification project for Webster… which the three of you voted down. While taking the
time to take action about the PRIDE FLAG to vilify people just trying to live their own lives as
they choose. The only thing that you stand for is protecting the serial child rapist and trafficker,
Donald J Trump. I understand that you are not decision makers on the hiding of the Epstein
files..but your vote for this monster for “President” shows where you stand. The blood of these
children are on the hands of every “Republican” at every level, every single “PUB” chooses to
protect the rapists of children. You have chosen to enable the rape and murder of children as a
political party and you make me want to vomit. The three of you make good people embarrassed
to live in Webster..I look forward to working against the three of you in future elections…
Start doing things for the people of Webster..YOU WORK FOR US!!! “
20
06-18-2026
Webster Town Board
Andrew Vogini, a Webster resident stated, “I am disappointed to see that our Town has chosen
to remove the Pride flag. This isn't just some harmless housekeeping decision. This is a blatant
attack on an entire, diverse community of people carried out by just three hateful people. It is a
statement, by those three individuals that they alone do not support those who they view as
different from themselves to such an extent that they would take time and resources away from
actual important matters and choose to actively demonstrate, by purposefully removing the flag,
that they do not support marginalized members of the community. Not all people have equal
treatment in America. It is a sad but ever apparent fact that we all must realize. While the flag
may be meaningless to the members of the Board involved in its removal, for the people who it
does have meaning for it is irreplicable. For a mere 30 days, just 8% of the year, we bring
attention and awareness to issues that the LGBTQ community faces and celebrate people as a
whole no matter who they are. The flag shows that their voices matter and that they can be heard
and that they are welcome in our community, that we see them and we stand by them in their
fight against discrimination. By undergoing a decision to remove that flag you achieve the
opposite, beyond even simply having never flown the flag in the first place. If the flag was
simply never flown in the Town, it could have been logistics or tradition or any other number of
things that made it so that for one reason or another, it just hadn't been done. However, by
actively choosing to remove it you demonstrate hate, intolerance and quite frankly supremacist
actions beyond what any Town that simply has never flown it could. The act of taking down a
flag is a statement in itself. Webster is supposed to be "Where life is worth living", but
apparently only if you are part of the Board approved communities. Bring back the flag, bring
back inclusion. There is no place in our Town for hate and discrimination.”
Pamela Bianchi, a Webster resident stated, “Am I correct that you voted to take down the Pride
Flag and limit no other flag to fly with the American flag and then you hung a different flag
under the American flag? How embarrassing this is, and as a resident I feel totally shut down.
Meantime many other towns are compassionate and support PRIDE by displaying the flag for a
short time. Terribly disappointed in my Town”.
***
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at
9:04 p.m.
____________________________________
Danene M. Marr, Town Clerk
21
06-18-2026