Webster Town Board
June 4, 2026
A regular meeting of the Webster Town Board was called to order by Supervisor Scialdone at
7:36 p.m. at the Webster Town Board Meeting Room, 1002 Ridge Road, Webster, New York,
with the following officials present:
Supervisor ......................................................................... Alexander B. Scialdone
Councilman....................................................................................... John J. Cahill
Councilwoman...........................................................................Jennifer S. Wright
Councilman.............................................................................. Nicholas E. Hunter
Councilman................................................................................ Garrett J. Wagner
Attorney for the Town .........................................................................Kyle Taylor
Town Clerk .................................................................................. Danene M. Marr
Department Heads Present:
Community Development Director ................................................. Joshua Artuso
Finance Director ..................................................................................Paul Adams
Town Engineer .............................................................................. Keith Mortimer
Communications Director ............................................................. Bridget Harvey
Also in attendance was Rick Kenealy, Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief Operator.
***
Supervisor Scialdone led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
***
The meeting was open to the floor for public comment and noted that due to the large turnout,
instead of five minutes for each speaker, it would be three minutes, and the following Webster
residents appeared before the Town Board.
Michael Garbin, a Webster resident, came before the Board and expressed support for
displaying the Pride Flag at Town Hall and commended the Board for taking that action. They
stated that the flag represents freedom for individuals whose identities or relationships may differ
from others, emphasizing that supporting these residents helps protect everyone’s right to live
and love as they choose. Mr. Garbin also noted concern that the issue had become a controversy,
suggesting that such conflicts are often driven by political motives rather than genuine
community disagreement. They urged the Town to reject division, avoid manufactured conflict,
and instead focus on compassion and supporting fellow residents.
Supervisor Scialdone, stated to correct the record that displaying the Pride Flag was a decision
made by himself as the Town Supervisor, and was not a Board decision.
Sue Garbin, a Webster resident, came before the Board and expressed appreciation to the Town
Board for raising the Pride Flag, stating that it reinforces Webster’s message that “life is worth
living” and makes them feel included in the community. They praised the Board’s commitment
to inclusion and questioned why such issues remain contentious in 2026, suggesting
disagreements often stem from religious perspectives and unnecessary intrusion of government
into personal lives. Mrs. Garbin encouraged the Board to continue representing and supporting
all residents.
1
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Rev. Walter Stuber, a Webster resident and pastor, spoke in support of raising the Pride Flag.
He noted that both congregations he serves are open and affirming and welcome all people
without discrimination, a standard he believes the broader community should share. He also
referenced his work with a local support alliance for transgender youth. Reverend Stuber shared
a personal story about his brother, who died by suicide after experiencing severe bullying
following his coming out, emphasizing the importance of acceptance. He concluded by
expressing gratitude for the Town’s action and noting that many residents are encouraged by this
progress.
Laurie Read, a Webster resident, thanked the Town Supervisor and several Board members for
responding to her email and emphasized the importance of government neutrality, particularly
during the nation’s 250th year. Ms. Read stated that government buildings represent all residents
equally and should not display flags that elevate specific social or demographic groups. Ms.
Read stated that doing so creates implicit endorsements, conflicts with longstanding flag policies,
and moves government away from its neutral role. Ms. Read requested clarification on why one
group is considered more underrepresented than others in Webster and noted that many
municipalities have discontinued identity-based flag raisings for fairness and consistency. She
urged the Board to limit flagpoles on government property to the U.S. flag, the New York State
flag, and the municipal flag. Ms. Read thanked the Board for listening to resident concerns and
expressed hope that the Pride Flag would be removed and a clear, consistent policy adopted.
Wanda Moore, a Webster resident, spoke in support of flying the Pride Flag, sharing that their
family includes LGBTQ+ members and that the flag signals community acceptance for those
who may feel marginalized. They emphasized that many residents, especially young people,
struggle with identity-related stigma and that visible support can help prevent harm. The speaker
expressed concern about negative online comments and a recent rise in hostility, noting that it
has caused fear among some families. They concluded by affirming that LGBTQ+ residents are
part of the community and that the flag represents safety and solidarity.
Katelyn Thompson, a Webster resident, spoke about the need to foster community in a time of
division and suggested that displaying a variety of flags throughout the year could highlight
different organizations and causes. They proposed featuring a different group each month on the
Town’s webpage, including information and donation links. The speaker noted that many types
of flags—such as police, military, pride, fire service, and health-related causes—could be
included and suggested exploring options such as a second flagpole or temporary display in the
Town Hall window to accommodate them. They emphasized that these approaches could help
bring residents together and address differing viewpoints.
Kathy Taddeo, a Webster resident, expressed concern about declining courtesy and respect at
public events and emphasized the importance of orderly participation in Town meetings. They
referenced Resolution No. 19, noting that it outlines rules for public conduct, and urged the
Board to ensure that disruptive individuals can be removed when necessary, including by police
if warranted. The speaker described witnessing significant disruptive behavior at the June 1st
flag-raising event and suggested that police presence at similar gatherings may help maintain
safety and order. They concluded by thanking the Board for modeling respectful listening during
the meeting.
2
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Michael D’Amico, a Webster resident and developer of the Westwood Subdivision, addressed
the Board regarding the dedication of approximately 40 acres of maintained open space
originating from the former Webster West golf course. He explained that, unlike typical cluster
subdivisions where open space remains largely unused, this land has been mowed and
maintained to a high standard for years with the help of residents. Mr. D’Amico noted that many
neighbors may request the area be considered for a Park District and wished to inform the Board
in advance that continued maintenance at a higher standard would be important to the
community. Mr. D’Amico also commented on broader Town operations, stating that frequent
turnover among department heads in recent years has created challenges. Drawing on decades of
development experience, they encouraged the Town to prioritize promoting existing employees
within departments—such as Highway, Parks and Recreation, and Sewer—into leadership roles,
suggesting that internal candidates bring valuable institutional knowledge and stability.
Joanne Nania, a Webster resident, shared that she and her husband raised their family in
Webster and continue to proudly call the Town home. She spoke about their son, a Webster
Thomas graduate whose strong education helped him earn a full scholarship to Northeastern
University, followed by a master’s degree and later a law degree from Yale. He now works as a
knowledge management and innovation attorney and lives in Massachusetts, remaining proud of
his Webster roots. She expressed that flying the Pride Flag sends a meaningful message of
support to her son, his husband, and all LGBTQ+ residents, demonstrating that the Town values
and celebrates their contributions. She thanked the Board for showing this support to their
neighbors.
Brittany Bonanno, a Webster resident, spoke about the personal and emotional impact the
current debate over flying the Pride Flag has had on LGBTQ+ individuals in Webster, stating
that it feels as though their worth and visibility are being questioned. They described the deeply
personal nature of realizing one’s identity and emphasized that their family life is no different
from that of other residents. The speaker highlighted concerns about safety and the
disproportionate burden placed on marginalized groups to protect themselves, noting that queer
adults represent a small portion of the population and are often the targets, not the sources, of
harm. The speaker also addressed the legal and procedural framework surrounding the
Supervisor’s authority to issue proclamations, stating that such ceremonial actions do not require
a Board vote. They expressed concern that a video released by a Board member misrepresented
this authority and contributed to public distrust. The speaker argued that religious objections
cannot serve as a basis for governing public spaces and urged the Town to uphold accurate
communication and fair treatment of all residents.
Barbara Grosh, a Penfield resident, spoke about the importance of supporting young people in
the community, sharing her experience as the parent of a daughter who came out as gay at age
sixteen after years of worry and self-doubt. She emphasized that her love for her daughter did
not change and expressed hope that her child would not face the challenges endured by LGBTQ+
individuals she knew while growing up. The speaker noted that her daughter, now a young
adult, continues to live in Monroe County, and she hopes she will remain in the area and
someday raise a family of her own. The speaker stressed that young people in Webster need to
feel loved, supported, and valued in order to remain in the community and thrive. She urged the
Town to send a clear message that all youth are welcome and wanted, and that their presence
strengthens local families and the broader community.
3
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Tracey Konopko, a Webster resident, thanked the Board for raising the Pride Flag and shared
that, as the parent of a young child, she teaches him daily about kindness toward people who are
different. She expressed that diversity within the community is something to be valued, noting
that visibility and acceptance can make the world better for everyone. The speaker reflected on
how meaningful it is when individuals are able to express who they are openly and said the Pride
Flag helps signal that inclusivity. She also thanked the Town Supervisor and the Board members
who supported flying the flag, expressing pride in living in a community that recognizes and
affirms its LGBTQ+ residents. The speaker stated that the decision represents an important and
positive step that demonstrates the Town’s commitment to seeing and supporting all members of
the community.
Annie Murphy, a Webster resident, expressed appreciation for the Pride Flag display, sharing
that she and her husband are proud allies raising their family in Webster. She noted that she was
initially hesitant to move from the city to the suburbs out of concern for a lack of diversity and
inclusivity but has been impressed by Webster’s welcoming environment. The speaker stated
that she is proud of the Town, grateful for the flag’s placement, and respectful of differing
opinions.
Desiree Moore, a Webster resident, addressed the Board, expressing appreciation for the Town’s
decision to display the Pride flag. Ms. Moore stated that the visible support within the
community is meaningful and shared that their six-year-old child was excited to fly a new Pride
flag at home. Ms. Moore emphasized the importance of continued support and inclusion within
the Webster community.
John Godwin, a Webster resident and Navy veteran, and retired police officer, spoke regarding
the Pride event and issues of diversity and inclusion. He described his family’s international
background, including time spent teaching abroad, marrying in Austria, and adopting their son
from Cambodia, who later graduated from Webster schools and is now pursuing a PhD in
molecular medicine. Mr. Godwin expressed concern that the concepts of diversity, equity, and
inclusion are increasingly misrepresented, and he referenced foundational American principles of
equality and unity to reinforce their importance. He noted that communities and nations benefit
from being open and welcoming and cited historical and philosophical perspectives emphasizing
knowledge over ignorance. Mr. Godwin urged the Town not to retreat from inclusion due to
pressure from a small group of residents and emphasized that decisions driven by discomfort or
prejudice send negative messages—particularly to LGBTQ+ youth and families who may be
reluctant to speak publicly. He concluded by encouraging the Board to uphold dignity, fairness,
and safety for all residents and to continue supporting inclusive community values.
Rev. Rocco Vallerand, a Webster resident and founder of Support Alliance for Fairness and
Equity for Transgender Youth (SAFETY). The Reverand spoke in support of Pride Month and
the display of the Pride flag, stating that the flag is not a political statement but a symbol
affirming that LGBTQ+ residents, including young people, belong in the community. The
speaker emphasized that national tensions should not influence local governance and that
Webster has the opportunity to demonstrate dignity, courage, and a clear message of inclusion.
They noted that New York State has designated itself a safe-haven for transgender youth and
families and asserted that this responsibility extends to local governments as well. The speaker
cautioned that retreating from inclusion in response to a small, vocal opposition sends a harmful
message and urged the Board not to allow fear, prejudice, or discomfort to shape public policy.
4
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
He stated that leadership should be measured by protecting dignity even when challenged and
highlighted that many residents, including LGBTQ+ youth, observe these decisions even if they
are not comfortable speaking publicly. The speaker concluded by reaffirming that the Pride flag
does not diminish anyone’s values or rights but signals safety and belonging, urging the Board to
stand firm in supporting inclusion, fairness, and safety for all residents.
Kevin Lockhart, a Webster resident, addressed the Board, expressing concern about what he
described as increasing hostility and divisiveness in the community. He stated that no resident
should receive special privilege based on identity and emphasized that Town governance should
focus on resident satisfaction and quality of life. Mr. Lockhart urged the Board to adopt a clear,
neutral flag policy permitting only official Town, State, and national flags on municipal
flagpoles, stating that the recent decision by an individual elected official to raise the Pride flag
created unnecessary controversy and discord. He noted that members of the LGBTQ+
community should feel safe and welcome but not singled out for special attention and stated that
public property should not be used in ways that create division among residents. Mr. Lockhart
also raised a neighborhood concern regarding trees cut along the Hojack Trail near Joylene
Drive, requesting follow-up on cleanup and maintenance. He concluded by urging the Board to
center its work on resident satisfaction to strengthen unity within the community.
Monica Gorlick, a Webster resident, began by thanking Alex for raising the Pride Flag on
June 1st and recognizing Pride Month. She described the ceremony as joyful and peaceful,
noting that only one individual tried unsuccessfully to disrupt it. The crowd’s positive response
drowned out that person’s negativity, allowing the event to continue without issue. Ms. Gorlick
expressed appreciation for Supervisor Scialdone’s past initiatives on behalf of the Town of
Webster but criticized a Board member who, in their view, repeatedly voted against Supervisor
Scialdone’s proposals. Ms. Gorlick stated Councilman Wagner mislead voters, acting with
self-interest, and voting against programs he previously claimed to support. Ms. Gorlick cited
specific examples, such as votes related to the Climate Smart Community Program and a
proposed contribution to the police chief’s salary. Ms. Gorlick stated, in her opinion,
Councilman Wagner has political ambitions but lacks the values and sincerity. She believes that
Supervisor Scialdone demonstrates. Ms. Gorlick concluded by saying she will work to prevent
Garrett from becoming Supervisor and will remind voters of what she views as Councilman
Wagner’s contradictory actions.
Richard Kendrick, a Webster resident, proud of the action by Town Supervisor to raise the
Pride Flag in honor of Pride Month. rather than speaking what he came to say, he finished
Brittany Bonanno’s prepared statement. After this meeting, you will now know at least one
queer person firsthand. They explain that queer people in Webster are ordinary community
members—neighbors, parents, coworkers, coaches, and first responders—with the same
everyday concerns as everyone else. They emphasize that LGBTQ+ residents are not hiding and
that disagreement with a small Pride flag does not justify outrage. The speaker read that, over
time, some Board members will be remembered positively for supporting inclusion, while others
may later regret their actions. They challenge the Board to explain why queer residents do not
deserve a safe and welcoming space in Webster, though they expect legal counsel would advise
against answering such a question directly. They concluded by stating that the Public Record
should show that when the Board had a simple opportunity to say, “you are welcome here”, some
members chose silence instead.
5
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Morgan VanDerLeest, a Webster resident and publisher of the Webster Ledger, addressed the
Board to express concerns about the idea of using “resident satisfaction” as a primary measure of
successful governance. Mr. VanDerLeest explained that while resident feedback is valuable,
satisfaction is not an appropriate overarching goal for government decision-making. He noted
that unlike customers at a business, residents cannot simply opt out of local government, and
officials must sometimes make decisions that may be unpopular in the short term but necessary
for the long-term well-being of the community, including future residents. Mr. VanDerLeest
cautioned that governing is based on the sentiments of those who are most vocal at any given
meeting risks prioritizing immediate individual preferences over broader community needs. He
emphasized that important Town decisions—such as enforcing codes, approving developments,
or raising fees to maintain infrastructure—are often unpopular but essential. Mr. VanDerLeest
identified three goals they believe should guide the Board’s work: providing essential public
goods that the private market will not, such as safe roads, clean water, and functional
infrastructure; administering fair and transparent processes for zoning, permits, and assessments,
noting that research shows residents often accept outcomes they dislike when the process is
perceived as fair; and stewarding decisions with long-term impacts in mind, rather than relying
on short-term satisfaction as a benchmark. He concluded by acknowledging the Board’s efforts
and encouraging members to continue focusing on sound, long-term governance.
The following comments came from emails or online form submitted by the individuals:
Jennifer Miller-Doyle, “I am a resident of West Webster, and have lived here for 4 years. I
decided to move here with my family despite worries that my wife, child and I may not be
welcome because we are an LGBTQ family. We found our home and fell in love but had heard
all the rumors and worries from friends and co-workers that Webster was not known to welcome
diversity. We wanted a great school for our daughter, and a lifetime home for her to enjoy. I
will not lie; it has not always been easy. There are definitely times when it's clear that we are not
welcome. Our neighbors by the way are wonderful and welcoming, and we are building
community here. All that said, I am writing with deep gratitude to the Board for raising a Pride
flag this year. I will ignore the hate this year and know that on a governmental level that my
family is welcome to make a home here in Webster and that families like mine can continue to
join this community without fear. Diversity makes our community stronger, and I know that
young people can build their own families here knowing that a large percentage of GenZ identify
as queer. Stay strong Webster Town Board, and know that you have a large LGBTQ community
here who is excited to see this support and to support you in return.
Wanda Moore, a Webster resident stated, “I just wanted to say that I am very proud that the
Town Supervisor chose to raise the Pride flag in the Town of Webster. I know that this has
caused a divide with some residents but it’s usually residents that are less tolerant of others. My
wife and I love Webster and are proud to have called this our home for 31 years as a couple and
my wife for over 57 years growing up here. With the racist talk that has been going on online
under the guise of having an opinion but in actuality it’s hatred at its best which was very
surprising to me. Please continue to support all of your residents in this area and help us to
protect our less marginalized persons and children”.
6
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Rachel Healey, a Webster resident stated, “I am writing in full support of the decision to fly the
Pride flag at Town Hall this June. The LGBTQ+ residents of Webster are our neighbors, our
coworkers, our family members, and our friends. They contribute to this community every
single day. Displaying the Pride flag is a simple, powerful acknowledgment that they belong
here. When our local government chooses to recognize a community that has faced real
discrimination and real harm, it demonstrates empathy, leadership, and inclusivity, which is
exactly what we should expect from the people we have elected to represent us. I urge the Board
to stand firm in the decision to fly the Pride flag and not be swayed by those who would rather
our LGBTQ+ neighbors feel invisible. Webster is better than that. Thank you for your time and
your service to this community.
Kevin Lockhart, a Webster resident stated, “To the Webster Town Board:
I respectfully request that the Town Board adopt a formal written, content-neutral flag display
policy governing all flags displayed on Town-owned flagpoles and government property.
The purpose of such a policy is not to favor or disfavor any particular viewpoint, organization,
cause, ideology, religion, or political movement. Rather, it is to ensure that government property
is administered in a neutral, objective, transparent, and legally defensible manner consistent with
constitutional principles and sound public administration.
Findings and Basis for Request:
1. Government Property Belongs to All Residents
Town facilities are funded and maintained by taxpayers of diverse political, religious, and
philosophical viewpoints. When a government body displays flags that appear to endorse
particular viewpoints without a clearly defined policy, residents may reasonably perceive the
Town as favoring some viewpoints over others. A written policy helps preserve public
confidence that Town government serves all residents equally.
2. Supreme Court Precedent Supports Clear Flag Policies
In Shurtleff v. City of Boston, 596 U.S. 243 (2022), the United States Supreme Court held that
when a municipality allows outside groups to use a government flagpole without meaningful
governmental control, the flag display may constitute private speech protected by the First
Amendment. The Court emphasized that the government’s policies, practices, and degree of
control over flag displays are critical in determining whether a flag represents government
speech or private speech. As a result, municipalities that wish to avoid viewpoint-discrimination
disputes should establish clear standards governing flag displays and retain objective control
over what is displayed on government flagpoles.
3. Content-Neutral Rules Reduce Legal Risk
Federal courts have repeatedly recognized that governments may adopt viewpoint-neutral
policies governing the use of government property. A clear policy:
•
•
•
•
7
Reduces the risk of First Amendment litigation.
Prevents claims of favoritism or discrimination.
Ensures consistent treatment of all residents and organizations.
Protects future Town Boards from accusations of arbitrary decision-making.
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
4. Objective Standards Promote Public Trust
Public confidence is strengthened when decisions are made according to written standards rather
than individual preferences. A formal policy prevents uncertainty regarding:
•
•
•
•
•
Who has authority to approve flag displays.
Which flags may be displayed.
Whether private groups may request displays.
How competing requests will be handled.
Whether temporary commemorative displays are permitted.
Proposed Policy Framework
I respectfully recommend that the Town Board adopt a policy providing that Town-owned
flagpoles shall be limited to:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. The flag of the United States.
The flag of the State of New York.
The Town flag, if adopted.
Official military service flags and POW/MIA flags as authorized by law.
Flags required or authorized by federal or state statute.
Alternatively, if the Town wishes to permit commemorative or ceremonial flag displays, it
should establish written objective criteria and a formal approval process applicable to all
requests.
Conclusion
The issue before the Board is not whether any particular flag is worthy or unworthy of display.
The issue is whether government property should be governed by neutral rules rather than ad hoc
decisions. A content-neutral flag policy would promote fairness, transparency, public
confidence, and legal consistency while reducing the risk of future disputes. Accordingly, I
respectfully request that the Town Board direct the Town Attorney and appropriate staff to
prepare a draft flag display policy for public consideration and adoption”.
Rocco Vallerand, a Webster resident stated, “I am writing in support of the Town of Webster
recognizing Pride Month and raising the Pride Flag at Town Hall. This action sends an
important message to LGBTQIA residents, families, and young people that they are seen, valued,
and welcome in this community. Recognizing Pride Month does not take anything away from
anyone. It simply acknowledges that LGBTQIA people are part of Webster. We are neighbors,
families, taxpayers, students, workers, faith leaders, volunteers, and community members. I
respectfully ask the Town Board to continue standing firm in support of dignity, inclusion, and
respect for all residents. Public leadership should not be shaped only by the loudest or most
negative voices in the room. Please continue recognizing Pride Month and please continue
making Webster a place where every resident and every family can feel safe, respected, and
included.”
8
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Emily Gorman Caraglio, a Webster High School class of 2001 graduate stated, “I am proud of
my hometown for publicly displaying the Pride flag as a sign of love and inclusivity for our
whole community. I grew up in Webster and have chosen to raise my own family in Webster.
Let's keep moving forward as a community and keep finding ways to spread love”.
Tracy Dennis, a Webster resident stated, “I am very proud of the Town Supervisor and the
Town of Webster for raising the Pride flag in recognition of Pride Month. Pride Month
recognizes the many contributions of members of the LGBTQ+ community but it also recognizes
a portion of our community that has been bullied and ridiculed and made to feel "less" for much
too long. A simple flag shows our support for our neighbors who are part of the LGBTQ+
community and those that love them. Everyone, but especially our young people who see that
flag will see a community that supports them being their true selves... why would anyone
question support for Webster's young people? My children grew up in the Webster community
and Webster schools and I was an active volunteer. We encountered so many young people who
longed for safe spaces to be their authentic selves. My home and my children were safe spaces
for these kids and I could not be more proud of my own children for being that to their friends.
These kids who were part of the LGBTQ+ community were smart, kind, talented, beautiful
humans and Webster should be a welcome space for them too. We ALL should be HAPPY
about this flag raising and the only "concern" should be that this wasn't done sooner. To the
Town Board members who are triggered by this flag: If a rainbow triggers you, don't look. But I
encourage you to ask yourself why this is the battle you are waging. No one is asking you to be
gay. We are asking you to let others live their lives and love who they want. If the flag is too
much for you... then go find less. I love Webster and I continue to work tirelessly to support this
community. On June 1, 2026, I stood with a beautiful, kind group of individuals at that flag
raising. I felt such a wonderful sense of community and immense pride for the proclamation the
Town Supervisor read. It was a very proud day for Webster. That is the bottom line... Pride
Month is about creating spaces where ALL Webster residents can be proud of who they are.
Thank you,
A Proud Webster Mother and since some people seem to think it matters... a straight married
woman and registered Republican”.
William Small, a non-Webster resident stated, “I used to be an active member in the youth
community of Webster while I still lived there. Even while I was away at college, I kept up to
date on the Town I grew up in. Being able to attend the raising of the Pride flag outside the
Town Hall was both an honor, but also a slight wake up call. I saw certain members of the
community attempt to disgrace the ceremony by interrupting the proclamation and inserting
themselves into conversations. As a citizen of this nation, I recognize that they have the right to
make their voice heard. But to see this right abused in such a way was disheartening. I
unfortunately bore witness to a member of the community discuss how the Pride flag was a 'kink'
and that something so sexualized should not imposed upon children. I agree with this individual,
over-sexualized content should not be imposed upon children. It is important to note that this
individual was the only one making the event sexualized. I also saw this individual discuss
'ejaculation' while around a child, an action that is antithetical to their claim of wanting to protect
children. During my time at college, I saw close friends of mine fall into deep places because the
communities they were in refused to accept them. My freshman year saw a student end his life
as a result of this. This student was not protected; they were not safe. People who truly believe
9
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
in protecting children would recognize this. I applaud the community of Webster that showed
their support for the raising of the Pride flag, and a special thanks to the Town Supervisor for
overseeing this event. And to those who may oppose this action, I ask you to reflect on whether
your actions are truly protecting the kids you claim to care about”.
“Concerned Resident - Webster Citizens Action League”, stated the following, “The Webster
Citizens Action League is very concerned about the current unilateral actions of the Town
Supervisor with regard to raising any flag at Town Hall that is not the Flag of the United States
or New York State. The action appears capricious and arbitrary, suggesting overt political
motivations unbecoming of an elected official.
The issue here is the not the subject of the flag itself but the authority to raise it and the policy
behind it:
•
•
Any action by the Town that diverges from past practice should be approved by the Town
Board at an open meeting. To do less is to assume powers not provided for under Town
Law.
Should this action still occur (and it should not) then which other flags will the Town fly?
Supreme Court decisions are very clear: A government cannot discriminate on what flags
should be flown. Is the Town prepared for the variety of groups that may want their flag
flown? Why, when law enforcement week just passed, did the Town not fly the Back the
Blue Flag? What process does the Town have in place for groups to apply? WCAL is
aware of other groups and causes that wish their flags flown.
It is clearly understandable how a politician would want to curry favor by supporting a specific
flag. Less clear is if politicians think through these decisions. The right course of action here is
to get approval of the Town Board, clearly define the process by which other groups may ensure
their flags can be flown and ensure that the residents of the Town understand the process”.
Submitted as “Tax Payer”, “I am reaching out to voice my concern about a troubling issue that
has recently come to light: the removal and destruction of books by Kevin Lockhart from our
library, particularly those that address gender identity and LGBTQ+ topics. This situation raises
critical questions about censorship and the accessibility of information within our community. It
seems that Mr. Lockhart's decision to eliminate these books may be influenced by his personal,
cultural, or religious beliefs, which lead him to consider certain content as unsuitable or
detrimental. While I respect that individuals can hold strong views, it’s important to
acknowledge the wider consequences of these actions on our community's access to a variety of
perspectives. The removal of these titles not only restricts access to valuable resources but also
hampers open discussions and understanding of important issues. By eliminating materials that
some might find challenging, we risk fostering an atmosphere where fear and ignorance
overshadow knowledge and acceptance. Moreover, Mr. Lockhart's inclination to control the
narrative around these subjects is troubling. It is vital that our library and Town meetings remain
a space that embraces all voices and viewpoints, rather than being dictated by the beliefs of one
individual. I encourage you to reflect on the necessity of preserving a diverse array of
perspectives in our library and on the Town Board, especially as Mr. Lockhart is likely to secure
10
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
a seat on the Board due to his collected signatures and lack of opposition. Addressing this
situation with care is crucial. Open conversations about these matters are essential to ensuring
our community remains a hub for learning, exploration, and understanding for all. Thank you for
considering my concerns. I hope to see our library continue to promote diversity and inclusivity
in its offerings.”
Florika Dedes, a Webster resident states, “I am a Webster resident, a mother, and have proudly
called Webster home for nearly 40 years. Unfortunately, I am unable to attend tonight's meeting
in person. I respectfully request that this letter be entered into the official record and meeting
minutes and read aloud during public comment. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this
public comment. I am writing in support of the continued display of the LGBTQ+ Pride flag as a
symbol of inclusion, respect, and belonging within our community. As the mother of a child
with special needs, I have come to understand how important it is for people to feel accepted for
who they are. Every day, I hope that my daughter will encounter a world that meets differences
with compassion rather than judgment and understanding rather than exclusion. That hope
extends beyond the disability community. EVERY person deserves to feel that they belong in
the community they call home. To me, the Pride flag is not about politics. It is about people. It
is a visible reminder that our neighbors, friends, family members, and fellow residents are valued
members of this community and deserve to be treated with dignity and respect. The strength of a
community is not measured by how similar its members are, but by how willing it is to welcome
and support people whose experiences may differ from our own. We do not all have to share the
same beliefs or life experiences to recognize the humanity in one another and to treat each other
with kindness. As a parent, I want my daughter to grow up in a Town that teaches acceptance,
empathy, and respect for all people. I want her to see a community that chooses inclusion and
understanding, especially when it would be easier to focus on our differences. The continued
display of the Pride flag sends a simple but meaningful message: that Webster is a place where
all people are welcome and where every resident deserves to be seen, respected, and valued”.
Stefanie Maira, a Webster resident states, “I am writing as a Webster resident to express my
support for flying the Pride flag at Town Hall. To me, this is not about politics. It is about
making sure our neighbors, friends, family members, students, coworkers, and community
members know that they belong here and are valued. A community is strongest when everyone
feels safe, respected, and welcomed. The Pride flag is a symbol of inclusion and visibility for
people who have historically faced discrimination and exclusion. Flying it sends a simple but
meaningful message: Webster is a place where all people matter. As someone who works with
children, I know how important it is for people of all ages to see that they are accepted for who
they are. Small acts of visibility can have a profound impact on a person’s sense of belonging
and worth. I encourage the Town Board to continue supporting efforts that foster kindness,
inclusion, and respect for all Webster residents. We may not all share the same experiences, but
we can share a commitment to treating one another with dignity. Thank you for your time and
service to our community.”
William Small, unknown if still currently a Webster resident states, “As a young member of the
community who grew up in Webster, I would like to express my gratitude for the inclusion of the
Pride flag upon the post outside of the Town Hall. During my time at Webster schools, ending
less than 4 years ago, many of my friends were able to confide in their peers and educators about
various identities of theirs. Having these spaces to express themselves without fear of judgement
11
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
allowed them to continue being extremely successful students; many of which, were top of their
class. While some may disagree with their beliefs, and deny the authenticity of their identity, it
is important to note the substantial evidence that providing safe spaces for students allows them
to be more successful. I have often heard the rhetoric that they are trying to 'protect the kids'.
But if what you are trying to protect them from is helping them succeed and live happier lives,
then do they truly need your protection? Our country prides itself on certain freedoms. Freedom
of speech protects our right to express our beliefs in safe manners. Freedom of religion protects
our right to practice our beliefs in safe manners. And the right to pursue happiness protects our
ability to live our lives the way that is the most fulfilling. No one is denying your right to speak
your voice, but it is antithetical to the Constitution of our nation to deny the right for those you
disagree with to express theirs. I hope some of my words could resonate with those on either
side. And once again, thank you to the Town of Webster for recognizing all of those who have
and continue to fight for the right of free expression.”
***
Resolution No. 195: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve the May 21, 2026 Town Board Workshop Meeting Minutes as submitted by the Town
Clerk.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 196: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilwoman Wright,
to approve the May 21, 2026 Town Board Meeting Minutes as submitted by the Town Clerk.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 197: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to
approve the bills as submitted in Warrant #0626 by the Director of Finance.
Fund
General (A,B) #141-2018
Highway (C,D)
Sewer (G)
Library (L)
Drainage Districts (M)
Park Districts (P)
Special Districts (N,Q,S)
Trust & Agency (T/A,N/SF,T/T,
WEMS)
Capital Projects (H) #037-038
H231 WWTP Upgrade Phase II
H232 Highway Garage Building
Inside
128,159.98
42,941.05
41,583.58
9,068.13
9,750.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
Outside
34,395.19
364.90
41,250.86
5,115.08
0.00
70.21
3,653.97
221,571.27
Card/ACH
4,945.50
4,307.16
29,965.36
224.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
167,500.67
47,613.11
112,799.80
14,407.89
9,750.62
70.21
3,653.97
221,571.27
1,064,162.48
5,510.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,064,162.48
5,510.00
TOTAL
1,301,175.84
306,421.48
12
39,442.70 1,643,386.05
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 198: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve the prepaid vouchers included in Warrant #0626 by the Director of Finance in the
amount of $306,421.48. [Included in the summary of vouchers approved in Resolution #197]
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 199: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve purchase orders as submitted by the Director of Finance.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried ................... 5-0
***
Resolution No. 200: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to
approve the 2026 Budget amendments as presented by the Director of Finance.
Budget Amendments Journal Entry #3
Effective Date 05/19/2026
Line Account Code Department
Previous
Changed Amended
1. A6772.20000 Program for Aging
0.00
159,000.00
159,000.00
2. A7020.20063 Recreation
3,000.00
26,700.00
29,700.00
3. A7110.20064 Park Department
20,000.00
41,700.00
61,700.00
4. A7110.20064 Park Department
20,000.00
75,400.00
95,400.00
5. A430.04089
Federal Aid
(349,000.00) (302,800.00) (651,800.00)
6. G8130.20000 Sewage Treatment/Disposal 215,918.06
217,000.00
432,918.06
7. G599.40092
Appropriated Fund Balance
0.00 (217,000.00) (217,000.00)
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 201: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone,
to grant limited relief from an established stormwater drainage easement at 645 Kayloc Circle.
13
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
WHEREAS, a stormwater drainage easement running through and on the property at 645 Kayloc
Circle, Webster, NY 14580 recorded in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office; and
WHEREAS, Andrew and Melissa Phillips are the owners (the “Owners”) of the property located
at 645 Kayloc Circle, Webster, NY 14580, Tax ID #064.14-2-87; and
WHEREAS, the Owners have applied to install a 6’ privacy fence upon, within and through the
aforesaid easement, and that in the event the placement and/or height of such fence is not in such
conformance, such fence shall not be constructed unless the proper variance(s) is/are received
from the Town of Webster Zoning Board of Appeals; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster has the authority to grant the relief requested, and the public
good will not be harmed thereby:
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1. Pursuant to application of the Owners of the property located at 645 Kayloc Circle, Webster,
NY, Tax ID #064.14-2-87 and in recognition of the hardship created if the relief sought
herein is not granted, the limited detriment to the Town of Webster, and upon consideration
of all relevant factors, the Webster Town Board hereby allows the construction of the
aforesaid privacy fence which will exist upon and encroach upon the easement affecting 645
Kayloc Circle, Town of Webster.
2. This Resolution in no way applies to any other encroachment, violations or relief sought by
the owners, their successors, grantees or assigns from any other building, structure or zoning
violation which may exist on such premises.
3. This relief is granted upon the following conditions:
A. The proposed fence shall encroach upon the said easement as proposed as drawn on the
survey map prepared by Warren R. McGrail and dated May 8, 2013.
B. The proposed fence shall not be expanded to further encroach on or in the easement, nor
will it be moved from its permitted places within the easement as shown on the
Instrument Survey Map presented to the Town Board, and as referenced above.
C. Upon the destruction or demolition of the aforesaid fence or any part of thereof, through
natural causes or otherwise, the Owners of the fence will not reconstruct it without a
specific Resolution of the Town Board authorizing its replacement or reconstruction.
D. The Owners of the fence shall be solely responsible for any damage caused by or to the
fence as a result of the Town’s maintenance of said easement, and the Owners, their
successors and assigns further agree to indemnify, defend and hold the Town harmless
from any and all loss or damage caused to or by the fence as a result of work done by the
Town as a result of reasonable and necessary work done by the Town within said
easement.
E. In the event of an emergency, or if the Town deems it necessary or imperative, the Town
will have the right to remove or take down all or any part of said fence, without recourse
by the Owners or their successors or assigns to such removal or taking down.
14
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
F. This Resolution shall in no way affect the rights, if any, of any other public entities or
public utilities in or to said easement.
4. The record Owners of the fence and the Town of Webster will enter into a licensing
agreement incorporating all the conditions of this Resolution in form and substance as
approved by the Town Attorney, and which will further provide that the Owner, at his
expense, will record the licensing agreement in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 202: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilwoman Wright,
to adopt the Standard Workday and Reporting Resolution for the New York State and Local
Employees’ Retirement System.
That the Town of Webster hereby establishes the following as standard
workdays for elected and appointed officials and will report the following days worked to the
New York State and Local Employees’ Retirement System based on the record of activities
maintained and submitted by these officials to the clerk of this body:
Title
Name
Standard
Work/Day
(Hrs/day)
Appointed Officials:
Town Board
Wagner, Garrett
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Hunter ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
6
Term
1/1/26 – 12/31/28
Days/Month
Record of
Activities
Tier
17.17
6
Councilman Wagner ......... Abstain
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Motion carried ................... 4-1-0
***
Josh Artuso, Director of Community Planning and Development, presented the following
Resolution to the Board for the Town to take dedication of the remaining open space parcels in
Sections 2 and 3 of the Westwood Estate Subdivision. The Communications Department will be
working with Community Planning and will reach out to residents in the area about ongoing
maintenance responsibilities for these open spaces. The developer previously explained the
history and approvals related to the project, and since the project is now nearing completion, the
Town is preparing to formally take ownership of these areas.
Councilwoman Wright asked; since the developer mentioned mowing and maintaining the area
more than twice a year, will this Park District follow the same schedule as other park districts
and be mowed by the Town only twice a year?
Mr. Artuso responded the Town will mow the area at least twice a year, and if residents want
more frequent maintenance or additional improvements, the Town can work with them to
arrange it.
15
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Councilman Wagner asked if this is Park Land or a Park District
Councilwoman Wright responded that the area is designated as a Park District within a
subdivision, meaning the land is intended specifically for the use and enjoyment of the residents
who live in that neighborhood, not for the general public or the entire Town.
Resolution No. 203: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone,
to accept a deed of dedication of three (3) Park District parcels, Tax ID #’s 050.04-1-72.002,
065.02-7-37, and 065.02-7-38 for the Webster West Park District (Westwood Estates).
WHEREAS, a map entitled “Proposed Webster West Subdivision Park District” was prepared by
Marathon Engineering, last dated December 11, 2018; and
WHEREAS, said map, plan and report relating to the establishment of the “Webster West
Subdivision Park District” was received and approved by the Webster Town Board by
Resolution dated March 21, 2019; and
WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board has the authority to accept dedication of land for park
purposes pursuant to New York Town Law 279(4); and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is Type II action under SEQR:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Webster Town Board hereby accepts by deed the dedication of land identified in the
Webster West Subdivision Park District originally approved by the Webster Town Board by
Resolution dated March 21, 2019 and reflected on the map prepared by Marathon Engineering,
last dated December 11, 2018.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Leigh Ann Kimber, Interim Executive Director of the Webster Economic Development
Alliance (WEDA), came before the Board stating the Town received an application on
May 29, 2026 from the Webster Economic Development Alliance to begin roadway
improvements under the Webster Transportation Infrastructure Project, which includes road
rehabilitation, reconstruction, extensions, and a trail along Phillips Road. The Board’s
Resolution tonight is only to declare the Town’s intent to act as the lead agency for the
coordinated SEQRA environmental review. After this declaration, notification will be sent to all
involved entities—such as the village, county, State agencies, Empire State Development, and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. No environmental impact decisions are being made tonight;
the vote simply states that the Town sees itself as the appropriate lead agency for the review
process.
16
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Resolution No. 204: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
declare the intent of the Town of Webster Town Board to be designated as lead agency for the
purposes of New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) related to the
Webster Transportation Improvement Project and direct to the Town Supervisor the Full EAF
Part
1. WHEREAS, the Town of Webster Town Board (hereinafter referred to as “Town Board”) has
reviewed the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) Full
Environmental Assessment Form (“EAF”) Part 1 on the above-referenced Webster
Transportation Improvement Project (hereinafter referred to as “Action”); and
WHEREAS, the Town Board determines that said Action is classified as a Type 1 Action under
the SEQRA Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board determines that said Action is also subject to review and approval
by other involved agencies under the SEQRA Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board determines that it is the most appropriate agency to ensure the
coordination of this Action and will provide written notifications to involved agencies, for the
purposes of conducting a coordinated review and making the determination of significance
thereon under the SEQRA Regulations:
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Town Board does hereby declare its
intent to be designated as the lead agency for the Action and directs the Town Supervisor to sign
and date the Full EAF Part
1. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Town Engineer is directed to provide notice hereof
to the involved and interested agencies, seeking their agreement (or objection thereto) in writing.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 205: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to
approve the 2026 Budget Expenditure Transfers as submitted by the Finance Director.
Budget Expenditure Transfer Journal Entry #2
Effective Date 06/05/2026
Line
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
17
Account Code
A1010.40140
A1010.40000
A1110.20000
A1110.20011
A1310.40007
A1320.40011
A1325.40032
A1325.40043
Department
Town Board
Town Board
Justice Court
Justice Court
Director of Finance
Audit/Accounting
Technology Admin & Maint
Technology Admin & Maint
Previous
0.00
1,500.00
0.00
3,600.00
4,500.00
44,800.00
200.00
0.00
Changed
180.00
(180.00)
1,000.00
(1,000.00)
1,500.00
(1,500.00)
200.00
250.00
Amended
180.00
1,320.00
1,000.00
2,600.00
6,000.00
43,300.00
400.00
250.00
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Line
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
18
Account Code
A1325.40053
A1355.40018
A1355.40036
A1430.20011
A1430.20000
A1910.40070
A1990.40091
A3120.40120
A3120.40128
A3129.20050
A1990.40091
A5010.10039
A5010.40754
A1990.40091
A5185.40194
A5010.40178
A6510.40208
A5187.40198
A7020.10096
A7020.10087
A8989.40007
A8989.40203
A9010.10300
A9030.80010
B1490.40276
B1490.40754
C5130.10072
C5130.20058
C5130.20082
C5130.10116
D5110.10072
D5110.10116
D9050.80018
D9040.80016
G8110.40023
G8110.40113
G1990.40091
G8120.20011
G8120.20095
G8120.40358
G8120.40354
G8130.40234
G8130.40350
G8130.40360
G9011.10300
G9040.80016
L7410.40100
L7410.40152
Department
Previous
Technology Admin & Maint
1,500.00
Assessment
660.00
Assessment
12,000.00
Human Resources
660.00
Human Resources
800.00
Insurance
561,000.00
Contingency
250,000.00
Law Enforcement
0.00
Law Enforcement
100,000.00
Crime Proceeds
34,641.00
Contingency
250,000.00
Highway Superintendent
600.00
Highway Superintendent
55,000.00
Contingency
250,000.00
Cont.-Lake Road District
1,800.00
Highway Superintendent
25,000.00
Veterans Expense
3,500.00
Intersection Lighting
35,000.00
Recreation
0.00
Recreation
165,000.00
Communications
0.00
Communications
19,500.00
Employees
0.00
Social Security
360,000.00
Public Works
6,000.00
Public Works
34,000.00
Equipment
4,320.00
Equipment
145,000.00
Equipment
1,663,662.00
Equipment
229,211.00
General Repairs
24,483.00
General Repairs
678,370.00
Unemployment Insurance
0.00
Workers Compensation
60,000.00
Sewer Administration
0.00
Sewer Administration
0.00
Contingency
40,000.00
Sanitary Sewer
3,500.00
Sanitary Sewer
200,000.00
Sanitary Sewer
2,500.00
Sanitary Sewer
25,000.00
Sewage Treatment/Disposal
200.00
Sewage Treatment/Disposal
0.00
Sewage Treatment/Disposal 115,000.00
Collection
0.00
Workers Compensation
10,000.00
Library
3,000.00
Library
6,500.00
Changed
Amended
(450.00)
1,050.00
600.00
1,260.00
(600.00)
11,400.00
300.00
960.00
(300.00)
500.00
75,000.00
636,000.00
(75,000.00) 175,000.00
100.00
100.00
(100.00)
99,900.00
66,000.00
100,641.00
(66,000.00) 184,000.00
8,000.00
8,600.00
60,000.00
115,000.00
(68,000.00) 182,000.00
5,000.00
6,800.00
(5,000.00)
20,000.00
300.00
3,800.00
(300.00)
34,700.00
11,000.00
11,000.00
(11,000.00) 154,000.00
200.00
200.00
1,100.00
20,600.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
(9,300.00) 350,700.00
2,600.00
8,600.00
(2,600.00)
31,400.00
10,000.00
14,320.00
26,000.00
171,000.00
700.00 1,664,362.00
(36,700.00) 192,511.00
5,000.00
29,483.00
(5,000.00) 673,370.00
7,000.00
7,000.00
(7,000.00)
53,000.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
120.00
120.00
(8,120.00)
31,880.00
2,400.00
5,900.00
(2,400.00) 197,600.00
2,400.00
4,900.00
(2,400.00)
22,600.00
230.00
430.00
300.00
300.00
(530.00) 114,470.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
(6,000.00)
4,000.00
800.00
3,800.00
700.00
7,200.00
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Line Account Code
Department
Previous
Changed
57. L7410.40754
Library
45,000.00
(1,500.00)
58. V9901.90000
Transfer to Other Funds
16,287.00
1.00
59. V9901.90000
Transfer to Other Funds
0.00
719.00
60. V9901.90000
Transfer to Other Funds
20,000.00
(720.00)
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Amended
43,500.00
16,288.00
719.00
19,280.00
Resolution No. 206: MOTION by Councilman Hunter, seconded by Councilman Wagner, to
authorize the Town Supervisor to sign an engagement letter with DeMarco Taylor Law Group to
provide legal representation in Article 78 proceeding involving the Montante Solar Project at a
rate of $250 per hour.
[Contract to be filed in Town Clerk’s Office]
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill .................... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter................... Aye
Councilman Wagner ........... Aye
Motion carried .......................... 5-0
***
The Town Supervisor announced the following Resolution and provided the following
information: the Town of Webster is considering implementing a temporary development
Moratorium. This Moratorium would apply to large-scale solar projects, data centers, large-scale
residential developments (defined as projects with more than five units), and projects in
commercial zones. The Town has already held a workshop and a Public Hearing, and the
proposal was reviewed by the County, which determined it to be a local matter. The Town is
now eligible to move forward with making a decision on the Moratorium.
Councilwoman Wright stated she watched the Planning Board meeting last night and saw an
application that has been reviewed multiple times but has not yet received preliminary approval
and now falls under the proposed Moratorium. Because this project is already active and has
been before the Planning Board, is it still allowed to move forward?
Kyle Taylor, Attorney for the Town, indicated No. The rule is straightforward: only projects that
have already received preliminary approval are allowed to proceed. Any project that has not yet
been granted preliminary approval—regardless of how many times it has appeared before the
Planning Board or Zoning Board—will be subject to the Moratorium.
Councilman Cahill asked if there was an option to request a developer relief from the
Moratorium.
19
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Kyle Taylor, Attorney for the Town, indicated that the Moratorium still allows developers to
request relief from the Town Board. There is a formal provision outlining criteria for reviewing
such requests. However, Board members emphasized that granting an exception must be
approached very carefully because it can set a precedent. Any approval must be supported by a
well-reasoned, clearly documented decision and consistent benchmarks; otherwise, it risks being
viewed as arbitrary and capricious, which could invite legal challenges. Therefore, the Board
must pay close attention to the details and nuances when considering any request for relief.
There was confusion with an earlier email communication about what actions the Town had or
hadn’t taken and what legal counsel had approved. Mr. Taylor clarifies that legal approval
applied only to the process of submitting the Moratorium text to the County Planning Agency, as
required under General Municipal Law 239-m—not to the Resolution itself or the county’s
response. The county stamped the submission as “local”, meaning it found no significant
countywide impact. Board members note that internal email exchanges need clearer
communication going forward so legal approvals are accurately understood.
Councilman Cahill brought up a point that New York State has an agency called, The Office of
Renewable Energy Siting and Electric Transmission (ORES)—within the Department of Public
Services that oversees large-scale solar farms. This office allows major solar developers, often
foreign companies, to bypass local boards when proposing massive projects, sometimes spanning
hundreds of acres. Because of that authority, Councilman Cahill is concerned about the Town’s
limited jurisdiction, though supportive that the Moratorium includes solar farms. Kyle Taylor,
Attorney for the Town, notes they are unfamiliar with this specific agency and will look into it.
The discussion highlights how State-level authority can override local zoning and environmental
rules, raising questions about whether the State’s power also applies to local moratoriums. The
broader concern is the ongoing tension between State and local control over large solar
developments.
Resolution No. 207: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilwoman Wright,
to enact Local Law Number 2 of 2026 Implementing a Moratorium on Certain Permits and
Approval for Certain Development Projects.
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster has experienced growing development pressure in certain
development districts and through certain development activities; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster is currently reviewing and revising its Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHREAS, the Town of Webster desires to complete its review and potential revisions to the
Comprehensive Plan and related Zoning and Planning laws; and
WHEREAS, while completing revisions to the Comprehensive Plan and related zoning and
planning laws, the Town of Webster desires to enact reasonable, temporary measures to halt
certain development activities to maintain the status quo and protect the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board has the authority pursuant to Article 10 of the Municipal Home
Rule Law of the State of New York to adopt and amend local laws not inconsistent with law; and
20
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
WHEREAS, a Notice of this Public Hearing was published in the Webster Herald on
March 25, 2026, and posted on the Town’s website and on the Town Clerk’s Bulletin Board at
1000 Ridge Road, Webster, New York; and
WHEREAS, a hearing on this matter has been held on April 2 2026, at 7:30 p.m. at the Webster
Town Board Meeting Room, 1002 Ridge Road, Webster, New York, and all interested persons
have been heard; and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is a “TYPE II” action under the New York State Environmental
Quality Review Act, it being routine or continuing agency administration and management, not
including new programs or major reordering of priorities that may affect the environment:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. Enact Local Law No. 2 of 2026 Implementing a moratorium on certain permits and approval
for certain development projects.
2. Such Local Law will be designated as:
LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2026
This law is entitled "A local law to Implementing a Moratorium on certain permits and approvals
for certain development projects”.
This local law shall take effect upon filing with the Secretary of State.
Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Webster as follows:
Section
1. Title.
This local law shall be known as “Local Law No. 2 of the year 2026, A Moratorium on certain
permits and approvals for certain development projects”.
Section
2. Legislative Intent.
The Town of Webster has experienced growing development pressure in certain development
districts and through certain development activities. The Town Board recognizes that temporary,
reasonable measures must be implemented to halt these development activities within the Town
to maintain the status quo and protect the public interest while the Town Board completes its
review and potential revisions to the Town’s Comprehensive Plan and related Zoning and
Planning Laws.
The Town’s Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2008. Since that time, the Town has
experienced tremendous growth and significant changes. The Town Board finds that the current
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning and Planning Laws are inadequate to protect and preserve the
Town of Webster’s unique character and attributes while accommodating appropriate growth.
The Town Board desires to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the desired
growth and development of the Town. To assist in this matter, the Town Board has retained the
services of a third-party consultant to review the Town’s Comprehensive Plan and to provide
recommendations and amendments and to assist in drafting the updated Comprehensive Plan. It
is expected that the draft Comprehensive Plan will be completed within the next six to seven
21
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
months. Therefore, the Town Board has determined that this Moratorium should be adopted for
a certain amount of time, as set forth herein, to accommodate the time needed to complete the
update to the Comprehensive Plan and related changes to the Town’s Zoning and Planning Laws,
including all necessary public hearings, referrals to interested agencies, and filing of laws with
the New York State Secretary of State.
Section
3. Authority.
The Town Board enacts this Moratorium pursuant to its authority to adopt local laws under
Article IX of the New York State Constitution, Municipal Home Rule Law Section 10, and the
general powers vested with the Town of Webster to promote the health, safety, and welfare of all
the residents and property owners in the Town of Webster.
Section
4. Definitions.
Unless otherwise defined in this Local Law, all terms used herein shall have the same meaning
as defined in the Town of Webster Town Code.
Section
5. Affected Properties and Development Activities.
This Moratorium shall be applicable only to the subdivision of land resulting in more than 4
parcels of land, large scale solar projects, data centers (“Development Activities”), and all real
property located in the Town of Webster’s Office Park North District (O-P), Medium Intensity
Commercial District (MC), High Intensity Commercial District (HC), CO Commercial Outdoor
Storage District (CO), and Low Intensity Commercial District (LC-1 and LC-2) as identified on
the Town’s Zoning Map last dated May 2021 (“Affected Properties”).
Section
6. Scope.
Subject to any exceptions set forth in Section 6 herein, no board, commission, agency,
department, officer, employee, consultant, or agent of the Town of Webster shall process,
review, approve, hold a hearing or meeting, or make any decision upon an application and/or
appeal for any new site plan, subdivision plan, or Special Permit during the duration of this
Moratorium for any of the Affected Properties and Development Activities.
Section
7. Duration.
This Moratorium shall expire without further action of the Town Board six months following the
effective date hereof and thereafter shall be of no force or effect. However, the Town Board
may, by Resolution, extend the period of this Moratorium for up to two additional three-month
extensions.
Section
8. Exceptions.
This Moratorium shall not apply to any of the following:
A. Development applications that have received Preliminary Site Plan or Special Permit
approval as of the effective date of this Local Law.
B. Development applications for the redevelopment or rehabilitation of existing structures.
C. Development applications related to ordinary repairs, maintenance, or interior renovations.
22
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
Section
9. Administrative Relief for Moratorium.
The Town Board is authorized to grant limited relief from this Moratorium pursuant to the
standards set forth herein.
A. An application for relief from the terms of this moratorium may be submitted, with a $150
fee, to the Town Clerk.
B. An applicant seeking relief from this Moratorium shall be required to demonstrate by clear
and convincing evidence, including dollars and cents proof, that the applicant is unable to
make any reasonable use of its property as a result of this Moratorium; that this Moratorium
causes irreparable injury to the applicant; and that it would be unreasonable and unjust not to
grant relief from this Moratorium.
C. In the event relief from this Moratorium is granted by the Town Board, the applicant shall
proceed to all other Town boards and/or employees to apply for all required approvals. Any
application granted relief from this Moratorium shall be required to comply with all land use
regulations and other requirements in effect as of the date of approval.
Section
10. Suspension and Supersession of Other Law.
All local laws that conflict with the provisions of this Moratorium are hereby superseded and
suspended for the Duration of this Moratorium. This Moratorium also supersedes, amends, and
takes precedence over any inconsistent provisions of New York State Town Law under the
Town’s Municipal Home Rule powers, pursuant to Municipal Home Rule Law §§
10(1)(ii)(d)(3), 10(1)(ii)(a)(14) and
22. In particular, this Moratorium supersedes any
inconsistent provisions of Article 16 New York State Town Law, including, but not limited to,
New York Town Law §§ 267, 267-a, 267-b, 274-a, 274-b, 276, and
277. To the extent that any
provision of law imposes a time frame for action by a municipal entity, board or body so that a
default approval will result from inaction, the time for any action required by any agency or body
of the Town shall be and is hereby extended until this Moratorium and all extensions thereof
have expired. No default approval shall be deemed to have taken place regarding any application
for any approval concerning land use development by reason of this Moratorium being in effect.
Section
11. Severability.
If any section, subsection, clause, phrase or other portion of this Local Law is, for any reason,
declared invalid, in whole or in part, by a court, agency, commission, legislative body or other
authority of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and
independent portion. Such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
hereof, which other portions continue in full force and effect.
Section
12. New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR).
This Local Law constitutes a Type II Action under SEQR because it constitutes the adoption of a
moratorium on land development or construction. As such, this action is not subject to review
under SEQR.
Section
13. Effective Date.
This Local Law shall take effect immediately when it is filed with the New York State Secretary
of State in accordance with Section 27 of the Municipal Home Rule Law.
23
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
The Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to take such action as may be necessary to
carry this Resolution into effect.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Rick Kenealy, Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief Operator, explained the below Resolution.
During the early stages of the Wastewater Treatment Plant Project, the team reduced costs by
removing certain work, such as painting, with the intention of completing it in-house. The
budget already includes a line item for summer help, but the Town does not yet have an actual
position established. He is requesting that the Board create this temporary summer position so
the hired individual can assist with painting, cleaning, and groundskeeping for about two and a
half months. The work would be paid slightly above minimum wage, costing roughly $4,600 out
of the $13,000 already budgeted.
Resolution No. 208: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to
approve the addition of one “Summer Help” position for roughly 2.5 months in an amount not to
exceed $13,000.00 to the 2026 list of authorized positions.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Councilman Wagner .......... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
The Board discussed the need to clarify the process for adding emailed public comments to the
official record. When a resident submits a comment through the website form or emails the
board requesting that it be added to the record, the Town Clerk should be included so the
comment can be entered into the minutes of the next Town Board meeting. These written
submissions are made available online in the Town Board Meeting Minutes but are not read
aloud during the meeting.
Board members note that recent email exchanges raised questions about how anonymous
submissions should be handled. They agree that the Town should establish a clear policy, since
past practice has allowed anonymous comments. This aligns with internal email discussions
where the Town Clerk highlighted that other Towns within Monrow County either accept
anonymous comments, exclude them, or include but do not read them aloud. The Board
acknowledges that past practice in Webster has been to include anonymous submissions in the
minutes, but they express concerns about issues such as fraudulent names or personal attacks,
and agree a formal, consistent policy is needed going forward.
***
Resolution No. 209: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Wagner, to
approve the following for recycling from the Assessment Office:
24
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
• 4-Drawer Filing Cabinet
• 72” Hutch- part of men’s desk
• File Cabinet
• Modular Desk Unit
• 2-Drawer Lateral File
• 5-Drawer Lateral File
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Asset Tag #001203
Asset Tag #003014
Asset Tag #003183
Asset Tag #003265
Asset Tag #003809
Asset Tag #003810
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Resolution No. 210: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Wagner, to
approve the following item for transfer from the Assessment Office to the Sewer Department:
• 3-Drawer Lateral File Cabinet
• 4-Shelf Wooden Bookcase
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Asset Tag #003421
Asset Tag #003188
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
Councilman Cahill introduced a Resolution which was not on the meeting agenda, to establish a
Town Flag Policy. Supervisor Scialdone questioned whether it functions as a local law requiring
a Public Hearing. Kyle Taylor, Attorney for the Town, clarified that it is a Resolution, not a
code change, since the Town currently has no formal flag policy.
The proposed Resolution states that only the American flag and New York State flag should be
flown on Town-owned properties. It was confirmed that there are three flagpoles on the Town
Hall campus (Challenger Miracle Field, Webster Athletic Association (WAA), and the Town
Hall). This raised concerns about locations such as the Challenger Miracle Field, which flies its
own flag despite being on Town-owned property. Supervisor Scialdone noted that these partners
are stakeholders and should be consulted.
Because of these uncertainties, especially defining which properties and locations are affected,
Councilman Wagner suggested narrowing the proposal to apply only to the Town Hall campus
for now and continuing the discussion over the next two weeks to refine details.
Resolution No. 211: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Councilman Wagner, to
create a defined flag policy.
WHEREAS, the Town of Webster does not currently have a defined flag policy:
25
06-04-2026
Webster Town Board
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
The Town of Webster Flag Policy shall be as follows; the American and New York State Flags
shall be the official flags and the only flags of the Town of Webster to be displayed on properties
owned by the Town of Webster.
Said Flag Policy shall take effect on Friday, June 5, 2026.
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Nay
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Nay
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Motion carried .................. 3-2
***
Resolution No. 212: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to
approve the following item for transfer from the Town Clerk’s office to Records Management:
• Microfiche Reader
Vote on motion:
Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye
Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye
Councilman Wagner………Aye
Asset Tag #3108
Councilman Cahill ............ Aye
Councilman Hunter ........... Aye
Motion carried .................. 5-0
***
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at
9:00 p.m.
____________________________________
Danene M. Marr, Town Clerk
26
06-04-2026