Planning Board Meeting
Planning Minutes 2023.07.11

Minutes

July 11, 2023 · 41 min read · extracted text · View original

WEBSTER TOWN PLANNING BOARD MINUTES

PLACE

Webster Town Board Meeting Room 1002 Ridge Road

TIME

7:00 p.m.

DATE

I1 July 2023

PRESENT

ABSENT:

Anthony Casciani, Chairman

Dave Malta, Vice Chairman

Mark Giardina, Secretary

Derek Anderson

John Kosel

Derek Meixeli

Jennifer Wright

Josh Artuso, Director of Community Development

Katherine Kolich, Recording Secretary

Kyle Taylor, Attorney

*** PEF ASE NOTE: The night of this meeting, July 11, 2023 we were

having technical difficulties. These minutes will only reflect what was

voted and written on the board motion forms and the parts that were

captured while recording***

Anthony Casciani

Welcome to the July 11 2023 Webster Planning Board meeting. Please join

us in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Roll call

Summary overview of outcome:

SCHEDULED MATTERS

:

PUFF N’ STUFF SMOKE SHOP-SIGN

Applicant

Mohammed Alsalafi

Status

TABLED TO AUGUST 1, 2023

GREEN TEA ESTHETICS-SIGN

Applicant

Grace Bertou

Status

APPROVED AS PRESENTED

RIDGE TERRACE PUB & GRILL-SIGN

Applicant

Jessica Costa

Status

APPROVED FOR 18 SQ. FT., NORTH FACING SIGN ONLY

Pg. 176 Aluly tL, 2023, Planning Meeting

IN TRUTH METAL HEALTH-SIGN

Applicant

Jessica Costa

Status

APPROVED AS PRESENTED

TAKE 5 OIL CHANGE-SIGN

Applicant

Evan Gefell

Status

APPROVED MODICATION WITH DRAWING DATED JULY 10, 2023

BANK OF AMERCIA LIGHTING UPGRADES

Applicant

Project Expediters

Status

APPROVED AS PRESENTED

1450 ENGLISH OAK DRIVE-ACCESSORY STRUCTURE

Applicant

Patrick Meredith

Status

APPROVED AS PRESENTED

1432 SCHLEGEL ROAD-ACCESSORY STRUCTURE

Applicant

Joseph & Sue Trottier

Status

TABLED TO AUGUST 1, 2023

243 PEBBLE BEACH TRAIL-ACCESSORY STRUCTURE

Applicant

Ted Hosmer

Status

SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, PROCEED TO ZONING BOARD FOR VARIANCES

(Mark Giardina read the first application):

PUFF N’ STUFF SMOKE SHOP SIGN: Located at 950 Ridge Road. Applicant Mohammed

Alsalafi is requesting SIGN APPROVAL to allow the installation of a 24.8 SF building mounted

sign within the Webster Square Plaza on a 37.91]- acre parcel having SBL# 079. 15-1-1.312 located

in an HC High Intensity Commercial District under Section 265-7 of the Code of the Town of

Webster. APPLICANT DID NOT SHOW.

RESOLUTION 23-072 John Kose] made a motion to TABLED

APPLICATION TO AUGUST 1, 2023 which was

seconded by Dave Malta.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

Pg. 177 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

(Mark Giardina read the second application):

GREEN TEA ESTHETICS SIGN

Located at 668 Ridge Road. Applicant Grace Bertou is

requesting SIGN APPROVAL associated with the installation of a 7 SF monument sign ona

0.97-acre parcel having SBL# 078.20-1-38 located in an MC Medium Intensity Commercial

District under Section 265-7 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Grace Bertou. (She explained her sign and what she was

proposing)

Derek Anderson:

RESOLUTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Grace Bertou to replace a

7 SF panel in an existing monument sign for Green Tea Esthetics located at 668 Ridge Road ona

0.97- acre parcel having SBL# 078.20- 1-38.

The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section

617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject

to further review.

RESOLUTION 23-073 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE II

SEQR which was seconded by Dereck Meixell.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-074 John Kosel a made a motion for SIGN

APPROVAL Located at 668 Ridge Road.

Applicant Grace Bertou is requesting SIGN

APPROVAL associated with the installation of a7

SF monument sign on a 0.97-acre parcel having

SBL# 078.20- 1-38 located in an MC Medium

Intensity Commercial District under Section 265

7 of the Code of the Town of Webster which was

seconded by Mark Giardina.

Pg. 178 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

(Mark Giardina read the third application):

RIDGE TERRACE PUB & GRILL SIGN: Located at 1839 Ridge Road. Applicant Jessica

Costa is requesting SIGN APPROVAL associated with the installation of a 28.3 SF building

mounted sign on a 2.60-acre parcel having SBL# 081.01-1-28.21 located in an LL Large Lot

Single Family Residential District under Section 265-7 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Jessica Costa. (She indicated they are only requesting the north

facing sign at 18 feet)

Derek Anderson:

RESOLUTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Jessica Costa to install a

28.3 SF building mounted sign for Ridge Terrace Pub & Grill located at 1839 Ridge Road on a

2,60-acre parcel having SBL# 081.01-1-28.21.

The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section

617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject

to further review.

RESOLUTION 23-075 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE II

SEQR which was seconded by Jennifer Wright.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE’

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

Pe. 179 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

[

RESOLUTION 23-076 John Kosel a made a motion for SIGN

APPROVAL Located at 668 Ridge Road.

Applicant Grace Bertou is requesting SIGN

APPROVAL associated with the installation of a 7

SF monument sign on a 0.97-acre parcel having

SBL# 078.20-1-38 located in an MC Medium

Intensity Commercial District under Section 265

7 of the Code of the Town of Webster which was

seconded by Jennifer Wright.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

(Mark Giardina read the fourth application):

IN TRUTH MENTAL HEALTH SIGN

Located at 807 Ridge Road, Ste.

201. Applicant

Jessica Costa is requesting SIGN APPROVAL associated with the installation of a 13.8 SF

building mounted sign with the Webster Woods Plaza on a 3.54-acre parcel having SBL#

079,18-1-69.11 located in an MC Medium Intensity Commercial District under Section 265-7

of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Jessica Costa. (She explained her sign and what she was

proposing)

Derek Anderson:

RESOLUTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Jessica Costa to install a

13.8 SF building mounted sign for In Truth Mental Health located at 807 Ridge Road, Suite

201 within the Webster Woods Plaza, on a 3.54-acre parcel having SBL# 079. 18-1-69.11.

The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section

617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject

to further review.

Pg. 180 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

RESOLUTION 23-077 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE II

fi SEQR which was seconded by Derek Meixell.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-078 John Kosel a made a motion for SIGN

APPROVAL Located at 807 Ridge Road, Ste.

201. Applicant Jessica Costa is requesting SIGN

APPROVAL associated with the installation of a

13.8 SF building mounted sign with the Webster

Woods Plaza on a 3.54-acre parcel having SBL#

079.18-1-69.11 located in an MC Medium

Intensity Commercial District under Section 265-

7 of the Code of the Town of Webster which was

seconded by Derek Meixell.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

(Mark Giardina read the fifth application):

TAKE 5 OIL CHANGE SIGNAGE: Located at 1045 Ridge Road. Applicant Evan Gefell is

requesting SIGN APPROVAL to allow the installation of (2) building mounted facade signs,

(1) monument sign and instructional / directional wayfinding signage associated with the

construction of a Take Five Oil Change facility on a 1.25-acre parcel having SBL # 079. 15-1-

8.009 located in an MC Medium Intensity Commercial District under Section 269-11 and 265-

7 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Evan Gefell. (He asked that the modifications be made to

drawing dated 7.10.23)

[ Pe. 18! uly 14, 2023, Planning Meeting

Derek Anderson:

MOTION FOR UNLISTED ACTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Quattro Development to

construct a 1,600-sf oil changing facility on a 1.25-acre parcel located at 1045 Ridge Road

having SBL # 079.15-1-8.009.

The Planning Board determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action under Part 617:

State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR).

The Planning Board determined that the action is subject to a single agency review pursuant to

Part 617.6(b)(1) of SEQR and that it is the most appropriate agency for making the determination

of significance. The Planning Board therefore designates itself lead agency for the proposed

action.

The Planning Board has given consideration to the criteria for determining significance as set

forth in Section 617.7(c)(1) of SEQR, and has

1. considered the information contained in the Short Environmental Assessment Form Part

1 dated April 12, 2023,

2. considered public comments directed to the Planning Board during the Public Hearing on

June 6, 2023, and

3. completed Parts 2 and 3 of the Environmental Assessment Form.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING

BOARD hereby determines that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse effect on

the environment for the reasons set forth in the attached Notice of Determination of Non-

Significance; be it further,

RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD is authorized to take all

actions reasonable and necessary to file the Negative Declaration and discharge the TOWN OF

WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD’S responsibility as lead agency for this action, be it further,

RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, based on the information

and analysis above, the referenced supporting documentation, and discussions of the action by

the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD as documented by the Minutes for this

meeting, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant environmental impacts, be

it further,

RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, therefore makes a

DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, be it further,

RESOLVED, that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, based on the above reasons

issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION as evidence of its determination.

Py. 182 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

TAKE 5 OIL CHANGE

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE

The Planning Board has reasonably concluded the following results from the proposed action,

when compared against the criteria in Section 617.7(c):

I.

2.

10. I,

12.

13.

14,

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in air quality since it does

not include a regulated emission source.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in ground or surface

water quality or quantity since the proposed action includes storm water detention

systems designed in accordance with New York State Department of Environmental

Conservation standards.

Water will be supplied by the Monroe County Water Authority which has adequate

capacity to support the action.

Wastewater will be treated by the Town of Webster which has adequate capacity to

support the action.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in potential for erosion,

flooding, leaching or drainage problems. The project will conform to NYSDEC storm

water management and control.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in existing solid waste

production since the facility produces minimal solid wastes.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in existing noise, odor or

light since the action is being developed in accordance with Town of Webster standards.

A temporary increase in noise levels consistent with normal construction activities is

anticipated during construction.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change, or cumulative change

since the proposed action is contained on a single parcel. Traffic generated is anticipated

to be minimal.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse impact on the criteria listed under

Section 617(c)(1)(ii) of SEQR because no habitats or threatened or endangered species

were identified on or contiguous to the proposed site.

The proposed action is not located in an area designated as a Critical Environmental Area

by the Town of Webster or New York State pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g) of SEQR.

The proposed action is not in material conflict with the Town of Webster 2008

Comprehensive Plan.

The proposed action will not create an impairment of the criteria listed under Section

617(c)(1)(¥) of SEQR since the action is not located in or adjacent to the listed resources

and is in character with the surrounding community.

The action will not result in a major change in the type or use of energy since the action

is for the construction of a single structure housing an oil change facility.

The action will not create a hazard to human health since it does not contain nor is it

located adjacent to an existing source of hazardous substances or contaminants. Waste

oil will be collected and the site and temporally store in accordance with NYSDEC

guidelines.

Pg. 183 /July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

15. The action will not create a substantial change in use of the land since the action 1s

consistent with zoning for the land, the existing community character, and the Town of

Webster 2008 Comprehensive Plan.

16. The action will not attract a large number of people for more than a few days when

compared to taking no action since the action involves the creation of nine new parcels

and does not create areas that will attract a large number of people.

17. The action will not create a cumulative impact on the environment as listed under

617(c)(1)(x), (xi), and (xil) of SEQR.

RESOLUTION 23-080

VOTE:

(Mark Giardina read the sixth application):

Anthony Casciani made a motion for

MODIFICATION APPROVAL Located at

1045 Ridge Road. Applicant Evan Gefell is

requesting SIGN APPROVAL to allow the

installation of (2) building mounted fagade signs,

(1) monument sign and instructional / directional

wayfinding signage associated with the

construction of a Take Five Oil Change facility on

a 1.25-acre parcel having SBL # 079.15-1-8.009

located in an MC Medium Intensity Commercial

District under Section 269-11 and 265-7 of the

Code of the Town of Webster which was

seconded by Mark Giardina.

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

BANK OF AMERICA LIGHTING UPGRADES

Located at 980 Ridge Road. Applicant

Project Expediters is requesting PRELIMINARY / FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL

(

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated with proposed lighting upgrades surrounding Bank of America

within the Webster Plaza on a 17.03- acre parcel having SBL# 079.15-1-3.1 located in an HC

High Intensity Commercial District under Section 269-11! of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was a representative for Project Expediters.

Po. 184 July (1. 2023, Planning Meeting

Derek Anderson:

RESOLUTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Project Expediters to

upgrade site lighting surrounding Bank of America located at 980 Ridge Road within the

Webster Plaza on a 17.03- acre parcel having SBL# 079.15-1-3.1.

The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section

617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject

to further review.

RESOLUTION 23-081

Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE I

SEQR which was seconded by Derek Meixell.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr, Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-082

LIMI

1. Subject to PRC comments

RY APPROVAL

Dave Malta a made a motion for

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Located at 980

Ridge Road. Applicant Project Expediters is

requesting PRELIMINARY PLAN

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated

with proposed lighting upgrades surrounding Bank

of America within the Webster Plaza ona 17.03-

acre parcel having SBL# 079.15-1-3.1 located in

an HC High Intensity Commercial District under

Section 269-11 of the Code of the Town of

Webster which was seconded by Mark Giardina.

2. All the improvements shall be constructed according to the specification of the

Town of Webster.

RY

Comply with all requirements of any State, County, or Town agency.

Approvals are subject to Drawing No: Dated: AS PRESENTED

5. Proceed to Final approval.

Pg. 185 Aluly 11, 2023, Planning Mceting

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-082 Dave Malta a made a motion for FINAL

APPROVAL Located at 980 Ridge Road.

Applicant Project Expediters is requesting

FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL (PUBLIC

HEARING) associated with proposed lighting

upgrades surrounding Bank of America within the

Webster Plaza ona 17.03- acre parcel having

SBL# 079.15-1-3.1 located in an HC High

CHECKLIST FOR FINAL APPROVAL

I.

oS)

Intensity Commercial District under Section 269-

11 of the Code of the Town of Webster which was

seconded by John Kosel.

Subject to Project Review Committee comments

Subject to Preliminary Approval conditions.

Subject to all applicable governmental fees.

Subject to Department of Public Works approvals.

Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the

Planning Board, to expire on 7.1 1.2024

The conditions of Preliminary and Final approval are depicted on the cover page

of the final designed plans.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

Pe. 186 July $1, 2023, Planning Meeting

Mark Giardina read the seventh application):

1450 ENGLISH OAK DRIVE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE: Located at 1450 English Oak

Drive. Applicant Patrick Meredith is requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated with the construction of 24’ x 24’ accessory

structure with an 8’ x 24 covered overhang (768 SF total) on a 0.92-acre parcel having SBL#

050.04- 1-88.11 located in an R-3 Single Family Residential District under Sections 269-11 and

350-36 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Patrick Meredith. (He explained the scope of the project and

why it was needed)

Derek Anderson:

RESOLUTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Patrick Meredith to

construct a 24’ x 24” accessory structure with an 8’ x 24’ covered overhang (768 SF total) on a

0.92-acre parcel located at 1450 English Oak Drive having SBL# 050.04-1-88.11.

The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section

617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject

to further review.

RESGLUTION 23-083 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE II

SEQR which was seconded by Derek Meixell.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-084 Dave Malta a made a motion for

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Located at 1450

English Oak Drive. Applicant Patrick Meredith is

requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE

PLAN APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

)

associated with the construction of 24’ x 24’

accessory structure with an 8’ x 24’ covered

overhang (768 SF total) on a 0.92-acre parcel

having SBL# 050.04-1-88.11 located in an R-3

Single Family Residential District under Sections

Pg. 187 Auty 11, 2023, Planning Mecting

269-11 and 350-36 of the Code of the Town of

Webster which was seconded by Derek Meixell.

PRELIMINARY_APPROVAL

The lot is restricted to one accessory building

The building is to conform to the size and location presented on the plan

The placement of the building shall conform to all setback requirements

The building shall not be placed nearer to the front property line than the rear

line or footprint of the main building or residence upon the lot.

No point on the building will be higher than the existing structure

No commercial use shall occur on the parcel

7. The accessory building shall be used for personal use only, as defined by Town

Code

8. Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning

Board, to expire on 7-11-24.

9. Comply with all requirements of any State, County, and Town agency

10. All site work is to be in compliance with the standards of the Town of Webster

11. Subject to all engineering and governmental approvais

12. Subject to all appropriate governmental fees

13. Subject to resolution of final approved minutes

fwWnN >

ene

RESOLUTION 23-085

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

Dave Malta a made a motion for FINAL

APPROVAL Located at 1450 English Oak

Drive. Applicant Patrick Meredith is requesting

PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated

with the construction of 24’ x 24’ accessory

structure with an 8’ x 24’ covered overhang (768

SF total) on a 0.92-acre parcel having SBL#

050.04-1-88.11 located in an R-3 Single Family

Residential District under Sections 269-11 and

350-36 of the Code of the Town of Webster

which was seconded by Derek Meixell.

Pg. 188 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

;

CHECKLIST FOR FINAL APPROVAL

1. Subject to Project Review Committee comments

2. Subject to Preliminary Approval conditions.

3. Subject to all applicable governmental fees.

4. Subject to Department of Public Works approvals.

5. Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning

Board, to expire on 7.11.24

6. The conditions of Preliminary and Final approval are depicted on the cover page

of the final designed plans.

7. Subject to resolution of final approved minutes.

8. Approvals are subject to Drawing No: Dated: JUNE 19, 2023

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

Mark Giardina read the eighth application):

1242 LAKE ROAD ACCESSORY APARTMENT / GARAGE EXPANSION: Located at

1242 Lake Road. Applicant Matt Lester is requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated with the expansion of an existing detached

accessory structure and construction of an accessory apartment on a 3.26- acre parcel having

SBL# 050.05-1-10 located in an R-1 Single Family Residential District under Sections 269-1 1,

350-36 and 350-50 of the Code of the Town of Webster. Applicant requests waiver for overall

size of accessory apartment (maximum of 500 SF permitted, 1016 SF being proposed).

Appearing before the board was Betsy Brugg and Evan Gefell with Costich and the homeowner

Matt Lester is here tonight. You have seen this proposal to expand his carriage house the

Planning Board issued a favorable recommendation to the Zoning Board which needed to grant

(wo area variances which if fact were already granted a couple weeks ago so we are now back to

get approval and | think the one thing that changed is there was a little discussion about the

interpretation of the code at the Zoning Board meeting so that was kind of re-framed, if I get this

right, they decided to call it an accessory structure apartment maybe that was the boards decision

so in addition to asking for your approval, we are requesting a waiver for the size of the

structure. Nothing has changed with the application. It is a high-quality project, and it is Matt’s

home, and he is planning for his family to live in this structure while they do a massive

renovation of there primary residence. They love living on the lake and there whole life revolves

around living on the lake and they intend for this to be something that there family uses.

Going forward, as far as any impact, in respect to the waiver 6:09 the code requires that board

considers any health safety and impact on the environment and neighbors. We have

provided communications from two neighbors from the west who are both aware of this. One of

Pg, 189 /July 11, 2023, Planning Mecting

them has a similar type of structure and the neighbors don’t have any issue. The closest most

immediate neighbor to the west who would be most affected if anything were to be affected is on

board with it and has given there consent. Essentially there is a structure there and it is going to

push a little closer to the room but essentially it is still going to be over three hundred feet from

the road and if anything, it is going to be kind of cute and adorable with a little porch and from

the outside it is going to look like a carriage garage. It will j just have some living space. So, it

should be just replacing what if there in essentially the same spot and come a little bit further

forward to. It will be just a pretty little structure and he has a substantial piece of property, and

it wouldn’t have any impact on any neighbor. Matt owns the barn across the street, and | believe

there is a group home but also a good distance so it shouldn’t impact anyone, and it will not

change the character of the neighborhood in any way. These structures are coming to be more

common along the lake.

Jennifer Wright

I have a question and J] don’t know if this came up last time because we talked

about the guests, and it says it wouldn’t be used to accommodate guests just family; not short

time rental.

Matt Lester

Will have friends, my wife and I have friends that live out of town that we hope to

invite or show up now and they will stay there.

Jennifer Wright

But not for Airbnb or short-term rentals?

Matt Lester

No that is not something that we are interested in.

Betsy Brugg

It is not a commercial project.

Jennifer Wright

There are a lot of Airbnb’s that are in peoples basements now, so. They come

in all flavors.

Matt Lester

INAUDIBLE (not at the mic)

Anthony Casciani

We saw this before and it went to the Zoning Board and received it’s

variances and back here for preliminary site plan approval and are we going to have to doa

separate motion for the waiver or just included in the preliminary?

Kyle Taylor

It can be included in the preliminary,

Anthony Casciani

It’s a public hearing but does anyone here have anything to say first?

Board

No

Anthony Casciani

Would anyone like to speak to this application? Not seeing anyone we will

return it back to the board and close the public hearing.

Pg, 190 Auly 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

Mark Giardina

We are talking 1242 Lake Road, right?

Anthony Casciani

Yes, nothing has changed, and he has his variances, and we were ok with it.

Ok, want to move forward.

Derek Anderson:

RESOLUTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Matt Lester to expand an

existing detached accessory structure and construction of an accessory apartment located at 1242

Lake Road on a 3.26-acre parcel having SBL # 050.05- 1-10.

The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section

617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject

to further review.

RESOLUTION 23-086 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE I

SEQR which was seconded by Dave Jennifer

Wright.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-087 Dave Malta a made a motion for

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Located at 1242

Lake Road. Applicant Matt Lester is requesting

PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated

with the expansion of an existing detached

accessory structure and construction of an

accessory apartment on a 3.26- acre parcel having

SBL# 050.05- 1-10 located in an R-1 Single

Family Residential District under Sections 269-

11, 350-36 and 350-50 of the Code of the Town

of Webster. Applicant requests waiver for overall

size of accessory apartment (maximum of 500 SF

permitted, 1016 SF being proposed) which was

seconded by Derek Meixell.

Pe. 191 July 11,2023. Planning Meeting

Jennifer Wright

The number is different in the announcement than it is on the plans.

Betsy Brugg

So, I am not sure which number that they put in the announcement. Just to be

totally clear, the structure, the entire size of the structure is 2085 feet, and the footprint is 1069

and I believe the 1016 is the second-floor residential space and that dimension is on the

drawing on the east elevation.

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

1.

2.

3. Sd ae

Subject to PRC comments

Subject to the determination of the ZBA for requested variances (If applicable).

All the improvements shall be constructed according to the specification of the

Town of Webster.

All sitework is to be in compliance with the standards of the Town of Webster.

Comply with all requirements of any State, County, or Town agency.

Approvals are subject to Drawing No: Job # 822-085

Proceed to Final approval.

Waiver for 500 sq ft to 1016 sq ft

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-088

Dave Malta a made a motion for FINAL

APPROVAL Located at 1242 Lake Road.

Applicant Matt Lester is requesting

PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated

with the expansion of an existing detached

accessory structure and construction of an

accessory apartment on a 3.26- acre parcel having

SBL# 050.05-1-10 located in an R-! Single

Family Residential District under Sections 269

11, 350-36 and 350-50 of the Code of the Town

of Webster. Applicant requests waiver for overall

size of accessory apartment (maximum of 500 SF

permitted, 1016 SF being proposed)which was

seconded by John Kosel.

Pe. 192 July 11,2023, Planning Meeting

[

CHECKLIST FOR FINAL APPROVAL

cer A MP YN SD

Subject to Project Review Committee comments

Subject to Preliminary Approval conditions.

Subject to all applicable governmental fees.

Subject to Department of Public Works approvals.

Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning

Board, to expire on 6.6.204

The conditions of Preliminary and Final approval are depicted on the cover page

of the final designed plans.

Subject to resolution of final approved minutes.

Approvals are subject to Drawing No: Job # 822-085

To be used for personal use only.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr, Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

Mark Giardina read the eighth application):

1432 SCHLEGEL ROAD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE: Located at 1432 Schlegel Road.

Applicant Joseph & Sue Trottier is requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated with the construction of a 1,680 SF accessory

structure on a 1.29-acre parcel having SBL# 065.02-1-3.4 located in an R-3 Single Family

Residential District under Sections 269-11 and 350-36 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

APPLICANT REQUESTED TO TABLE APPLICATION TO AUGUST 1, 2023.

RESOLUTION 23-089 Derek Anderson made a motion to TABLED

APPLICATION TO AUGUST 1, 2023 which was

seconded by Dave Malta.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

Pg. 193 /July 14, 2023, Planning Meeting

Mark Giardina read the eighth application):

243 PEBBLE BEACH TRAIL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE: Located at 243 Pebble Beach

Trail. Applicant Ted Hosmer is requesting SKETCH PLAN REVIEW associated with the

renovation and expansion of an existing accessory structure on a 1.64-acre parcel having SBL#

078.13-1-12-11 located in an R-3 Single Family Residential District under Section 350-36 of

the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Ted Hosmer and I live at 243 Pebble Beach, and I purchased the

property back in 2003. The garage was built in the 70’s and IJ think they had extremely compact

cars because nothing now a days would have necessarily be able to go into it. There has been

some damage to the building through water and what not and animals. About ten years ago |

asked a local designer to go through the property and make some recommendations and this is

what he came up with and for the past four years we have been going through approvals with

DEC and we finally reached it.

Anthony Casciani

You got your variances, didn’t you?

Ted Hosmer

I am going before the Zoning Board next week.

Anthony Casciani

And you have DEC and have the permits.

Ted Hosmer

Yes

Anthony Casciani

And the intent. It looks like a house but what is it? Is it a workshop you are

putting in there?

Ted Hosmer

It is built like a carriage house sort of speak. It’s a detached garage and it’s going

to be a wood shop.

Jennifer Wright

Is there a loft and living space?

Ted Hosmer

It is for storage. The house literally has no closets, and I am amazed of how simple

they lived back then. It has been an interesting endeavor.

Dave Malta

Actually, it looks more like a house than a garage facility.

Derek Anderson

It does have a second story to it, right?

Ted Hosmer

Yes, it does.

Derek Anderson

It is just not included in our set of plans.

Ted Hosmer

I gave it to the gentleman in Engineering before I was able to give him the DEC

permit which actually had the upper floor.

Py. 194 uly 11, 2023, Planning Mecting

Derek Anderson

And that upper floor is just all storage?

Ted Hosmer

Storage, yes. 1 am into every type of sport you could imagine. I do everything from

dog training to snowmobiling to waterskiing and it just seems like we can never have enough

space.

Anthony Casciani

Ok, so the bottom line is it is not for rental or to use for income or rent?

Ted Hosmer

No. Initially my parents were alive, and I was planning ahead for them and since

then my mother has passed, and my father is 95 and he is where he’s at right now.

Anthony Casciani

Now I don’t know what the variance actually for. Do you know what it is

Josh?

Josh Artuso

Yes, there is a couple. He needs a side setback variance as well as to legalize

having a second accessory structure on the parcel because I believe there is one down the

shoreline and for the placement. I know it’s a very irregularly shaped lot, but it is technically

not behind the front wall of the building so there are two to three variances that he applied for.

Anthony Casciani

Alright. So, in that case, we really can’t act on it.

Jennifer Wright

It is just a sketch plan .

Anthony Casciani

Yes, that is all it is. That is what | am saying. We can’t act on it; he has to get

his variance. Alright, so you are going to go to the Zoning Board next meeting?

Ted Hosmer

Yes, next Tuesday.

ADMINISTRATIVE MATTER

No Minutes were approved

Anthony Casciani

We need to make a motion for the lead agency ts generally taken by the

Planning Board and the Town Board and in this case, the Town Board has chosen to take lead

agency on this project. (FAIRLIFE) and one of the criteria’s is a letter to the participants and

they have 30 days to respond, the county, the state, federal and so on and so forth. If they are

taking it, we should be a respondent so I am recommending we do a letter of recommendation

that we accept the fact that they are taking lead agency for the project so we will call that a

motion. Anthony Casciani made the motion, Mark Giardina seconded it.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Pg, 195 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting,

Mr. Giardina AYE

Mrs. Wright AYE

Josh Artuso

Earlier I distributed the extensive sheet index for the plans for the FAIRLIFE

project. We are expecting to receive it later this week. So, I did go over it with Mr. Casciani and

obviously these plans are going to be hard to read on the I1 x 17 scale, so they are probably

going to be larger in nature, not the full size, tablecloths as you like to refer to them but

something kind of in between to make sure you are able to read and see certain things. We kind

of went through this list and identified what we thought the Planning Board members would be

most interested in.

Anthony Casciani

Do you have that sheet that I marked up; I don’t have it.

Josh Artuso

Ido. So, ] could go through it and if anyone feels strongly and they would like

additional information than Katherine and I can work to get that to you. Either

electronically......we are expecting it to be a very volumes mission so il 1s going to be

challenging to do it how we normally do it in regards to providing ten copies of everything but if

there are specific things that you all are interested in, that I don’t mention, just reach out to us

and we will certainly get you whatever specific plan sheets that you are interested in but for the

overall group, we have identified the:

e The cover sheet COO!

e The overall site plan

e The overall existing conditions plan...then we skipped down because I guess it is on

multiple pages, because there is multiple parcels involved but then we go back to the

overall

Geometry plan

Overall utility plan

Overall grading and drainage plan

Overall initial erosion and sediment contro} plan

Overall final erosion and sediment control plan

Overall line of sight plan C220

Grading and drainage profile

Utility details

Overall landscaping plan

Landscaping details

So, if there is any specific portion of the site or if you want to drill in deeper, and you want a

closer look to any particular on one of these indexes, we can accommodate that but as the normal

distribute of what I just read, that is what they are going to be providing in hard copy form.

Derek Anderson

(not speaking loud enough and hard to hear) The overall sheets identify

everything, and they are the best one.

Ps, 196 /July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

Anthony Casciani

When Josh and I were going through it, I could see, I mean the utility details,

that is more engineering stuff and that is nothing that we need to get to involved in. Sanitary

sewer profiles? That is engineering details, right? Unless there is something you guys want.

Jennifer Wright

Did you say the overall vs the detail?

Josh Artuso

Yes, we have identified most of the overall.

Jennifer Wright

There are all these pages, but we are just getting the overalls?

Josh Artuso

Correct. If there is anything within there that you notice or want to see closer than

you can request that and will get it to you.

Board having conversations.

Josh Artuso

In terms of and J did send an email regarding this, SEQR and I know Derek

downloaded the full document electronically because it is literally almost a foot thick hard copy

so if any of you would like portions of that like the traffic study results, noise, lighting, if you

want copies of those, we can also get that to you as well.

Anthony Casciani

Personally, I think their traffic study, I mean the way they engineered it, they

show all these numbers and how many turns there are, that doesn’t make any sense to me. J

know the reality of what is there, and I want someone up there to be speaking about what they

are proposing to do and again, I am going to bring it up again is they are claiming they don’t

need a stop light and the extension coming over to Salt Road and I am going to argue that they

do need a stop light there with those trucks pulling out there onto Salt Road, it will be a disaster.

It’s already bad there now. We have talked about this, down by Schlegel Road there it’s

ridiculous down there and now they are proposing this and with that new subdivision down the

road there. With these trucks coming ultimately there will be able to come out onto Salt Road.

Jennifer Wright

Is that the one that is just through and then there is only a one way stop?

Anthony Casciani

Yes, it should have a stop light there.

Board having conversations.

Anthony Casciani

But I think that is one of the things that...

Josh Artuso

Their traffic study basically said that the existing counts don’t warrant a four-way

signal, but it would have two stop signs on either side of Salt Road and the traffic on Salt would

have no INAUDIBLE (someone speaking over), but the trucks would have a stop sign coming

out of Xerox.

Anthony Casciant

Another words, they are creating a situation just like Schlegel and Salt.

Pg. 197 /July 11, 2023, Planning Mceting

Josh Artuso

Yes, il was very surprising.

Anthony Casciani

It’s ridiculous. We will argue that.

Board having conversations.

With no other applications before the Board this evening Anthony Casciani concluded tonight’s

meeting at 9:30 PM.

Respectfully Submitted,

Signed A Jin. L

Dated sl, [vs

Mark Giardina, Secretary

Katherine Kolich, Recording Secretary

Pe. 198 /July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting

End of document