WEBSTER TOWN PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
Webster Town Board Meeting Room 1002 Ridge Road
7:00 p.m.
I1 July 2023
ABSENT:
Anthony Casciani, Chairman
Dave Malta, Vice Chairman
Mark Giardina, Secretary
Derek Anderson
John Kosel
Derek Meixeli
Jennifer Wright
Josh Artuso, Director of Community Development
Katherine Kolich, Recording Secretary
Kyle Taylor, Attorney
*** PEF ASE NOTE: The night of this meeting, July 11, 2023 we were
having technical difficulties. These minutes will only reflect what was
voted and written on the board motion forms and the parts that were
captured while recording***
Welcome to the July 11 2023 Webster Planning Board meeting. Please join
us in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll call
Summary overview of outcome:
SCHEDULED MATTERS
:
PUFF N’ STUFF SMOKE SHOP-SIGN
Mohammed Alsalafi
TABLED TO AUGUST 1, 2023
GREEN TEA ESTHETICS-SIGN
Grace Bertou
APPROVED AS PRESENTED
RIDGE TERRACE PUB & GRILL-SIGN
Jessica Costa
APPROVED FOR 18 SQ. FT., NORTH FACING SIGN ONLY
Pg. 176 Aluly tL, 2023, Planning Meeting
IN TRUTH METAL HEALTH-SIGN
Jessica Costa
APPROVED AS PRESENTED
TAKE 5 OIL CHANGE-SIGN
Evan Gefell
APPROVED MODICATION WITH DRAWING DATED JULY 10, 2023
BANK OF AMERCIA LIGHTING UPGRADES
Project Expediters
APPROVED AS PRESENTED
1450 ENGLISH OAK DRIVE-ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
Patrick Meredith
APPROVED AS PRESENTED
1432 SCHLEGEL ROAD-ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
Joseph & Sue Trottier
TABLED TO AUGUST 1, 2023
243 PEBBLE BEACH TRAIL-ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
Ted Hosmer
SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, PROCEED TO ZONING BOARD FOR VARIANCES
(Mark Giardina read the first application):
PUFF N’ STUFF SMOKE SHOP SIGN: Located at 950 Ridge Road. Applicant Mohammed
Alsalafi is requesting SIGN APPROVAL to allow the installation of a 24.8 SF building mounted
sign within the Webster Square Plaza on a 37.91]- acre parcel having SBL# 079. 15-1-1.312 located
in an HC High Intensity Commercial District under Section 265-7 of the Code of the Town of
Webster. APPLICANT DID NOT SHOW.
RESOLUTION 23-072 John Kose] made a motion to TABLED
APPLICATION TO AUGUST 1, 2023 which was
seconded by Dave Malta.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
Pg. 177 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting
(Mark Giardina read the second application):
Located at 668 Ridge Road. Applicant Grace Bertou is
requesting SIGN APPROVAL associated with the installation of a 7 SF monument sign ona
0.97-acre parcel having SBL# 078.20-1-38 located in an MC Medium Intensity Commercial
District under Section 265-7 of the Code of the Town of Webster.
Appearing before the board was Grace Bertou. (She explained her sign and what she was
proposing)
Derek Anderson:
RESOLUTION
Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Grace Bertou to replace a
7 SF panel in an existing monument sign for Green Tea Esthetics located at 668 Ridge Road ona
0.97- acre parcel having SBL# 078.20- 1-38.
The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section
617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject
to further review.
RESOLUTION 23-073 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE II
SEQR which was seconded by Dereck Meixell.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
RESOLUTION 23-074 John Kosel a made a motion for SIGN
APPROVAL Located at 668 Ridge Road.
Applicant Grace Bertou is requesting SIGN
APPROVAL associated with the installation of a7
SF monument sign on a 0.97-acre parcel having
SBL# 078.20- 1-38 located in an MC Medium
Intensity Commercial District under Section 265
7 of the Code of the Town of Webster which was
seconded by Mark Giardina.
Pg. 178 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
(Mark Giardina read the third application):
RIDGE TERRACE PUB & GRILL SIGN: Located at 1839 Ridge Road. Applicant Jessica
Costa is requesting SIGN APPROVAL associated with the installation of a 28.3 SF building
mounted sign on a 2.60-acre parcel having SBL# 081.01-1-28.21 located in an LL Large Lot
Single Family Residential District under Section 265-7 of the Code of the Town of Webster.
Appearing before the board was Jessica Costa. (She indicated they are only requesting the north
facing sign at 18 feet)
Derek Anderson:
RESOLUTION
Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Jessica Costa to install a
28.3 SF building mounted sign for Ridge Terrace Pub & Grill located at 1839 Ridge Road on a
2,60-acre parcel having SBL# 081.01-1-28.21.
The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section
617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject
to further review.
RESOLUTION 23-075 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE II
SEQR which was seconded by Jennifer Wright.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE’
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
Pe. 179 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting
[
RESOLUTION 23-076 John Kosel a made a motion for SIGN
APPROVAL Located at 668 Ridge Road.
Applicant Grace Bertou is requesting SIGN
APPROVAL associated with the installation of a 7
SF monument sign on a 0.97-acre parcel having
SBL# 078.20-1-38 located in an MC Medium
Intensity Commercial District under Section 265
7 of the Code of the Town of Webster which was
seconded by Jennifer Wright.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
(Mark Giardina read the fourth application):
Located at 807 Ridge Road, Ste.
201. Applicant
Jessica Costa is requesting SIGN APPROVAL associated with the installation of a 13.8 SF
building mounted sign with the Webster Woods Plaza on a 3.54-acre parcel having SBL#
079,18-1-69.11 located in an MC Medium Intensity Commercial District under Section 265-7
of the Code of the Town of Webster.
Appearing before the board was Jessica Costa. (She explained her sign and what she was
proposing)
Derek Anderson:
RESOLUTION
Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Jessica Costa to install a
13.8 SF building mounted sign for In Truth Mental Health located at 807 Ridge Road, Suite
201 within the Webster Woods Plaza, on a 3.54-acre parcel having SBL# 079. 18-1-69.11.
The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section
617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject
to further review.
Pg. 180 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting
RESOLUTION 23-077 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE II
fi SEQR which was seconded by Derek Meixell.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
RESOLUTION 23-078 John Kosel a made a motion for SIGN
APPROVAL Located at 807 Ridge Road, Ste.
201. Applicant Jessica Costa is requesting SIGN
APPROVAL associated with the installation of a
13.8 SF building mounted sign with the Webster
Woods Plaza on a 3.54-acre parcel having SBL#
079.18-1-69.11 located in an MC Medium
Intensity Commercial District under Section 265-
7 of the Code of the Town of Webster which was
seconded by Derek Meixell.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
(Mark Giardina read the fifth application):
TAKE 5 OIL CHANGE SIGNAGE: Located at 1045 Ridge Road. Applicant Evan Gefell is
requesting SIGN APPROVAL to allow the installation of (2) building mounted facade signs,
(1) monument sign and instructional / directional wayfinding signage associated with the
construction of a Take Five Oil Change facility on a 1.25-acre parcel having SBL # 079. 15-1-
8.009 located in an MC Medium Intensity Commercial District under Section 269-11 and 265-
7 of the Code of the Town of Webster.
Appearing before the board was Evan Gefell. (He asked that the modifications be made to
drawing dated 7.10.23)
[ Pe. 18! uly 14, 2023, Planning Meeting
Derek Anderson:
MOTION FOR UNLISTED ACTION
Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Quattro Development to
construct a 1,600-sf oil changing facility on a 1.25-acre parcel located at 1045 Ridge Road
having SBL # 079.15-1-8.009.
The Planning Board determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action under Part 617:
State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR).
The Planning Board determined that the action is subject to a single agency review pursuant to
Part 617.6(b)(1) of SEQR and that it is the most appropriate agency for making the determination
of significance. The Planning Board therefore designates itself lead agency for the proposed
action.
The Planning Board has given consideration to the criteria for determining significance as set
forth in Section 617.7(c)(1) of SEQR, and has
1. considered the information contained in the Short Environmental Assessment Form Part
1 dated April 12, 2023,
2. considered public comments directed to the Planning Board during the Public Hearing on
June 6, 2023, and
3. completed Parts 2 and 3 of the Environmental Assessment Form.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING
BOARD hereby determines that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse effect on
the environment for the reasons set forth in the attached Notice of Determination of Non-
Significance; be it further,
RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD is authorized to take all
actions reasonable and necessary to file the Negative Declaration and discharge the TOWN OF
WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD’S responsibility as lead agency for this action, be it further,
RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, based on the information
and analysis above, the referenced supporting documentation, and discussions of the action by
the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD as documented by the Minutes for this
meeting, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant environmental impacts, be
it further,
RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, therefore makes a
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, be it further,
RESOLVED, that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, based on the above reasons
issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION as evidence of its determination.
Py. 182 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting
TAKE 5 OIL CHANGE
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
The Planning Board has reasonably concluded the following results from the proposed action,
when compared against the criteria in Section 617.7(c):
I.
2.
10. I,
12.
13.
14,
The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in air quality since it does
not include a regulated emission source.
The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in ground or surface
water quality or quantity since the proposed action includes storm water detention
systems designed in accordance with New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation standards.
Water will be supplied by the Monroe County Water Authority which has adequate
capacity to support the action.
Wastewater will be treated by the Town of Webster which has adequate capacity to
support the action.
The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in potential for erosion,
flooding, leaching or drainage problems. The project will conform to NYSDEC storm
water management and control.
The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in existing solid waste
production since the facility produces minimal solid wastes.
The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in existing noise, odor or
light since the action is being developed in accordance with Town of Webster standards.
A temporary increase in noise levels consistent with normal construction activities is
anticipated during construction.
The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change, or cumulative change
since the proposed action is contained on a single parcel. Traffic generated is anticipated
to be minimal.
The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse impact on the criteria listed under
Section 617(c)(1)(ii) of SEQR because no habitats or threatened or endangered species
were identified on or contiguous to the proposed site.
The proposed action is not located in an area designated as a Critical Environmental Area
by the Town of Webster or New York State pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g) of SEQR.
The proposed action is not in material conflict with the Town of Webster 2008
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed action will not create an impairment of the criteria listed under Section
617(c)(1)(¥) of SEQR since the action is not located in or adjacent to the listed resources
and is in character with the surrounding community.
The action will not result in a major change in the type or use of energy since the action
is for the construction of a single structure housing an oil change facility.
The action will not create a hazard to human health since it does not contain nor is it
located adjacent to an existing source of hazardous substances or contaminants. Waste
oil will be collected and the site and temporally store in accordance with NYSDEC
guidelines.
Pg. 183 /July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting
15. The action will not create a substantial change in use of the land since the action 1s
consistent with zoning for the land, the existing community character, and the Town of
Webster 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
16. The action will not attract a large number of people for more than a few days when
compared to taking no action since the action involves the creation of nine new parcels
and does not create areas that will attract a large number of people.
17. The action will not create a cumulative impact on the environment as listed under
617(c)(1)(x), (xi), and (xil) of SEQR.
RESOLUTION 23-080
VOTE:
(Mark Giardina read the sixth application):
Anthony Casciani made a motion for
MODIFICATION APPROVAL Located at
1045 Ridge Road. Applicant Evan Gefell is
requesting SIGN APPROVAL to allow the
installation of (2) building mounted fagade signs,
(1) monument sign and instructional / directional
wayfinding signage associated with the
construction of a Take Five Oil Change facility on
a 1.25-acre parcel having SBL # 079.15-1-8.009
located in an MC Medium Intensity Commercial
District under Section 269-11 and 265-7 of the
Code of the Town of Webster which was
seconded by Mark Giardina.
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
Located at 980 Ridge Road. Applicant
Project Expediters is requesting PRELIMINARY / FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
(
PUBLIC HEARING
) associated with proposed lighting upgrades surrounding Bank of America
within the Webster Plaza on a 17.03- acre parcel having SBL# 079.15-1-3.1 located in an HC
High Intensity Commercial District under Section 269-11! of the Code of the Town of Webster.
Appearing before the board was a representative for Project Expediters.
Po. 184 July (1. 2023, Planning Meeting
Derek Anderson:
RESOLUTION
Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Project Expediters to
upgrade site lighting surrounding Bank of America located at 980 Ridge Road within the
Webster Plaza on a 17.03- acre parcel having SBL# 079.15-1-3.1.
The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section
617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject
to further review.
RESOLUTION 23-081
Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE I
SEQR which was seconded by Derek Meixell.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr, Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
RESOLUTION 23-082
LIMI
1. Subject to PRC comments
RY APPROVAL
Dave Malta a made a motion for
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Located at 980
Ridge Road. Applicant Project Expediters is
requesting PRELIMINARY PLAN
APPROVAL (
PUBLIC HEARING
) associated
with proposed lighting upgrades surrounding Bank
of America within the Webster Plaza ona 17.03-
acre parcel having SBL# 079.15-1-3.1 located in
an HC High Intensity Commercial District under
Section 269-11 of the Code of the Town of
Webster which was seconded by Mark Giardina.
2. All the improvements shall be constructed according to the specification of the
Town of Webster.
RY
Comply with all requirements of any State, County, or Town agency.
Approvals are subject to Drawing No: Dated: AS PRESENTED
5. Proceed to Final approval.
Pg. 185 Aluly 11, 2023, Planning Mceting
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
RESOLUTION 23-082 Dave Malta a made a motion for FINAL
APPROVAL Located at 980 Ridge Road.
Applicant Project Expediters is requesting
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL (PUBLIC
HEARING) associated with proposed lighting
upgrades surrounding Bank of America within the
Webster Plaza ona 17.03- acre parcel having
SBL# 079.15-1-3.1 located in an HC High
CHECKLIST FOR FINAL APPROVAL
I.
oS)
Intensity Commercial District under Section 269-
11 of the Code of the Town of Webster which was
seconded by John Kosel.
Subject to Project Review Committee comments
Subject to Preliminary Approval conditions.
Subject to all applicable governmental fees.
Subject to Department of Public Works approvals.
Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the
Planning Board, to expire on 7.1 1.2024
The conditions of Preliminary and Final approval are depicted on the cover page
of the final designed plans.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
Pe. 186 July $1, 2023, Planning Meeting
Mark Giardina read the seventh application):
1450 ENGLISH OAK DRIVE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE: Located at 1450 English Oak
Drive. Applicant Patrick Meredith is requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN
APPROVAL (
PUBLIC HEARING
) associated with the construction of 24’ x 24’ accessory
structure with an 8’ x 24 covered overhang (768 SF total) on a 0.92-acre parcel having SBL#
050.04- 1-88.11 located in an R-3 Single Family Residential District under Sections 269-11 and
350-36 of the Code of the Town of Webster.
Appearing before the board was Patrick Meredith. (He explained the scope of the project and
why it was needed)
Derek Anderson:
RESOLUTION
Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Patrick Meredith to
construct a 24’ x 24” accessory structure with an 8’ x 24’ covered overhang (768 SF total) on a
0.92-acre parcel located at 1450 English Oak Drive having SBL# 050.04-1-88.11.
The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section
617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject
to further review.
RESGLUTION 23-083 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE II
SEQR which was seconded by Derek Meixell.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
RESOLUTION 23-084 Dave Malta a made a motion for
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Located at 1450
English Oak Drive. Applicant Patrick Meredith is
requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE
PLAN APPROVAL (
PUBLIC HEARING
)
associated with the construction of 24’ x 24’
accessory structure with an 8’ x 24’ covered
overhang (768 SF total) on a 0.92-acre parcel
having SBL# 050.04-1-88.11 located in an R-3
Single Family Residential District under Sections
Pg. 187 Auty 11, 2023, Planning Mecting
269-11 and 350-36 of the Code of the Town of
Webster which was seconded by Derek Meixell.
PRELIMINARY_APPROVAL
The lot is restricted to one accessory building
The building is to conform to the size and location presented on the plan
The placement of the building shall conform to all setback requirements
The building shall not be placed nearer to the front property line than the rear
line or footprint of the main building or residence upon the lot.
No point on the building will be higher than the existing structure
No commercial use shall occur on the parcel
7. The accessory building shall be used for personal use only, as defined by Town
Code
8. Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning
Board, to expire on 7-11-24.
9. Comply with all requirements of any State, County, and Town agency
10. All site work is to be in compliance with the standards of the Town of Webster
11. Subject to all engineering and governmental approvais
12. Subject to all appropriate governmental fees
13. Subject to resolution of final approved minutes
fwWnN >
ene
RESOLUTION 23-085
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
Dave Malta a made a motion for FINAL
APPROVAL Located at 1450 English Oak
Drive. Applicant Patrick Meredith is requesting
PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN
APPROVAL (
PUBLIC HEARING
) associated
with the construction of 24’ x 24’ accessory
structure with an 8’ x 24’ covered overhang (768
SF total) on a 0.92-acre parcel having SBL#
050.04-1-88.11 located in an R-3 Single Family
Residential District under Sections 269-11 and
350-36 of the Code of the Town of Webster
which was seconded by Derek Meixell.
Pg. 188 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting
;
CHECKLIST FOR FINAL APPROVAL
1. Subject to Project Review Committee comments
2. Subject to Preliminary Approval conditions.
3. Subject to all applicable governmental fees.
4. Subject to Department of Public Works approvals.
5. Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning
Board, to expire on 7.11.24
6. The conditions of Preliminary and Final approval are depicted on the cover page
of the final designed plans.
7. Subject to resolution of final approved minutes.
8. Approvals are subject to Drawing No: Dated: JUNE 19, 2023
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
Mark Giardina read the eighth application):
1242 LAKE ROAD ACCESSORY APARTMENT / GARAGE EXPANSION: Located at
1242 Lake Road. Applicant Matt Lester is requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN
APPROVAL (
PUBLIC HEARING
) associated with the expansion of an existing detached
accessory structure and construction of an accessory apartment on a 3.26- acre parcel having
SBL# 050.05-1-10 located in an R-1 Single Family Residential District under Sections 269-1 1,
350-36 and 350-50 of the Code of the Town of Webster. Applicant requests waiver for overall
size of accessory apartment (maximum of 500 SF permitted, 1016 SF being proposed).
Appearing before the board was Betsy Brugg and Evan Gefell with Costich and the homeowner
Matt Lester is here tonight. You have seen this proposal to expand his carriage house the
Planning Board issued a favorable recommendation to the Zoning Board which needed to grant
(wo area variances which if fact were already granted a couple weeks ago so we are now back to
get approval and | think the one thing that changed is there was a little discussion about the
interpretation of the code at the Zoning Board meeting so that was kind of re-framed, if I get this
right, they decided to call it an accessory structure apartment maybe that was the boards decision
so in addition to asking for your approval, we are requesting a waiver for the size of the
structure. Nothing has changed with the application. It is a high-quality project, and it is Matt’s
home, and he is planning for his family to live in this structure while they do a massive
renovation of there primary residence. They love living on the lake and there whole life revolves
around living on the lake and they intend for this to be something that there family uses.
Going forward, as far as any impact, in respect to the waiver 6:09 the code requires that board
considers any health safety and impact on the environment and neighbors. We have
provided communications from two neighbors from the west who are both aware of this. One of
Pg, 189 /July 11, 2023, Planning Mecting
them has a similar type of structure and the neighbors don’t have any issue. The closest most
immediate neighbor to the west who would be most affected if anything were to be affected is on
board with it and has given there consent. Essentially there is a structure there and it is going to
push a little closer to the room but essentially it is still going to be over three hundred feet from
the road and if anything, it is going to be kind of cute and adorable with a little porch and from
the outside it is going to look like a carriage garage. It will j just have some living space. So, it
should be just replacing what if there in essentially the same spot and come a little bit further
forward to. It will be just a pretty little structure and he has a substantial piece of property, and
it wouldn’t have any impact on any neighbor. Matt owns the barn across the street, and | believe
there is a group home but also a good distance so it shouldn’t impact anyone, and it will not
change the character of the neighborhood in any way. These structures are coming to be more
common along the lake.
I have a question and J] don’t know if this came up last time because we talked
about the guests, and it says it wouldn’t be used to accommodate guests just family; not short
time rental.
Will have friends, my wife and I have friends that live out of town that we hope to
invite or show up now and they will stay there.
But not for Airbnb or short-term rentals?
No that is not something that we are interested in.
It is not a commercial project.
There are a lot of Airbnb’s that are in peoples basements now, so. They come
in all flavors.
INAUDIBLE (not at the mic)
We saw this before and it went to the Zoning Board and received it’s
variances and back here for preliminary site plan approval and are we going to have to doa
separate motion for the waiver or just included in the preliminary?
It can be included in the preliminary,
It’s a public hearing but does anyone here have anything to say first?
No
Would anyone like to speak to this application? Not seeing anyone we will
return it back to the board and close the public hearing.
Pg, 190 Auly 11, 2023, Planning Meeting
We are talking 1242 Lake Road, right?
Yes, nothing has changed, and he has his variances, and we were ok with it.
Ok, want to move forward.
Derek Anderson:
RESOLUTION
Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Matt Lester to expand an
existing detached accessory structure and construction of an accessory apartment located at 1242
Lake Road on a 3.26-acre parcel having SBL # 050.05- 1-10.
The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section
617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject
to further review.
RESOLUTION 23-086 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE I
SEQR which was seconded by Dave Jennifer
Wright.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
RESOLUTION 23-087 Dave Malta a made a motion for
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Located at 1242
Lake Road. Applicant Matt Lester is requesting
PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN
APPROVAL (
PUBLIC HEARING
) associated
with the expansion of an existing detached
accessory structure and construction of an
accessory apartment on a 3.26- acre parcel having
SBL# 050.05- 1-10 located in an R-1 Single
Family Residential District under Sections 269-
11, 350-36 and 350-50 of the Code of the Town
of Webster. Applicant requests waiver for overall
size of accessory apartment (maximum of 500 SF
permitted, 1016 SF being proposed) which was
seconded by Derek Meixell.
Pe. 191 July 11,2023. Planning Meeting
The number is different in the announcement than it is on the plans.
So, I am not sure which number that they put in the announcement. Just to be
totally clear, the structure, the entire size of the structure is 2085 feet, and the footprint is 1069
and I believe the 1016 is the second-floor residential space and that dimension is on the
drawing on the east elevation.
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
1.
2.
3. Sd ae
Subject to PRC comments
Subject to the determination of the ZBA for requested variances (If applicable).
All the improvements shall be constructed according to the specification of the
Town of Webster.
All sitework is to be in compliance with the standards of the Town of Webster.
Comply with all requirements of any State, County, or Town agency.
Approvals are subject to Drawing No: Job # 822-085
Proceed to Final approval.
Waiver for 500 sq ft to 1016 sq ft
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
RESOLUTION 23-088
Dave Malta a made a motion for FINAL
APPROVAL Located at 1242 Lake Road.
Applicant Matt Lester is requesting
PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN
APPROVAL (
PUBLIC HEARING
) associated
with the expansion of an existing detached
accessory structure and construction of an
accessory apartment on a 3.26- acre parcel having
SBL# 050.05-1-10 located in an R-! Single
Family Residential District under Sections 269
11, 350-36 and 350-50 of the Code of the Town
of Webster. Applicant requests waiver for overall
size of accessory apartment (maximum of 500 SF
permitted, 1016 SF being proposed)which was
seconded by John Kosel.
Pe. 192 July 11,2023, Planning Meeting
[
CHECKLIST FOR FINAL APPROVAL
cer A MP YN SD
Subject to Project Review Committee comments
Subject to Preliminary Approval conditions.
Subject to all applicable governmental fees.
Subject to Department of Public Works approvals.
Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning
Board, to expire on 6.6.204
The conditions of Preliminary and Final approval are depicted on the cover page
of the final designed plans.
Subject to resolution of final approved minutes.
Approvals are subject to Drawing No: Job # 822-085
To be used for personal use only.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr, Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
Mark Giardina read the eighth application):
1432 SCHLEGEL ROAD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE: Located at 1432 Schlegel Road.
Applicant Joseph & Sue Trottier is requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN
APPROVAL (
PUBLIC HEARING
) associated with the construction of a 1,680 SF accessory
structure on a 1.29-acre parcel having SBL# 065.02-1-3.4 located in an R-3 Single Family
Residential District under Sections 269-11 and 350-36 of the Code of the Town of Webster.
APPLICANT REQUESTED TO TABLE APPLICATION TO AUGUST 1, 2023.
RESOLUTION 23-089 Derek Anderson made a motion to TABLED
APPLICATION TO AUGUST 1, 2023 which was
seconded by Dave Malta.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
Pg. 193 /July 14, 2023, Planning Meeting
Mark Giardina read the eighth application):
243 PEBBLE BEACH TRAIL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE: Located at 243 Pebble Beach
Trail. Applicant Ted Hosmer is requesting SKETCH PLAN REVIEW associated with the
renovation and expansion of an existing accessory structure on a 1.64-acre parcel having SBL#
078.13-1-12-11 located in an R-3 Single Family Residential District under Section 350-36 of
the Code of the Town of Webster.
Appearing before the board was Ted Hosmer and I live at 243 Pebble Beach, and I purchased the
property back in 2003. The garage was built in the 70’s and IJ think they had extremely compact
cars because nothing now a days would have necessarily be able to go into it. There has been
some damage to the building through water and what not and animals. About ten years ago |
asked a local designer to go through the property and make some recommendations and this is
what he came up with and for the past four years we have been going through approvals with
DEC and we finally reached it.
You got your variances, didn’t you?
I am going before the Zoning Board next week.
And you have DEC and have the permits.
Yes
And the intent. It looks like a house but what is it? Is it a workshop you are
putting in there?
It is built like a carriage house sort of speak. It’s a detached garage and it’s going
to be a wood shop.
Is there a loft and living space?
It is for storage. The house literally has no closets, and I am amazed of how simple
they lived back then. It has been an interesting endeavor.
Actually, it looks more like a house than a garage facility.
It does have a second story to it, right?
Yes, it does.
It is just not included in our set of plans.
I gave it to the gentleman in Engineering before I was able to give him the DEC
permit which actually had the upper floor.
Py. 194 uly 11, 2023, Planning Mecting
And that upper floor is just all storage?
Storage, yes. 1 am into every type of sport you could imagine. I do everything from
dog training to snowmobiling to waterskiing and it just seems like we can never have enough
space.
Ok, so the bottom line is it is not for rental or to use for income or rent?
No. Initially my parents were alive, and I was planning ahead for them and since
then my mother has passed, and my father is 95 and he is where he’s at right now.
Now I don’t know what the variance actually for. Do you know what it is
Josh?
Yes, there is a couple. He needs a side setback variance as well as to legalize
having a second accessory structure on the parcel because I believe there is one down the
shoreline and for the placement. I know it’s a very irregularly shaped lot, but it is technically
not behind the front wall of the building so there are two to three variances that he applied for.
Alright. So, in that case, we really can’t act on it.
It is just a sketch plan .
Yes, that is all it is. That is what | am saying. We can’t act on it; he has to get
his variance. Alright, so you are going to go to the Zoning Board next meeting?
Yes, next Tuesday.
No Minutes were approved
We need to make a motion for the lead agency ts generally taken by the
Planning Board and the Town Board and in this case, the Town Board has chosen to take lead
agency on this project. (FAIRLIFE) and one of the criteria’s is a letter to the participants and
they have 30 days to respond, the county, the state, federal and so on and so forth. If they are
taking it, we should be a respondent so I am recommending we do a letter of recommendation
that we accept the fact that they are taking lead agency for the project so we will call that a
motion. Anthony Casciani made the motion, Mark Giardina seconded it.
VOTE:
Mr. Anderson AYE
Mr. Kosel AYE
Mr. Malta AYE
Mr. Meixell AYE
Mr. Casciani AYE
Pg, 195 July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting,
Mr. Giardina AYE
Mrs. Wright AYE
Earlier I distributed the extensive sheet index for the plans for the FAIRLIFE
project. We are expecting to receive it later this week. So, I did go over it with Mr. Casciani and
obviously these plans are going to be hard to read on the I1 x 17 scale, so they are probably
going to be larger in nature, not the full size, tablecloths as you like to refer to them but
something kind of in between to make sure you are able to read and see certain things. We kind
of went through this list and identified what we thought the Planning Board members would be
most interested in.
Do you have that sheet that I marked up; I don’t have it.
Ido. So, ] could go through it and if anyone feels strongly and they would like
additional information than Katherine and I can work to get that to you. Either
electronically......we are expecting it to be a very volumes mission so il 1s going to be
challenging to do it how we normally do it in regards to providing ten copies of everything but if
there are specific things that you all are interested in, that I don’t mention, just reach out to us
and we will certainly get you whatever specific plan sheets that you are interested in but for the
overall group, we have identified the:
e The cover sheet COO!
e The overall site plan
e The overall existing conditions plan...then we skipped down because I guess it is on
multiple pages, because there is multiple parcels involved but then we go back to the
overall
Geometry plan
Overall utility plan
Overall grading and drainage plan
Overall initial erosion and sediment contro} plan
Overall final erosion and sediment control plan
Overall line of sight plan C220
Grading and drainage profile
Utility details
Overall landscaping plan
Landscaping details
So, if there is any specific portion of the site or if you want to drill in deeper, and you want a
closer look to any particular on one of these indexes, we can accommodate that but as the normal
distribute of what I just read, that is what they are going to be providing in hard copy form.
(not speaking loud enough and hard to hear) The overall sheets identify
everything, and they are the best one.
Ps, 196 /July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting
When Josh and I were going through it, I could see, I mean the utility details,
that is more engineering stuff and that is nothing that we need to get to involved in. Sanitary
sewer profiles? That is engineering details, right? Unless there is something you guys want.
Did you say the overall vs the detail?
Yes, we have identified most of the overall.
There are all these pages, but we are just getting the overalls?
Correct. If there is anything within there that you notice or want to see closer than
you can request that and will get it to you.
Board having conversations.
In terms of and J did send an email regarding this, SEQR and I know Derek
downloaded the full document electronically because it is literally almost a foot thick hard copy
so if any of you would like portions of that like the traffic study results, noise, lighting, if you
want copies of those, we can also get that to you as well.
Personally, I think their traffic study, I mean the way they engineered it, they
show all these numbers and how many turns there are, that doesn’t make any sense to me. J
know the reality of what is there, and I want someone up there to be speaking about what they
are proposing to do and again, I am going to bring it up again is they are claiming they don’t
need a stop light and the extension coming over to Salt Road and I am going to argue that they
do need a stop light there with those trucks pulling out there onto Salt Road, it will be a disaster.
It’s already bad there now. We have talked about this, down by Schlegel Road there it’s
ridiculous down there and now they are proposing this and with that new subdivision down the
road there. With these trucks coming ultimately there will be able to come out onto Salt Road.
Is that the one that is just through and then there is only a one way stop?
Yes, it should have a stop light there.
Board having conversations.
But I think that is one of the things that...
Their traffic study basically said that the existing counts don’t warrant a four-way
signal, but it would have two stop signs on either side of Salt Road and the traffic on Salt would
have no INAUDIBLE (someone speaking over), but the trucks would have a stop sign coming
out of Xerox.
Another words, they are creating a situation just like Schlegel and Salt.
Pg. 197 /July 11, 2023, Planning Mceting
Yes, il was very surprising.
It’s ridiculous. We will argue that.
Board having conversations.
With no other applications before the Board this evening Anthony Casciani concluded tonight’s
meeting at 9:30 PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Signed A Jin. L
Dated sl, [vs
Mark Giardina, Secretary
Katherine Kolich, Recording Secretary
Pe. 198 /July 11, 2023, Planning Meeting