Minutes

WEBSTER TOWN PLANNING BOARD MINUTES

Anthony Casciam, Chairman Mark Giardina, Secretary

Dave Malta, Vice Chairman

Derek Anderson

John Kosel

Derek Meixell

Jennifer Wright

Josh Artuso, Director of Community Development

Katherine Kolich, Recording Secretary

Kyle Taylor, Attorney

join us in the Pledge of Allegiance. Roll call

the agenda tonight, but they are not prepared to come in yel so what we have done in licu of that.

we have asked Hegadorns to come tn with their proposed project for just a review. Justa sketch

plan to show what they are doing and stuff and that will speed you up a little dawn the road. So,

with that, we can start. Now the first one was Puff N° Stuff and [don’t see them here so we will

wait until the end of the meeting, We have heard this before and we denied the application the

last lime and they are not here again and they are not here again, | don’t know why but. Alright,

we will wait Gli the end of the inceting and make a decision on it. So, the next one ts Burd

Physical Therapy Sign.

Anthony Casciani began reading the first application.

Summary overview of outcome:

SCHEDULED MATTERS

:

PUFF N? STUFF SMOKE SHOP-SIGN-950 RIDGE ROAD

BURD PHYSICAL THERAPY SIGN-847 HOLT ROAD

Ps, 226 September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting

HEGEDORN’S PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT-964 RIDGE ROAD

IN-LAW ADDITION-457 PINEVILLE LANE

Status) APPROVED WAIVER FOR OVERALL SIZE OF 916 SFO WETH

CODE SECTION 350-50; FOR FAMILY USE ONLY; APPLICANT TO FILE

ACCESSORY APARTMENT AGREEMENT WITH TOWN AND COUNTY

PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE.

VERIZON ROOF TOP MICROCELL-900-963 CHERRY RIDGE BLVD

USE PERMIT

SPLASH CAR WASH SITE PLAN APPROVAL EXTENION-1013 RIDGE ROAD

LIGHTING PLANS PRIOR TO BUELDING PERMIT ISSUANCE.

(Anthony Casciant read the first application):

PUFF N’ STUFF SMOKE SHOP SIGN: Located at 950 Ridge Road. Applicant Mohammed

Alsalali is requesting SIGN APPROVAL to allow the installation of a 24.8 SF building mounted

sign within the Webster Square Plaza on a 37.91 acte parecl having SBL# 079. 15-1-1.312 located

inan HC High Intensity Commercial District under Section 265-7 of the Cade of the Town of

Webster,

month and half now.

Appearing before the board was Mohammed Alsalalt. T think we came to the wrong meeting one

thine.

Pe. 227 September 5, 2023 Planning Meeting

up? It’s not up?

notice from you guys, we Look it down.

see on the fagade so just inaking sure that the front of the building is freshly painted behind the

Sign.

to add that back in?

have to get another permit because that sign was there for tenants in there and you are a tenant in

there, I don’t see any issue. As long as if goes in, and itis nota separate sign,

Anthony Cascianis Justa placard that goes in there, right?

Board all agreed,

Pe. 228 September 5. 2023 Planning Mecting

Derek Anderson:

RESOLUTION

‘Fown of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant. Mohammed Alsalafi to

install a 24.8 SF building mounted sign within the Webster Square Plaza located at 950 Ridge

Road on a 37.91- acre parcel having SBL# 079.15-1-1.312.

The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type I Action under Scetion

617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject

1o further review.

RESOLUTION 23-102 Derek Anderson made a motion TYPE TI SEQR

which was seconded by John Kosel.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Mcixcll AYE

Mr. Casciam AYE

Mr, Giardina ABSENT

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-103 John Kosel made a motion for SIGN APPROVAL

Located at 950 Ridge Road. Applicant Mohammed

Alsalafi is requesting SIGN APPROVAL to allow

the installation ofa 24.8 SF building mounted sign

within the Webster Square Plaza on a 37.91- acre

parce] having SBL# 079, 15-1-1.312 located in an

HC High Intensity Commercial District under

Seclion 265-7 of the Code of the Town of Webster

which was seconded by Derck Meixell.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Koscl AY I:

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixel! AYE

Mr. Casctami AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mrs. Wright AYE

Pe. 229 September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting

(Anthony Casciani read the second application):

BURD PHYSICALTHERAPY SIGN; Located at 847 Holt Road. Applicants Patrice Lesniak

& Chris McCaffrey of Ulrich Sign Co, are requesting SIGN APPROVAL to allow a 30 SF

building mounted fagade sign fora physical therapy business on a 4.89-acre pareel having SBL#

079,08-1-9.1 1 located in an OP Office Park under Section 265-7 of the Code of the Town of

Webster.

Appearing before the board was Andrew Warne, Ulrich Sign Co. [tis a pretly straightforward

request. There is an existing 3 X 10 box sign already on the building and all we are looking to do

is simply change the face plate on it as you can sce Burd Physical Therapy.

hew face in,

darken so that the white doesn’t show the ight at night. The idea was to always tone them down

and that was away of doing it.

Py. 230 September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting

does allow light to pass through it, So potentially, if the board wanted, we could figure out how

to put a block out on it.

code even calls for that. So, if you can do that, that would be great.

Derek Anderson:

RESOLUTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicants, Patrice Lesniak & Chris

McCaffrey of Ulrich Sign Co. to construct a 30 SF building mounted fagade sign for Burd

Physical Therapy located at 847 Halt Road on a 4.89-acre parcel having SBL# 079.08-1- 9.11.

‘The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type HW Action under Section

617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject

to further review.

RESOLUTION 23-104 Derek Anderson made a motion for 'PYPE II

SEQR which was seconded by Jolin Kosei.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kose] AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-105 John Kosel a made a motion for SIGN

APPROVAL Located at 847 Holt Road.

Applicants Patrice Lesniak & Chris McCallrey of

Ulrich Sign Co. are requesting SIGN

APPROVAL to allow a 30 SF building mounted

Pe. 231 September 5, 2023 Planning Meeting

fagade sign for a physical therapy business on a

4.89-acre parcel having SBL# 079.08. 1-9, 1 1

located in an OP Office Park under Section 265-7

of the Code of the Town of Webster which was

seconded by Derek Meixell.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Caseciani AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mrs. Wright AYE

beginning, Puff N° Saul?

(Anthony Casctant read the third application):

Tomlinson of Marathon Engineering is requesting SKETCH PLAN REVHIEW associated with

the proposed redevelopment of the former Hegadorn’s Supermarket Plaza on a 6.68-acre parcel

having SBL #079.15-1-1.1 located in an HC High Intensity Commercial District under Section

269-5 of the Code of the Town of Webster,

Appearing before the board Appearing before the board was Matt Tomlinson with Marathon

Engincering and we are the Civil Engineers on the project Al Hazelwood is the Project Architect

and then we have various representatives of the ownership with us as well. We are excited to be

here and appreciate the board adding us to the agenda. We have liad some initial discussion wath

stall and wanted to bring this to the board because we do want to advance Planning Board

approvals. We felt that sketch plan discussion and getting some feedback on what are plans

would be a beneht to help us streamline the approval process as we come forward. We are

looking to submit at the next deadline which is in aboutla week and halfso we will be back in

front of Unis board relatively quickly assuming that we are not headed in the complete wrong

clirection,

So. as mentioned, the property is al 946 Ridge Road, down the streel, at the northwest corner of

Hard Road and Ridge Road . We are proposing some updates to the facade which | wall turn

over to Al ina couple minutes to talk through, but the site plan changes is that we wanted to

highhieht for the board and i you can see the cursor is primarily focused at the front of the plaza

oriented to Hard Road. As you know, there are some vacancies m the upper level of the plaza

Pg. 232 September 5, 2023 Phianning Meeting

and the parking lot slopes very steeply from south to north which causes some issues with ADA,

Accessibility, parking in there as well. The majority of the parcel is currently paved with very

lite landscaping. So, we are really looking to dress the plaza up. Not juston the fagade and for

accessibility but also by adding landscaping and islands with some traftic common as well. So,

you will see a new green perimeter: a flattened access drive that brings vehicles to the rear of the

parking vs right along the front which allows for some cut through traffic which we will be

looking to avoid and then the addition of a retaining wall to help lift up that lower northern

portion of the plaza parking so that folks can more casily walk to the front door along the entirely

of the fagade, Those changes did necessitate in a loss of parking spaces, Right now, there is 308

parking spaces on the plaza and so in order to help clevate that and try and maintain as much

parking as possible, we have reconfigured and restriped within the existing pavement limits in

the lower parking and looking to provide some access or accessibility within the corner tower

with stair; clevator or combination of those that would allow for overflow parking on the lower

level to casily come up to that upper level on the plaza as well.

] neglected to mention, there is one row of parking added within some green space on the lower

level just to get us closer. So, the proposed number of spaces is 290 parking spaces in total at the

plaza with a net loss of 18 spaces. We think that a mixed-use development with multi tenants

and there will be sufficient parking for it number one, and number two, we have been able to add

alot of green to the plaza which has some stormwater benefits; some beautification benefits

without losing very many spaces. We think it will be a great addition to that, With that, | will

turn iLover to Al to talk about the fagade of the building.

itself to Hard Road. We have taken the original building that has some small additions and

canopies and some loading docks and those types of things anc have removed them and raised

the grade as Matt said to facilitate public and pedestrian access into, he plaza strip and the store,

the plaza itself can be broken out into numerous layouts but at this pot we have it somewhat

phased and into three or four layouls depending on how you want lo reference them. Over on the

right had side, which would be the north, is the and | have indicated that there is probably going

10 be a vertical evaluator lift that would provide access from the lower level of the site to the

main level. So, like Matt had said, we have access for folks lo vertical elevation without

somewhat of a hazard. Then we have the fagade improvement around to the south and has it

wrap some of the front of the building to soflen some of the harshness of just a flat building and

we have also added the stone, vencer that we are going to propose further down where the

loading dock is. On my drawing it indicates that the loading dock on the side of the south will be

modihed and will only be for boxed trucks. Ie wouldia’t be meant for any semi-trailer (ruck

access, “That loading dock would be towards the northwest corner of the property. fs there any

questions anyone would like to presen?

Pe. 233 September 5, 2023 Planning Meeting

I inentioned the loading dock and you agreed to climinate the tractor trailers. Ithas been a

headache with those guys parking in the road and everything. So, box trucks are fine and then the

large trucks going around the back.

traffic and then tractor trailers can come down and loop around back and use the north portion

and thanks for bringing that up. One of the other benefits with potential users with not as a

heavy delivery as a grocery store or some others. We will expect a few less trucks delivery wise,

at least on the large side, so there would be some benefits related to just how many delivery

vehicles we are queuing in along the front on Ridge Road there and really help with circulation,

for any detention or anything on that site.

Matt Tomlinsom So, the storm water requirements are, if you reduce your disturbance limits,

which we are not disturbing all of the plaza but the whole front forthe most part. Ifyou add 25

% greenspace from what is there today that satisfies all DEC all stormwater requirements and by

extension the towns MS4 requirements so we will have that detail for this board when we come

back in, but L anticipate that any stormwater treatment is required it will be relatively minimal

because of how much landscaping we are adding.

(SHOWING PLANS ON THE SCREEN) That area, if nothing else, somewhat of a containment

like what they have down in front of Taco Bell.

northeast corner is going to be removed and the upper portion of it, if you follow the sequence,

will be an addition or part of the main floor and then we would be squaring off the building so

there 1s no projections lowards the east.

Pe. 234 September 5. 2023 Planning Mecting

existing grocery store entrance to where the liquor store ts, so we are looking to fill in that entire

fagade to have a level frontage to the plaza,

be...... because that parking lot gocs down a hill a bit is all that going to be Hat as well,

am trying to envision that. Doesn’U that slop down as well. That area is not fat either,

the sidewatk a little on Ridge and there is very lithe separation along Hard Road as well so, we

have pulled the parking areca back towards the building a little bit in order to slope up the lawn

Justa touch in that area so , it will fall away from the building just tike anormal parking lot like

Weemnans or anything like that but it will be much flatter than it is today.

change lo that plaza.

there.

there.

there.

pavement limits. Just restriping itand maybe some new lighting. we will see where tt fits. “Phe

only really change through the parking again ts the row there just to make up some of what we

Pg. 235 September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting

fost on the front so you can’t sce what Fam looking out but there will be an additional row of

parking and then right in the front of Warren’s we are putting some parking along the frontage

of the store for convenience and ADA accessibility as well right in here,

(LAUGHTER)

that dirt over there. That is a major pole of it. Is that what that is for’? Ok, EF guess we are all set

then,

(Anthony Casctani read the fourth application):

457 PINEVILLE LANE IN-LAW ADDITION: Located at 457 Pineville Lane. Applicant

Robert & Jennifer DeVos for are requesting an ACCESSORY APARTMENT WAIVER

FOR OVERALL SIZE associated with the construction of a 916 Sk handicap accessible in

law addition to an cxisting single-family residence on a O.45-acre parcel having SBL# 050.03-

6-74 located in an R-3 Single Family Residential District ander Section 350-50 of the Cade of

the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was (NOT SPEAKING CLEARLY INTO MIC AND DID NOT

SIGN JN) INAUDIABLE Construction, The plan is to hopefully build this for Bob DeVos

and wife and mother in-law who is presently looking lo move in the proposed addition which

goes beyond your square footage requirement with the town. Essentially what this is, ts a

handicapped accessible in-law apartment that will have a small kitchenette; small, handicapped

bathroom; a bedroom and it living space.

There is access to the family through a doorway so thal they can share meals if they so desire

but al the same time, she can have her own space . We looked into meeting and conforming

with (he square footage requirement. Phe customer actually paid an architect to do a drawing

and we went through the process to see if the square footage that would conform would work

with what we were looking to de, and it became to cumbersome and not actually a comfortable

living space. Iwas really difficult, and we couldn't get her the square footage that she needed

if she potentially went into a wheelchair, which she is not but when we construct these types of

projects. we hike lo anticipate any future issucs that might arise.

I don’t see any other issues. The property is a farger property where it docs not obstruct any

ones view: the grade is such that we should not have any water drainage issues. We looked at

Py, 236 September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting

other areas in the house lo potentially do this sometimes we wall build out a garage but thal

didn’t work in this particular situation. That’s the overview of what we are anticipating doing.

and so forth, can we do preliminary approval on it too?

forth in the code with 35%. See section C-3.

7. ver Ir . ; . i srotoqe

fect,

maximum and they are proposing 916,

and obviously not then. OK, we are good with tt.

layout that you are going with and the ramp, that must run on the side of the garage for aceess

lo the front of the house.

pitch on that property is such so that there is a grade change on the back, so we got lucky there.

There is an existing walkway there so we can enter right into he addition at that level and it

actually Ges in with the level of their house. ft's kind of strange but we have some luck on our

side. So. there won't be a visible ramp but, in the negatives of that from the neighbors point of

view,

Py. 237 September 5. 2023 Planning Mecting

Derek Anderson:

RESOLUTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Robert & Jennifer De Vos

for an accessory apartment waiver for overall size associated with the construction of a 916 SE

handicap accessible in-law addition to an existing single-family residence located at 457

Pineville Lane on a 0.45-acre parcel having SBL# 050.03-6-74.

The Phinning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type 1 Action tinder Section

617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subject

to further review.

RESOLUTION 23-106 Derek Anderson made a motion for TYPE H

SEQR which was seconded by John Kosel.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-107

Anthony Casciant made a motion for

ACCESSORY APARTMENT WAIVER

Located al 457 Pineville Lane. Applicant Robert

& Jennifer DeVos for are requesting an

ACCESSORY APARTMENT WAIVER FOR

OVERALL SEZE associated with the

construction of a 946 SF handicap accessible in

law addition to an existing single-family residence

on a 0.45-acre parcel having SBL# 050.03-6-74

located in an R-3 Single Family Residential

District under Section 350-S0 of the Code of the

Town of Webster which was seconded by Dave

Malta.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Miatlta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Pe. 238 September 5, 2023 Planning Meeting

Mr. Casciant AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mrs. Wright AYE

SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS:

f. Zoning ordinance of 350-50 regarding accessory apartments.

2. Occupancy is for personal, family member and not to be rented out.

3. The same utilities as the home: no separate utilities

So, you have access to going into from the other on your Moor plan?

you will need paperwork to file this with Monroe County. So that is parl of it

(Anthony Casciant read the fifth application):

VERIZON ROOF TOP MICROCELL @ CHERRY RIDGE, Located at 900-965 Cherry

Ridge Blvd. Applicant Steve Fantuzzo, Nixon Peabody LLP Attorneys for Verizon Wireless is

requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL (#

PUBLIC HEARING

*)

associated with (he installation of a microcell facility and associated cquipment atop a building

in the Cherry Ridge development on a 39.21-acre parcel having SBL# 079.14- 1-40.11 Jocated

inan MEHR Medium High Residential District under Sections 130-8 and 130-11] of the Code of

the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Robert Burgdorf with Nixon Peabody (DID NOT SIGN EN) also

with me is Mike Crosby who ts the RF Engineer for Verizon and Will Groover who is the Site

Acquisition Specialist lor Verizon. This ts an application for approvals fora cell site remedy for

the service deficiencies in what we call the five mile 104 INAUDIBALE geographic area that is

expericncing service difficulties. You probably Know [rom previous applications, by us or other

cell carriers. that there is limited Mexibility as to where you can place one of these Tactlities and

still make i work properly with the network.

We first looked for INAUDIBLE opportunities before we could before introducing a new tower,

In this case, we were able to find a location/opportunity that is on the rool top, 49 square feet

rool top, penthouse actually portion of the reef top at St. Anas Senior Home 900 Cherry Ridge

Road, You can see from the site plan, and this is up en the sereen rieht now, showing a pair of

about 4 2 fect antennas mounted on a poles and roughly about 10-foot total clevation on top of

the penthouse. ICs visually minimal. Exhibit K has photos. Hyou looked at the application,

there are some minor cquipment cabinets as well that are attached to the house electronic

equipment and that is all there is to this one, Procedurally, is requires a special use from the

Town Board and we have been tn front of the Town Board. and they reviewed it and also

Pe. 239 September 5. 2023 Planning Mecting

requires site plan approval from this board as well as County referral and of course, SEQR

review.

So, that is where we are right now. Let me stop there. [tis a pretty straight forward application

for one of these cell sites and let me see if the board has any questions.

ordinarily...

structure.

macro sites, like the one we have at the Police Department. We call that one Hard & Ridge and

of course one at the town highway garage so of course we have various, ccll tower macro Lype

sites that provide the blanket umbrella coverage area but because we have been building

coverage deliciencies and also because of the capacity needs [rom those big siles being

overloaded this is more of a densification effort to fill in the existing network arcas where we

are having coverage and capacity issucs. The coverage is related more to in building number one

and two, Verizon like other wireless carriers is licensed by the FCC lo operate is various service

bands so we have various [requencies that our service operates on and not all created equally.

Our higher frequency bands tn this case, this ts a what we call a mud-band coverage. site, Our

mid-band service when we add that to this site, which this site is designed to have, it will help to

olfload not only the existing mid-band in the area but also the low band that gets into the area

from the neighboring cxisting site. So, it’s like a three-dimensional puzzle that you put together

and there is different pieces that fit in different ways. This is a nice opportunity for us to use an

existing structure without having to have a major impact visually.

things as a regular macro would do

to co-locate? | don’t know bow these work.

siles as well and what we are doing does not prevent them from doing something similar, They

just may have a different way of doing it and we certainly cannot speak for them,

Pe. 240 September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting

that. They would have to go to St. Ann’s and work a deal with them and then come before the

town to get their approval.

board. Does anyone have any issues or concerns with it?

like this. Which ! think is way betler than INAUDIBLE

height as the tower would be.

something like this?

this.

Derck Anderson:

RESOLUTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Steve Fantuzzo from

Nixon Peabody LLP, Attorneys for Verizon Wireless, to install a microcell facility and

assaciated equipment atop a building in the Cherry Ridge development located at 900-965

Cherry Ridge Blvd on a 39.2 l-acre parcel having SBILL# 079. 14-1-40.

11. The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type TH Action under Section

617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not subjcet

to further review,

RESOLUTION 23-108 Derck Anderson made a motion for TYPE II

SEQR which was seconded by Derek Mcixcll.

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kaosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Meixell AYE

Pe, 24h September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Criardina ABSENT

Mrs. Wright AYE

RESOLUTION 23-109 Dave Malta made a motion for FINAL

APPROVAL Located at 900-965 Cherry Ridge

Blvd. Applicant Steve Fantuzzo, Nixon Peabody

LLP Attorneys for Verizon Wireless is requesting

FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL (FPUBLIC

HEARING*) associated with the installation of a

microcell facility and associated equipment atop a

building in the Cherry Ridge development on a

39.2 b-aere parcel having SBL#079.14- 1-40.11

located in an MHR Medium High Residential

District under Sections 130-8 and }30-11 of the

Code of the Town of Webster which was

seconded by Derek Meixell.

I, Subject to Preliminary Approval.

2, Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning

Board, to expire on 9.5.24

and it depends on what is in front of it, and it should be done within a year or at least started.

steppingstone Tor us to get it into the build plan so of course once we vet our building permit

then it gets in the hopper for build plan, but we already have all of our sites that are im

construction for 2023 so it would be in 2024 and the minimuns that we would start would be

in 2024.

and re-apply and that shouldi’t be an issue.

Thank you

Pg. 242 September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Metxell AYE

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Gtardina ABSENT

Mrs. Wright AYE

(Anthony Casciani_ read the sixth application):

SPLASH CAR WASH EXTENSION OF APPROVAL: Located at 1013 Ridge Road.

Applicant Anne Riley, LLC Attorney for Splash Car Wash is requesting a 1-YEAR

EXTENSION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL associated with the construction of a 7.000 SF

car wash facility and associated improvements on a 2.16-acre parcel having SBL# 079.15- |

16.003 located in an MC Medium Intensity Commercial District under Section 269-17 of the

Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Anne Riley. So, we had a varianee with the Zoning Board, and

they extended it last month, so we are just looking for this site plan approval to be extended for

another year. We are in Htigation, and PE represent the properly owner so we are in litigation, but

itis very possible thatit will be resolved shortly, and we don’t want (o loose these approvals if

we can get them extended.

owners of the property or for the applicant who applied?

site plan and subdivision, Everything was approved last year.

applicant, so he received approvals. So. this is the update for him again.

Pe. 243 September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting

with it.

approved, that the location that they have in Geneva and down the road, Ethink itis Seneca that

they way the buildings are constructed while the lighting is on the inside of the building that it

spills out in the road and you can read newspapers across the street from the amount of light

pollution that these facilities put out and ] want to make sure that the lighting is corrected that i

does not leave the building. They put glass all the way around the wash bays, and they have a

big lower with glass on the top and this really, really bright pink neon lighting that wraps around

the whole building and we cannot allow that. It is like a beacon that goes off and you see it from

miles away. Is an eye sore,

iddressed’?

appearing before the board for any updated or whatever prior to getting a building permit. Ok,

are you comfortable with that.

permit, they would have to re-appear for a short review of what they are doing.

strips at their other facilites thal wrap around the entire building and windows.

Pe. 244 September 5, 2023 Planning Meeung

where the old Perkins was.

pay attention to it. TPyou are saying that their lighting plan that they submitted last year doesn't

show that, then they should have to comply with what they submitted because that is...

cume that way inthe plan. The problem is this is the type of lighting that is wound up being pul

on the side of the building and an example, Oaklee as he built the Country Max. They have all

this bright LED lighting that goes around the entire building, and it is not showing up in the

lighting plan and the other issue with this place, is the interior ighting in the wash bays and the

way they do it. They have big glass windows that pours outside in the street. So, it is not

something that would be caught on a regular lighting plan, i€'s the lighting concept for the

building that needs to change.

RESOLUTION 23-H1 Anthony Casciant made a motion for

MODIFICATION APPROVAL Located at

1013 Ridge Road. Applicant Anne Riley, LLC

Attorney for Splash Car Wash is requesting a 1-

YEAR EXTENSION OF SITE PLAN

APPROVAL associated with the construction of

a 7,000 SF car wash facility and associated

improvements on a 2.16-acre parcel having SBL#

079. t5-1-16.003 located in.an MC Medium

Intensity Commercial District under Section 269

17 of the Code of the Town of Webster which

was seconded by Derek Meixell,

CONDITIONS:

¢ Subject to prior to receiving a building permit, applicant should re-appear to the

Planning Board for review of update on their proposed project for site and fagade

lighting plan

24)

VOTE:

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Pe. 245 September 5, 2023 Planning Meeting

Mr. Meixell AYE

Mr. Cascian AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mrs. Wright AYE

With no other applications before the Board this evening Anthony Casciani concluded tonight's

meeting al 8:00 PM.

Respecttully Submitted,

i a Lge

Mark Giarflina, Secretary

Katherine Kolich, Recording Secretary

Signed

SEP 24°23 an7:07

FILED WEBSTER TWN CLK

Pe. 246 September 5, 2023 Planning Mecting