W/Z NIXON Nixon Peabody LLP =: RObert W. Burgdorf
AS PEABODY ee, Oe
Atomeysatbaw = + 1595 963:1333 nixonpeabody.com . @NixonPeabodyLLP rburgdorf@nixonpeabody.com
January 12, 2026
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL
Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals
Town of Webster
1000 Ridge Rd
Webster, NY 14580
Josh Artuso, Director of Community Planning & Development
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon’s application (the “Application”) to the Town of Webster (the “Town”) for site plan approval, special permit approval, and an area variance to construct and operate a 125’ wireless telecommunications facility (with 4’ lightning rod) on property located near the intersection of Lake Road and Monroe-Wayne County Line Road (Tax Parcel No. 037.03-1-44) in the Town of Webster, Monroe County, New York (Verizon Wireless’ “Lake Road” site)
Dear Members of the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals:
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon (“Verizon”) is a public utility and wireless telecommunications licensee of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). To remedy service inadequacies in and around the northeastern area of the Town of Webster (the “Town”), Verizon makes this Application to construct and operate a wireless telecommunications facility (the “Project’’) near the intersection of Lake Road and Monroe-Wayne County Line Road, Monroe County, New York, Tax Parcel No. 037.03-1-44 (the “Site”).
The Site consists of a 100’ x 100’ parcel leased from Windmill Farms LLC (the “Landowner”). The Project would consist of the construction of a 125’ monopole tower (with an additional 4’ lightning rod) and wireless telecommunications antennas, associated exterior equipment cabinets, together with other site improvements, all as shown on the enclosed site plan prepared by Costich Engineering. (the “Site Plan”).
The Site is located in the Town’s Large Lot Single Family Residential (“LL”) zoning district. Pursuant to Local Law No. 8-1996, as amended and codified in Chapter 130, Communications Installations, Energy Towers, Antennas and Flagpoles of the Town of Webster (the “Code”), telecommunications facilities are permitted in the LL zoning district upon the issuance of site plan approval from the Planning Board and a tower special permit from the Town Board. (Code § § 130-8 ). Additionally, as the tower exceeds the maximum height limit for a new telecommunication tower stated in Section § 130-10 , an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals is necessary.
4901-8287-7566.1
Planning Board Town of Webster January 12, 2026 Page 2
Accordingly, please accept this letter and the following exhibits and enclosures as Verizon’s application for site plan approval, area variance for tower height, and a special permit:
Exhibit A:
Town-supplied application forms;
Project description;
Applicable legal standards;
Proof of the Project’s compliance with the applicable site plan and special permit review requirements set forth in § § 130-8 through 130-13 of the Code;
Proof of the Project’s compliance with the applicable area variance review requirements set forth in § 130-24 of the Code;
Radio frequency search ring justification (“RF Justification’’), with
propagation studies setting forth the need for the Project; Exhibit G: Site selection analysis; Exhibit H: Long environmental assessment form (“Long EAF”), with visual addendum;
Verizon’s co-location policy;
Proof of the Landowner’s consent to this Application;
Photosimulation report;
Structural design letter;
Tower removal letter and removal cost estimate;
Verizon’s FCC licenses for Monroe County;
Ag data statement;
Proof of compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding RF emissions; and
11" x 17” copy of the site plan.
Also included with this Application are:
e Twenty (20) copies of this Application book; e Three full-size 34” x 22”) copies of the Site Plan; and
e Acheck payable to the Town of Webster in the amount of $1,050.00 for the applicable fees for this Application.
Because the Project is located within 500 feet of Lake Road (County Route 1), County
Line Road (County Route 2), NYS AG District #6 (Monroe County), NYS AG District #1 (Wayne County), the Wayne County County Line, and the Town of Ontario Town Line, the Application must be referred to the Monroe County Planning Department (“County Planning”)
4901-8287-7566.1
Planning Board Town of Webster January 12, 2026 Page 3
pursuant to General Municipal Law § 239-m. Please refer this Application to County Planning as soon as possible. An extra copy of the Application is enclosed for the referral.
We respectfully request that this Application be placed on the agenda for the next available Planning Board meeting. In the meantime, should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Robert W. Burgdorf
RWB/jcm Enclosures
ce:
Kathy Pomponio, Verizon Nico Facey, Network Building + Consulting
4901-8287-7566.1
EXHIBIT A
TOWN OF WEBSTER
TOWN BOARD APPLICATION
Office (585) 872-7028 « Fax (585) 872-1352 * publicworks@ci.webster.ny.us
Applicant/Contact Person: Name: Robert Burgdorf for Bel Atlantic Mobile Systems d/b/a Verizon Address: 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586
Phie:: E-mail: Property Owner Information (if different than above):
Windmill Farms, LLC Address: 193 County Line Road Ontario, NY 14519 Phone: —_——_ E-mail:
Architect / Engineer (if applicable):
Costich Engineering Address: 217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14068 Phone: a Enail:
INTERSECTION OF LAKE RD & MONROE-WAYNE COUNTY LINE RD
Verizon - Lake Road Macro
Industrial Use Planned Dev. Special Use Code Amendment Easement Permit District (PDD) Permit Rezonin Encroachment Meeting Type Request: Town Board Workshop Town Board Meeting Y (Concept stage) (Approval stage)
Project Description (additional information can be attached):
125' Telecommunications Tower with associated ground-mounted equipment. See cover letter
and Exhibit P, Site Plan For additional information.
Length of time to complete project: TBD based on discretionary approval timelines
By the signature below, on behalf of the applicant or owner, | hereby authorize representatives from the Town of Webster to enter the above referenced property, during normal hours, for the purpose of conducting inspections of the proposed construction/activity, as required by applicable law, rules, regulations, ordinances and orders. | also certify that, to the best of our knowledge, the information supplied on this application is complete and accurate, and that the project described, if approved, will be completed in accordance with the conditions and terms of that approval.
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems d/b/a Verizon
By Nixon Peabody LLP
Its orf
DATE: /fi2/ 26
Office Use Only Parcel Number (SBL): Zoning District:
TOWN BOARD APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
1. Cut off dates for all applications to be submitted to the Department of Community Development or Department of Engineering for an appearance before the Town Board is each Thursday, one week prior to the scheduled meeting. The Webster Town Board meets on the 1° and 34 Thursdays of each month at 7:30 PM for their official meeting(s). Town Board Workshops are held on the 2" and 4" Thursdays of each month at 5:30 PM. The Webster Town Board, at its discretion, reserves the right not to hear new applications after 7:30 PM on workshop meeting dates and 9:30 PM on any regular meeting dates.
2. Applicants shall submit:
a completed application form (8 copies)
a letter of intent (8 copies)
a site plan or instrument survey map showing the proposed layout of the use (8 copies) a completed Environmental Assessment Form (8 copies)
Payment of proper fees on or before each closing / cut off date
Any application received deemed to be incomplete will not be scheduled to be heard by the Board. It will be the applicant's or agent's responsibility to submit a complete application for the hearing date requested.
3: Any revisions made to the plans necessitated by comment from the Project Review Committee (PRC) or Engineering Division must be resubmitted to the Engineering Division no later than 7 days prior to the meeting date. The Town Board will not entertain any new or revised plans which have not been reviewed by the Town’s Project Review Committee.
4. S. Applicants or their representatives must appear at the hearings. All withdrawals must be made in writing. Town Board Application Fee Schedule
Application Type Application Fee Misc. Fee Independent Review Fee Re-zoning $500.00 $250.00 (review fee) Consultant Review at cost Industrial Use $100.00 $100.00 (review fee) Consultant Review at cost District Formation (per district) $100.00 $100.00 (advertising fee) | N/A
Special Use Permit $200.00 $250.00 (review fee) Consultant Review at cost PDD Overlay District $200.00
Topsoil Permit $200.00 | $.50 per cubic yard | N/A
Dock Variance $100.00
Easement Encroachment Permit | $50.00
Communication Tower Permit $500.00 | N/A | Engineering Review at cost
The above fee schedule is a list of the most common Town Board application types. A complete list of fees is on file at the Department of Community Development permit office.
NON-COLLUSION DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 225-111 OF THE WESTER ZONING ORDINANCE
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
To the best of our knowledge, no officer or employee of the State of New York, County of Monroe or Town of Webster has any financial interest in the land affected by or in the
partnership making application for the project known as Verizon - Lake Road Macro
L/L wl dab 77
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems d/b/a Verizon By Nixon Peabody LLP
DISCLOSURE OF INTENT TO REQUEST TAX INCENTIVES, ABATEMENTS, OR EXEMPTIONS
Have you currently applied for, or intend to apply for any tax incentives, abatements, or exemptions?
Yes
-— No VA
| If YES, would you agree to enter into a Host Community Agreement* (HCA) with the Town of Webster?
Yes No
—» If NO: If you apply for or receive any tax incentives, abatements or exemptions in the future, would you agree to enter into a Host Community Agreement (HCA)?
Yes Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems d/b/a Verizon
No N/A _ By Nixon Peabody LLP
Robert Burgdorf
NAME OF PROPERTY / BUSINESS OWNER
SIGNATUR SS OWNER
L220
DATE
* A Host Community Agreement (HCA) is an agreement between the business/property owner, wherein the business/property owner recognizes that the Town provides services which benefit the business/property and the owner desires to compensate the Town for such services, by making payment to the Town (and to make the Town whole in regard to property taxes) by entering into this agreement to acknowledge the Town’s cost of providing services to its residents and property owners.
EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT B
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon (“Verizon”) is a public utility, and federally licensed wireless telecommunications provider. It currently has service inadequacies in the Town of Webster (the “Iown’”). To remedy this service inadequacy, Verizon is proposing to construct and operate a new wireless telecommunications facility (the “Project’’) near the intersection of Lake Road and Monroe-Wayne County Line Road on property owned by Windmill Farms LLC and identified as Tax Parcel No. 037.03-1-44 (the “Project Site”). This application consists of a request for Site Plan Approval, a Special Permit from the Planning Board, and an Area Variance for additional height to permit the Project to provide adequate and reliable wireless telecommunications service to emergency services, businesses and individuals
in and around the Town.
The Project would consist of the construction and operation of a 125’ tower (plus a 4’ lightning rod), exterior equipment cabinets and other associated improvements, all as shown on
the enclosed site plan prepared by Costich Engineering.
Essentially, wireless telecommunication devices operate by transmitting a very low power radio signal between the wireless telecommunication devices and an antenna mounted on a tower, pole, building or other structure. The antenna feeds the signal to electronic apparatus located near the antenna (the “base station”), where it is connected to traditional telephone systems, and is then routed anywhere in the world. The antennas and base station are known as a
“cell site.”
Because of the low power, a cell site is capable of transmitting to and from wireless telecommunication devices only within a limited geographic area. This limited geographic area is called a “cell.” A cell site must be located within a prescribed area in order to provide
coverage for the entire cell.
Wireless telecommunications technology requires that cells overlap somewhat in order to provide uninterrupted service. When the wireless telephone user moves into a new cell, the transmission is automatically transferred to the cell site in the new cell. If there is no cell site in
the new cell, there is no wireless telecommunications service.
4901-8287-7566.1
-2-
Because each cell site must be placed in such a manner as to provide service within a particular cell, and so as to provide overlapping (but not duplicate) coverage with the existing or planned cells around it, there is limited flexibility as to where a cell site can be placed. Wireless telecommunications providers conduct a thorough engineering study, including using an elaborate computer program known as a “propagation study.” A propagation study shows, based on cell boundaries, topography and other factors, where a cell site needs to be located in order to provide wireless telecommunications coverage in a particular cell. The wireless telecommunication companies and RF engineers identify technologically feasible locations for
the cell site.
In this case, the proposed site was identified by Verizon as being an appropriate site to remedy the service deficiencies. The Project Site was located within that area and was available
to Verizon to meet the technological requirements.
As set forth in this application, Verizon meets the legal standards necessary for the requested approvals. Moreover, the Project will not pollute, will not create noise or vibration, will not create any significant increase in traffic, will not create any environmental problems, will not increase population density, and will not create any demand on governmental facilities. Thus, the Project will not create any detriment to adjoining properties or change the character of the neighborhood. Instead, the Project will enhance governmental facilities and promote the public welfare by providing a modern, more efficient system of communications for police, fire and other emergency services, as well as provide modern wireless telecommunication service to
business, industry and individuals in and around the Lake Road Cell.
4901 -8287-7566.1
EXHIBIT C
EXHIBIT C APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS
In Cellular Tel. Co. v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 364 (1993), the New York Court of
Appeals determined that wireless telephone facilities are public utilities. The Court held that proposed wireless telephone installations are to be reviewed by zoning boards pursuant to the traditional standard afforded to public utilities, rather than the standards generally
required for the necessary approvals.
‘It has long been held that a zoning board may not exclude a utility from a community where the utility has shown a need for its facilities.’. . . Application of our
holding in Matter of Consolidated Edison to sitings of wireless telephone companies, such
as Wireless One, permits those companies to construct structures necessary for their operation which are prohibited because of existing zoning laws and to provide the desired services to the surrounding community. ... Moreover, the record supports the conclusion that Cellular One sustained its burden of proving the requisite public necessity. Cellular One established that the erection of the cell site would enable it to remedy gaps in its service area that currently prevent it from providing adequate service to its customers in the Dobbs Ferry area.
Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d at 372-74 (citing Consolidated Edison Co. v. Hoffman, 43 N.Y.2d 598 (1978)).
This special treatment of a public utility stems from the essential nature of its service, and because a public utility transmitting facility must be located in a particular area in order to provide service. For instance, water towers, electric switching stations, water pumping stations and telephone poles must be in particular locations (including
within residential districts) in order to provide the utility to a specific area:
[Public] utility services are needed in all districts; the service can be provided only if certain facilities (for example, substations) can be located in commercial and even in residential districts. To exclude such use would result in an impairment of an essential
service.
490 1-8287-7566.1
-2-
Salkin, New York Zoning Law Practice, 4th ed., § 7:12 (2013) (hereafter “Salkin”). See also, Wireless Tel. Co. v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 364 (1993); Payne v. Taylor, 178 A.D.2d 979 (4th Dep’t 1991).
Accordingly, the law in New York is that a municipality may not prohibit facilities, including towers, necessary for the transmission of a public utility. In Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d at 371, the court found that “the construction of an antenna tower . . . to facilitate the supply of cellular telephone service is a ‘public utility building’ within the meaning of
a zoning ordinance.” See also Long Island Lighting Co. v. Griffin, 272 A.D. 551 (2d Dep’t
1947) (a municipal corporation may not prohibit the expansion of a public utility where
such expansion is necessary to the maintenance of essential services).
In the present case, Verizon is suffering from inadequate service coverage in the northeastern part of the Town of Webster. The Project is needed to remedy this service problem and to provide wireless telecommunications service coverage to this area. Therefore, Verizon satisfies the requisite showing of need for the facility under applicable New York law.
490 1-8287-7566.1
EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT D
PROOF OF THE PROJECT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE COMMUNICATION TOWER SITE PLAN AND SPECIAL PERMIT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN § § 130-7 OF THE CODE
ARTICLE I Communications Towers
§ 130-7. Communications towers in industrial and commercial districts.
A. Communications towers and accessory facilities/structures shall be permitted in any of the following nonresidential districts upon the issuance of final site plan approval by the Town of Webster Planning Board under the procedures set forth in Chapter 269 of the Code of the Town of Webster and consistent with New York State Town Law § 274- a:
I-N Industrial District
HC High-Intensity Commercial District MC Medium-Intensity Commercial District
LC Class IT Low-Intensity Commercial District CO Commercial Outdoor Storage District
Office Park
No response necessary.
B. In addition for communications towers and accessory facilities/structures located in an I-N Industrial District, the issuance of an industrial use permit by the Town Board under the procedures set forth in § 350-22D of the Code of the Town of Webster shall be required.
Not applicable.
§ 130-8. Communications towers permitted in other districts.
Communications towers and accessory structures are permitted in the following districts, other than those identified in § 130-7 above, only upon the issuance of a conditional or special use permit by the Town Board as set forth in § § 130-11 , 130-12 and 130-13 and upon the issuance of final site plan approval by the Town of Webster Planning Board under the procedures set forth in Chapter 269 of the Code of the Town of Webster and consistent with New York State Town Law § 274-a:
R-I Single-Family Residential District
4901-8287-7566.1
R-2 Single-Family Residential District
R-3 Single-Family Residential District
LL Large-Lot Single-Family Residential District MAR Medium-High Residential District
LMR Low-Medium Residential District
LC Class I Neighborhood Commercial
WD Waterfront Development District
The Site is located in the LL Large-Lot Single-Family Residential District. Special permit and site plan approval are hereby requested by this application in conformance with the above requirements.
§ 130-9. Communications towers prohibited in certain districts.
Regardless of the provisions of § § 130-7 and 130-8, communications towers and accessory structures are not permitted in the following Environmental Protection Overlay Districts:
EPOD (2) Steep Slopes Protection District EPOD (3) Woodlot Protection District Not applicable.
§ 130-10. Height.
The maximum height for communications towers permitted under this chapter, including any antennas, extensions or other devices extending above the structure of the tower, measured from the ground surface immediately surrounding the site, shall be 100 feet.
The Project is 125’ with a 4’ lightning rod, the minimum necessary to solve the coverage discrepancies. An area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals allowing the Project to exceed the maximum permitted height is hereby requested.
§ 130-11. Procedure for special use permit.
A special use permit shall be obtained as follows:
A. The owner/applicant shall submit to the Town Board a completed application and site plan under the provisions of § 130-12 herein. Upon receipt of such application, the Town Board shall refer such application, together with all supporting documents, to the Planning Board for its review and recommendation as to the special use permit and for site plan approval procedures as set forth in Chapter 269 of the Code of The Town of Webster and consistent with New York State Town Law § 274-a.
No response necessary.
B. Within 62 days of receipt of both the recommendation of the Planning Board and final
site plan approval of the Planning Board, the Town Board shall hold a public hearing and shall comply with all the requirements of Town Law § 274-b for the approval of a special use permit. The Town Board shall review the application for compliance with the provisions of this chapter and shall determine that the location of the proposed communications tower is in accordance with the principles and requirements stated herein.
No response necessary.
§ 130-12. Special use permit and site plan standards.
Prior to the issuance of a special use permit by the Town Board or site plan approval by the Planning Board, the following requirements shall be complied with:
A. Application and site plan. All applications for a special use permit and site plan approval shall be by written application on forms provided by the Town of Webster Department of Public Works. The application shall include a site plan setting forth specific site data on a map, acceptable in form and content to the Town Board or Planning Board, which shall be prepared to scale and in sufficient detail and accuracy and which shall show the following:
(1) The location of property lines and permanent easements. See Exhibit Q, Site Plan.
(2) The location of the communications tower, together with guy wires and guy anchors, if applicable.
See Exhibit Q, Site Plan. (3) A side elevation or other sketch of the tower showing the proposed antennas. See Exhibit Q, Site Plan.
(4) The location of all structures on the property and all structures on any adjacent property within 10 feet of the property lines, together with the distance of these structures to the communications tower.
See Exhibit Q, Site Plan.
(5) The names of adjacent landowners as appears on the Town of Webster Assessor's records.
See Exhibit O, Ag Data Statement, for a map and list of adjacent landowners.
(6) The location, nature and extent of any proposed fencing, landscaping and/or screening.
See Exhibit Q, Site Plan. (7) The location and nature of proposed utility easements and access road, if applicable.
See Exhibit Q, Site Plan.
(8) Inventory of other communications towers within a two-mile radius of the proposed site.
See Exhibit G, Site Selection Analysis.
(9) A completed visual environmental assessment form (visual EAF) and a landscaping plan addressing other standards listed within this section with particular attention to visibility from key viewpoints within and outside of the municipality as identified in the visual EAF. A board may require submittal of a more detailed visual analysis based on the results of the visual EAF.
See Exhibit H. Long Environmental Assessment Form with Visual Addendum;
(10) A grid or map of all of the owner's/applicant's existing communications tower site areas in the Town of Webster and site areas proposed or projected by the owner/applicant for installations for a period of two years.
See Exhibit F, RF Justification, for the applicant’s existing communications tower sites.
Preference for higher-intensity use districts. The Town Board or Planning Board may express a preference that the proposed facility be located in a higher-intensity use district or on higher-intensity use property, provided that there is a technologically feasible and available location. A guideline for the preference, from most favorable to least favorable district/ property, is as follows:
(1) Property with an existing structure suitable for colocation. (2) Commercial districts. (a) I-N Industrial District. (b) HC High-Intensity Commercial District. (c) CO Commercial Outdoor Storage District. (d) MC Medium-Intensity Commercial District. (e) LC Class TH Low-Intensity Commercial District. (f) LC Class I Neighborhood Commercial District. (3) Municipal- or government-owned property. (4) Residential districts.
(a) MHR Medium-High Residential District. (b) LMR Low-Medium Residential District.
(c) R-3 Single-Family Residential District.
(d) R-2 Single-Family Residential District.
(e) R-I Single-Family Residential District. (f) LL Large-Lot Single-Family Residential District. (5) WD Waterfront Development District.
(6) Environmental Protection Overlay Districts. (a) EPOD (2) Steep Slopes Protection District.
(b) EPOD (3) Woodlot Protection District. NOTE: Any request by the Town Board or Planning Board for information on a preferred alternate site shall not unreasonably delay the application.
The Site is located in the LL Large-Lot Single-Family Residential District. See Exhibit F, RF Justification, and Exhibit G, Site Selection Analysis for detailed site selection information.
C. Shared use.
(1) At all times, shared use of existing towers shall be preferred to the construction of new towers. Additionally, where such shared use is unavailable, location of antenna on preexisting structures shall be considered. An applicant shall be required to present an adequate report inventorying existing towers within reasonable distance of the proposed site and outlining opportunities for shared use of existing facilities and use of other preexisting structures as an alternative to a new construction.
See Exhibit G, Site Selection Analysis. No existing towers or preexisting structures are suitable to accommodate Verizon’s coverage needs.
(2) An applicant intending to share use of an existing tower shall be required to document intent from an existing tower owner to share use. The applicant shall pay all reasonable fees and costs of adapting an existing tower or structure to anew Shared use. Those costs include but are not limited to structural reinforcement, preventing transmission or receiver interference, additional site screening and other changes, including real property acquisition or lease required to accommodate shared use.
Not applicable.
(3) In the case of new communications towers, the applicant shall be required to submit a report demonstrating good-faith efforts to secure share use from existing towers. Copies of written requests and responses for shared use shall be provided.
No existing towers are suitable for co-location.
(4) The applicant must examine the feasibility of designing a proposed commercial communication tower to accommodate future demand for commercial broadcasting and reception facilities. The scope of this analysis shall be determined by the Town Board for special use permits or the Planning Board for
site plan approvals. This requirement may be waived, provided that the applicant demonstrates that the provisions of future shared usage of the facility is not Seasible and an unnecessary burden, based upon:
(a) The number of FCC licenses foreseeably available for the area; (b) The kind of tower site and structure proposed;
(c) The number of existing and potential licenses without tower spaces/sites; (d) Available spaces on existing and approved towers; and (e) Potential adverse visual impact by a tower designed for shared usage.
The Project so complies. See Exhibit I, Verizon’s Co-Location Policy.
D. Aesthetics. In order to minimize any adverse aesthetic effect on neighboring properties
E.
to the extent possible, a board may impose reasonable conditions on the applicant, including the following:
(1) All communications towers and accessory facilities or structures shall be sited to have the least practical adverse visual effect on the environment.
(2) A monopole or guyed tower (if sufficient land is available to applicant) instead of a freestanding communications tower shall be used.
(3) Reasonable landscaping consisting of trees or shrubs to screen the base of the communications tower and/or to screen the tower to the extent possible from adjacent residential property shall be used. Existing on-site trees and vegetation Shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible.
(4) The applicant shall show that it has made good-faith efforts to colocate on existing towers or other available and appropriate structures and/or to construct new towers near existing towers in an effort to consolidate visual disturbances. However, such request shall not unreasonably delay the application.
(5) Towers should be designed and sited so as to avoid, whenever possible, application of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) lighting and painting requirements. Towers shall not be artificially lighted except as required by the FAA. Towers shall be painted a galvanized finish or matte gray unless otherwise required by the FAA.
(6) No communication tower shall contain any signs or advertising devices, except those signs containing emergency contact information are permitted.
(7) Accessory facilities and structures shall maximize use of building materials, colors and textures designed to blend with the natural surroundings.
- The project so complies. See Exhibit Q, Site Plan, and Exhibit K, Photosimulation Report.
Setbacks.
(1) All communication towers and accessory structures shall be set back from abutting
residential parcels, public property or right-of-way lines a distance sufficient to contain on-site substantially all ice-fall or debris from tower failure and preserve the privacy of adjoining residential properties.
(2) All communication tower bases must be located at a minimum setback from any property line at a distance at least equal to the tower height, or the distance between the tower base and guy wire anchors, or the minimum setback of the underlying zoning district, or a minimum setback at a distance which shall be established at the discretion of the Planning Board as part of the site plan approval procedures based on the unique characteristics of the site, whichever of the foregoing is greater. The minimum setback requirement of this subsection may be increased at the discretion of Planning Board as part of the site plan approval procedures or it may be decreased in those instances where the owner/applicant has submitted plans for a tower design in such a manner as to collapse within a smaller area. Such tower design and collapse zone must be acceptable to the Town Commissioner of Public Works or his/her division heads or agents or designees and the Town Building Inspector.
(3) All accessory structures must comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zoning district.
The project so complies. See Exhibit Q, Site Plan.
Radio-frequency effects. It is recognized that federal laws [Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104, Section 704 (February 8, 1996)] prohibits the regulation of cellular and personal communication services communications towers based on the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions where those emissions comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standards for those emissions. A board may, however, impose a condition on the applicant that the communications antennas be operated only at FCC-designated frequencies and power levels.
The Project so complies. See Exhibit P, Proof of compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding RF emissions.
Traffic, access and safety.
(1) All road and parking will be provided to assure adequate emergency and service access. Maximum use of existing roads, public or private, shall be made. Road construction shall be consistent with standards for private roads and shall at all times minimize ground disturbance and vegetation cutting to within the toe of fill, top of cuts or no more than 10 feet beyond the edge of any pavement. Road grades Shall closely follow natural contours to assure minimal visual disturbance and reduce soil erosion potential. Public road standards may be waived in meeting the objective of this subsection.
The Project so complies. See Exhibit Q, Site Plan.
(2) All communications towers and guy anchors, if applicable, shall be enclosed by a fence not less than eight feet in height or otherwise sufficiently protected from trespassing or vandalism.
The Project so complies. See Exhibit Q, Site Plan.
(3) The applicant must comply with all applicable state and federal regulations, including but not limited to FAA and FCC regulations.
The project so complies. See Exhibit P, Proof of compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding RF emissions.
H. Existing vegetation. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible, and no cutting of trees exceeding four inches in diameter (measured at a height of four feet off the ground) shall take place prior to approval of the special use permit. Clear-cutting of all trees in single contiguous areas exceeding 20,000 square feet shall be prohibited.
The Project will so comply.
I. Screening. Deciduous or evergreen tree plantings may be required to screen portions of the tower from nearby residential property as well as from public sites known to include important views or vistas. Where the site abuts residential or public property, including streets, the following vegetation screening shall be required. For all communication towers, at least one row of native evergreen shrubs or trees capable of forming a continuous hedge at least 10 feet in height within two years of planting shall be provided to effectively screen the tower base and accessory facilities. In the case of poor soil conditions, planting may be required on soil berms to assure plant survival. Plant height in these cases shall include the height of any berm.
The Project Site is partially screened by an existing hedge row. To the extent that the Planning Board or Town Board reasonably requires additional screening, the Project will so comply.
J. Bond/security. The applicant and the owner of record of the premises may be required to execute and file with the Town Clerk of the Town of Webster a bond or other form of security acceptable to the Town Attorney and Town Director of Finance as to form and manner of execution, in an amount sufficient for the faithful performance of the terms and conditions of this chapter, the conditions of the permit or approval issued hereunder, for the observation of all Town local laws or ordinances, to cover the maintenance of the tower during its lifetime and provide for its removal. The amount required shall be determined by the Town Board in its special use permit procedure or the Planning Board in its site plan approval procedure if no special use permit is required. In the event of default upon the performance of any of such conditions or any of them, the bond or security shall be forfeited to the Town of Webster, which shall be entitled to maintain an action thereon. The bond or security shall remain in full force and effect until the removal of the transmission tower, telecommunication tower, communication installation, freestanding tower, satellite dish, antenna, pole, accessory facility/structure and site restoration.
See Exhibit M, Verizon’s Tower removal letter and removal cost estimate. To the extent required by law, the Project will so comply.
K. Expiration. The special use permit and site plan approval shall expire upon:
(1) The failure to commence active operation of the transmission tower, telecommunication tower, communication installation, freestanding tower, satellite dish, antenna, pole, accessory facility/structure within 12 months of the issuance of a special use permit by the Town Board or final site plan approval by the Planning Board; or
(2) The discontinuance of the active and continuous operation of the transmission tower, telecommunication tower, communication installation, freestanding tower, satellite dish, antenna, pole or accessory facility/structure for a continuous period of 12 months, regardless of any reservation of an intent not to abandon or discontinue the use or of an intent to resume active operations.
(3) From time to time, the Town Board or the Planning Board, at the Town Board's direction, may review the special use permit or site plan approval to ascertain if the requirements, conditions and restrictions of this chapter are being substantially complied with in good faith. In the event that, upon review, the Town Board finds that site is not in accordance with the approved building and site plans, and the requirements, conditions and/or restriction of this chapter or of the special use permit are not being substantially complied with, the enforcement procedures under § 130-25 shall be invoked and/or the special use permit shall be canceled or terminated within a specified period of time unless the requirements, conditions and restrictions are complied with after reasonable notice.
No response necessary.
L. Conditions. A board may impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed transmission tower, telecommunication tower, communication installation, freestanding tower, satellite dish, antenna and/or pole, special use permit or site plan.
No response necessary.
§ 130-13. Removal of obsolete/unused facilities.
Approval of a new commercial communications tower facility or the expansion or modification of any existing commercial tower facility shall be conditioned upon the owner's and applicant's agreement to remove such facility once it is no longer used. Removal of such obsolete and/or unused commercial communication tower facilities shall take place within 12 months of cessation of use.
The Project will so comply. See Exhibit M, Tower removal letter and removal cost estimate.
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT E
PROOF OF THE PROJECT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE AREA VARIANCE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN § § 130-24 OF THE CODE
As discussed in Exhibit C, the legal standard applicable to Verizon is the standard afforded to public utilities, rather than the standard to be generally applied. As demonstrated below, the Project also complies with the Town of Webster’s requirements and standards for the requested zoning variance(s). The following Town review criteria are set forth in Code Section 130-24 (the Town’s requirements are outlined below in bold italicized type with Verizon’s response in regular type).
§ 130-24. Variances.
A.
Use variances. Application for any use variance from the provisions of § 130-9 shall be made to the Town of Webster Zoning Board of Appeals. A use variance may be granted, after public hearing, only upon the establishment of public necessity in that the use variance is required to render safe and adequate service and that there are compelling reasons, economic or otherwise, which make the site more feasible for the proposed use than alternative sites as might be provided or available.
Not applicable.
Area variances. Application for any area variance where the requirements of the provisions of § 130-10 cannot be met shall be made to the Town Board if a special use permit is required by § 130-11 , and an application for any other area variance where the requirements of any other provision of this chapter cannot be met shall be made to the Webster Zoning Board of Appeals. An area variance may be granted, after public hearing, upon the Town Board and Zoning Board of Appeals taking into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted, as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community. The Town Board and Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider:
(1D) Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by granting of the area variance;
As outlined in Exhibit B, neither the Project nor the granting of variance, for the height of the tower will result in an undesirable change in the neighborhood and will therefore, not be a detriment to nearby properties. The Project will not pollute, will not create noise or vibration, will not increase population density, will not create any demand on governmental services, and will not create any increase in traffic. It is an inert facility and, as such, is in harmony with the orderly development of the area as well as the nationwide wireless telecommunications system.
(2) Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance;
As outlined in Exhibit F, Verizon must be granted the requested height variance or it will be unable to provide adequate and reliable wireless telecommunications service in Verizon’s Lake Road Cell.
(3) Whether the requested area variance is substantial;
While the tower is moderately taller than the maximum 100’ permitted height, it is the minimum height necessary to deliver reliable service to the Webster Park cell. Varying the height limitation imposed by the Zoning Ordinance, as set forth above, is the least intrusive means by which the applicant can provide reliable wireless telecommunications coverage to the Lake Road Cell and surrounding area.
(4) Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district; and
This Project will enhance the public health, safety, welfare and convenience by providing a more efficient system of wireless telecommunications service for police, fire and other emergency services, as well as provide modern wireless telecommunications service to business, industry and individuals in the Lake Road Cell in the Town of Webster.
(3) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the Town Board or Zoning Board of Appeals, but Shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area variance. The Town Board and Zoning Board of Appeals, in its consideration of area variances, shall grant only the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate and, at the same time, preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
The hardship is not self-created but a function of the need to install a wireless telecommunications facility in an appropriate location (and height) to meet coverage and capacity needs, and provide reliable wireless telecommunications service to Verizon Wireless’ Lake Road Cell.
C. Imposition of conditions. The Town Board, in its consideration of an area variance, and the Zoning Board of Appeals, in its consideration of both use variances and area variances, shall have the authority to impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed use of the property and/or the period of time such variance shall be in effect. Such conditions shall be consistent with the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance[1] or local law and shall be imposed for the purpose of minimizing any adverse impact such variance may have on the neighborhood or community.
[1]: | Editor’s Note: See Ch. 350, Zoning.
No response necessary.
§ 130-25. Enforcement; penalties for offenses.
A, Any violation of this chapter or of any order, requirement decision or determination issued by the Commissioner of Public Works, his/her agent or designee pursuant to this chapter is hereby declared to be an offense punishable by a fine not exceeding $350 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six months, or both, upon conviction for a first offense; upon conviction for a second offense, both of which offenses were committed within a period of five years, punishable by a fine not less than $350 nor more than $700 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six months, or both; and upon a conviction for a third or subsequent offense, all of which offenses were committed within a period of five years, punishable by a fine of not less than $700 nor more than $1,000 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six months, or both. However, for the purpose of conferring jurisdiction upon courts and judicial officers generally, violations of this chapter or any order, requirement, decision or determination issued by the Commissioner of Public Works, his/her agent or designee, pursuant to this chapter, shall be deemed misdemeanors, and for such purpose only all provisions of law relating to misdemeanors shall apply to such violations. Each day (twenty-four- hour period) of violation shall constitute a separate violation of this chapter.
No response necessary.
B. In addition to the penalties provided above, the Town Board may also maintain an action or proceeding to prevent, correct or restrain any violation of this chapter.
No response necessary.
§ 130-26. Fees.
Fees for applications and permits under this chapter shall be established by resolution of the Webster Town Board.
No response necessary. § 130-27. Validity, savings and severability.
Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, word, part or provision of this chapter be declared void, invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of any other part of this chapter which can be given effect without the part(s) declared void, invalid or unenforceable.
No response necessary. § 130-28. Effective date. This chapter shall take effect on January 1, 1997.
No response necessary.
EXHIBIT F
Verizon Wireless Communications Facility
Engineering Necessit Case —“Lake “ae
a ES
= Search Area “a Project Location
Lake eat
Ginna Site Four Mile Creek Site East Webster Site
=" Wie : | et as. ie Dean Parkway Site
on
a
ie Eo
Timothy Zarneke, Senior RF Engineer, Verizon Wireless
» aa
The project is the installation and operation of a new tower co-located wireless telecommunications site in the Town of Webster (the “Project Facility”).
Sept 15", 2025
Introduction
The purpose of this subsequent analysis is to summarize and communicate the technical radio frequency (RF) information used in the justification of this new site.
Coverage and/or capacity deficiencies are the two primary driving conditions that typically prompt the need for a new wireless communications facility/site. All wireless customers depend on their wireless provider's ability to provide adequate and reliable coverage where needed. In areas where coverage does not exist the user can not make a connection which is categorized as a “Gap in Service” lacking adequate and reliable coverage. Where coverage exists but is over utilized this can also result with the user not being able to successfully use the connection which is also a “Gap in Service” and categorized as lacking adequate and reliable coverage. The service deficiencies sought to be remedied by this proposed cell site include a significant number of failed calls, resulting in users being unable to connect and/or maintain a connection capable of supporting a reasonably uninterrupted communication.
* Coverage can be defined as the existence of radio frequency signal of usable strength and quality/capacity in an area, including but not limited to in-vehicles or in-buildings.
The need for improved coverage is identified by RF Engineers that are responsible for developing and maintaining the network. RF Engineers utilize both theoretical and empirical data sets (propagation maps and real world coverage measurements or other data). Historically, coverage improvements have been the primary justification of new sites.
* Capacity can be defined as the amount of traffic (voice and data) a given site can process before significant performance degradation occurs.
When traffic volume exceeds the capacity limits of a site serving a given area, network reliability and user experience degrades. Ultimately this prevents customers from making/receiving calls, applications cease functioning, internet connections time out and data speeds fail. This critical condition is more important than just a simple nuisance for some users. Degradation of network reliability and user experience can affect emergency responders and to persons in a real emergency situation can make the difference between life and death.
*Note that, while Verizon Wireless provides sufficient evidence to establish the existence of a coverage gap and capacity need in this case, the FCC has confirmed that federal law does not require a provider to establish the existence of a coverage/capacity gap to establish the need for a site. There are several ways by which an applicant can establish
site need. See Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment,” FCC 18- 133, 85 FR 51867, at 9 37 (October 15, 2018) (confirming that the test for establishing an effective prohibition is whether “a state or local legal requirement materially inhibits a provider’s ability to engage in any of a variety of activities related to its provision of a covered service,” and this test is met “not only when filling a coverage gap but also when densifying a wireless network, introducing new services or otherwise improving service capabilities”) (emphasis added).
verizon :
Project Need Overview
The project area, located in the northern portion of the Town of Webster is currently served by three distant sites. These sites are overloaded requiring capacity relief or otherwise unable to adequately serve the project area from these relatively distant locations. Specifically, the project area is subject to significant terrain and or foliage challenges for RF (signal) propagation. This terrain and or foliage combined with long distance prevent effective propagation of Verizon's RF signals into this area compounding the capacity issue with areas of variable coverage creating significant gaps in service.
* The first serving site is Four Mile Creek, located in the Town of Webster, is approximately 2 miles west(of the project location) situated on an existing tower (146’ ACL) located off Phillips Rd. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity.
* The second serving site is East Webster, located in the Town of Webster, is approximately 2.75 miles south east (of the project location) on an existing tower (163’ ACL) off Basket Rd. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity.
* The third serving site is Ginna, located in the Town of Webster, is approximately 2.5 miles east(of the project location) situated on an existing tower (120° ACL) off Slocum Rd. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity.
Available (mid band) carriers at these and other area sites are not capable of effectively serving/offloading the project area due to inherent propagation losses from distance, challenging terrain and or in building coverage losses negatively impacting mid band coverage and capacity offload capabilities. There are other Verizon sites in this general area but due to distance and terrain/foliage they also do not provide any significant overlapping coverage in the area in question that could allow for increased capacity and improved coverage from other sources.
The primary objectives for this project are to increase capacity and provide and or improve coverage throughout this north portion of the Town of Webster, more specifically portions of Great Lakes Seaway Trail, County Line Rd, Basket Rd, as well as neighboring residential and commercial/public areas along and near these roads. In order to offload capacity from Four Mile Creek, East Webster and Ginna sites, a new dominant server must be created. This new dominant coverage will effectively offload the existing overloaded sites/cells as well as provide improved coverage where significant gaps exist today.
Following the search for co-locatable structures to resolve the aforementioned challenges and finding none available, Verizon proposes to attach the necessary antenna(s) to a new tower located near the intersection of Lake Rd and County Line Rd, Webster, NY 14519. Verizon's antennas will utilize 120’ ACL (Antenna Center Line) with a top of antenna height of 124’. This solution is the minimum height necessary to provide the coverage and capacity improvements needed.
verizon ;
Wireless 4G/5G Safety and Growth
Staying ahead of demand.
A wireless network is like a highway system...
Health and safety background.
Health and safety organizations worldwide have studied potential health effects of RF emissions for decades, and studies continue.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines for operating wireless networks are based on the recommendations of federal health and safety agencies including:
+ The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
+ The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
+ The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
* The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
+ The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
+ The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP)
Wireless technology, equipment and network operations are highly regulated.
Connectivity at home.
The demand for access to wireless broadband continues.
People continue to rely more and more on their wireless broadband for work and personal uses.
82 55cs 523m
Of voters say 17.4 to 55 gigabytes. 523 million wireless wireless is important The average connections as of driving innovation in monthly usage of 2022." the US. mobile data per
smartphone in 2022
and 2028."
1 CRA agape TLR
More wireless traffic needs more wireless facilities just like more vehicle traffic needs more lanes.
* Many wireless users share each cell site and congestion may result when too many try to use it at the same time. « Wireless coverage may already exist in an area, but with data usage growth increasing exponentially each year, more capacity is needed.
* To meet capacity demands, we need to add more sites closer to users and strategically spaced with other cell sites to provide the reliable service customers have come to expect from Verizon.
The monthly data traffic in North America is projected
to amount to 19.53 exabytes (the equivalent of over four billion DVD’s) by 2027. In 2021, the average data traffic amounted to almost 5 EB per month.*
verizon
Wireless facilities and property values.
Cell service in and around the home has emerged as a critical factor in home-buying decisions.
National studies demonstrate that most homebuyers value good cell service over many other factors including the proximity of schools when purchasing a home.
90. 87% 71»
Of single family Of prospective of adults live in homebuyers homebuyers wireless-only consider an area identified faster households.*
of good cellular service somewhat
mobile phone connections as
important or very somewhat or
important when very important
buying a home.’ when looking at 5G anda
potential home.'
Wireless connectivity is critical in schools and communities.
Wireless is a critical component in schools and for today’s students.
20k 12% 600. C1% west
10%
Learning apps are available for iPads.
Of iTunes top selling educational apps are designed for preschool and elementary students.
Schoo! districts replaced text books with tablets in classrooms.
Of teens use cellphones to heip with homework.
Reliable and Critical Communications
More people than ever before rely on wireless connections to manage their
Wireless is a critical
lives and businesses.
Verizon is expanding its wireless network to meet the growing demands of today and tomorrow.
But it takes time.
466 76.
Globally, total mobile network data traffic will grow to an estimated 466 EB per month by the end
of 2029."
14,
Of Americans say government should make it easier
to build wireless networks?
of adults and 86.8% of children live
in wireless-only households.?
The reliability of your cell phone is never more important than when crisis strikes.
That’s when a simple call or text message can make the difference between life and death.
We build reliability into every aspect of our wireless network to
keep customers connected when you need it most. Reliability starts when we choose the safest, most secure locations for our wireless equipment. The likelihood of earthquakes, and risk from wildfires, mudslides, floods, hurricanes and more are all considered. When disaster strikes, we coordinate with first responders and can mobilize charging stations, special equipment, emergency vehicles and more to support local, state and federal agencies in all 50 states.
80 240
Of 911 calls originate from a cell phone.’
Million 911 calls are made annually. In many areas, 80% or more are from wireless devices.'
component in today’s medical fields.
Smart pill bottles and cases can help patients and their Caregivers track medication usage, ensuring medications are taken on time and correctly. This supports increased medical compliance, provides more consistent care, and enables preventative care, keeping patients in their homes longer and reducing the number of emergency visits to the doctor's office or hospital.
Wireless connected glucose monitors, blood-pressure cuffs, and EKGs can track a patient's vital signs and catch an issue before it turns into an emergency.
Pacemakers and sleep apnea monitors can be tracked remotely.
Routine eye exams can be conducted with a wireless device connected to a smartphone, bringing solutions and services to low-income and remote areas that would otherwise go unsupported.
verizon
Wireless is a critical component in today’s communities.
Wireless smart city solutions are being used to track available parking and minimize pollution and wasted time.
These same solutions are being used to track pedestrian and bike traffic to help planning and minimize accidents.
Smart, wireless connected lighting enables cities to control lighting remotely, saving energy and reducing energy costs by 20%.
4G technology is utilized to track and plan vehicle deliveries to minimize travel, maximize efficiency, and minimize carbon footprint.
4G technology is also used to monitor building power usage down to the circuit level remotely, preventing energy waste and supporting predictive maintenance on machines and equipment.
Wireless sensors placed in shipments are being used to track temperature-sensitive medications, equipment, and food. This is important for preventing the spread of foodborne diseases that kill 3,000 Americans each year.
Explanation of Wireless Capacity
Capacity in this analysis is evaluated with up to three metrics further explained below. These metrics assist Verizon traffic planning and RF Engineers in determining actual usage for a given site as well as can be used to project when a site is expected to run out of capacity (i.e. reach a ~ point of exhaustion where it can no longer process the volume of voice and data requested by local wireless devices, thus no longer providing adequate service). Unfortunately capacity exhaustion has already occurred which presents an urgent need to deliver the capacity relief ~ necessary in an effort to provide adequate and reliable coverage to this
} project area.
* Forward Data Volume (“FDV”), is a measurement of usage (data throughput) on a particular site over a given period of time.
a - Average Schedule Eligible User (“ASEU”), is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site.
* Average Active Connections (“AvgAC”) is a measurement of the number of devices actively connected to a site in any given time slot.
Verizon Wireless uses proprietary algorithms developed by a task force of traffic planning engineers to monitor each site in the network and accurately project and identify when sites will approach their Capacity limits. Using a rolling two-year window for projected exhaustion dates allows enough time, in most cases, to develop and activate a new site. It is critical that these capacity approaching sectors are identified early and the site development process is started and completed in time for new solutions (sites) to be on air before network issues impact the customers. As mentioned previously, actual utilization for the last year indicates several KPI's have already exceeded 100% utilization creating a more urgent need in this project area.
verizon
Capacity Utilization (Four Mile Creek Alpha)
—— LowBandLTE | “oso Sees —— Low Band LTE {eR RARE Ss —— Low Band LTE —— Mii Band LTE —— Mid Band LTE —— Mid Band LTE ——— 100% Utikzation —=—— 100% Utilization ——____~ | _... 100% Utilization a - © a = ——— Le ea a = $< Oe OO oN ee FDV (Forward Data Volume), shown above is a ASEU (Average Schedule Eligible User), shown above AvgAC (Average Active Connections), shown above is measurement of the customer data usage that this sector is ameasurement of the loading of the control utilization by carrier showing a measurement of max active currently serves. As this limit is approached, data rates channels and systems of a given site. The ASEU load connection capacity per sector in any given time slot. When slow to unacceptable levels, potentially causing unreliable is heavily impacted by distant users or those in poor this limit is reached, no additional devices will be able to service for Verizon Wireless customers. RF conditions. connect to the site, resulting in connection failures and
dropped calls.
In each graph above, the purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line represents the daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the Four Mile Creek site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple and/or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Capacity exhaustion can create the same customer experience as a coverage gap.
Ideally, capacity relief should be implemented prior to reaching exhausted conditions. In this case the site/sector shown has already exceeded its capability to support one or more of these capacity KPI’s. In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Lake Road and the surrounding project area, network densification is required.
verizon :
Capacity Utilization
(East Webster Alpha)
—— Low BandLTE —— Mid Band LTE —=-— 100% Utilization
FDV (Forward Data Volume), shown above is a measurement of the customer data usage that this sector currently serves. As this limit is approached, data rates slow to unacceptable levels, potentially causing unreliable service for Verizon Wireless customers.
—— Low Band LTE —— Mid Band LTE —=— 100% Utilization
ASEU (Average Schedule Eligible User), shown above is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site. The ASEU load is heavily impacted by distant users or those in poor RF conditions.
—— Low Band LTE —— Mid Band LTE ——— 100% Utilization
AvgAC (Average Active Connections), shown above is utilization by carrier showing a measurement of max active connection capacity per sector in any given time slot. When
this limit is reached, no additional devices will be able to
connect to the site, resulting in connection failures and dropped calls.
In each graph above, the purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line represents the daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the East Webster site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple and/or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Capacity exhaustion can create the same customer experience as a coverage gap.
Ideally, capacity relief should be implemented prior to reaching exhausted conditions. In this case the site/sector shown has already exceeded its capability to support one or more of these capacity KPI's. In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Lake Road and the surrounding project area, network densification is required.
verizon
Capacity Utilization (Ginna Gamma)
—— Low Band LTE —— Low Band LTE —— Low Band LTE —— Mid Band LTE —_ Mid Band LTE —— Mid Band LTE —=—— 100% Utilization —-—— 100% Utilization —-— 100% Utilization FDV (Forward Data Volume), shown above is a ASEU (Average Schedule Eligible User), shown above AvgAC (Average Active Connections), shown above is measurement of the customer data usage that this sector is a measurement of the loading of the control utilization by carrier showing a measurement of max active currently serves. As this limit is approached, data rates channels and systems of a given site. The ASEU load connection capacity per sector in any given time slot. When slow to unacceptable levels, potentially causing unreliable is heavily impacted by distant users or those in poor this limit is reached, no additional devices will be able to service for Verizon Wireless customers. RF conditions. connect to the site, resulting in connection failures and
dropped calls.
In each graph above, the purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line represents the daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Gamma sector of the Ginna site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple and/or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Capacity exhaustion can create the same customer experience as a coverage gap.
Ideally, capacity relief should be implemented prior to reaching exhausted conditions. In this case the site/sector shown has already exceeded its capability to support one or more of these capacity KPI’s. In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Lake Road and the surrounding project area, network densification is required.
verizon ;
Explanation of Wireless Coverage
=
Best Signal Level (d8m) >=-75 Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-85 -95 Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-95 -105 Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-105 im xy _ ses
he
is fie
[9 *Dark Green >/= -75dBm RSRP, typically serves dense urban areas as well as areas of substantial construction (colleges, hospitals, dense multi family etc.)
[Green >/= -85dBm RSRP, typically serves suburban single family residential and light commercial buildings
[yettow >/= -95dBm RSRP, typically serves most rural/suburban-residential and in car applications
orange >/=-105dBm RSRP, rural highway coverage, subject to variable conditions including fading and seasonality gaps
Uwnite = <-105dBm RSRP, variable to no reliable coverage gap area
More detailed, site-specific coverage slides are later in the presentation
*Signal strength requirements vary as dictated by market and conditions ** Not displayed in example map, layer not used in all site justifications
verizon
Coverage is best conveyed via coverage maps. RF engineers use computer simulation tools (in this case Verizon uses Forsk Atoll) which takes into account terrain, vegetation, building types, and other site/network specifics to model the RF environment. This propagation model is used to simulate the real world network and assist RF Engineers to evaluate the impact of a proposed site (along with industry experience and other tools). Network design, performance evaluation and development needs have become far too complex for drive test data and dropped call records which for many years have become antiquated and simply not effective in visually communicating gaps (need) in coverage or capacity capability for 4 and 5G networks.
Upstate NY Verizon Wireless sites provide customers service using several FCC licensed frequencies including 700 and 850MHz. To resolve capacity congestion for these coverage layers higher frequency (and bandwidth) PCS (1900 MHz), AWS (2100 MHz) and C-Band (3700MHz) mid band carriers are added however due to differences in propagation characteristics, many gaps in coverage and capacity still remain requiring network densification to resolve. In some mountaintop or long distance situations the mid band (higher frequency) AWS, PCS and C-Band carriers are either not or not fully effective due to excessive distance (path loss). This is because the site is located too far from the user population to provide adequate and reliable service. Although exclusively regulated by the FCC and subject to market adjustment as needed, it is worth noting that all of the propagation slides in this RF Justification are generated using the max power of the LB and MB Samsung radio capabilities.
Signal strength throughout a given site’s coverage area is subject to the limitations of the frequencies used. Lower frequencies with narrower bandwidth propagate further distance, and are less attenuated by clutter than higher frequencies with wider bandwidth. Unfortunately due to relatively narrow spectrum available these low bands can become quickly overloaded especially where similar signal strength from mid band carriers are not available. Similar coverage levels from mid band carriers are needed to resolve capacity issues (including the ability to make and receive voice calls). In order to provide similar coverage levels using the higher capacity/higher frequencies, a denser network of sites is required (network densification). Modern 4 and 5G networks are designed and intended to combine or use more than one frequency band at atime. This is called carrier aggregation which is not effective when the mid band signal is too weak or nonexistent. This means that site justification including ACL requirements must be derived from mid band capabilities. It is critical to understand the relationship between low band capacity and mid band coverage especially when reviewing the need for new suburban and rural morphology sites.
10
Explanation of Lake Road Search Area
: A Search Area is the geographical area within which a new site is targeted to ai solve a coverage and or capacity deficiency. Three of the factors taken into > Be consideration when defining a search area are topography, user density, and the
existing network.
Topography must be considered to minimize the obstacles between the proposed site and the target coverage area. For example, a site at the bottom of a ridge will not be able to cover the other side from a certain height.
In general, the farther from a site the User Population is, the weaker the RF conditions are and the worse their experience is likely to be. These distant users also have an increased impact on the serving site’s capacity. In the case of a multi sector site, centralized proximity is essential to allow users to be evenly distributed and allow efficient utilization of the site’s resources.
+ The existing Network Conditions also guide the design of a new site. Sites placed too close together create interference due to overlap and are an inefficient use of resources. Sites that are too tall or not properly integrated with existing sites cause interference and degrade service for existing users.
Existing co-locatable structures inside the search area as well as within a reasonable distance of the search area are submitted by site acquisition and reviewed by RF Engineering. If possible, RF will make use of existing or
La ke Road Sea rch Ar €a nearby structures before proposing to build new towers.
To resolve the coverage and capacity deficiencies previously detailed, Verizon Wireless is seeking to add one new cell facility within this area to improve wireless service capacity and coverage. By providing a new dominant signal area and offloading weak and distant traffic from Four Mile Creek, East Webster and Ginna sites with the proposed site, adequate and reliable service will be restored. The new Lake Road site will provide dominant and dedicated signal to the identified portions of the Town of Webster. This helps to improve not only the Lake Road project area but will also result with significant improvements to the above mentioned overloaded sites ultimately improving community wide areas in and around the Lake Road project area.
11
Existing Low Band (700/850MHz) Best Server -105dBm RSRP
Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites dominant signal area.
~~ County Line Rd
Ml On Air Coverage ee
Four Mile Creek Alpha
East Webster Alpha
Ginna Gamma Search Area
The map above represents coverage from existing sites, with the sites in need of capacity offload detailed in the legend above. Blue coverage is from other on air (Low Band) sites. Notice the lack of a dominant server throughout the Lake Road project area. This reveals several sites that are stretching their coverage capabilities excessively which results with poor coverage and performance capabilities.
12
Proposed Low Band (700/850MHz) Best Server -105dBm RSRP
Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites dominant signal area.
GE On Air Coverage Four Mile Creek Alpha East Webster Alpha Ginna Gamma [23] Proposed Coverage
Search Area
The map above adds the footprint of the proposed Lake Road site with a 120’ ACL coverage in green. The green best server footprint provides improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap area. This will improve service to users in the green area as well as help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting the existing overloaded sectors identified in the image above.
13
Existing Low Band (700/850MHz) Coverage (signal strength)
This coverage map shows how weak the RF conditions are in portions of the Town of Webster and surrounding area. Refer to slide 10 for further explanation of these color thresholds
Lake Road -—
G9
* A
Lakeridge Rd
' ™ County Line Rd
s
-75 Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-75 MH 2-85 —s Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-85
-95 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-95
-105 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-105
a — : a 2 **
The map above represents low band signal strength coverage from existing sites. While low band generally serves this projectarea it is subject to overloading as shown in the capacity slides. This overloading in part is due to gaps in adequate and reliable mid band coverage as shown in the following slides. Network densification is needed to resolve these coverage and capacity issues.
+> Compare to p12 to better understand the LB best server footprint
14 Compare to p15 to visualize the proposed site LB impact
Proposed Low Band (700/850MHz) Coverage (signal strength)
This coverage map shows how improved the RF conditions will be in portions of the Town of Webster and surrounding area. Refer to slide 10 for further explanation of these color thresholds
: os a *
7
Lakeridge Rd
* ais see i -75 ~~ Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-75
Bae. To SS Sere MME -85 Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-85
Pn =e -95 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-95
Silas an ‘ST WEBSTER ae MEE -105 Best Signal Level (48m) > =-105 eee ed -"
The map above adds low band of the Lake Road site at 120’ ACL to the existing coverage map. The significantly improved signal strength corresponds to improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap areas. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting portions of the Town of Webster.
; ea
a verizon *PRO TIP Compare to p13 to better understand the LB best server footprint =
Compare to p14 to visualize the proposed site LB impact
Existing Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Best Server -105dBm RSRP
Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites dominant signalarea.
Lake Road F
County Line’ Rd
- - Schlegel R d ; 4 MM On Air Coverage : Four Mile Creek Alpha East Webster Alpha Ginna Gamma 7 a J Search Area aa :
The map above represents coverage from existing sites, with the sites in need of capacity offload detailed in the legend above. Blue coverage is from other on air (Mid Band) sites. Notice the lack of signal or where there is signal, a dominant server throughout the Lake Road project area. This reveals several sites that are stretching their mid band coverage capabilities which results with unacceptable coverage and performance.
16
Proposed Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Best Server -105dBm RSRP
Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites dominant signal area.
(I On Air Coverage Four Mile Creek Alpha East Webster Alpha Ginna Gamma
[3] Proposed Coverage | | () Search Area ee :
The map above adds the mid band footprint of the proposed Lake Road site with a 120° ACL in green. The green best server footprint provides improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap area. This will improve service to users in the green area as well as help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting the existing overloaded sectors identified in the image above.
Schlegel Rd © 5) Some-"o
17
Existing Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength)
This coverage map shows how weak the RF conditionsare in portions of the Town of Webster and surrounding area. Refer to slide 10 for further explanation of these color thresholds
Lake Road @) and
Loheside Rd
Boston Rd
County Line Rd Lakeridge Rd
Willits Re
Ceunty dure @
Schlegel Rd
-75 ~~ Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-75 8S —_— Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-85 -95 —_ Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-95 -105 Best Signal Level (8m) > =-105
The map above represents mid band coverage from existing sites. This mid band signal is very weak to non existent throughout the project area. Additional mid band network densification is required to resolve these conditions. Notice the large orange and blank coverage areas near the proposed Lake Road site that are subject to overloaded low band as well as variable coverage conditions including fading and seasonality gaps.
verizon * Compare to p16 to better understand the MB best server footprint PRO TIP Compare to p19 to visualize the proposed site MB impact =
Proposed Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength)
This coverage map shows how improved the RF conditions will be in portions of the Town of Webster and surrounding area. Refer to slide 10 for further explanation of these color thresholds
“he
Lake Road
Lakeridge Rd
Willits Ra
Schlegel Rd b
a
ide Rd
a og?
e
eS
EAST W
~
- -75 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-75 % GM -85_—s Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-85
-95 Best Signal Level (d8m) > =-95
— MME -105 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-105
¥,
The map above adds mid band of the Lake Road site at 120’ ACL to the existing coverage map. The significantly improved signal strength
corresponds to improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap areas. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting portions of the Town of Webster.
verizon *PRO TIP Compare to p17 to better understand the MB best server footprint Compare to p18 to visualize the proposed site MB impact
RF Justification
Summary
Sones g The proposed site resolves the substantial and significant gaps in coverage and capacity impacting this portion of the Town of Webster. These gaps are shown above: The green shaded area represent the gaps in coverage and capacity that the proposed Lake Road site with a 120’ ACL will resolve.
verizon
ES] Low and Mid Band Gap fj Low Band Gap
The network was analyzed to determine whether there is sufficient RF coverage and capacity in the Town of Webster. It was determined that there are significant gaps in adequate LTE service for Verizon Wireless in the Low and Mid Band LTE frequencies. In addition to the coverage deficiencies, Verizon Wireless’ network does not have sufficient capacity (low band or mid band) to handle the existing and projected LTE voice and data traffic in the area near and ig been the proposed facilities (“targeted service improvement area”). Based on the need for additional coverage and capacity while considering the topography and specific area requiring service, any further addition of capacity to distant existing sites does not remedy Verizon’s significant gap in reliable service. Therefore, the proposed facility is also needed to provide “capacity relief” to the existing nearby Verizon Wireless sites, allowing the proposed facility and those neighboring sites to adequately serve the existing and projected capacity demand in this area.
With the existing network configuration there are significant gaps in service which restricts Verizon Wireless customers from originating, maintaining or receiving reliable calls and network access. It is our expert opinion that the proposed site will satisfy the coverage and capacity needs of Verizon Wireless and users on it’s network in these portions of the Town of Webster and this project area. The proposed location depicted herein satisfies the identified service gaps and is proposed at the minimum height necessary for adequate and reliable service.
RF Design Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 585-297-7006
Verizon Wireless
EXHIBIT G
verizon’
BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS LLC d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS
Lake Road
Lake Rd and County Line Rd, Webster NY
SITE SELECTION REPORT JANUARY 8, 2026
Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street, Suite #100 West Henrietta, New York 14586
SITE SELECTION REPORT
Verizon Wireless proposes to install and operate a new wireless telecommunications facility, including a new tower structure, associated antennas and equipment and related appurtenances located at the intersection of Lake Rd and Monroe-Wayne County Line Rd, in the Town of Webster, Monroe County, New York. The property is a 7.8-acre parcel. It is primarily all farmland in nature. The Town of Webster permits wireless telecommunications facilities in the LL zoning district upon the issuance of a special use permit from the Town Board and site plan approval from the Planning Board
1. NEED FOR FACILITY
(a) Problem
The process of identifying a technologically appropriate location, as well as the need for this communications facility are as provided in the Radio Frequency (“RF”) Engineering Necessity Case report (“RF Justification”) prepared by Verizon Wireless’ RF Design Engineer. As indicated in that report, when a Verizon Wireless RF Engineer identifies coverage gaps in the system or sites that have or will reach data capacity exhaustion or lack of coverage, they issue a “search area” or “search ring”, A search area is a geographical area located within the inadequately serviced area, and it is designed such that if a wireless telecommunications facility is located within the search area, and installed at an appropriate height, it will likely provide the required coverage. For the most part, locations outside of the search area will fail to provide adequate service to the cell. Due to technological constraints and existing topography, there is limited flexibility as to where a new facility can be located and still function properly within the existing wireless network. The goal of the search area is to define the general locations for placement of a cell site that will provide adequate service in the subject cell and work properly as part of the overall network.
(b) Solution
A search area was developed for this portion of the Brockport area to address certain network deficiencies identified in the accompanying RF Justification. As shown in Figure 1, the search area is centered near the intersection of Lake Rd and County Line Rd. The search ring is depicted by the red circle in Figure 1. The goal of the search area is to define the permissible location for placement of a cell site that will provide adequate coverage to users of Verizon Wireless’ services in the target cell, and also work properly as part of the overall network.
Page 2 of 10
2. SEARCH RING ANALYSIS
(a) Geography & Topography
The Lake Rd search area is located on border of Monroe County and Wayne County in the Town of Webster. The search area can be identified as a mixture of some farmland, suburban residential properties and some wetlands. Topography in the area is fairly flat throughout the search area. 320’ AMSL north to south across the search area that was also factored into the candidate selection. Figure 2 depicts an overlay of the Search Area on an aerial tax map for the area.
(b) Land Use
The Search Area is made up of a mixture of farms and suburban residential properties. The Search Area is located in Monroe County in the Town of Webster and Town of Ontario.
(c) Description of Figures
The following figures are provided to illustrate the different characteristics which exist within the Search Area relative to the identification of a location for a new wireless communications facility.
Figure 1 - Depicts the Search Area.
Figure 2 — Depicts an overlay of the Search Area with candidates and Tax Map and Wetlands/Floodplains overlay.
Figure 3- Depicts a three-mile radius from the proposed tower location and existing towers or tall structures identified.
3. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
(a) Collocation
Verizon Wireless routinely seeks to install its antennas and equipment on an existing communication towers or other tall structures, including municipally owned properties (“co- location”), whenever feasible. Local communities universally favor co-location because they can minimize the number of wireless telecommunications towers in an area and many municipalities even provide a streamlined application review process. Co-location is often listed as the highest siting priority in a local municipality’s Zoning Law. In addition to the streamlined zoning application process, co-location is preferred by wireless providers because it is generally a less expensive and more timely option, compared to the installation of a new tower facility.
Unfortunately, there are no suitable towers or tall structures in the surrounding area viable for the installation of Verizon Wireless’ antennas and equipment. The closest existing tower located 2.1 Page 3 of 10
miles west would not meet Verizon’s RF objective since that site is too far away from where the new cell is needed and too close to other Verizon existing or proposed sites.
After carefully investigating the properties within the Search Area, it was evident that there are no structures or buildings tall enough to provide the relief needed. Based on the foregoing, co- location is not a viable option, and a new tower facility is necessary.
(b) New Structure on Municipally owned Property
As its next priority, Verizon Wireless generally seeks to locate wireless telecommunication facilities on municipally owned property. These locations are often preferred by municipalities as the second preference behind co-location as it allows municipalities to benefit from a rental stream for the leased premises. There weren’t any municipal owned properties within the search area for consideration. ,
(c) New Structure on Privately-owned Property
When it is not feasible to co-locate on an existing tower or tall structure, Verizon Wireless must find an appropriate site that can accommodate a new communications structure. In doing so, the Site Acquisition Specialist attempts to identify properties in the search area large enough to accommodate the facility and any required bulk area requirements such as set back and fall zones that may exist in the local zoning law. In addition, other characteristics such as existing compatible land use and existing mature vegetation that can screen the facility are considered. Access, land use, the presence of wetlands, floodplains and other contributing factors are also examined, as well as construction-related issues.
4, CANDIDATE/ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
After a comprehensive investigation of the Search Area, no existing towers or tall structures were identified and/or suitable for co-location within or near the limits of the search area. Because of the large nature of the parcels within the search area and need to accommodate the zoning requirements of the town, a total of seven (7) parcels were identified in the Lake Road area as being potential candidates for a new communications facility. All the parcels considered within the Search Area are large, ranging from 5.1 to 154 acres. The parcels contain farmland and rural residential structures. The parcels in the Search Area are on Lake Road or County Line Road. Coverage within the Lake Road area is the primary objective for this site and terrain and environmental conditions like wetlands were major factors for determining the primary location. The locations are identified in Figure 2. A summary of the properties is detailed below.
Page 4 of 10
(Selected Candidate)
Tax parcel#: 037.03-1-44 151.8 acres LAKE RD & MONROE-WAYNE COUNTY LINE RD Town of Webster | Monroe County
LL - Large Lot Single Family Residential District
Windmill Farms LLC, David & Judith Coene
This parcel was identified as the primary candidate by Verizon Wireless’ RF Engineer due to the property’s elevation and ability to resolve the existing network issues in this portion of the area, including properties along Lake Rd. There is adequate space for a 100’ x 100” lease area for a telecommunications tower and compound located in the eastern portion of the parcel. As shown on the site plans, the location of a 125’ tall tower will meet 100% tower setbacks from the nearby property boundaries. This property was selected by RF as the primary candidate because it satisfies the RF coverage requirements.
Candidate B:
Tax parcel#: 60118-00-995953 154 acres 7390 County Line Rd Town of Ontario | Wayne County .
RR — Rural Residential District
Windmill Farms LLC, David & Judith Coene
Candidate B is approx. 154 acres within the search area. The site is currently a large farm. The property owner expressed interest in this project only if the tower could be placed outside of the farmland. However, within this parcel there is no space outside the farmland to place the tower.
Candidate C:
Tax parcel#: 60119-00-994221 18.28 acres 180 Lake Road Town of Ontario | Wayne County
RR — Rural Residential District
Gary & Wendy Smith
Candidate C is approx. 18.28 acres within the center of the search area. This location is currently a densely wooded area. This parcel does have a large area covered by wetlands. The parcel is within
the RR - Rural Residential District zoning district.
Multiple attempts to engage the property owner resulted in no interest.
Page 5 of 10
Candidate D:
Tax parcel#: 60119-00-995332 10.59 acres 131 Lake Road Town of Ontario | Wayne County
RR — Rural Residential District
Catherine Kilcrease
Candidate D is approx. 10.59 acres within the northern portion of the search area. It is a residential property with a small wetland on the parcel. The site is within the RR - Rural Residential District zoning district.
Multiple attempts to engage the property owner resulted in no interest.
Candidate E:
Tax parcel#: 60119-00-963349 10.76 acres 95 Lake Road Town of Ontario | Wayne County
RR — Rural Residential District
Jennifer Jerome-Roberts
Candidate E is approx. 10.76 acres within the northern portion of the search area. Parcel is undeveloped, tree cutting would be required at this parcel. The site is within the RR - Rural
Residential District zoning district.
Multiple attempts to engage the property owner resulted in no interest.
Candidate F:
Tax parcel#: 60119-00-928376 16.68 acres 73 Lake Road Town of Ontario | Wayne County
RR — Rural Residential District
William L. Kolstad
Candidate F is approx. 16.68 acres within the northern portion of the search area. The site is a residential lot with an open field. Parcel is within an RR — Rural Residential District zoning district.
After meeting with M. Kolstad, they have no interest in the project.
Property owner was not interested.
Page 6 of 10
Candidate G:
Tax parcel#: 037.03-1-42 5.10 acres 1880 Lake Road Town of Webster | Monroe County
LL - Large Lot Single Family Residential District Owner: John Myers
Candidate G is approx. 5.10 acres within the eastern portion of the search area. The site is a residential lot with an open field. The site is within an RR — Rural Residential District zoning district. This is the smallest parcel considered, setbacks would be difficult to meet in this location.
Multiple attempts to engage the property owner resulted in no interest.
5. SUMMARY
After canvassing this Search Area, it has been determined that Candidate A was the only available site after a thorough investigation of alternatives. The RF Engineer has verified that this property will adequately meet RF coverage/capacity objectives for anew Macro Facility. The property is currently being used as farmland. The property is also large enough to accommodate the proposed facility while meeting setback requirements and avoiding disturbances to the wetlands. The owner and Verizon have entered into a ground lease agreement for the Facility, and a favorable site design has been completed and approved by both parties. This macro site is intended to provide increased wireless telecommunications coverage in an area where Verizon Wireless’ existing macro cell network is overburdened by demand and is lacking coverage for its 4th Generation LTE Network.
Thank you, Nico Facey Project Manager
NETWORK BUILDING + CONSULTING 1777 Sentry Parkway W | VEVA 17, Suite 400 | Blue Bell, PA | 19422
Ns:+C
TOTALLY COMMITTED.
Page 7 of 10
FIGURE 1
Verizon Wireless Lake Road Search Area
Page 8 of 10
FIGURE 2
Verizon Wireless Lake Road Search Area with Candidates and Tax Map and Wetlands/Floodplains Overlay
[ZZ] Federal Wetlands 100 Year Floods 100 Yr Floods ] Monroe Co Parcels Tax Map 60119 —— Tax Map 61119
Page 9 of 10
FIGURE 3
Three Mile Radius from Proposed Tower Location Showing Existing Towers/Tall Structures
Four Mile Creek
os ‘
tee.
' 4 o™ ; a , ‘ : ’ - v JS yg rm 2 ff * Sait East Webster mdean Parkway ite ~O RA ae 2
7 « oe © we iB.
5 ” 5 ~ » oi?
‘a - +. a “
Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT H -
Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting
Instructions for Completing Part 1
Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject.to public review, and may be subject to further verification.
Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information.
Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant- or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete.
A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information.
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless - Lake Road Wireless Telecommunications Facility
Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Intersection of Lake Rd & Monroe-Wayne County Line Rd. Webster, NY 14580 (Town of Webster, Monroe County) (T.A.#037.03-1-44, 7.8+ per Co. GIS)
Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need):
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless is proposing the construction of a wireless telecommunications facility. The facility will consist of a 125' monopole (with proposed 4' lightning rod) that will support a Verizon Wireless antenna array at 120' AGL, and two future carriers below; ground based improvements include outdoor equipment cabinets on a 11'x12.5' concrete slab with an ice canopy over it, a cable bridge, 10’ H-frame, a 50 kW diesel generator with tertiary containment tank on a 4'x8' concrete slab, all enclosed by a 36'x76’, 7' tall chain link fence with a 1' barbed wire top. The compound, generator, proposed tower, wireless telecommunications equipment, and meter board are all to be located within an 100'x100' lease area. Access to the site will utilize a proposed 12' wide gravel driveway off of Lake Road (County Route 1) to the proposed tower location.
Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: 585-943-2623
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless E-Mail: kathy pomponio@veri irel : y. ponio@verizonwireless.com
1275 John Street, Suite 100
City/PO: west Henrietta State: wy Zip Code: 4 4596
Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: 585-263-1333
Nixon Peabody-Robert Burgdorf, Esq. E-Mail: rburgdori@nixonpeabody.com
211 High Point Drive, Suite 110 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Victor NY 14564 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: Windmill Farms LLC E-Mail: Address: 193 County Line Road City/PO: Ontario State: NY Zip Code: ye4g
Page | of 13
B. Government Approvals
B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial
assistance.)
Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Counsel, Town Board, []YesL_JNo or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village WYesLJNo | Town of Webster: Planning Board - Site Plan December 2025 Planning Board or Commission Approval; Special Use Permit c. City, Town or WYes-JNo __| Town of Webster: Planning Board - Area Variance |December 2025 Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies - ClYesLINo e. County agencies WY esLJNo Monroe County DOT - Highway Permit December 2025 f. Regional agencies [TYesL_JNo g. State agencies [Yes[JNo h. Federal agencies CJYes[[]No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ClYes¥INo ii, Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? YesLINo iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? [1 YeskZINo C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the [7]Yesh/JNo only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? e If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. e If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part | C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site CTYesiZINo where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action [CYesIZINo would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; WY es[_INo Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): NYS Heritage Areas:West Erie Canal Corridor c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, [Yesh¥JNo
or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s):
Page 2 of 13
C.3. Zoning
a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. 1 Yes[_JNo If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? LL (LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
b. Is the use permitted or-allowed by a special or conditional use permit? 1 Yes(-]No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? LFYesMINo If Yes,
i, What is the proposed new zoning for the site?
C.4, Existing community services.
a. In what school district is the project site located? Webster Central School District
b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Webster Police Department, Monroe County Sheriffs Department, NYS Police
¢. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Penfield Webster EMS, Northeast Joint Fire District
d. What parks serve the project site? Four Mile Creek Preserve
D. Project Details
D.1. Proposed and Potential Development
a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Wireless Telecommunications Facility
b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 7.84 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.33+ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.44+ acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? CL Yesk/] No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % Units: d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? CJYes WINo If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? C]Yes [-JNo iti: Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? C1 YesiINo i, If No, anticipated period of construction: 3 months ii. If Yes: e Total number of phases anticipated « Anticipated commencement date of phase | (including demolition) month year e Anticipated completion date of final phase month year e Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may
determine timing or duration of future phases:
Page 3 of 13
f. Does the project include new residential uses? ; LC] Yesk]No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed.
One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase At completion of all phases g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? WYesLJNo If Yes, i. Total number of structures 1 ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 129' height; width; and length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: N/A square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ClYesWINo liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: [_] Ground water [[] Surface water streams [_]Other specify:
iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source.
iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons; surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete):
D.2. Project Operations
a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? [_]Yes/|No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i. What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii, How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? e Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): e Over what duration of time? iii, Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them.
iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? [_]Yes[_|No If yes, describe.
v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vil, What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii, Will the excavation require blasting? []Yes[_]No
ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan:
b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment [_]Yesl¥No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description):
Page 4 of 13
ii, Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels; banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres:
iii. Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? []Yes[_]No If Yes, describe:
iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ["] Yes[_]No If Yes:
* acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed:
¢ expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:
¢ purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access):
¢ proposed method of plant removal:
¢ if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s):
v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance:
c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? LJYes t/INo If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: gallons/day ii, Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? CyYes (No If Yes: e Name of district or service area: ¢ Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? [-] Yes] No ¢ — Is the project site in the existing district? (C1 Yes[[] No e Is expansion of the district needed? [1 YesL] No ¢ Do existing lines serve the project site? (1 Yes] No iii, Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? [TYes INo If Yes:
e Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
¢ Source(s) of supply for the district:
iv, Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? [J Yes[-]No If, Yes:
e Applicant/sponsor for new district:
e Date application submitted or anticipated:
e Proposed source(s) of supply for new district:
v. Ifa public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project:
vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? [C1 YesWINo If Yes:
i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: gallons/day
ii, Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each):
iii, Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? LJ Yes[_JNo If Yes: e Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used:
« Name of district:
e Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? C]Yes[_JNo e Is the project site in the existing district? []Yes[[JNo e _Is expansion of the district needed? []Yes[JNo
Page 5 of 13
* Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? [ClYesLJNo
e Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? [JYes[JNo If Yes:
e Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? C]YesLINo If Yes: e Applicant/sponsor for new district: e Date application submitted or anticipated: e What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans):
vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste:
e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point LlYes No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction?
i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or acres (impervious surface) Square feet or acres (parcel size)
ii, Describe types of new point sources.
iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)?
e If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands:
e Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? []Yes[_] No iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? []YesL]No
f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel WyYes No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) Construction equipment
ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) N/A
iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) Standby 50KW Diesel Generator with tertiary containment tank
g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, []Yesi/No or Federal Clean Air Act Title [V or Title V Permit?
If Yes:
i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet LlYesCJNo ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year)
ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate:
Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N20)
Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF,)
Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs)
Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)
Page 6 of 13
h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, [}Y¥esk4]No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes:
i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric):
ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring):
i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as [ ]Yesk/]No quarry or landfill operations?
Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust):
j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial []¥esh4No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes:
i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): [1] Morning [] Evening L]Weekend (J Randomly between hours of to
ii, For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks):
iii. Parking spaces: — Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease
iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ClyesINo v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe:
vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within /% mile of the proposed site? []Yes[_]No
vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric | []Yes[_]No or other alternative fueled vehicles?
viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections.to existing L]Yes[_]No pedestrian or bicycle routes?
k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand bYes[_]No for energy? If Yes: i, Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: 70,000 kwh
ii, Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): Local Utility
iii, Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation? [TY esk4]No
|. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply.
i, During Construction: ii. During Operations: e Monday - Friday: 7am - 6pm e Monday - Friday: 24 Hours e Saturday: 7am - 6pm e Saturday: 24 Hours e =Sunday: NA e = Sunday: 24 Hours e Holidays: N/A e —_— Holidays: 24 Hours
Page 7 of 13
m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, 1 YesLINo operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: During construction
ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? C] Yes No Describe:
n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? Yes[_JNo
If yes:
i, Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: (1) 25W flood light mounted on H-frame activated with spring wound timer, 8' +/- above grade
ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? Ll YesMINo Describe: o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? [1] Yes/No
If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures:
p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) [CL] YesWNo or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s) to be stored
ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g., month, year) iii. Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:
q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, [Yes No insecticides) during construction or operation?
i. Describe proposed treatment(s):
ii, Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? CL] Yes LINo
r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal [] Yes MNo of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)?
i, Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: e Construction: tons per (unit of time) e =Operation : tons per (unit of time)
ii, Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: e Construction:
e Operation:
ill, Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: e ~=Construction:
© Operation:
Page 8 of 13
s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ["] Yes (4 No [f Yes:
i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities):
ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing:
° Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or ° Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: years
t. Will the proposed action at the-site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous [_] Yes/No waste? If Yes:
i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility:
ii, Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents:
iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents:
vy. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? L]YesLINo If Yes: provide name and location of facility:
describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility:
E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action
E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site
a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. (-] Urban [J Industrial [4] Commercial [] Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) Forest Agriculture [[] Aquatic LC] Other (specify): ii. If mix of uses, generally describe:
b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site.
Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres +/-) « Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious 0.00 0.144 +0.14 surfaces
e = Forested
« Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non-
: : : : 0.024 0.174 +0.15 agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) ¢ = Agricultural 7.30% 7.10: -0.29 (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) e Surface water features 0.394 0.30+ 0.00
(lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.)
e Wetlands (freshwater or tidal)
e Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill)
e Other Describe:
Page 9 of 13
c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? LJ Yesl¥JNo i. If Yes: explain:
d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed L] Yesh/]No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site?
If Yes, i. Identify Facilities:
e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? C]Yesi]No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: e Dam height: feet e Dam length: feet e Surface area: acres ® Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet
ii, Dam’s existing hazard classification:
iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection:
f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, [Yes] No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility?
i. Has the facility been formally closed? [_]Yes[_] No
e = If yes, cite sources/documentation:
ii, Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility:
iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities:
g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin [1] Yes/No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred:
h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any Cl Yesk/] No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site L1YeslINo Remediation database? Check-all that apply: [J Yes — Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): C] Yes — Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s):
([] Neither database
ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:
iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? Ll YesINo If yes, provide DEC ID number(s):
iv. If-yes to (i), (ii) or (ili) above, describe current status of site(s):
Page 10 of 13
v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? [] Yes/No If yes, DEC site ID number: Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): Describe any use limitations: Describe any engineering controls: Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? [J YesEJNo Explain:
E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site
a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? >7 feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? [Yes/No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: CIB - Collamer Silt Loam 44% HuB - Hudson Silt Loam 56% % d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: 1,.5-2 feet e. Drainage status of project site soils:[_] Well Drained: % of site Moderately Well Drained: 100 % of site (-] Poorly Drained % of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: (41 0-10%: 400 % of site [-] 10-15%: % of site (] 15% or greater: % of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? [_] Yesh/No If Yes, describe: h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, WYes[_]No _ ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? WyYesl_]No If Yes to either / or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii, Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, WM Yes_INo state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: Py Streams: Name Deer Creek and Tribs Regulation #847-572 Classification C ® Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification © §=6Wetlands: Name Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland&Riverine Approximate Size 5.96 - PFO1B/16.42 R2UBH °® Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired L]Yes No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? L]Yes (No j. Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain? [_]Yes|¥JNo k. Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain? LJYesINo 1. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? LlYes¥JNo
i. Name of aquifer:
Page 11 of 13
m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site:
Small mammals Birds n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? L]YesWJNo If Yes:
i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation):
ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation:
iii, Extent of community/habitat:
e =Currently: acres e Following completion of project as proposed: acres e Gain or loss (indicate + or -): acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as _] Yes/No
endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an.endangered or threatened species?
i. Species-and listing (endangered or threatened):
p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of LI] Yes/No special concern?
i. Species and listing:
q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? LlYes[/JNo If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use:
E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site
a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located-in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to W]Yes[_JNo Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: MONRcné
b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? W]YesL_JNo i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? 7.8 Acres +/-
ii, Source(s) of soil rating(s): 2025 NY Agricultural Land Classification Monroe County - HuB: 3, CIB: 3
c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National L]Yes7JNo Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: (1 Biological Community [-] Geological Feature
ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent:
d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? [C]Yes/]No If Yes: i, CEA name:
ii. Basis for designation:
iii. Designating agency and date:
Page 12 of 13
ce. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district CI Yes] No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i, Nature of historic/archaeological resource: [JArchaeological Site | [JHistoric Building or District ii, Name:
iii. Brief description of-attributes on which listing is based:
f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for LlYesWINo archacological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory?
g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified en the project site? (1 YesJNo
If Yes:
i, Describe possible resource(s):
ii. Basis for identification:
h, Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local )Yes[JNo scenic or aesthetic resource?
i. Identify resource: Great Lakes Seaway Trail
ii, Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): National Scenic Byway - Lake Road / County Route 1
iii. Distance between project and resource: 05 miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers L} YesJNo Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? (J Yes[JNo
F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project.
If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them.
G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. /
Date 11/11/2025
Title Project Engineer-Costich Engineering, DPC
PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13
EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, November 11, 2025 7:59 AM
The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are ? = answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF
03720351643" a question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although
x <= the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources to confirm data provided by the Mapper or to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.
sae Le cae { ERE Garmin, usés. mond eras
Conner tic ut
oy t ng Keng) Ei Katea, ‘Esa “Sperst reatiMan contnigatcrs ara the GIs
Jarcy
User Comrmrarity, sn. HERE Garmin, JESUS NPS
SPSS SoH lA Site) See iaeeeeK
B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] -|No
B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] Yes :
C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Yes - Digital mapping data are not available for all Special Planning Districts. Refer to EAF Workbook. - ; oe
C2b. [Special Planning District - Name] _ ‘NYS Heritage Areas:West Erie Canal Corridor
Eth [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Potential Contamination History] ‘Workbook. 7
EAhi [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Listed] oo, ‘Workbook. _
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to AF
Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation ‘No
E.2. g [Unique Geologic Features] ‘No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF — ss WVORDOOK
E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes - Digital mapping information on local, New York State, and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to the EAF
E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes - Digital mapping information on local, New York State, and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to the EAF
E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] ‘No
E.2.i. [Floodway] No 7
E.2,j. [100 Year Floodplain] ‘No
E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] _ ‘No
E.2.1. [Aquifers] : ‘No
EAF Mapper Summary Report 1
E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No
E20. [Endangered or Threatened Species] ‘No a
E.2p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No
E.3.a. [Agricultural District] Yes
E.3.a. [Agricultural District] ; MONRen6 E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] -No
E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No | oo
E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Places or State Eligible Sites] Workbook.
E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No
E.3i. [Designated River Corridor] No
EAF Mapper Summary Report
14-14-11 (9/95)-9¢ 617.20 SEQR Appendix B Lake Road
State Environmental Quality Review een /aOos
Visual EAF Addendum
This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between
Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ A.) A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to oO Ol O OQ CO
the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities?
B.) An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public oO Oo . oO O Oo observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man- made scenic qualities?
C.) A site or structure listed on the National or State oO oO oO Oo Oo Registers of Historic Places?
D.) State Parks? Oo Oo Oo oO C E.) The State Forest Preserve? O | 0 O O F.) National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? O | QO | O G.) National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding O O O O O natural features?
H.) National Park Service lands? Oo Oo Oo O O J.) Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or oO O im O CQ Recreational?
K.) Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as Oo O O oO | part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak?
L.) A governmentally established or designated interstate or Oo O O CO O inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for
establishment or designation?
M.) A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as | | a O O scenic?
N.) Municipal Park, or designated open space? O oO C O O P.) County Road? * a | | O
R.) State? * O O Oo Oo
S.) Local Road? * a | B Oo
2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e. screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons? OYes No
3. Are any of the resources checked in questions 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? BYes No
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4, From each item checked in questions 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment.
Within *1/4 mile *41 mile Essentially undeveloped a a Forested | a Agricultural | | Suburban residential O O Industrial oO oO Commercial | oO Urban O O River, Lake, Pond O | Cliffs, Overlooks Oo O Designated Open Space O QO Flat | | Hilly oO oO Mountainous oO oO Other Oo O
5. Are there visually similar projects within:
* 1/4 mile CO Yes BH No* * 1 mile O Yes @ No* * 1¥%miles H Yes O No* * 3 miles @ Yes {1 No*
* Distance from project sites are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate.
EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is 73,365* NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate.
CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Activity Holidays/ Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally
Travel to and from work =| Oo O O Involved in recreational activities a O O O Routine travel by residents a Oo | oO At a residence a Oo oO QO At worksite | Oo oO O Other Oo O O O
*Refer to attached sheet
Lake Road Project No 9161 , 11/14/2025
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA FOR VISUAL EAF ADDENDUM
1. (M): Seaway Trail, Lake Road
1P.) County Distance Between Distance Between County Roads Project & Resource County Roads Project & Resource (Miles) (Miles) CR 1, Lake Rd. 0.04 - 0.28 CR 2, Monroe Wayne County 0.04 - 0.72 CR 4, Basket Rd. - 0.63 - 0.66 Line Rd.
1R.) State Roads
State Roads
Distance Between Project & Resource (Miles)
1S.) Local Roads
Distance Between
Distance Between
Local Road(s) Project & Resource Local Road(s) Project & Resource (Miles) (Miles) Rockledge Dr. 0.24 - 0.42 Area = Est. # of Viewers Estimate Traffic: Lake Road 2009 x 10% = 201
Total Average Daily Viewers
Total Estimated Viewers per Year
201 365 days per year
Pad
73,365/ year
EXHIBIT I
verizon
UPNY 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586
CO-LOCATION POLICY
Verizon's co-location policy is as follows:
Verizon encourages and promotes co-location, both by allowing other providers to locate on its towers, and by attempting to locate its facilities on other providers’ towers.
Verizon maintains the following requirements for other wireless telecommunication providers who desire to locate on Verizon's facilities:
1. The other provider must pay Verizon appropriate and fair compensation reflecting Verizon's investment in the engineering, legal, construction, material, and related costs for the site and facility;
2: The co-location must be technologically feasible both in terms of radio frequency transmissions and structural integrity of the tower; and
3; The other provider must have a similar policy of co-location for Verizon and its affiliated/related companies.
4913-4463-0318.1
EXHIBIT J
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
LAND LEASE AGREEMENT
This Land Lease Agreement (the "Agreement") is made by and between Windmill Farms, LLC (“Lessor”), with a mailing address of 193 County Line Road, Ontario, New York 14519 and Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Lessee”), with a mailing address of One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920. Lessor and Lessee are at times collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Parties" or individually as the "Party."
WITNESSETH
In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1. GRANT. Lessor hereby grants to Lessee the right to install, maintain, replace, add and operate communications equipment (“Use”) upon a portion of that real property owned, leased or controlled by Lessor located at O Lake Road, Webster, New York 14580 in the Town of Webster, Monroe County, New York, Tax Map No. 037.03-1-44 (the “Property”). The Property is legally described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof. The portion of the Property Lessee has rights to for its Use is approximately 10,000 square feet and is more particularly described and/or depicted on Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof (together with the Easements granted pursuant to Paragraph 5, collectively referred to herein as the “Premises’).
2. INITIAL TERM. This Agreement shall be effective as of the date of execution by both Parties (“Effective Date”). The initial term of the Agreement shall be for five (5) years beginning on the earlier of: (i) twenty-four (24) months after the Effective Date or (ii) the first day of the month after Lessee begins installation of Lessee’s communications equipment on the Premises (the “Commencement Date”). Lessee shall notify Lessor in writing, including electronic mail, of the Commencement Date, which Lessor shall confirm. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, Rent shall accrue starting on the Commencement Date.
3. EXTENSIONS. The initial term of this Agreement shall automatically be extended for four (4) additional 5-year terms unless Lessee gives Lessor written notice of its intent to terminate at least three (3) months prior to the end of the initial term or then current extension term, as applicable. The initial term and any extension terms shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Term”.
4. RENT.
a. Rent payments shall begin on the Commencement Date and be due at a total annual rent of ae (the “Rent’), to be paid in equal monthly installments on the first day of the month, in advance, to Lessor at 193 County Line Road, Ontario, New York 14519, or to such other person, firm, or place as Lessor may, from time to time, designate in writing at least thirty (80) days in advance of any Rent payment due date by notice given in accordance with Paragraph 4.d below. Rent shall accrue starting on the Commencement
1
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
Date; however, the initial Rent payment(s) will be delivered no later than ninety (90) days after: (i) Lessee’s receipt of the Rental Documents (as defined in Paragraph 4.c), or (ii) the written acknowledgement confirming the Commencement Date, whichever is later. Upon agreement of the Parties, Lessee may pay Rent by electronic funds transfer and in such event, Lessor agrees to provide to Lessee bank routing information for such purpose upon request of Lessee. Each year during the Term, as of the anniversary of the Commencement Date, annual Rent shall increase by over the Rent for the immediately preceding year.
b. As additional consideration for this Agreement, Lessee shall pay Lessor a one-time, non-refundable, lump-sum signing bonus of | (“Signing Bonus”) no later than ninety (90) days after: (i) Lessee’s receipt of the Rental Documents (as defined in Paragraph 4.c), or (ii) the Effective Date, whichever is later. The Signing Bonus shall be considered additional rent for the Premises for the period from the Effective Date until the Commencement Date (the “Due Diligence Period”). Lessor agrees that the Signing Bonus is fair and adequate consideration for the Due Diligence Period, and Lessor recognizes that Paragraph 2 of this Agreement governs the Commencement Date. This paragraph does not impact whether or not Lessee chooses to install Lessee’s communications equipment on the Premises and commence the Term.
c. For any party to whom Rent payments are to be made, Lessor or any successor in interest of Lessor hereby agrees to provide to Lessee (i) a completed, current version of Internal Revenue Service Form W-9, or equivalent; (ii) complete and fully-executed state and local withholding forms if required; (iii) Lessee’s payment direction form, and (iv) other documentation to verify Lessor’s or such other party’s right to receive rental as is reasonably requested by Lessee (collectively, the “Rental Documents”). If the Rental Documents are not provided by Lessor, or there is a change to the Lessor payee, Rent shall accrue in accordance with this Agreement, but Lessee shall have no obligation to deliver Rent payments to Lessor or its designee or successor in interest, as applicable, until thirty (30) days after Lessee receives the required Rental Documents. Thereafter, Lessee shall deliver the accrued Rent payments in accordance with the Rental Documents.
d. Lessor must register in the Verizon Landlord Connect portal (“VLC Portal”) at https://landlordconnect.verizon.com and shall utilize the VLC Portal to submit changes to Lessor’s account information (e.g. notice address, ownership information, banking details, email address), provide Rental Documents, view rental payments, submit an invoice/bill (e.g. utilities) for payment, and to access this Agreement or certificates of insurance.
5, ACCESS/UTILITIES. Lessee shall have the non-exclusive right of ingress and egress from a public right-of-way, seven (7) days a week, twenty-four (24) hours a day, over the Property to and from the Premises for the purpose of installation, operation and maintenance of Lessee’s communications equipment over or along one or more rights-of- way (“Easements”) shown or described on Exhibit “B”. Lessee may use the Easements for the installation, operation and maintenance of wires, cables, conduits and pipes for all necessary electrical, telephone, fiber and other similar support services as deemed necessary or appropriate by Lessee for the operation of Lessee’s communications equipment. In the event it is necessary, Lessor agrees to grant Lessee or the service provider the right to install such services on, through, over and/or under the Property, provided the
2
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
location of such services shall be reasonably approved by Lessor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties hereby agree that all such support services that are buried shall be buried in locations that avoid disrupting the roots of existing orchard trees. Support services shall be buried at least forty-eight (48) inches below the surface of the ground. Any deviation from this requirement must be approved in writing by Lessor and supported by a geological survey demonstrating the infeasibility of meeting the standard depth requirement. Lessee shall have the right to install underground utilities as set forth above. In the event of any power interruption at the Premises, Lessee shall be permitted to install, maintain and/or provide access to and use of a temporary power source to be located on the Property within one hundred (100) feet of the Premises, including related equipment and appurtenances, such as conduits connecting the temporary power source to the Premises.
6. CONDITION OF PROPERTY. Lessor shall deliver the Premises to Lessee in a condition ready for Lessee’s Use and clean and free of man-made debris but in its natural condition. Lessor represents and warrants to Lessee that as of the Effective Date, Lessor has not received any notices of violation and has no actual knowledge of any non-compliance with Laws (as defined in Paragraph 26), including EH&S Laws (as defined in Paragraph 23).
7. IMPROVEMENTS. The communications equipment including, without limitation, the tower structure, antennas, conduits, fencing and other screening, and other improvements shall be at Lessee’s expense and installation shall be at the discretion and option of Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to replace, repair, add to or otherwise modify Lessee’s communications equipment, tower structure, antennas, conduits, fencing and other screening, or other improvements or any portion thereof and the frequencies over which the communications equipment operates, at no additional cost to Lessee, whether or not any of the communications equipment, antennas, conduits or other improvements are listed on any exhibit. Lessee shall only be required to obtain Lessor consent for modifications that increase the square footage of Lessee’s Premises. Lessor shall respond in writing to any Lessee consent request within thirty (80) days of receipt or Lessor’s consent shall be deemed granted, provided, any increase to the Premises shall be memorialized by the Parties in writing. Lessor is not entitled to a Rent increase associated with any Lessee modification unless it is increasing its Premises, in which case, any Rent increase shall be proportionate to the additional square footage of ground space included in the Premises.
8. GOVERNMENT APPROVALS. Lessee’s Use is contingent upon Lessee obtaining all of the certificates, permits and other approvals (collectively the “Government Approvals”) that may be required by any Federal, State or Local authorities (collectively, the “Government Entities”) as well as a satisfactory soil boring test, environmental studies, or any other due diligence Lessee chooses that will permit Lessee’s Use. Lessor shall reasonably cooperate with Lessee, at Lessee’s sole cost and expense, in its effort to obtain and maintain any Government Approvals. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, Lessor hereby agrees to allow Lessee to install any radio frequency signs as are necessary to ensure Lessee’s compliance with Laws: (as defined herein).
9, TERMINATION. Lessee may, unless otherwise stated, immediately terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Lessor in the event that (i) any applications for such Government Approvals should be finally rejected; (ii) any Government Approval issued to Lessee is canceled, expires, lapses or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by any
3
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
Government Entity; (iii) Lessee determines that such Government Approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner; (iv) Lessee determines any structural analysis is unsatisfactory; (v) Lessee, in its sole discretion, determines the Use of the Premises is obsolete or unnecessary; (vi) with three (8) months prior notice to Lessor, upon the annual anniversary of the Commencement Date; or (vii) at any time before the Commencement Date for any reason or no reason, in Lessee’s sole discretion.
10. INDEMNIFICATION. Subject to Paragraph 11, each Party and/or any successor and/or assignees thereof, shall indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the other Party, and/or any successors and/or assignees thereof, against all third party claims of liability or loss (including reasonable attorney’s fees, expenses, and defense costs incurred by the indemnified Party) from bodily injury or property damage resulting from or arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnifying Party, its employees, contractors or agents, except to the extent such claims or damages may be due to or caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the other Party, or its employees, contractors or agents. The indemnified Party will provide the indemnifying Party with prompt, written notice of any claim that is subject to the indemnification obligations in this paragraph. The indemnified Party will cooperate appropriately with the indemnifying Party in connection with the indemnifying Party’s defense of such claim. The indemnifying Party shall defend any indemnified Party, at the indemnified Party’s request, against any claim with counsel selected by the indemnifying Party and reasonably satisfactory to the indemnified Party. The indemnifying Party shall not settle or compromise any such claim or consent to the entry of any judgment without the prior written consent of each indemnified Party and without an unconditional release of all claims by each claimant or plaintiff in favor of each indemnified Party. All indemnification obligations shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.
11. INSURANCE. Except as provided in Paragraph 11.c below, the Parties agree to maintain during the Term of this Agreement the following insurance policies:
a. Commercial general liability in oe per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage and general aggregate. Each Party shall be included as an additional insured as its interest may appear under this Agreement on the other Party’s insurance policy.
b. “All-Risk” property insurance on a replacement cost basis insuring their respective property with no coinsurance requirement. Where legally permissible, each Party agrees to waive subrogation against the other Party and to ensure said waiver is recognized by the insurance policies insuring the property.
Cc. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessor hereby acknowledges that all portions of the Property within three hundred feet (G00') of the Premises (hereinafter referred to as the “Insurance Buffer") are currently being used solely for agricultural, forestry or non-commercial purposes. The Parties hereby agree that as long as the current use of the Insurance Buffer remains as agricultural, forestry or non-commercial use during the Term, Lessor shall not be required to maintain the insurance required by Paragraph 11.a and 11.6 above. In the event that the current use of the Insurance Buffer changes during the Term to a non-agricultural, non-forestry or commercial use, Lessor shall provide Lessee with
4
49 12-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
30 days’ prior written notice of such change, and following such change, Lessor shall maintain the insurance as described above.
12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Except for indemnification pursuant to Paragraphs 10 and 28, a violation of Paragraph 28, or a violation of law, neither Party shall be liable to the other, or any of their respective agents, representatives, or employees for any lost revenue, lost profits, diminution in value of business, loss of technology, rights or services, loss of data, or interruption or loss of use of service, incidental, punitive, indirect, special, trebled, enhanced or consequential damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages, whether such damages are claimed for breach of contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, unless applicable law forbids a waiver of such damages.
13. INTERFERENCE.
a. Lessee agrees that Lessee will not cause interference that is measurable in accordance with industry standards to Lessor’s equipment. Lessor agrees that Lessor and other occupants of the Property will not cause interference that is measurable in accordance with industry standards to the then existing communications equipment of Lessee.
b. Without limiting any other rights or remedies, if interference occurs and continues for a period in excess of 48 hours following notice to the interfering Party via telephone to Lessee’s Network Management Center (at 1-800-264-6620 or 1-800-621- 2622) or to Lessor at (585-746-2044), the interfering Party shall or shall require any other user to reduce power or cease operations of the interfering equipment until the interference is cured.
c. The Parties acknowledge that there will not be an adequate remedy at law for noncompliance with the provisions of this Paragraph and therefore the Parties shall have the right to equitable remedies such as, without limitation, injunctive relief and specific performance.
14. REMOVAL/HOLDOVER.
a. Within ninety (90) days of the expiration or earlier termination of the Agreement, Lessee shall remove Lessee’s communications equipment (including footings and foundations) to a depth of at least forty-eight (48) inches below grade, unless Lessor otherwise agrees in writing, and restore the Premises to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear and casualty damage excepted. Lessor agrees and acknowledges that the communications equipment shall remain the personal property of Lessee and Lessee shall have the right to remove the same at any time during the Term, whether or not said items are considered fixtures and attachments to real property under applicable laws. The provisions of this Paragraph 14 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.
b. If the Parties are negotiating an amendment or new lease at the time of
the expiration of the Term, Lessee may remain on the Premises until: (i)the amendment or new lease has been executed; or (ii) until the removal of the communications equipment is
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
completed if the parties fail to enter into an amendment or new lease within ninety (90) days of the expiration of the Term; provided Lessee shall pay Rent at the then existing monthly rate, or on the existing monthly pro-rata basis if based upon a longer payment term.
15. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. If at any time after the Effective Date, Lessor receives an offer or letter of intent from any person or entity that is in the business of owning, managing or operating communications facilities or is in the business of acquiring landlord interests in agreements relating to communications facilities (hereinafter, collectively a “Communications Company’), to purchase fee title, an easement, a lease, a license, or any other interest in the Property or any portion thereof or to acquire any interest in this Agreement, or an option for any of the foregoing, Lessor shall provide written notice to Lessee of said offer (“Lessor’s Notice”). Lessor’s Notice shall include the prospective buyer’s name, the purchase price being offered, any other consideration being offered, the other terms and conditions of the offer, a description of the portion of and interest in the Property and/or this Agreement which will be conveyed in the proposed transaction, and a copy of any letters of intent or form agreements presented to Lessor by the third party offeror. Lessee shall have the right of first refusal to meet any bona fide offer of sale or transfer on the terms and conditions of such offer or by effectuating a transaction with substantially equivalent financial terms. If Lessee fails to provide written notice to Lessor that Lessee intends to meet such bona fide offer within forty-five (45) days after receipt of Lessor’s Notice, Lessor may proceed with the proposed transaction in accordance with the terms and conditions of such third party offer, in which event this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and the right of first refusal described in this Paragraph shall survive any such conveyance to a third party. If Lessee provides Lessor with notice of Lessee’s intention to meet the third party offer within forty-five (45) days after receipt of Lessor’s Notice, then if Lessor’s Notice describes a transaction involving greater space than the Premises, Lessee may elect to proceed with a transaction covering only the Premises and the purchase price shall be prorated on a square footage basis. Further, Lessor acknowledges and agrees that if Lessee exercises this right of first refusal, Lessee may require a reasonable period to conduct due diligence and effectuate the closing of a transaction on substantially equivalent financial terms of the third party offer. Lessee may elect to amend this Agreement to effectuate the proposed financial terms of the third party offer rather than acquiring fee simple title or an easement interest in the Premises. The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the provisions of this Paragraph 15 are only applicable to a Communications Company and shall not be applicable to any transaction involving a party acquiring the Property for agricultural purposes or residential or commercial development.
16. RIGHTS UPON SALE. Should Lessor, at any time during the Term, decide (i) to sell or otherwise transfer all or any part of the Property, or (ii) to grant to a third party by easement or other legal instrument an interest in and to any portion of the Premises, such sale, transfer, or grant of an easement or interest therein shall be under and subject to this Agreement and any such purchaser or transferee shall recognize Lessee's rights hereunder. In the event that Lessor completes any such sale, transfer, or grant described in this Paragraph without executing an assignment of the Agreement whereby the third party agrees in writing to assume all obligations of Lessor under this Agreement, then Lessor shall not be released from its obligations to Lessee under this Agreement, and Lessee shall have the right to look to Lessor and the third party for the full performance of the Agreement.
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
17. LESSOR’S TITLE. Lessor covenants that Lessee, on paying the Rent and performing the covenants herein, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Premises. Lessor represents and warrants to Lessee as of the Effective Date and covenants during the Term that Lessor has full authority to enter into and execute this Agreement and that there are no liens, judgments, covenants, easements, restrictions or other impediments of title that will adversely affect Lessee’s Use.
18. ASSIGNMENT/SUBLETTING. Without any approval or consent of the other Party, this Agreement may be sold, assigned or transferred by either Party to (i) any entity in which the Party directly or indirectly holds an equity or similar interest: (ii) any entity which directly or indirectly holds an equity or similar interest in the Party; or (iii) any entity directly or indirectly under common control with the Party. Lessee may assign this Agreement to: (a) any entity which acquires all or substantially all of Lessee's assets in the market defined by the Federal Communications Commission in which the Property is located by reason of a merger, acquisition or other business reorganization without any notice to, or approval or consent of, Lessor; or (b) a company that is engaged in the business of owning and/or operating communications towers (a "Tower Company") without prior written approval or consent of Lessor, provided Lessee shall provide Lessor written notice of any Tower Company assignment and the Tower Company shall assume all obligations of the original Lessee under this Agreement. As to other parties, this Agreement may not be sold, assigned or transferred without the written consent of the other Party, which such consent will not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. No change of stock ownership, partnership interest or control of Lessee or transfer upon partnership or corporate dissolution of either Party shall constitute an assignment hereunder.
Lessee may sublease any portion of the Premises, solely to install, maintain, replace, add and operate communications equipment, at its sole discretion, upon notice to Lessor. Any sublease that is entered into by Lessee shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement and shall be binding upon the successors, assigns, heirs and legal representatives of the respective Parties hereto. The term “Sublease”, “Sublet”, “Sublessee” and any other similar term shall apply to any situation by which Lessee allows a third party use of the Premises for co-location, whether it be by formal sublease, license or other agreement. All rights and responsibilities of Lessee set forth in this Agreement shall be enjoyed by and binding on any Sublessee.
a. In the event Lessee subleases any portion of the Premises in accordance with this Agreement, Sublessee(s) shall pay
per month to Lessor. Any Sublessee shall be instructed to pay the foregoing amount directly to Lessor. Lessee shall not be responsible to Lessor for the collection or payment of rents by the Sublessee to Lessor, and Lessee shall have no liability to Lessor in the event of failure of payment by Sublessee. Lessee shall have no liability of any nature to Lessor for failure to sublet all or any part of the Premises to any or all potential Sublessee(s). Lessee shall provide Lessor with a tri-party agreement to be executed by Lessee, Sublessee, and Lessor to confirm the direct payment obligation from Sublessee to Lessor and to indicate Lessor has been notified of the Sublease.
b. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Lessee shall not be required to obtain approval from the Lessor for Subletting the Premises or part
7
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
thereof provided that such Sublessee’s use is consistent with the terms of this Agreement. Lessee shall have the sole right to determine whether it will Sublet any portion of the Premises or whether it will Sublease to any specific Sublessee.
Cc. lf Lessee assigns this Agreement to a Tower Company which subsequently subleases any portion of the Premises to original Lessee, no sublease fee as described above shall be due and payable from the original Lessee for such Sublease. Pursuant to Paragraph 18.a above, Lessor shall be entitled to sublease fees from all other Sublessees.
d.: The rental provisions of this section shall not apply to any subletting for public emergency and/or safety systems purposes (i.e. police, ambulance and/or fire), that may be required or ordered by any governmental authority having jurisdiction over Lessee or the Premises. Lessee shall not be required to pay any amount to Lessor in connection with the subletting for public emergency and/or safety system purposes that may be required or ordered by any governmental authority having jurisdiction. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Lessee shall not be required to obtain any approval from Lessor for the subletting for public emergency and/or safety system purposes.
19. NOTICE. Except for notices permitted via telephone in accordance with Paragraph 13 or via electronic mail in accordance with Paragraph 2, all notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested or by commercial courier, provided the courier's regular business is delivery service and provided further that it guarantees delivery to the addressee by the end of the next business day following the courier's receipt from the sender, addressed as follows (or any other address that Lessee may have designated to Lessor by like notice, or that the Lessor may have designated to Lessee in the VLC Portal):
Windmill Farms, LLC 193 County Line Road Ontario, New York 14519 Attention: David Coene
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless Attn: Network Real Estate 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, New Jersey 07921
Basking Ridge Mail Hub Attn: Legal Intake One Verizon Way Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920
491 2-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
Notice shall be effective upon actual receipt or refusal as shown on the receipt obtained pursuant to the foregoing.
20. SUBORDINATION AND NON-DISTURBANCE. Within fifteen (15) days of the Effective Date, Lessor shall obtain a Non-Disturbance Agreement (as defined below) and/or any required consent from existing mortgagee(s), ground lessors and master lessors, if any, of the Property. At Lessor's option, this Agreement shall be subordinate to any future master lease, ground lease, mortgage, deed of trust or other security interest (a “Mortgage”) by Lessor which from time to time may encumber all or part of the Property; provided, however, as a condition precedent to Lessee being required to subordinate its interest in this Agreement to any future Mortgage covering the Property, Lessor shall obtain for Lessee's benefit a non-disturbance and attornment agreement for Lessee's benefit in the form reasonably satisfactory to Lessee, and containing the terms described below (the “Non- Disturbance Agreement”), and shall recognize Lessee's rights under this Agreement. The Non-Disturbance Agreement shall include the encumbering party's (“Lender's”) agreement that, if Lender or its successor-in-interest or any purchaser of Lender’s or its successor’s interest (a “Purchaser”) acquires an ownership interest in the Property, Lender or such successor-in-interest or Purchaser will honor all of the terms of the Agreement. Such Non- Disturbance Agreement must be binding on all of Lender's participants in the subject loan (if any) and on all successors and assigns of Lender and/or its participants and on all Purchasers. In return for such Non-Disturbance Agreement, Lessee will execute an agreement for Lender's benefit in which Lessee (i) confirms that the Agreement is subordinate to the Mortgage or other real property interest in favor of Lender, (ii) agrees to attorn to Lender if Lender becomes the owner of the Property, and (iii) agrees to accept a cure by Lender of any of Lessor's defaults, provided such cure is completed within the deadline applicable to Lessor. In the event Lessor defaults in the payment and/or other performance of any Mortgage or other real property interest encumbering the Property, Lessee, may, after providing thirty (80) days written notice to Lessor, at its sole option and without obligation, cure or correct Lessor's default and upon doing so, Lessee shall be subrogated to any and all rights, titles, liens and equities of the holders of such Mortgage or other real property interest and Lessee shall be entitled to deduct and setoff against all Rents or fees that may otherwise become due under this Agreement the sums paid by Lessee to cure or correct such defaults.
21. DEFAULT. It is a “Default” if (i) either Party fails to comply with this Agreement and does not remedy the failure within thirty (80) days after written notice by the other Party or, if the failure cannot reasonably be remedied in such time, if the failing Party does not commence a remedy within the allotted thirty (80) days and diligently pursue the cure to completion within ninety (90) days after the initial written notice, or (ii) Lessor fails to comply with this Agreement and the failure interferes with Lessee’s Use and Lessor does not remedy the failure within ten (10) days after written notice from Lessee or, if the failure cannot reasonably be remedied in such time, if Lessor does not commence a remedy within the allotted ten (10) days and diligently pursue the cure to completion within twenty (20) days after the initial written notice. The cure periods set forth in this Paragraph 21 do not extend
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
the period of time in which either Party has to cure interference pursuant to Paragraph 13 of this Agreement. .
22. REMEDIES. In the event of a Default, without limiting the non-defaulting Party in the exercise of any right or remedy which the non-defaulting Party may have by reason of such default, the non-defaulting Party may terminate this Agreement and/or pursue any remedy now or hereafter available to the non-defaulting Party under the laws or judicial decisions of the state in which the Property is located. Further, upon a Default, the non- defaulting Party may at its option (but without obligation to do so), perform the defaulting Party's duty or obligation. The costs and expenses of any such performance by the non- defaulting Party shall be due and payable by the defaulting Party upon receipt of an itemized invoice. If Lessee undertakes any such performance on Lessor's behalf, Lessee must first provide written notice to Lessor detailing the proposed work and estimated costs. If Lessor does not pay Lessee the full undisputed amount within thirty (80) days of its receipt of an itemized invoice setting forth the amount due, and after written notice of default and opportunity to cure, Lessee may offset the full undisputed amount due against up to fifty percent (50%) of the monthly fees due under this Agreement until the full undisputed amount is fully reimbursed to Lessee.
23. ENVIRONMENTAL. Lessee shall conduct its business in compliance with all applicable laws governing the protection of the environment or employee health and safety (“EH&S Laws”). Lessee shall indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Lessor from claims to the extent resulting from Lessee’s violation of any applicable EH&S Laws or to the extent that Lessee causes a release of any regulated substance to the environment. Lessor shall indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Lessee from all claims resulting from the violation of any applicable EH&S Laws or a release of any regulated substance to the environment except to the extent resulting from the activities of Lessee. The Parties recognize that Lessee is only leasing a small portion of the Property and that Lessee shall not be responsible for any environmental condition or issue except to the extent resulting from Lessee’s specific activities and responsibilities. In the event that Lessee encounters any hazardous substances that do not result from its activities, Lessee shall promptly notify Lessor in writing and the parties shall work together in good faith to identify a mutually agreeable solution, which may include relocation of Lessee's facilities to another location on the Property. Lessee may also, at its option (but without obligation to do so), remove at its own cost all or some of the hazardous substances or materials (such as soil) containing those hazardous substances, in which case, Lessor agrees to sign any necessary waste manifest associated with the removal, transportation and/or disposal of such substances.
24. CASUALTY. If a fire or other casualty damages the Property or the Premises and impairs Lessee’s Use, Rent shall abate until Lessee’s Use is restored. If Lessee’s Use is not restored within forty-five (45) days, Lessee may terminate this Agreement. If Lessee’s Use is not restored within three hundred and sixty-five (365) days and Lessee has not terminated this Agreement, then Lessee shail re-commence Rent payments.
25. CONDEMNATION. If a condemnation of any portion of the Property or Premises impairs Lessee’s Use, Lessee may terminate this Agreement. Lessee may on its own behalf make a claim in any condemnation proceeding involving the Premises for losses
10
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
related to Lessee’s communications equipment, relocation costs and, specifically excluding loss of Lessee’s leasehold interest, any other damages Lessee may incur as a result of any such condemnation.
26. APPLICABLE LAWS. During the Term, Lessor shall maintain the Property in compliance with all applicable laws, EH&S Laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, directives, covenants, easements, consent decrees, zoning and land use regulations, and restrictions of record, permits, building codes, and the requirements of any applicable fire insurance underwriter or rating bureau, now in effect or which may hereafter come into effect (including, without limitation, laws regulating hazardous substances) (collectively “Laws”). Lessee shall, in respect to the condition of the Premises and at Lessee’s sole cost and expense, comply with (i) all Laws relating solely to Lessee’s specific and unique nature of use of the Premises; and (ii) all building codes requiring modifications to the Premises due to the improvements being made by Lessee in the Premises. It shall be Lessor’s obligation to comply with all Laws relating to the Property, without regard to specific use (including, without limitation, modifications required to enable Lessee to obtain all necessary building permits). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessor’s compliance with any law required to enable Lessee to obtain all necessary building permits or to use the Property as intended herein shall be at Lessee’s sole cost and expense.
27. TAXES. If Lessor is required by law to collect any federal, state, or local tax, fee, or other governmental imposition (each, a “Tax”) from Lessee with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, then Lessor shall bill such Tax to Lessee in the manner and for the amount required by law, Lessee shall promptly pay such billed amount of Tax to Lessor, and Lessor shall remit such Tax to the appropriate tax authorities as required by law; provided, however, that Lessor shall not bill to or otherwise attempt to collect © from Lessee any Tax with respect to which Lessee has provided Lessor with an exemption certificate or other reasonable basis for relieving Lessor of its responsibility to collect such Tax from Lessee. Except as provided in this Paragraph 27, Lessor shall bear the costs of all Taxes that are assessed against or are otherwise the legal responsibility of Lessor with respect to itself, its property, and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Lessee shall be responsible for all Taxes that are assessed against or are otherwise the legal responsibility of Lessee with respect to itself, its property, and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, if the Property assessment includes amounts specifically attributable to Lessee’s communications equipment (collectively, “Communications Equipment Assessment”), Lessee shall be responsible for payment of real estate taxes based on the Communications Equipment Assessment; provided the Parties receive a courtesy split of the real estate tax bill by the appropriate Government Entity so that Lessee will receive its own real estate tax bill(s) which Lessee will pay directly to the appropriate Governmental Entity(ies).
28. NON-DISCLOSURE. The Parties agree that this Agreement and any information exchanged between the Parties regarding the Agreement are confidential. The Parties agree not to provide copies of this Agreement or any other confidential information to any third party without the prior written consent of the other Party or as required by law, provided however that either Party may share such information with its attorneys, accountants, lenders, and potential purchasers who have a need to know, subject to such recipients maintaining the confidentiality of such information. If a disclosure is required by
11
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
law, prior to disclosure, the disclosing Party shall notify the non-disclosing Party and cooperate with the non-disclosing Party to take lawful steps to resist, narrow, or eliminate the need for that disclosure.
29. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED.
30. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement contains all agreements, promises and understandings between Lessor and Lessee regarding this transaction, and no oral agreement, promises or understandings shall be binding upon either Lessor or Lessee in any dispute, controversy or proceeding. This Agreement may not be amended or varied except in a writing signed by all Parties. This Agreement shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns hereto. The failure of either Party to insist upon
‘ strict performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to exercise any of its rights hereunder shall not waive such rights and such Party shall have the right to enforce such rights at any time. The performance of this Agreement shall be governed, interpreted, construed and regulated by the laws of the state in which the Premises is located without reference to its choice of law rules. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, nothing in this Agreement shall grant, suggest or imply any authority for one Party to use the name, trademarks, service marks or trade names of the other for any purpose whatsoever. Lessor agrees to execute a Memorandum of this Agreement, which Lessee may record with the appropriate recording officer. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, including written and electronic forms. All executed counterparts shall constitute one Agreement, and each counterpart shall be deemed an original.
[Signature page follows]
12
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE:; NP / August 2025
(Signature page to Land Lease Agreement)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is entered into by the Parties as of the Effective Date.
LESSOR:
Name: Davi D R Coewe
mem hee /mawag « pate: ules
LESSEE:
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless
By:
Name:
lts:
Date:
18
4912-8383-$964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND, situate in the Town of Webster, County of Monroe and State of New York, being part of Subdivision 1 of the north part of Lot 10, Section 10, Township 14, Range 4 on
the south side of Lake Road and west side of the Monroe-Wayne County Line Road bounded and described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the center line of Lake Road at the northeast corner of premises conveyed to Richard A. Calabrese et al by deed recorded in Monroe County Clerk's Office October 4, 1876 in Liber 5108 of Deeds, Page 197; thence
1. Due east along the center line of Lake Road and continuing along the center line of the original right of way, now abandoned, of said road a distance of 1492.34 feet to the intersection of the abandoned right of way center line with the center line of the Monroe-Wayne County Line Road: thence
2. $00° 43' 10" E along the center line of the Monroe Wayne County Lien Road a distance of 380.80 feet to a point marking the easterly extension of the north line of premises conveyed to the Union Hill
Volunteer Fireman's Association, Inc. by deed recorded April 5, 1974 in Liber 4625 of Deeds, Page 25; thence
3. Westerly along the north line of said Union Hill Volunteer Firemen's Association Inc. premises aforesaid S 89° 16' 50" W a distance of 292.79' to a point in the center of Deer Creek marked by an iron pipe; thence
4. The following distances and courses along the center line of Deer Creek:
N 39° 42' 05" W a distance of 57.80' to an iron pipe; thence
N 51° 43' 20" W a distance of 157.87' to an iron pipe; thence
N 58° 47 15" W a distance of 168.82' to an iron pipe; thence
5 85° 36' 55" W a distance of 272.99" to an iron pipe; thence
8 75° 37' 00" W a distance of 652.83' to an iron pipe, marking the southeast corner of premises conveyed to Calabrese aforesaid; thence
5. N 00° 541' 20" E along the east line of said Calabrese premises a distance of 338.08" to the place of beginning.
4912-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
EXHIBIT "B"
PREMISES DESCRIPTION LEASE PARCEL DESCRIPTION All that tract or parcel of land situate in the Town of Webster, County of Monroe, State of New York, all as shown on a map entitled "Lake Road Schematic Total Holdings/Survey Plan", prepared by Costich Engineering, D.P.C., having drawing number 9161, sheet number VA100, dated 05/27/2025, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: Commencing at the point being the intersection of the southerly right-of-way line of Lake Road - County Route 1 (49.5° R.O.W.) with the westerly right-of-way line of County Line Road — County Route 2 (66’ R.O.W.), said point being the northeast corner of lands now or formerly owned by Windmill Farms LLC having T.A.# 037.03-1-44; thence A. S44°34'14"W, along a tie line and through lands said now or formerly owned by Windmill Farms, LLC having T.A.# 037.03-1-44, a distance of 135.20 feet to the northeast corner of the proposed Verizon Wireless lease parcel said point also being the point and place of beginning; thence 1. $00°47°12”E, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point; thence 2. $89°12'48”W, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point; thence
N00°47’12”W, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point; thence
ie?)
4. N89°12’48”E, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point and place of beginning. Containing 0.23 acres of land, more or less.
30’ WIDE ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
All that tract or parcel of land situate in the Town of Webster, County of Monroe, State of New York, all as shown on a map entitled "Lake Road Schematic Total Holdings/Survey Plan", prepared by Costich Engineering, D.P.C., having drawing number 9161, sheet number VA100, dated 05/27/2025, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows:
Commencing at the point being the intersection of the southerly right-of-way line of Lake Road - County Route | (49.5’ R.O.W.) with the westerly right-of-way line of County Line Road — County Route 2 (66’ R.O.W.), said point being the northeast corner of lands now or formerly owned by Windmill Farms LLC having T.A.# 037.03-1-44; thence
B. $89°12'48"W, along said assumed southerly bounds of Lake Road — County Route 1, a distance of 191.69 feet to the point and place of beginning; thence
5. $00°47°12”E, a distance of 65.00 feet to a point; thence 6. N89°12°48”E, a distance of 95.50 feet to a point; thence
7, $00°47'12"E, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point being the northeast corner of the proposed Verzion Wireless lease parcel; thence
8. S$89°12'48"W, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point being the northwest corner of the proposed Verizon Wireless lease parcel; thence
49] 2-8383-5964.7
Lake Road MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 LEGAL/DATE: NP / August 2025
9.
10.
11.
12.
14.
S00°47°12"E, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point being the southwest corner of the proposed Verizon Wireless lease parcel; thence
S $89°12'48"W, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point; thence N00°47°12”W, a distance of 130.00 feet to a point; thence
N89°12°48”E, a distance of 4.50 feet to a point; thence
. N00°47°12”W, a distance of 65.00 feet to a point on the assumed southerly bounds of Lake Road — County
Route 1; thence
N89°12’48”E along said assumed southerly bounds of Lake Road — County Route 1, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point and place of beginning.
10’ WIDE UTILITIES EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
All that tract or parcel of land situate in the Town of Webster, County of Monroe, State of New York, all as shown on a map entitled "Lake Road Schematic Total Holdings/Survey Plan", prepared by Costich Engineering, D.P.C., having drawing number 9161, sheet number VA100, dated 05/27/2025, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows:
Commencing at the point being the intersection of the southerly right-of-way line of Lake Road - County Route | (49.5’ R.O.W.) with the westerly right-of-way line of County Line Road — County Route 2 (66’ R.O.W.), said point being the northeast corner of lands now or formerly owned by Windmill Farms LLC having T.A.# 037.03-1-44; thence
C.
15.
16.
17.
18.
$89°12'48"W, along said assumed southerly bounds of Lake Road — County Route 1, a distance of 221.69 feet to the point and place of beginning; thence
$00°47°12”E, a distance of 10.00 to a point; thence S89°12°48"W, a distance of 17.32 feet to a point; thence
NO00°47°12”W, a distance of 10.00 feet to a point on said assumed southerly bounds of Lake Road — County Route 1; thence
N89°12748”E along said assumed southerly bounds of Lake Road — County Route 1, a distance of 17.32 feet to a point and place of beginning.
4912-8383-5964.7
PI N u N g a | e|| verizon = z E | a &¢ " i 1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 Ay WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14686. _—_ ‘ , EXISTING UTILITY POLE: i Se EXISTING BROKEN: WaT ASPHALT eyiSTING UTILITY POLE <= 1 a EXISTING UTILITY POLE: RGE 7084 Oh) al nt sown RGE 3. WiTRANSFORMERS \ ty. Oe a Etisicerns EXISTING UTILITY POLE: COM SE \ a Lan RTC 110 TAL. SURVEY POLE LINE EASEMENT Tq ROCHESTER FRO : sLanoseare GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION = 2 TAS a LANDSCAPE PER LIBER 1365 OF DHEDS PAGE 32 - _ ca o COSTICH wcll oo a a ‘ - ENGINEERING “innnanes _ ee : =f ONTARIO SIGN \ Ls) “iWTERSEcTION S- EXISTING ASPHALT —~ "ai raver \ “\ Vit "TiO. DATE COMMENTS NF NF AHEAD “tT - 3 4 ° “TW [DaueR PnetIveWay Fon T.A# 037.03-1-40.1 T.A.H 037,03-1~40.2 SIGN 31 ame = la ~ a t oo i. 1 AJK |tEca. Nir NiF “RPPROXIMATE ROW. 2 5 posers ISTING UTILITY POLE: Q T.AM# 037,03-1-39.2. TAH 037.03-1-42 BOUNDS & py a RGE 70A i g * sw 4074 2 OPO. RI PROPOSED VERIZON EXISTINGEOGE OF) 4 NF | / PROPOSED VERIZON 10° WIDE UTILITIES y Pe 1 CULTIVATED FIELD, oo 7.03-1-26 WIRELESS — c TAS 037.03-1-2 u EASEMENT NFO. 10" WIDE UTILITIES Zz NF EASEMENT i) | we TAM 037.03.1-37 | 1 1.A#037.03-1-43 Cw ——- j TAH 037,03+1-27 | | | | | | | | _ a 2 NIF as A | TA 037.03-1-38.1 ! | j — a 5 : TAM ose 1-30 | — : 78 —e VF 3) it lL ] | Q taseor 13.00.904221 aia fH Na S — . L. \ 12} EXISTING FIELD pooh oe 5 a LAKE ROAD- COUNTY ROUTE! (@9.5°WIDE) S 0 | e 3 APPROXIMATE R.O.W, BOUNDS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS tia { » a 2 x 30° WIDE ACCESS ANO UTILITIES EASEMENT <a ———+— Fs e PRoleT NE W/ PROPOSED TEMPORARY 10° WIDE CLEARING hacen A 8 os 8 a 3 4 =j MANAGER WANDMILL FARMS, LLC AND GRADING EASEMENTS ON EITHER SIDE 5B } id _] 34 fe) TAM O57. 00-1~44 "S 1s | as een 3 55 n DAW BP, OS, 99% fay | NF Qa, & | LIBER 8718 PAGE 872 ce pou I © T.A.# 60119-00-948199 RN PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS: 2 a yn nsee in We & 125'MONOPOLE TOWER re) 4 DRAWN aY neon? Nef 129" MINIMUM 8 So SX LAT:43,268833"(43" 16" 07.80°N) 3 Nl WINOMILL FARMS, LLC TOWER SETBACK ts iP % LONG:-77,376738°(77" 22' 36.26) _/¥ B i T.KW, T.A.# 037,03-1~49 Q BASE ELEV= 308,5't AMSL x ¢| COUNTY LINE ROAD PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS | ——_----——- S Py Fa ie NF LIBER 8718 PAGE 672 125' MONOPOLE TOWER 3 S a a COPURITIT aE GAUGER & SINGLY, INC. LAT:43.268833'(43" 16° 07.80°N) alii AREL ESS ty COSTICH ENGINEERING, DPC. TAH 037.03-1-60 LONG-77,376738"(77" 22'36.26°W) 2g a PN WIRELESS |_COSTCH FNGINEERING, DEC] 1827 LAKE ROAD BASE ELEV= 308.5't AMSL. \ 82 WS we 1 x 100 LEASE PARCET, fs iesgAcio innit te ante inn or ART AS 0,236 4 ” LAN LIBER 12799 PAGE 292 Nf Bally | Q tax corte-00-005083 CENTERLINE OF. WE \y “ainaon arontter on esa PROPOSED VERIZON Wi} Fy S sees Ream WINDMILL FARMS, LLC 3 i"3 SCUMENT RIAN OAT ANY LCENSEE IO SED VERIZOY AW 18 CLASS € STRI TAH 037.03+1-44 = lee ALTENS THUS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW NE aL) TAKE ROAD 3 |g TOMTIEHSHERGEAL IN HIE TE TRTION T.A.# 037.03-1-61 \Bis|° NF LIER 8716 PAGE 672 2 Igo {Han TURE AND EOECH I DESCRIPTION OF 1 S| WINDMILL FARMS, LLC 2a VATERATIOH. FO THE OOCUME NT. ar a T.A.# 037.03-1-49 & le? SHE FPORMATION WALA — COUNTY LINE ROAD APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS.) oD 1] 3 a alg = LIBER 8718 PAGE 672 a 3 LAKE ROAD S.C. PRECISION Lawn & GARDEN, CORP. B35 Hon 2 {es ee PROJECT ID: 17108195 ee RF OOM a One als & C-S.C. PRECISION LAWN § GARDEN, CORP, = Mg MDG LOCATION ID: 5000910807] 158 COUNTY LINE ROAD Als 155 COUNTY LINE ROAD % lg? LIBER 12135 PAGE 417 31 LIBER 12135 PAGE 417 2 16 TOWN OF WEBSTER Ziz & oO ° F WEBSTER | B19 ie Qe COUNTY OF MONROE gre 3 (2 STATE OF NEW YORK Olz gi |_-pristin I] SEELIE - I BUILDING #155 My SCHEMATIC TOTAL ' i HOLDINGS/ SURVEY \, a PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE GRAPIC SCALE JOB NUMBER SHEE) HUMBER, 10 ° 75 150 xO 600 40 80 460 (ig) SCHEMATIC TOTAL HOLDINGS ae ey Sunvey Pian as 9161 || VA100 LSTH “Al oe 180° Ss} I Perera SCALE 1° = 40 (22 x 34 SHEET} SCALE 17 159 (22 94 SHEET) = 80 (15 x 17 SHEET} UINFEET) sr dog (13x 17 SHEET} CNFEET) ar ch a0 ft OF 4° SHEET Dich" 1SUR O22" x 44° SH Haaee Ee ibe > Finch > 3on. (1 x17" inch = 40 (11" x17" 8
EXHIBIT K
=~ Costich Engineering
U =< Land Surveying E Landscape Architecture
217 LAKE AVENUE
(585) 458-3020
PROJECT NAME
Lake Road
Photo 1
PHOTO DESCRIPTION View toward site
balloons at 125’ and 145’
DATE OF PHOTO 11/16/2025
PHOTO COORDINATES 43.26983300° N, 77.37545700° W
PHOTO LOCATION View SW from Lake Rd.
500’ from site
C.E. JOB# 9161
Project ID 17108195
Costich Engineering
¢ — Land Surveying E Landscape Architecture
217 LAKE AVENUE
TICH ROCHESTER, NY 14608 eee (585) 458-3020
PROJECT NAME
Lake Road
Photo 1
PHOTO DESCRIPTION Photosimulation of proposed
125’ monopole
DATE OF PHOTO 11/16/2025
PHOTO COORDINATES 43.26983300° N, 77.37545700° W
PHOTO LOCATION View SW from Lake Rd. 500’ from site
C.E. JOB# 9161
Project ID 17108195
COSTICH
Costich Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture
217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020
PROJECT NAME
Lake Road
Photo 2
PHOTO DESCRIPTION View toward site
balloons at 125’ and 145’
DATE OF PHOTO 11/16/2025
PHOTO COORDINATES 43.26927300° N, 77.37889598° W
PHOTO LOCATION View E from Lake Rd.
600’ from site
C.E. JOB# 9161
Project ID 17108195
Costich Engineering
Q- Land Surveying |= Landscape Architecture
217 LAKE AVENUE (585) 458-3020
PROJECT NAME
Lake Road
Photo 2
PHOTO DESCRIPTION Photosimulation of proposed
125’ monopole
DATE OF PHOTO 11/16/2025
PHOTO COORDINATES 43.26927300° N, 77.37889598° W
PHOTO LOCATION View E from Lake Rd. 600’ from site
C.E. JOB# 9161
Project ID 17108195
Costich Engineering ll Land Surveying bs} Landscape Architecture
217 LAKE AVENUE
(585) 458-3020
PROJECT NAME
Lake Road
Photo 3
PHOTO DESCRIPTION View toward site
balloons at 125’ and 145’
DATE OF PHOTO 11/16/2025
PHOTO COORDINATES 43.26578900° N, 77.38822498° W
PHOTO LOCATION View NE from Basket Rd. 3256’ from site
C.E. JOB# 9161
Project ID 17108195
Costich Engineering
¢ Land Surveying [= Landscape Architecture
217 LAKE AVENUE TICH ROCHESTER, NY 14608 saiaiiaianien (585) 458-3020
PROJECT NAME
Lake Road
Photo 3
PHOTO DESCRIPTION Photosimulation of proposed
125’ monopole
DATE OF PHOTO 11/16/2025
PHOTO COORDINATES 43.26578900° N, 77.38822498° W
PHOTO LOCATION View NE from Basket Rd.
3256’ from site
C.E. JOB# 9161
Project ID 17108195
PROJECT NAME PHOTO DESCRIPTION DATE OF PHOTO
¢ Eagan Lake Road View toward site 11/16/2025 El Landscape Architecture balloons at 125’ and 145’ C.E. JOB# 217 LAKE AVENUE Photo 4 PHOTO LOCATION 9161
View N from Monroe Wayne County Line Rd. Proj ROCHESTER, NY 14608 PHOTO COORDINATES ; ; sae COSTICH (685) 458-3020 43.26630200° N, 77.37599998° W 952’ from site 17108195
Costich Engineering
Q- Land Surveying |= Landscape Architecture
217 LAKE AVENUE COSTICH ROCHESTER, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020
PROJECT NAME
Lake Road
Photo 4
PHOTO DESCRIPTION Photosimulation of proposed
125’ monopole
DATE OF PHOTO 11/16/2025
PHOTO COORDINATES 43.26630200° N, 77.37599998° W
PHOTO LOCATION View N from Monroe Wayne County Line Rd. 952’ from site
C.E. JOB# 9161
Project ID 17108195
EXHIBIT L
C OSTI CH Project No. 9161
November 7, 2025
Kathy Pompnio
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street, Suite 100
West Henrietta, NY 14586
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless Lake Road - Tower Design Letter PROJECT ID# 17108195/ MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 Intersection of Lake Rd & Monroe-Wayne County Line Rd, Webster, NY 14580 (Town of Webster, Monroe County)
Dear Ms. Pomponio,
For the Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless Lake Road Telecommunications Facility, a 125’ monopole tower constructed of galvanized steel, with a 4’ lighting rod is proposed. The tower is to be located within a 100' x 100' lease parcel area and shall be designed to support a total of (3) cellular carriers. The tower shall be designed to support this loading with a 109-mph basic wind speed (no ice) and 2 inch minimum radial ice at 40 mph in accordance with TIA/EIA-222-H, “Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures”. This is the standard currently referenced by the International Building Code. The tower shall be designed by a licensed New York State Professional Engineer meeting the aforementioned criteria.
The tower is approximately +/- 145' from the closest property line and therefore meets the town’s setback requirement.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
Costich Engineering, D. P.C.
David A. Weisenreder, P.E.
H:\job\9 161\Documents\Specifications\Zoning Materials\Lake Road _ 9161_Tower Design letter _ 20251107.docx
CIVIL ENGINEERING « LAND SURVEYING * LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Costich Engineering, DPC + 217 Lake Avenue « Rochester, New York 14608 Office (585) 458-3020 + Fax (585) 458-2731 + www.costich.com
EXHIBIT M
UPNY 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586
December 9, 2025
Town Board, Planning Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Webster
1000 Ridge Rd
Webster, NY 14580
Application for a special use permit, site plan approval, and area variance from the Town of Webster by Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon to construct and operate a 125’ wireless telecommunications tower (plus 4’ lightning rod) and associated improvements on land owned by Windmill Farms LLC located near the intersection of Lake Road and Monroe-Wayne County Line Road (Tax Pparcel No. 037.03-1-44) in the Town of Webster, Monroe County, New York (Verizon’s “Lake Road” site).
Dear Members of the Planning Board:
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon (“Verizon”) agrees to remove the proposed wireless telecommunication facility and related improvements installed as part of the above- referenced project within ninety (90) days if the facility becomes obsolete, damaged beyond use or ceases to be used for its intended purpose for a period of twelve (12) consecutive months.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (585) 321-5435.
Sincerely,
/s/ Kathleen Pomponio
Kathleen Pomponio
4913-56 13-5294.1
COSTICH Project No, 9161
November 7, 2025
Kathy Pompnio
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street, Suite 100
West Henrietta, NY 14586
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless Lake Road - Tower Design Letter PROJECT ID# 17108195/ MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 Intersection of Lake Rd & Monroe-Wayne County Line Rd, Webster, NY 14580 (Town of Webster, Monroe County)
Dear Ms. Pomponio,
For the Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless Lake Road Telecommunications Facility, a 125’ monopole tower constructed of galvanized steel, with a 4’ lighting rod is proposed. The tower is to be located within a 100' x 100' lease parcel area and shall be designed to support a total of (3) cellular carriers. The tower shall be designed to support this loading with a 109-mph basic wind speed (no ice) and 2 inch minimum radial ice at 40 mph in accordance with TIA/EIA-222-H, “Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures”. This is the standard currently referenced by the International Building Code. The tower shall be designed by a licensed New York State Professional Engineer meeting the aforementioned criteria.
The tower is approximately +/- 145' from the closest property line and therefore meets the town’s setback requirement.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
Costich Engineering, D. P.C.
David A. Weisenreder, P.E.
H:\job\9161\Documents\Specifications\Zoning Materials\Lake Road _ 9161_Tower Design letter _ 20251107.docx
CIVIL ENGINEERING « LAND SURVEYING * LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Costich Engineering, DPC + 217 Lake Avenue + Rochester, New York 14608 Office (585) 458-3020 + Fax (585) 458-2731 + www.costich.com
EXHIBIT N
Page | of 1 ULS License
AWS-3 (1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, and 2155-2180 MHz) License - WQVN927 - Celico Partnership
Call Sign WQVN927 Radio Service AT - AWS-3 (1695-1710 MHz, 1755- 1780 MHz, and 2155-2180 MHz)
Status Active Auth Type Regular
Market BEA007 - Rochester, NY-PA Channel Block J
Submarket 0 Associated 001770.00000000-001780.00000000
Frequencies (MHz) |002170.00000000-002180.00000000
Grant 04/08/2015 Expiration 04/08/2027 Effective 11/01/2016 Cancellation
ist 04/08/2021 2nd 04/08/2027
co i
Licensee
FRN 0003290673 Type | General Partnership
Cellco Partnership P:(770)797-1070 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering F:(770)797-1036
Alpharetta, GA 30022 E:licensingcompliance@verizonwireless.com ATTN Regulatory
Cellco Partnership P:(770)797-1070
Licensing Manager F:(770)797-1036
5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com Alpharetta, GA 30022
ATTN Regulatory
Ownership and Qualifications
Radio Service Type Mobile 7 Regulatory Status Common Carrier ‘Interconnected |Yes
Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions.
Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions.
Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits.
Demographics
Race Ethnicity Gender |
4/4/2017
ULS License AWS (1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz) License - WQGA715 - Cellco Partnership
Call Sign WQGA715
Status Active
Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit
Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Service Provider (RSP) bidding credit?
Reserved Spectrum Reserved Spectrum
Market Market REAOO1 - Northeast Submarket 21
3.7 GHz License Type Dates
Grant 12/14/2021 Effective 12/14/2021 Buildout Deadlines
1st
Discontinuance Dates
1st
Notification Dates
1st
Licensee FRN Licensee
0003290673
Cellco Partnership 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022
Contact
Cellco Partnership
Manager
5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ownership and Qualifications Mobile Common Carrier
Radio Service Type Regulatory Status Alien Ownership
Interconnected
Is the applicant a foreign government or the representative of any foreign government?
Is the applicant an alien or the representative of an alien?
Is the applicant a corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government?
Radio Service Auth Type
Channel Block
Associated Frequencies (MHz)
3.7 GHz Linked License
Expiration Cancellation
2nd
2nd
2nd
Type
P:(770)797-1070 F:(770)797-1036
AWS (1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz) Regular
F
001745,00000000-001755.00000000 002145.00000000-002155.00000000
11/29/2036
08/26/2021
General Partnership
E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com
P:(770)797-1070 F:(770)797-1036
E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com
Yes
No No No
Is the applicant a corporation of which more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or No voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any
corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country?
Is the applicant directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one-fourth
Yes
of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign
country? The Alien Ruling question is not answered,
Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions.
Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits.
Demographics Race Ethnicity
Gender
ULS License AWS (1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz) License -
Call Sign WQPZ962
Status Active Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Service Provider (RSP) bidding credit?
Reserved Spectrum Reserved Spectrum
Market Market Submarket
REAOO1 - Northeast 13
3.7 GHz License Type Dates
Grant
Effective
Buildout Deadlines ist
Discontinuance Dates 1st
Notification Dates
ist
02/16/2022 02/16/2022
Licensee FRN Licensee
Cellco Partnership 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022
0003290673
Contact
Cellco Partnership
Licensing Manager
5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ownership and Qualifications Mobile Common Carrier
Radio Service Type Regulatory Status Interconnected
Alien Ownership
Is the applicant a foreign government or the representative of any foreign government?
Is the applicant an alien or the representative of an alien?
Is the applicant a corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government?
Is the applicant a corporation of which more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or
WQPZ962 - Celico Partnership
AWS (1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155
MHz) Auth Type Regular Channel Block E
001740.00000000-001745.00000000 002140,00000000-002145,00000000
Associated Frequencies (MHz)
3.7 GHz Linked License
Expiration 11/29/2036 Cancellation
2nd
2nd
2nd 10/04/2021
Type General Partnership
P:(770)797-1070 F:(770)797-1036 E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com
P:(770)797-1070 F:(770)797-1036 E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com
Yes
No No No No
voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by
any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country?
Is the applicant directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one-
Yes
fourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign
country? The Alien Ruling question is not answered.
Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions.
Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits.
Demographics Race Ethnicity
Gender
KNKA297 - Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC
Call Sign KNKA297
Status Active
Market
Market CMA034 - Rochester, NY Submarket 0
Dates
Grant 04/15/2025
Effective 04/15/2025
Five Year Buildout Date
10/01/1989
ECIP Information ECIP Flag
Small Carrier or Tribal Nation Transaction
ECIP Dates
5-Year Holding Period Begins
Required Operational Filing Dates
IORN Operation Begin FORN Deadline Date
Date
Control Points
3 500 W. Dove Rd., TARRANT, Southlake, TX P: (800)264-6620
Licensee
FRN 0029635588
Licensee
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC
5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022
ATTN Licensing Manager
Contact
Verizon Wireless
Licensing Manager
5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022
ATTN Regulatory
Ownership and Qualifications Mobile
Common Carrier
Radio Service Type Regulatory Status
Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions.
Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions.
Demographics Race Ethnicity
Interconnected
Cellular Auth Type Regular Channel Block
Phase 2
Expiration 05/15/2035 Cancellation
Rural-Focused
Transaction
5-Year Holding Period Ends
FORN Filed Date
Type Limited Liability Company
P:(770)797-1070 E:Licensingcompliance@VerizonWireless.com
P:(770)797-1070 E:Licensingcompliance@VerizonWireless.com
Yes
Sex
ULS License - PCS Broadband License - KNLH270 - Cellco Partnership Page 1 of 1
KNLH270 - Cellco Partnership
0007966578
Call Sign KNLH270 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband
Status Active Auth Type Regular
Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit
Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Service Provider (RSP) bidding credit?
Reserved Spectrum
Reserved Spectrum
Market
Market BTA379 - Rochester, NY Channel Block E
Submarket 0 Associated Frequencies 001890.00000000-001895.00000000 (MHz) 001970.00000000-001975.00000000
Dates
Grant 06/02/2017 Expiration 06/27/2027
Effective 06/02/2017 Cancellation
Buildout Deadlines
1st 06/27/2002 2nd
Notification Dates
1st 06/04/2002 2nd
Licensee
FRN 0003290673 Type Joint Venture
Licensee
Cellco Partnership P:(770)797-1070
5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering F:(770)797-1036
Alpharetta, GA 30022 E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com
ATTN Regulatory
Contact
Cellco Partnership P:(770)797-1070
Manager F:(770)797-1036
5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com
Alpharetta, GA 30022
ATTN Regulatory
Ownership and Qualifications
Radio Service Type Mobile
Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes
Alien Ownership
Is the applicant a foreign government or the representative of any foreign government? No
Is the applicant an alien or the representative of an alien? No
Is the applicant a corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government? No
Is the applicant a corporation of which more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned of record No or voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country?
Is the applicant directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one- Yes fourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a
foreign government or representative thereof, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country?
The Alien Ruling question is not answered.
Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions.
Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits.
Demographics Race Ethnicity Gender
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=10439&printable 11/16/2017
700 MHz Upper Band (Block C) License - WQJQ689 - Cellco Partnership Page 1 of 1
ULS License
700 MHz Upper Band (Block C) License - WQJQ689 - Cellco Partnership
0008657811
Call Sign WQI)Q689 Radio Service WU - 700 MHz Upper Band (Block C) Status Active Auth Type Regular
Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit
Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Service Provider (RSP) bidding credit?
Reserved Spectrum Reserved Spectrum
Market
Market REAOO1 - Northeast Channel Block Gc
Submarket 0 Associated 000746.00000000-000757.00000000 Frequencies (MHz) 000776.00000000-000787.00000000
Dates
Grant 09/11/2019 Expiration 06/13/2029
Effective 09/11/2019 Cancellation
Buildout Deadlines
1st 06/13/2013 2nd 06/13/2019
Notification Dates
1st 06/20/2013 2nd 06/17/2019
Licensee
FRN 0003290673 Type General Partnership
Licensee
Cellco Partnership P:(770)797-1070
5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com
Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory
Contact Verizon Wireless P:(770)797-1070 Licensing Manager E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com
5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory
Ownership and Qualifications Radio Service Type Mobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes
Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions.
Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions.
Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits.
Demographics Race Ethnicity Gender
https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3060316&printable 9/30/2019
EXHIBIT O
AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT
(pursuant to NY Ag & Mkt Law 305-a; N.Y. Town Law & 283-a; N.Y. Village Law § 7-739 and N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law 239-m)
Applicant Owner (if different from applicant)
Name:
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC Name: Windmill Farms, LLC d/b/a Verizon
193 County Line Road
1275 John Street, Suite 100 Ontario. NY
West Henrietta, NY 14586
ls
to
to
[XJ] Special Use Permit [X] Site Plan Approval [x] Height Variance(s) |_| Use Variance [_] Subdivision Approval
Construction and operation of a 125’ wireless telecommunications facility (plus 4’ lightning rod) and associated improvements.
Adjacent to intersection of Lake Road and Monroe- Wayne County Line Road
List all farm operations which are both: (i) located within 500 feet of the boundary of the property upon which the project is proposed, and (ii) located in an agricultural district:
SEE ATTACHED
Attach a tax map or other map showing the site of the proposed project relative to the location of farm operations identified above. SEE ATTACHED
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Nixon Peabody LLP, its attorneys
4931-5162-2270.1
—— = 2 NORTH
N/E T.A# 037.03-1-36.1
T.A# 037.03-1-38.1
NIF TA# 037.03-1-39.2~ 7 ees N/F SS ZA : a T.A# 037.03-1-39. SET Ye ™~ NIF
500' Offset
NYS Ag District
UU
g NF Ne NF is T.A# 037.03-1-36.3 VERS A eRe T.A# 037.03-1-37 Sx 8 NF * T.A.#.037.03-1-31 Pes NF T.A# 037.03-1:42 SSS Es 2 - : a 5 1A 4067.06 ar % 23 3 ~ = 3 3 s 8 # $ 2
T.A.# 037.03-1-43
NF
NF T.A.# 60119-00-928264
NES EY
Y3LSGIM JO NMOL RE is ie ee SSS Oe ae a ee
ALNNOD ANAVM ‘ORSVLNO 30 NMOL
N/F T.A.# 037.03-1-45
|
gl
gl
zZ
4 | |
BNIES PO
A
“ A#601 je-oosoazd1
yy
I | Wa Pickeemva | Project Parcel " * LANDSCAPE I ‘a #60118-96-99505 COSsTICH Bilin y ae Parcels bj, | a ENGINEERING “wan 2snscco Wis He, I GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 5 100 200 400 VZW - LAKE ROAD CE# 9161 (IN FEET)
linch= 100ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) linch = 200f. (11"x 17" SHEET)
TOWN OF WEBSTER, MONROE COUNTY 500' AG ADJOINER EXHIBIT
11/24/2025
LAKE ROAD LIST OF ADJOINERS WITHIN 500° OF TA#037.03-1-44
(HIGHLIGHTED PARCELS ARE LOCATED WITHIN NYS AG DISTRICT)
TAX ACCOUNT # OWNER NAME MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP 037.03-1-31 William J. Janis A. Schwappacher 1826 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-32.1 Janet Stern 1822 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-36 1854 Lake Road, LLC 1854 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 Recent subdivision of 037.03-1-36: 037.03-1-36.2 037.03-1-36.3 NO OWNER DATA AVAILABLE ON MONROE COUNTY ASSESSMENT WEBSITE 037.03-1-37 Timothy L. & CarolA. Kester 1850 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-38.1 Jeannette A. Cafalone 1854 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-39.1 Andrew Heiligman 1862 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-39.2 Andrew & Anne Marie Heiligman 1862 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-40.1 Michel J. Epstein & Kerri Kiniorski 1796 Trellis Circle Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-40.2 Peter & Deborah L. Gerritz 1870 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-42 John & Tina Myers 1880 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-43 Kelly E. Rasmussen 1890 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-45 CSC Precision Lawn & Garden Corp. 195 North Avenue Webster, NY 14580 (03703-4-49 Windmill Farms, LLC 193 CountyLineRoad Ontario,NY 14519 037.03-1-50 Gauger & Swingly, Inc. 1780 Tebor Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-51 Craig & Peggy Temple 1825 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-52 Jennifer M. & Randal S. Lewis 1823 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 037.03-1-53 Bugra Gul 1821 Lake Road Webster, NY 14580 TOWN OF ONTARIO PARCELS Gary & Wendy Smith 1258 Northrup Road Penfield, NY 14526 Robert D. & Margaret Janson 7516 County Line Road Ontario, NY 14519 John C. & Laura A. Abbett 7464 County Line Road Ontario, NY 14519 Windmill Farms, LLC 193 County LineRoad Ontario, NY 14519 60119-00-928264 Elizabeth Brackett 87 Lake Rd Ontario, NY 14519
CE#9161 11/13/2025
EXHIBIT P
verizon’
1/7/2026
Whom it may concern
Transmitted via email to Nico Facey
Verizon Wireless macro Facility near intersection of Lake Rd and Monroe Wayne County Line Rd, Webster, NY 14580
To Whom lt May Concern,
We write to inform you that Verizon Wireless performed a routine Radiofrequency (RF) emissions compliance evaluation for this Site. Based on the results of the evaluation, this Site complies with Federal Communication Commission Maximum Permissible Exposure limits (MPE Limits) that were developed in consultation with numerous other federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
More information on MPE Limits may be found at: htips://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter- A/part-1/subpart-I/section-1.1310.
The FCC also provides guidance on compliance with the MPE Limits in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 at: https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet65/oet65.pdf.
If you are interested in learning more about the safety of radio frequency (RF) emissions from wireless facilities, the
FCC provides valuable information on its website at: https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/electromagnetic- compatibility-division/radio-frequency-safety/faq/rf-safety.
Please contact your local Verizon Wireless resource listed below if you have questions about this specific Site.
Contact Name Contact Email Contact Phone Tim Zarneke Tim.zarneke@verizonwireless.com 585-297-7006 Sincerely, Timothy Zarneke
RF System Design Verizon Wireless
EXHIBIT Q
BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS LLC d/b/a
verizon
LAKE ROAD
ZONING DRAWINGS
17108195 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807
verizon
1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586
* CIVIL ENGINEERING
* LAND SURVEYING
* LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER. NY 14608
ENGINEERING _#s5)488-3020
NO, __DATE COMMENTS
Y FOR 0 jos/27/2025) TKW —— °
1 AJK |LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS REVISED COMPOUND AND
2 }10/20/2025| AJK |FENCE GATE. ISSUED FINAL
eo
UPDATED SURVEY PLAN; 11/25/2025) JP | Resssueo FINAL.
pred
ANITLALNOOD
(Z ALNOU ALNNOO)
PROJECT MANAGER
D.A.W.
DRAWN BY
T.K.W.
| 124'= AGL
129’ AGL (PROPOSED LIGHTNING ROD)
PROPERTY OWNER WINDMILL FARMS LLC eee
183 COUNTY LINE ROAD ONTARIO, NEW YORK 14519
INTERSECTION OF LAKE RD & MONROE-WAYNE COUNTY LINE RD SHEET Sencar ion REV | REVISION ELECTRIC PROVIDER: RG&E WEBSTER, NEW YORK 14580 * NO DATE NOTIFICATION #: TBD GAOO1 | TITLE SHEET 3_|_1925r2025 ACCOUNT #: TBO $ | |MUNICIPALITY: TOWN OF WEBSTER GA002 |GENERAL NOTES 3 11/25/2025 WORK ORDER #: TBD GA003_| GENERAL NOTES 3 11/25/2025 PLANNER: T8D ICOUNTY: MONROE PHONE: TBO VA100_| SCHEMATIC TOTAL HOLDINGS! SURVEY PLAN 3 14/25/2025 TAX MAP NUMBER: 037.03-1-44 (7.8 ACRES PER COUNTY GIS) VA110 | SURVEY NOTES AND DESCRIPTIONS 3 11/25/2025 FIBER: TBD PLANNER: TBD ZONING DISTRICT: LL (LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) A100 |OVERALL SITE PLAN 3 | 11/25/2025 PHONE: TBD TOWER SETBACK REQ, HEIGHT OF TOWER (1297), 1452 PROVIDED CA110 TCOMPOUND PLAN 3] 1172512025 CA120_| GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 3 11/25/2025 LATITUDE: $3.268833"(43" 16° 07.80°N) A200 | TOWER ELEVATION AND ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN 3 11/25/2025 DIG SAFELY _- NEW YORK LONGITUDE: “77.a76738 (17 22 3626 W) +» PERREF.#8 | [BASE ELEVATION: 306.5’ AMSL = CA500 | EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS | 3 11/25/2025 Before You Dig, Drill Or Blast! ISTRUCTURE HEIGHT & TYPE: | 125’ MONOPOLE CAS01 ISITE DETAILS 13 7172512025 ss CA5O2_| GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 3 11/25/2025 Dig 7 Safely. PROPOSED ANT. CENTERLINE:| 120°: AGL
New York
UNDERGROUND FACILITIES PROTECTIVE ORGANIZATION CALL US TOLL FREE 1-800-962-7962 NY incustrial coce rule 753 requires mo less an two working Gays notice, but Mot more than ter days notice.
@ upIG-NY|G
COPYRIGHT 2025 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C,
TTS A VIOLATION OF LAW UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS! HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION “ALTERED BY", FOLLOWED BY HIS! HER SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.
SITE INFORMATION
| SELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS, LLC
17108195 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807
d/bla VERIZON WIRELESS
1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE 100
DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS
| WEST HENRIETTA, NY 14586
KATHY POMPONIO
(585) 236-3307
0.33 ACRES
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 22°x34" FULL SIZE AND 11°x17" HALF SIZE. OTHER SIZED VERSIONS ARE NOT PRINTED TO THE SCALE SHOWN, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS, EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME
TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK
SHEET TITLE
SCOPE OF WORK
1. THE PROPOSED WORK CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF AN
i) D WIRELESS FACILITY WITH ASSOCIATED UTILITIES.
TITLE SHEET
C.E. JOB NUMBER SHEET NUMBER
9161 ||GAOO01
| LEGEND
| GENERAL NOTES
| SITE NOTES
w ves w
on
Tt t ve us c a
t e w w F ' ae e
SECTION/PARCEL BOUNDARY MIN. BUILDING SETBACK CENTER LINE
EXIST. RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE EXIST. CONCRETE CURB EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXIST. EDGE OF GRAVEL
EXISTING WATER MAIN, VALVE, & HYDRANT. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, & MANHOLE.
EXISTING DRAINAGE SEWER, FIELD INLET, INLET MANHOLE, MANHOLE, & END SECTION.
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES EXISTING TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES EXISTING GAS
EXISTING ELECTRIC
EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING ELEC & TELE EXISTING CABLE TV
EXISTING FIBER
EXISTING LIGHT CONTROL EXISTING GUARD RAIL TREE,HEDGE,EDGE OF WOODS
EXISTING SWALE
BARBED WIRE,STOCKADE, CHAIN LINKED FENCE EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION @ X CONCRETE PAD/ CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE. PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB
PROPOSED WATER MAIN, VALVE, & HYDRANT,
— “> PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, & MANHOLE. Pt RAI a INI ’ a. ae eee ae INLET MANHOLE, MANHOLE. & END SECTION. PROPOSED OVERHEAD UTILITIES e F PROPOSED FIBER PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 6 6 PROPOSED GAS SERVICE € € PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE EGF PROPOSED ELECTRIC AND FIBER SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE os os PROPOSED ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE O1 PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FS PROPOSED COMPOST FILTER SOCK FENCING NOTES |
1, CORNER POSTS, PULL POSTS, AND END POSTS SHALL BE 3° NOMINAL O.D., SCHEDULE 40, STEEL PIPE CONFORMING WITH ASTM F-1083. GATE POSTS SHALL BE 4* NOMINAL 0.D., SCHEDULE 40, STEEL PIPE CONFORMING WITH ASTM F-1083 AND MAY BE UTILIZED FOR SINGLE GATE OPENING WIDTHS OF 6 FEET OR LESS AND FOR DOUBLE GATE OPENING
WIDTHS OF 12 FEET OR LESS.
2. LINE POSTS SHALL BE 2” NOMINAL O.D. SCHEDULE 40 STEEL PIPE CONFORMING WITH ASTM
F-1083.
3. TOP RAIL AND BRACE RAIL SHALL BE 1 5/8" NOMINAL 0.D. PIPE CONFORMING WITH ASTM
F-1083.
4. GATE FRAMES SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM 1 1/2" NOMINAL O.D. PIPE CONFORMING WITH
ASTM F-71083.
5. FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE 9 GAUGE WIRE SIZE, 2” MESH CHAIN LINK FENCE CONFORMING
WITK ASTM A-392.
6. TIE WIRE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
a) AT POSTS, RAILS, AND WHERE NECESSARY ON GATE FRAMES: MINIMUM 11 GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL SPACED AT NOT LESS THAN 14" ON CENTER. b) AT TENSION WIRES: BY HOG RINGS SPACED AT NOT LESS THAN 24° ON CENTER.
7. TENSION WIRE SHALL BE 7 GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL.
8. THE GATE LATCH SHALL BE THE MALLEABLE IRON FORK TYPE AS MANUFACTURED BY PAGE WILSON AS THEIR TYPE 75 GATE LATCH ASSEMBLY, OR EQUAL. PAD LOCKS ARE TO BE
PROVIDED BY THE OWNER.
9. FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F-567 AND GATES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F-900.
| STRUCTURAL NOTES
1. PROPOSED TOWER AND FOUNDATION TO BE ANALYZED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
2. THE VERIFICATION OF STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY AND DESIGN OF THE ATTACHMENTS MUST BE PERFORMED, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
3, THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ANTENNA SUPPORTS SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI/TIA-222-H-2017 "STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES, ANTENNAS AND SMALL WIND TURBINE SUPPORT STRUCTURES”,
21,
22.
23.
24.
ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC), 2020 BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE, THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC SAFETY CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL CODES..
CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE AND FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED WORK AND MAKE PROVISIONS AS TO THE COST THEREOF. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FAMILIARIZING HIMSELF WITH ALL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, FIELD CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AND CONFIRMING THAT THE WORK MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.
PLANS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED. THESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE A DIAGRAMMATIC OUTLINE ONLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR NECESSARY TO EFFECT ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.
DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FINISH SURFACES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SPACING BETWEEN EQUIPMENT IS REQUIRED CLEARANCE. THEREFORE, IT IS CRITICAL TO FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS. SHOULD THERE BE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, EXISTING CONDITIONS AND/OR DESIGN INTENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING A CLARIFICATION FROM THE CARRIER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT JOB DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS, AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE WORK.
CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE CLARIFICATION IN WRITING, AND SHALL RECEIVE IN WRITING AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED BEFORE STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEMS NOT CLEARLY DEFINED OR IDENTIFIED BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ALL PRODUCTS OR ITEMS NOTED AS “EXISTING” WHICH ARE NOT FOUND TO BE IN THE FIELD.
CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK USING THE BEST CONSTRUCTION SKILLS AND ATTENTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, PROCEDURES. AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER CONTRACT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
ERECTION SHALL BE DONE IN A WORKMANLIKE MANNER BY COMPETENT EXPERIENCED WORKMEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND THE BEST ACCEPTED PRACTICE. ALL MEMBERS SHALL BE LAID PLUMB AND TRUE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.
. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF THE WORK AREA, ADJACENT
AREAS, AND BUILDING OCCUPANTS THAT ARE LIKELY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS.
. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK AND SCHEDULE HIS ACTIVITIES AND
WORKING HOURS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER.
. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING HIS WORK WITH THE WORK OF
OTHERS AS IT MAY RELATE TO RADIO EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS AND ANY OTHER PORTIONS OF THE WORK.
. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN LIABILITY INSURANCE TO PROTECT THE OWNER AND
CARRIER.
. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE.
. MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING SURFACES, EQUIPMENT,
IMPROVEMENTS, PIPING, ANTENNA AND ANTENNA CABLES. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURS DURING CONSTRUCTION,
. REPAIR ALL EXISTING SURFACES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SUCH THAT THEY
MATCH AND BLEND WITH ADJACENT SURFACES.
. KEEP CONTRACT AREA CLEAN, HAZARD FREE, AND DISPOSE OF ALL DEBRIS AND RUBBISH,
EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER SHALL BE REMOVED. LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL ITEMS UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO
FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF ANY MATERIAL. ANY UNUSUAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER.
. CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE ALL NECESSARY BUILDING PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS AND
PAY ALL REQUIRED FEES.
. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR
2-4/10-8C WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE BUILDOUT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION.
ALL BROCHURES, OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS, CATALOGS, SHOP DRAWINGS AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE TURNED OVER TO CARRIER AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
COMPLETE JOB SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY CARRIER. ANY WORK. MATERIALS, OR EQUIPMENT FOUND TO BE DEFECTIVE DURING THAT PERIOD SHALL BE CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY UPON WRITTEN NOTIFICATION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO CARRIER.
RIGGING OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY REGULATIONS (OSHA). COSTICH ENGINEERING, CARRIER AND THE OWNER SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT FOLLOW SUCH SAFETY REGULATIONS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE SITE AND ASSIST THE RADIO EQUIPMENT VENDOR AND THE ANTENNA INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR AS THEY MAY REQUIRE.
1.
2.
ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.
RUBBISH, STUMPS. DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY.
THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE PROPOSED PLATFORM.
NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT.
THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION.
ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES.
ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER.
THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, FERTILIZED, SEEDED, AND COVERED WITH MULCH.
CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION, EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STATE GUIDELINES AND ANY LOCAL REGULATIONS.
. ALL RESTORATION ISSUES SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF THE COMPLETION OF
THE WORK ACTIVITY OR WITHIN A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME AS DIRECTED BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/ENGINEER.
. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO RETAIN NATURAL GROWTH AND PREVENT DAMAGE TO TREES
WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIFIED WORK AREAS CAUSED BY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS. ANY DAMAGE TO THIS NATURAL GROWTH SHALL BE RESTORED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR.
. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION SHALL BE RESTORED)
BY THE CONTRACTOR,
. IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGES AN EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE CAUSING AN
INTERRUPTION IN SAID SERVICE, HE SHALL IMMEDIATELY COMMENCE WORK TO RESTORE SERVICE AND MAY NOT CONTINUE HIS WORK OPERATION UNTIL SERVICE IS RESTORED.
verizon
1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586
+ Civit ENGINEERING
* LAND SURVEYING
* LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
COSTICH 217 Lanc Avenue ESTER. NY 14606
Roc; ENGINEERING (585) 458-3020
| REFERENCES
3
TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN FROM A FIELD SURVEY BY COSTICH ENGINEERING ON 4/21/2025 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DATA OBTAINED THROUGH NYSDOT CORS NETWORK REFERENCED TO THE FOLLOWING MONUMENT:
PITTSFORD CORS STATION
43-05-35.48461 (N) NAD 83 (CORS) ~LONGITUDE: 077-31-31.11244 (W)
-ELLIP HEIGHT: 113.481 METERS NAVD 88 (CORS)
BOUNDARY SURVEY HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING. BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS APPROXIMATE AND DETERMINED BY LIMITED FIELD LOCATION OF BOUNDARY EVIDENCE, REVIEW OF TITLE COMMITMENT, IF PROVIDED, AND OVERLAY. OF COUNTY TAX MAPS AND/OR COUNTY GIS MAPPING.
PER THE NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAPS, THERE ARE FEDERAL WETLANDS IN ASSOCIATION WITH DEER CREEK (CLASS C STREAM) SOUTH EAST OF THE PROJECT AREA.
PER THE NYSDEC ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MAPPER, THERE ARE POTENTIALLY WETLANDS LOCATED 500't EAST OF PROJECT AREA. THE INFORMATIONAL FRESHWATER WETLAND MAPPING LAYER IS ONLY INTENDED TO BE USED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES IN IDENTIFYING THE GENERAL LOCATION AND EXTENT OF FRESHWATER WETLAND AREAS OF ANY SIZE THROUGHOUT THE STATE. INFORMATIONAL FRESHWATER WETLAND MAPPING IS NOT REGULATORY.
PER THE WETLAND AND WATERBODIES DELINEATION REPORT PREPARED BY LABELLA ASSOCIATES, D.P.C,, DATED APRIL 23, 2025 WITH LABELLA PROJECT NO.: 2252004, THERE ARE NO WETLANDS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. DEER CREEK IS A CLASS C STREAM.
PER THE ERSI/FEMA PROJECT IMPACT HAZARD INFORMATION AND AWARENESS SITE MAP THERE !S NO 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN IN THE PROJECT AREA.
ANTENNAS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SITE SPECIFIC RF ANTENNA DESIGN SHEET SUPPLIED BY VERIZON WIRELESS: PROJECT ID: 17108195, DATED 05/19/2025.
1A CERTIFICATION PREPARED BY COSTICHK ENGINEERING, PROJECT NO, 9161, SITE NAME: LAKE ROAD, DATED MAY 23, 2025.
NO. DATE COMMENTS, © Josr27/2025| TKW | SS¥EO PRELIMINARY FOR
1 25| AJK |LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS REVISED COMPOUND AND
2 AJK |FENCE GATE. IssuEO FINAL
3 |1125:2025| yp |YPOATED SURVEY PLAN:
RE-ISSUED FINAL.
PROJECT MANAGER
D.A.W.
DRAWN BY
T.K.W.
COPYRIGHT 2025 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.
AVIA ON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS! HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION “ALTERED BY", FOLLOWED BY HIS! HER SIGNATURE ANO SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.
SITE INFORMATION
17108195 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807
TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK
SHEET TITLE
GENERAL NOTES
Ld C.E_ JOB NUMBER SHEET NUMBER
9161 ||GA002
| EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES]
| SOIL AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES
_|
TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
GENERAL MEASURES:
1.
AS MUCH AS IS PRACTICAL, EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BE PRESERVED. FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN ANY PORTION OF THE SITE, PERMANENT VEGETATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL EXPOSED SOILS.
SITE PREPARATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PLANNED TO MINIMIZE THE SCOPE AND DURATION OF SOIL DISRUPTION,
PARTICULAR MEASURES:
1.
DITCHES, SHALL RECEIVE CHECK DAMS WITH 2-9 INCH STONE MEETING NYS-DOT LIGHT STONE FILL REQUIREMENTS SO AS TO EFFECTIVELY TRAP SEDIMENT AND MINIMIZE ITS RELEASE OFF-SITE. CHECK DAMS SHALL HAVE A 9” MINIMUM. WEIR AND BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN EACH DITCH BEGINNING AT ITS DOWNSTREAM TERMINUS. CHECK DAMS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE CHANNEL SO THAT THE CREST OF THE DOWNSTREAM DAM IS AT THE ELEVATION OF THE TOE OF THE UPSTREAM DAM.
SILT FENCES AND COMPOST FILTER SOCKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND ALL STOCKPILES OF FILL, TOPSOIL AND EXCAVATED OVERBURDEN THAT ARE TO REMAIN FOR PERIODS LESS THAN 30 DAYS. SILT FENCES AND COMPOST FILTER SOCKS SHALL BE ANCHORED AND MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME AS STOCKPILES ARE REMOVED AND STOCKPILING AREAS ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
TOPSOIL AND FILL THAT IS TO REMAIN STOCKPILED ON-SITE FOR PERIODS GREATER THAN 30 DAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SEEDING. PRIOR TO THE SEEDING OPERATION, THE STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE GRADED AS NEEDED AND FEASIBLE TO PERMIT THE USE OF CONVENTIONAL EQUIPMENT FOR SEEDBED PREPARATION, SEEDING, MULCH APPLICATION AND MULCH ANCHORING,
IN NO CASE SHALL ERODIBLE MATERIALS BE STOCKPILED WITH 25 FEET OF ANY DITCH, STREAM, OR OTHER SURFACE WATER BODY,
PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
1.
2
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OR WHERE WORK IS DELAYED AND WILL NOT BE DISTURBED FOR 21 DAYS OR MORE IN ANY PORTION OF THE SITE. PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY VEGETATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN 14 DAYS ON ALL EXPOSED SOILS. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SOON AS PRACTICAL FOLLOWING DISTURBANCE TO STABILIZE BARE SOIL AND PROMOTE THE PROMPT RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION.
A. AN ADEQUATE SEEDBED SHALL BE PREPARED BY SCARIFYING COMPACTED SOIL AND REMOVING SURFACE DEBRIS AND OBSTACLES.
LIME SHALL BE APPLIED SUFFICIENTLY TO ATTAIN A SOIL ACIDITY pH OF 6.0 TO 7.0.
2
FERTILIZER (5-10-10 MIXTURE OR EQUIVALENT) SHALL BE APPLIEO PER SOIL TEST RESULTS OR AT A RATE OF 600 LBS PER ACRE.
o
DISTURBED AREAS WHICH WILL REMAIN TEMPORARILY FALLOW FOR PERIODS GREATER THAN 14 DAYS SHALL BE SEEDED AT THE FOLLOWING RATE TO PRODUCE TEMPORARY GROUND COVER: 30 LBS RYEGRASS (ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL) PER ACRE. DURING THE WINTER, USE 100 LBS CERTIFIED “AROOSTOCK™ WINTER RYE (CEREAL RYE) PER ACRE,
m
. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED ON 4° MIN. TOPSOIL AT THE FOLLOWING RATE FOR ROUGH OR OCCASIONAL MOWING AREAS: 8 LBS EMPIRE BIRDSFOOT TIREFOIL OR COMMON WHITE CLOVER PER ACRE. 20 LBS TALL FESCUE PER ACRE PLUS 2 LBS REDTOP OR 5 LBS RYEGRASS (PERENNIAL) PER ACRE
65 LBS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS PER ACRE 65 LBS RYEGRASS (PERENNIAL) PER ACRE
™
ALL SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING THE BROADCAST METHOD OR HYOROSEEDING, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED.
o
ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED SUBSEQUENT TO SEEDING BY APPLYING 2 TONS OF STRAW MULCH PER ACRE. STRAW MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED BY APPLYING 750 LBS OF WOOD FIBER MULCH PER ACRE WITH A HYDROSEEDER, OR TUCKING THE MULCH WITH SMOOTH DISCS OR OTHER MULCH ANCHORING TOOLS TO A DEPTH OF 3°. MULCH ANCHORING TOOLS SHALL BE PULLED ACROSS SLOPES ALONG TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS.
ALL UNNECESSARY REMOVAL OF HEALTHY TREES SHALL BE AVOIDED. MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE STORED NOR MACHINERY OPERATED WITHIN THE DRIP-LINE OF THE TREES TO REMAIN.
MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES:
1
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ON A DAILY BASIS INSPECT AND MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY AND FUNCTION OF ALL TEMPORARY EROSION-AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS,
TO ASSURE PROPER FUNCTION, SILTATION BARRIERS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION AND REINFORCED, EXTENDED, REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS NECESSARY. WASHOUTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPAIRED, RE-SEEDED AND PROTECTED FROM FURTHER EROSION.
SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES ABOUT 0.5 FEET DEEP AT THE FENCE AND FROM BEHIND THE COMPOST FILTER SOCKS ONCE IT REACHES 1/2 THE FILTER SOCK HEIGHT, THE SEDIMENT FENCE AND COMPOST FILTER SOCKS SHALL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN BARRIER.
ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE VEGETATIVE PLAN IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A VIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER.
1.
Nn
o
-
a
»
~
TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION ENTRAPMENT AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT KEY LOCATIONS TO INTERCEPT AND CLARIFY SILT LADEN RUNOFF FROM THE SITE.
SILT THAT LEAVES THE SITE IN SPITE OF THE REQUIRED PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE COLLECTED AND REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY APPROPRIATE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES.
AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE AFFECTED AREAS REGRADED, OR TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED SITE PLANS.
ALL SEDIMENTATION ENTRAPMENT STRUCTURES WILL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED ON A REGULAR BASIS.
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCE AND/ OR COMPOST FILTER SOCKS) AROUND AREAS BEING DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AS NECESSARY.
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SILT FENCE OR COMPOST FILTER SOCKS DOWNSLOPE OF ALL UTILITY TRENCHES.
DISTANCES SHOWN FROM THE WETLANDS IF ANY ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM SEPARATION PERMITTED BETWEEN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND BOUNDARY OF THE WETLANDS.
7.1, AREA OF DISTURBANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY INSTALLING ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND THE ENTIRE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AREA. EXCEPT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE MITIGATION PLANTINGS, NO ENCROACHMENT BEYOND THESE LIMITS BY WORKERS OR MACHINERY SHALL BE PERMITTED.
7.2, | GRADING AND CLEARING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACTIVITIES SHALL TAKE PLACE ONLY WITHIN THE DELINEATED AREA OF DISTURBANCE LINES. THESE AREAS OF DISTURBANCE LINES REPRESENT THE MAXIMUM LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EVERY ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE TO FURTHER REDUCE GRADING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE LINES BY MAINTAINING NATURAL VEGETATION AND TOPOGRAPHY WHEREVER PRACTICABLE.
7.3, ALL CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED-ACTIVITIES OCCURRING ON THIS SITE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NEW YORK STATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.
74. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK, THE APPLICANT SHALL STAKE THE LOCATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR INSPECTION AND APPROVAL BY THE TOWN ENGINEER (IF REQUIRED).
7.5. ALL SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY SITE WORK. THE TOWN ENGINEER SHALL HAVE INSPECTED THE INSTALLATION OF ALL REQUIRED SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO THE AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH ANY PHASE OF THE SITE WORK (IF REQUIRED).
7.6. | THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL RETAINED BY THE APPLICANT SHALL, ON AT LEAST A WEEKLY BASIS, PRIOR TO ANY PREDICTED RAIN EVENT AND AFTER RUNOFF-PRODUCING RAIN EVENT, INSPECT THE SOM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES TO ENSURE THEIR PROPER FUNCTIONING.
7.7. ALL ORAINAGE STRUCTURES AND ANY OTHER REQUIRED UTILITY APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED BY TOWN SPECIFICATIONS AND AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.
7.8. \F THE APPLICANT, DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, ENCOUNTERS SUCH CONDITIONS AS FLOOD AREAS, UNDERGROUND WATER, SOFT OR SILTY AREAS. IMPROPER DRAINAGE, OR OTHER UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS THAT WERE NOT FORESEEN IN THE ORIGINAL PLANNING, THEY SHALL REPORT SUCH CONDITIONS IMMEDIATELY TO THE TOWN ENGINEER. THE APPLICANT MAY SUBMIT, IF THEY SO DESIRE, THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AS THE SPECIAL TREATMENT TO BE GIVEN SUCH AREAS TO SECURE ADEQUATE, PERMANENT AND SATISFACTORY CONSTRUCTION. THE TOWN ENGINEER, WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY, SHALL INVESTIGATE THE CONDITION OR CONDITIONS, AND SHALL EITHER APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S RECOMMENDATION TO CORRECT THE CONDITIONS, ORDER A MODIFICATION THEROF, OR ISSUE THEIR OWN SPECIFICATION FOR THE CORRECTION OF THE CONDITIONS. IN THE EVENT OF THE APPLICANT'S DISAGREEMENT WITH THE DECISION OF THE TOWN ENGINEER, OR IN THE EVENT OF A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE RESULTING TO THE SITE PLAN OR ANY CHANGE THAT INVOLVES WETLAND REGULATED AREAS, THE MATTER SHALL BE DECIDED BY THE PLANNING BOARD. ANY SUCH CONDITIONS OBSERVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD OR ITS AGENTS SHALL BE SIMILARLY TREATED.
verizon 1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586
+ CiviL ENGINEERING
* LAND SURVEYING
* LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
COSTICH ENGINEERING (885) 456-3020
217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER NY 14608
NO.
DATE
COMMENTS
05/27/2025) TKW
ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW
AJK
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
AJK
REVISED COMPOUND AND FENCE GATE. ISSUED FINAL
11/25/2025] JP
UPDATED SURVEY PLAN; RE-ISSUED FINAL.
PROJECT MANAGER D.A.W. DRAWN BY T.K.W. COPYRIGHT 2025 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C. A 1 LAW IN,
UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS! HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION “ALTERED BY, FOLLOWED BY HIS! HER SIGNATURE ANO SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.
SITE INFORMATION
17108195 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807|
TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE
STATE OF
NEW YORK
SHEET TITLE
GENERAL NOTES
C.E. JOB NUMBER
9161
SHEET NUMBER
GA003
a N q N i f=] ; °|| verizon z | E a g ol 1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586 1 ST HENRIETTA. NEW YO EXISTING BROKEN eXISTING vm WRT gi ee ASPHALT _—— TING UTILITY EXISTING UTILITY POLE SGD eS ei : esitanns W/ TRANSFORMERS i , ENGINEERING EXISTING UTILITY POLE Ps * LAND POLE LINE EASEMENT TQ ROCHESTER, RIC 110 SURVEYING GAS AND ELECTRIC GORPORATION — * LANDSCAPE NIE NIF PER LIBER 1365 OF DEEDS PAGE 32 | i ARCHITECTURE T.A# 037.03-1-40.1 = A = COSTICH 217 Lane Avense T.A# 037.03-1-39.2 — = on NY 1 a8 \ NIF isabel ti [_ \ | EXISTING, 4 i 8 ENGINEERING ““sesesszocs = \ T.A# 037.03-1-40.2 a seieten Saat 1 = WwooD iy *J pel NIF INTERSECTIO! ea eee: n= TOWN OF POSTS —* EXISTING TA#037.03-1-31 T.A#037.03-1-37 5 T.A# 037.03-1-39.1 AHEAD = ee Soe eA ONTARIO SIGN __,. | HYDRANT \ Aer ——“SIGN = 11 aie EXISTING ASPHALI—___\____--si-— | ATE) NO. DATE COMMENTS NIF \ | 4 | | = | \ | 0 osi27202s| TKW |!SSUEO PRELIMINARY FOR T.A# 037.03-1-36.1 \ | NIE 2 i | NIF | [al pat on ot—_—_+ i Lachine | T.A# 037.03-1-38.1 | TAR 037,08-1-42 | — Sat ea 4 |0s/05/2025] AJK |LEGAL DEScReTiONS _ = APPROXIMATE R.O.W. SER USE Gd EXISTING UTILITY POLE 5 | ' | BOUNDS S N (o) [REVISED CONPOUND AND | \ \, RGE 70A \] ca 2 |10/20/2025| AJK |FENCE GATE isSuED | | PROPOSED VERIZON-———"* \ \ X Sw 4074 Zz —e | WIRELESS \ \ \ Ys 8 \ EXISTING EDGE OF \J 2 3 frsasiz02s| JP |Reyssucorna NIF NIF | PROPOSED VERIZON 10" WIDE UTILITIES \ & Se _qy---> CULTIVATED FIELD i a pd T.A# 037.03-1-43 WIRELESS EASEMENT \ \ eH i ES = | TA#037.03-1-36.3 | T-A#037.03-1-36.2 | Pe 10' WIDE UTILITIES A \ Sy ==" Pa as Zz 8 | | | | | EASEMENT \ ‘. 9 LS 7 es _l x ag | Na "0 a ~ eS | | lj | | % 305. A BAS | 25 Bat | | | PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS/ oie Pa = ; 8] | | _—— | __ 30° WIDE ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT ~~. ie oa ieee Pa : | | ¢ | W/ PROPOSED TEMPORARY 10' WIDE CLEARING ~~~~~~ ee ‘ean me in iE : ps | ee AND GRADING EASEMENTS ON EITHER SIDE ai Sle | \-a07 \ Peeee! ~, cst | ] eo} | aes EXISTING \, \_ne ae 3 c ~ 2 +a#eo1 19-c0-opta2t =“ 166% 3 i 4 FIELD ee lad LAKE ROAD - COUNTY ROUTE 1 __(49.5' WIDE) —— - | 5 Ss ps ~ ay < =n [APPROXIMATE R.O.W. BOUNDS PROPO} B 2 = ' _—* - % AES leas 30' WIDE ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT Gs ks | ew H - / \ z | me) WNDU EAMIRS LO W/ PROPOSED TEMPORARY 10' WIDE CLEARING em i { - . \ 3 c PROJECT Bua OeAcel AND GRADING EASEMENTS ON EITHER SIDE = Fs / ‘ \ Q| A = MANAGER A: 1 aera j \ > LAKE ROAD : | \m \ \ / : in a D.A.W | LIBER 8718 PAGE 672 | yyw0S 99'+ | |Z \ a S LE} 5 AW, | parce b | o) NIF , \._ PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS \ 2 NF 129" MINIMUM 3 | 5 T.A# 60119-00-948199 | SS : 129, MONOROLE TOWET: \ iS) DRAWN BY WINDMILL FAMRS, LLC TOWER SETBACK 8 SBN . LAT:43.268833°(43° 16' 07.80"N) i = | T.A# 037.03-1-49 Hg | Oo \_LONG:-77.376738°(77° 22° 36.26°W) A j 8 1 T.KW. COUNTY LINE ROAD PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS >| | fo) >, one / S i Zz \ NIF LIBER 8718 PAGE 672 125' MONOPOLE TOWER 5 C —— / ‘ H 3 | \ GAUGER & SWINGLY, INC. LAT:43,268833°(43° 16’ 07.80"N) BY | / i COPYRIGHT 2025 \ T.A.# 037.03-1-50 LONG:-77.376738°(77° 22' 36.26°W) 2 a / PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS « | | COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C. \ 4827 LAKE ROAD BASE ELEV= 308.5’ AMSL =| | Rs 100’ x 100" LEASE PARCEL [TIS VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON % LIBER 12799 PAGE 292 = 5 ~~ AREA- 0.23 ACRES | | VARESS ACTING UNOBS THE ORNBCTICH DF 8 \ | SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE , 2 Cc } ; Me PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 1) \5 T.A# 60118-00-995953 | ass GC STREAM 4 i 4 pAROHTECT.TOALTER ANY EW ON TH | \rav oar ale rere Zhao 3 Es “Oumar vensex aeons \T.A# 037.03-1-51 AREA- 0.234 ACRES 5 aye * = “ALTERED BY", FOLLOWED BY HIS/ HER | = 9 2 SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE r 4 Rew ° ALTERATION. TO THE DOCUNENT lo EN = | z SITE INFORMATION al SS — APPROXIMATE PARCEL B B BS ‘ee te a ip> LAKE ROAD — [o) is C.S.C. PRECISION LAWN & GARDEN. CORP. B 5 io) < a = PROJECT ID: 17108195 T.A# 037.03-1-45 a's = is [MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807 155 COUNTY LINE ROAD ba 2 ls LIBER 12135 PAGE 417 32 Fs Ba Z\z ya Bs) TOWN OF WEBSTER a's eo fie mIg mois COUNTY OF MONROE gis 7. 7] 3 fe STATE OF NEW YORK y 3 2 G 4 EXISTING YU | | SHEET | q GY _ BUILDING #155 i SCHEMATIC TOTAL ' y il HOLDINGS/ SURVEY \ “ ar PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE GRAPHIC SCALE —C.E.JOB NUMBER __ SHEET NUMBER 150 [e] 75 150 300 600 40 0 20 40 80 160 eee eT ONS EE = ee ee ee (VAI007 Scave-1* = 150° (22 x 34 SHEET) \WAI00) scate:1* = 40° (22 x 34 SHEET) ; 9 ] 61 VAI 00 1" = 300° (11 x 17 SHEET) CIN FEFT) 1° = 80° (11x 17 SHEET) (IN FEET) Linch = 150ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) linch= 460 ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) Linch = 300ft. (11"x 17" SHEET) linch= 80 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)
SURVEY REFERENCES
TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN FROM A FIELD SURVEY BY COSTICH ENGINEERING ON 4/21/2025 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DATA OBTAINED THROUGH NYSDOT CORS NETWORK REFERENCED TO THE FOLLOWING MONUMENT:
PITTSFORD CORS STATION
-LATITUDE: 43-05-35.48461 (N) NAD 83 (CORS) -LONGITUDE: 077-31-31.11244 (W)
-ELLIP HEIGHT: 113.481 METERS NAVD 88 (CORS)
BOUNDARY SURVEY HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING. BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS APPROXIMATE AND DETERMINED BY LIMITED FIELD LOCATION OF BOUNDARY EVIDENCE, REVIEW OF TITLE COMMITMENT, IF PROVIDED, AND OVERLAY OF COUNTY TAX MAPS AND/OR COUNTY GIS MAPPING.
PER THE NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAPS, THERE ARE FEDERAL
WETLANDS IN ASSOCIATION WITH DEER CREEK (CLASS C STREAM) SOUTH
EAST OF THE PROJECT AREA.
PER THE NYSDEC ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MAPPER, THERE ARE POTENTIALLY WETLANDS LOCATED 500't EAST OF PROJECT AREA. THE INFORMATIONAL FRESHWATER WETLAND MAPPING LAYER IS ONLY INTENDED TO BE USED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES IN IDENTIFYING
THE GENERAL LOCATION AND EXTENT OF FRESHWATER WETLAND AREAS
OF ANY SIZE THROUGHOUT THE STATE. INFORMATIONAL FRESHWATER WETLAND MAPPING IS NOT REGULATORY.
PER THE WETLAND AND WATERBODIES DELINEATION REPORT PREPARED BY LABELLA ASSOCIATES, D.P.C., DATED APRIL 23, 2025 WITH LABELLA PROJECT NO.: 2252004, THERE ARE NO WETLANDS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. DEER CREEK IS A CLASS C STREAM.
PER THE ERSI/FEMA PROJECT IMPACT HAZARD INFORMATION AND
AWARENESS SITE MAP THERE IS NO 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN IN THE PROJECT
AREA. TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
HAVING TITLE NO. 71325051, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF APRIL 21, 2025.
SCHEDULE "A" PARENT PARCEL DESCRIPTION
ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND, SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF WEBSTER,
COUNTY OF MONROE AND STATE OF NEW YORK, BEING PART OF SUBDIVISION 1
OF THE NORTH PART OF LOT 10, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 14, RANGE 4 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LAKE ROAD AND WEST SIDE OF THE MONROE-WAYNE COUNTY LINE ROAD BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER LINE OF LAKE ROAD AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PREMISES CONVEYED TO RICHARD A. CALABRESE ET AL BY DEED
RECORDED IN MONROE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE OCTOBER 4, 1876 IN LIBER 5108 OF DEEDS, PAGE 197; THENCE
DUE EAST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF LAKE ROAD AND CONTINUING ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE ORIGINAL RIGHT OF WAY, NOW ABANDONED, OF SAID ROAD A DISTANCE OF 1492.34 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY CENTER LINE WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE MONROE-WAYNE
COUNTY LINE ROAD; THENCE
S 00° 43' 10" E ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE MONROE WAYNE COUNTY LIEN
ROAD A DISTANCE OF 380.80 FEET TO A POINT MARKING THE EASTERLY
EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF PREMISES CONVEYED TO THE UNION HILL VOLUNTEER FIREMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC. BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 5, 1974
IN LIBER 4625 OF DEEDS, PAGE 25; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID UNION HILL VOLUNTEER
FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC. PREMISES AFORESAID S 89° 16’ 50" W A DISTANCE
OF 292.79" TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF DEER CREEK MARKED BY AN IRON PIPE; THENCE
THE FOLLOWING DISTANCES AND COURSES ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF DEER
CREEK:
N 39° 42°05" W A DISTANCE OF 57.80' TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE
N 51° 43° 20" W A DISTANCE OF 157.37' TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE
N 58* 47" 15" W A DISTANCE OF 168.82’ TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE
S$ 85° 36' 55" W A DISTANCE OF 272.99" TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE
S 75° 37' 00" W A DISTANCE OF 652.83' TO AN IRON PIPE, MARKING THE are CORNER OF PREMISES CONVEYED TO CALABRESE AFORESAID;
N 00° 541' 20" E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID CALABRESE PREMISES A DISTANCE OF 338.08' TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING.
TITLE REVIEW
PER STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE NO. 71325051, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF APRIL 21, 2025, SCHEDULE B SECTION Il, SURVEY PERTINENT DETERMINATIONS ARE:
19. EASEMENT GRANTED BY HENRY BARNARD TO ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION RECORDED MAY 18, 1926 IN LIBER 1365 OF DEEDS, PAGE 32. EASEMENT IS A POLE LINE EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDS OF LAKE ROAD, NO WIDTH SPECIFIED EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE MAP. THE ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT WILL CROSS SAID POLE LINE EASEMENT.
20. RIGHT OF WAY AND RESERVATIONS AS CONTAINED WITHIN A WARRANTY DEED FROM HENRY BARNARD TO RUTH FITCH, DATED MAY 18, 1922 AND RECORDED ON MAY 19, 1922 IN LIBER 11698 OF DEEDS, PAGE 194. THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DESCRIBED IS IN TOWN LOT 13 WHICH IS LOCATED NORTH OF LAKE ROAD THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY DOES NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT OR THE PROPOSED LEASE PARCEL.
21. RIGHT OF WAY AND WATER RIGHTS AS CONTAINED WITHIN A WARRANTY DEED FROM NELSON R. PEET TO RICHARD J. COENE AND MARGARET J. COENE, DATED APRIL 1, 1960 AND RECORDED ON APRIL 1, 1960 LIBER 3266 OF DEEDS, PAGE 253. PARCEL MAY BE SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT OVER THE NORTH HALF OF DEER CREEK FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES. DEER CREEK IS SHOWN ON THE MAP, SAID EASEMENT DOES NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT OR THE PROPOSED LEASE PARCEL.
30' WIDE ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF WEBSTER, COUNTY OF MONROE, STATE OF NEW YORK, ALL AS SHOWN ON A MAP ENTITLED "LAKE ROAD SCHEMATIC TOTAL HOLDINGS/SURVEY PLAN", PREPARED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C., HAVING DRAWING NUMBER 9161, SHEET NUMBER VA100, DATED 05/27/2025, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE ROAD - COUNTY ROUTE 1 (49.5' R.O.W.) WITH THE WESTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY LINE ROAD —- COUNTY ROUTE 2 (66' R.O.W.), SAID POINT
BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY WINDMILL
FARMS LLC HAVING T.A.# 037.03-1-44; THENCE
A. $89°12'48"W, ALONG SAID ASSUMED SOUTHERLY BOUNDS OF LAKE ROAD - COUNTY ROUTE 1, A DISTANCE OF 191,69 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE
41. $00°47'12"E, A DISTANCE OF 65.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
2. N89°12'48"E, A DISTANCE OF 95.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
3. $00°47'12"E, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED VERZION WIRELESS LEASE PARCEL; THENCE
4. $89°12'48"W, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE PARCEL; THENCE
5. $00°47'12"E, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE PARCEL; THENCE
6. S$ $89°12'48"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 7. NQ0°47'12"W, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 8. N89°12'48"E, A DISTANCE OF 4.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
9. N00*°47'12"W, A DISTANCE OF 65.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ASSUMED SOUTHERLY BOUNDS OF LAKE ROAD - COUNTY ROUTE 1; THENCE
10. N89°12'48"E ALONG SAID ASSUMED SOUTHERLY BOUNDS OF LAKE ROAD - COUNTY ROUTE 1, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING.
10' WIDE UTILITIES EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF WEBSTER, COUNTY OF MONROE, STATE OF NEW YORK, ALL AS SHOWN ON A MAP ENTITLED "LAKE ROAD SCHEMATIC TOTAL HOLDINGS/SURVEY PLAN", PREPARED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, 0.P.C., HAVING DRAWING NUMBER 9161, SHEET NUMBER VA100, DATED 05/27/2025, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE ROAD - COUNTY ROUTE 1 (49.5' R.O.W.) WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY LINE ROAD —- COUNTY ROUTE 2 (66’ R.O.W.), SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY WINDMILL FARMS LLC HAVING T.A.# 037.03-1-44; THENCE
A. $89°12'48"W, ALONG SAID ASSUMED SOUTHERLY BOUNDS OF LAKE ROAD - COUNTY ROUTE 1, A DISTANCE OF 221.69 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE
1. $00°47'12"E, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 TO A POINT; THENCE
2. $89°12'48"W, A DISTANCE OF 17.32 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
3. N00°47'12"W, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID ASSUMED SOUTHERLY BOUNDS OF LAKE ROAD — COUNTY ROUTE 1; THENCE
4. N89°12'48"E ALONG SAID ASSUMED SOUTHERLY BOUNDS OF LAKE ROAD —- COUNTY ROUTE 1, A DISTANCE OF 17.32 FEET TO A POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING.
LEASE PARCEL DESCRIPTION
ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF WEBSTER, COUNTY OF MONROE, STATE OF NEW YORK, ALL AS SHOWN ON A MAP ENTITLED "LAKE ROAD SCHEMATIC TOTAL HOLDINGS/SURVEY PLAN", PREPARED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C., HAVING DRAWING NUMBER 9161, SHEET NUMBER VA100, DATED 05/27/2025, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE ROAD - COUNTY ROUTE 1 (49.5' R.O.W.) WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY LINE ROAD — COUNTY ROUTE 2 (66' R.O.W.), SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY WINDMILL FARMS LLC HAVING T.A.# 037.03-1-44; THENCE
A. $44°34'14"W, ALONG A TIE LINE AND THROUGH LANDS SAID NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY WINDMILL FARMS, LLC HAVING T.A.# 037.03-1-44, A DISTANCE OF 135.20 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE PARCEL SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE
1. $00°47'12°E, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
2. $89°12'48"W, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
3. N00°47'12"W, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
4. N89°12'48"E, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.23 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
verizon
1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586,
+ Civit ENGINEERING
* LAND SURVEYING
* LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
COSTICH 217 Laxc Avenue ROCHESTER. NY 14606
ENGINEERING oss) 4583020
NO. DATE COMMENTS.
ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR © jos/27/2025) TKW |eeview
4 AJK |LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
REVISED COMPOUND AND 2 AJK |FENCE GATE. ISSUED FINAL.
UPDATED SURVEY PLAN; 11/25/2025} JP |reassuep FINAL
wo
PROJECT MANAGER
D.A.W.
DRAWN BY
T.K.W.
COPYRIGHT 2025 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.
TSA UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS SOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS/ HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY, FOLLOWED BY HIS! HER AND SPECIFIC DE: OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.
SITE INFORMATION
17108195 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807|
TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK
SHEET TITLE
SURVEY NOTES AND DESCRIPTIONS
C.E. JOB NUMBER SHEET NUMBER
9161 || VA110
¥ AB a ? N $ E W/END SECTIONS — 1 NG BRO! oan h valle | LION CENTERLINI =311.5' » z 4 EXISTING baltia fOr ies ae ’ e a 1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 . P : bale pa Sie RO WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586 *] ye ; i nee fe care ~CO EXISTING uTiuiTy rie . RO Se 3 Ww, ~~. - a * * bd - as+— | le eta EXISTIN' | eee * ZN nuit POLE ( p — EXISTING 411 RT + CiviL ‘ —_—— x WOOD POSTS | ENGINEERING 2 Se EXISTING UTILITY POLE * LAND i ee 3 pa RCE TOR Mie 4 | SURVEYING eee ” GRIN” ome | : | " ancnmecre ‘ le te ARCHITECTURE _ - = EXISTING EE = a ~ ____— — —WNTERSECTION < ais we rs Ld ENGINEERING “Sinsue® AHEAD (ae Ls ss mae u 456 XISTING UTILITY POLE si HEAD pa w = data. 3 ae 335, ——————- EXISTING DITCH: gp sae = SS r = ey js : : i aaa ; ae = oS =e canes bf : oH os = -— ——__—- —_ = ea —FEPROXIMATE ROW. BOUNDS | Fn e f ea ar ae NODATE COMMENTS rod Soak Sa pat ] EXISTING ula pote ‘a 0 |osr27/2025] TKW |'SSUEOPRELWINARY FOR POLE LINE EASEMENT Hy carats ee sete Ea PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS i ‘ SW 4074 ‘a 1 }06/05/2025] AJK |LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PER LIBER 1365 OF DEEDS PAGE 32 IOAN UC ES EASeMeN EXISTING EDGE OF | | 2 |roreor2028| AsK |revce cate issusa PROPOSED A-FRAME CULTIVATED FIELD a ACCESS GATE z 1 a 3 |rtresreozs| yp |UPOATED SURVEY PLAN __ PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS’ = | 30' WIDE ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT | i~ i W/ PROPOSED. TEMPORARY 10' WIDE CLEARING ‘ AND GRADING EASEMENTS ON EITHER SIDE |} Beer | ee ES i GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE g 7] PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS| z 8 2 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (180'2) 4 & ic = a & aa ; EXISTING ae s | | 2 " ‘i AGRICULTURAL i z ro) FIELD g a (on mg o 3 i 2 ; ‘§ Pesca yolk g z | DRAWN BY ¥ ciate | 5 a T.K.W. g PROPOSED 36' x 76’ FENCED z 1 4 IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ‘ eR COMPOUND : | COPYRIGHT 2025 3 ; 8 Hee COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C. - PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS. | : [TT 1S A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, Re . wold ” : 125" MONOPOLE TOWER. z k * to « ; , . pire eo morass Ou. ENONEER LAND Na ’ LAT:43.268833°(43° 16' 07.80"N) | é ¥ c ft ~~ LONG:-77.376738"(7" 22' 36.26°W) % g i OGuIENT A Way An LICENSEE Wo 1 Root * f= = TERS THI iN t AW a ee Reha. aoe : cars "Raeeette eceee™ Ce : = : | Ee SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE haa NIF : PNY FA | ALTERATION TO THE DOCUMENT Ae ~ WINDMILL FAMRS. LUC 2S Be z SITE INFORMATION iy BCR er NERC Ne 8 mo LAKE ROAD te ee ‘UBER 8718 PAGE 672, geass EE PROJECT ID: 17108195 r ‘ oS | S MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807, & Bo lon 2, 8 r TOWN OF WEBSTER : ; 4 3 Pr COUNTY OF MONROE : creek ae | STATE OF NEW YORK ru ial a rh im f SHEET TITLE EXISTING UTILITIES (LOCATION, SIZES AND INVERTS) SHOWN ON THE GRAPHIC SCALE OVERALL SITE PLAN PLANS ARE AND ARE NOT AS TOTHE ACCURACY OF THEIR LOCATION OR COWPLETENESS THE x f:) 15 30 60 120 (OCANONS AND DP TIS OE AL UTTION Me ETRUCTURES BITS (a OVERALL SITE PLAN a a se TEJOBNUMBER SHEET NUMBER IN PATH OF OR CLOSELY Learnt Ais OR UNDER, THE cope \CAt00, = = LOCATED UTILITIES IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO Panter ial ei ae 9 1 6 i CA 1 00 NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTILITY OWNERS IN ANPLE TIVE FOR THEN TO linch= 60 ft, (11" x 17" SHEET) LOCATE AND WARK THEIR FACILITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO NOTIFY UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF COMVENCING ANY WORK
73
PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (780't)
PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100° x 100' LEASE PARCEL AREA- 0,23 ACRES
s a YARD, TO EXTEND 1' PAST FENCE LINE
12.5'X 11’ CONCRETE SLAB W/
PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT
| H-FRAME
PROPOSED sm /
12'X 10' ICE CANOPY & EQUIPMENT CABINETS
PROPOSED 2’ WIDE CABLE BRIDGE
ee
eee = = |
32.5°-— | | — = FEAR | Lae eee : ' ~ | | FUTURE CARRIER 4 || ss » 138
| | | }
@ UDIG-NY|@
\ =) | ‘ 20.0' 3 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED 7" TALL | PROPOSED VERIZON \ DROPOSED TOWER CHAIN LINK FENCE W/1' WIRELESS 4°x 8" FOUNDATION BARBED WIRE TOP PROPOSED UTILITY: | CONCRETE SLAB \ BACKBOARD | PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PROPOSED VERIZON 125' MONOPOLE TOWER | WIRELESS DIESEL LAT:43.268833°(43° 16° 07.80"N) GENERATOR W/ TERTIARY LONG:-77.376738°(77° 22' 36.26°W) | CONTAINMENT TANK BASE ELEV= 308.5't AMSL | EXISTING UTILITIES (LOCATION, SIZES AND INVERTS) SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THEIRLOCATION OR COMPLETENESS, THE 5 fe] 25 CONTRACTOR SHALL GE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF ALL UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IN THE
PATH OF, OR CLOSELY PARALLEL TO. OR UNDER, THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR DAMAGES OCCURRING AS A RESULT OF INCORRECTLY LOCATED UTILITIES ITIS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBLITY TO NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTEITY OWNERS IN AMPLE TIME FOR THEM TO LOCATE AND MARK THEIR FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO NOTIFY UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF COMMENCING ANY WORK
“+ \ COMPOUND PLAN
CATIO
1" = 5' (22 x 34 SHEET) 1° = 10'(11 x 17 SHEET)
GRAPHIC SCALE
5 10 20
ee
(IN FEET)
linch= 5 ft. (22"x 34" SHEET) linch= 10 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)
aaa
NORTH
verizon
1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586
+ Civic ENGINEERING
* LAND SURVEYING
* LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
COSTICH ENGINEERING
217 Lane AveNuc OCHESTEN. NY 14608 (S65) 486-3020
NO. DATE COMMENTS
ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 J0s/27/2025) TKW | Review
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
REVISED COMPOUND AND FENCE GATE, ISSUED FINAL
AJK
2 }10/20/2025
UPDATED SURVEY PLAN; RE-ISSUED FINAL.
wo
11/25/2025} JP
PROJECT MANAGER
D.A.W.
DRAWN BY
T.K.W.
COPYRIGHT 2025 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.
TIS A VIOLATION OF LAW ANY IN, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANOSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS! HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED GY", FOLLOWED BY HIS! HER SIGNATURE ANO SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION. TO THE DOCUMENT.
SITE INFORMATION
17108195 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807
TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK
SHEET TITLE
COMPOUND PLAN
C.E_ JOB NUMBER
9161
SHEET NUMBER
CA110
oe mM i i ‘a EXISTING WOOD POSTS-<<. Be | \ —-<— TOWN OF ee ae \ N am ONTARIO SIGN en ~ \ as w 1 | EXISTING BROKEN —__ PROPOSED 100" STABILIZED EXISTING UTILITY POLE . \ verizon ASPHALT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE on TART \ 2 \ = “ . g 1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 AHEAD SIGN eee SS —— EXISTING sent > poi * = WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586 ie saith a EXISTING UTILITY POLE aaa ge spe RTT . \ ee om soe RGE 336_\_____----- =a — DG —_ ¥ ------ EXISTING UTILITY POLE- , — Ss: ee eee 309.57 RTC 110 4 a am 3 i ait sees " f es aa a, 309 f 1 308.71 aor co = aoe 0 "* er ee BY / ——. —3-———— inthad abs _ ~f D piace Sacer, tar oD om / on © Civic ne SG cam ae OSE: = —— a X See | PAE eta 3 ‘ ENGINEERING = A 1 = \ oo + LAND Br H i egy aa t \ \ EXISTING UTILITY POLE N SURVEYING . : Sa \ \ \ \ RGE 70A * LANDSCAPE PROPOSED LIMITS OF GLEARING J S ' Q \ EXISTING UTILITY POLE, SW 4074 | ae | ARCHITECTURE \ \ \ ¥ \ RGE70B1 SOSTICH 217 Lake AveNUE \ \ ~, 1 ‘ ies Mes A POLE LINE EASEMENT TO ROCHESTER AROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ' e NE \ W/ TRANSFORMERS = \ | ENGINEERING ““wsssscscso. \_ ELECTRIC CORPORATION \YO" WIDE UTILITIES EASEMENT ARB 1 * LS K EXISTING EDGE OF PER LIBER 1365 OF DEEDS PAGE 32 \ \ PROPOSED A-FRAME s ! 1 \ CULTIVATED FIELD \ \ ACCESS GATE \ PROPOSED 40’ - 12" HDPE W/ END SECTIONS 4 \ \ \ \ E INV= 309.09' \ = \ \ \ \ W INV= 309.0" \ NO. DATE COMMENTS Ay \ PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS — | | 3128 “Sa. CENTERLINE OF DRIVE= 311.5" \ ‘ 0 |os/2772025| TKW issue! PRELIMINARY FOR \ 30’ WIDE\ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT A ~~ \ \ W/ PROPOSED TEMPORARY 10' WIDE CLEARING iH 7K > 1 |06/05/2025] AJK |LeGAL cescririons x \ AND GRADING EASEMENTS OW EITHER SIDE > ume TREVISED COMPOUND AND | \ \ \ q i Pg eet 2 |1ov20/2025| AJK Fence GATE, ISSUED \ \ ‘. pe | : yt ee \ \ Se tn B wer o < UPDATED SURVEY PLAN; \ \ "hes PROPOSED 12' WIDEN_{" (S —} ait” r 3 11/28/2025) JP |pesssugo FINAL \ \ ~s\,GRA VEL ACCESS DRIVE N m RY Z \ x TR — ' % J =e \ \ i q sot \ ee By aS 3 sacl 8 S SS “es os Cc Rg “305, { ee al \ ~ B: ‘gi ae 4 \ a > net we, \ NS al | 7 PROPOSED ptt * Near a = CONCRETE WASHOUT PROPOSED LIMITS OF ge" i 7a Tees ~.__ PROPOSED VERIZON —_— ef DISTURBANCE= 0.33 ACRES “ tes] ine WIRELESS UNDERGROUND | 20 o ° sate |x ee “SUTILITIES (180't) a | ss aS = “Se i = 309 —iorte Tw ie Be Q > | \ —] —— 308.85 | laa al 4 = OJECT naa . PROJ \ — | Slo MANAGER ’ \ / | PROPOSED CHECK DAM (TYP) 2 Aki \ \ Cd 308.51 7A SERN . : + —— —— r 4 | \ \ eka ™ x * wre | UP | _,. “ Na 20 \ 4 er Y/ —— Pru nea Te et eS DRAWN BY \ \ ane Cte 308.3 0g we ie Ny \ api see q (r Oa eat iw ones 4 pase : & ~~ tt oO TK.W \ - | it a 1 : = ' | ~~ S \ 1 | Lara eee. res] \ | . I = ols | a je COPYRIGHT 2025 i —— | ri Bias les | — COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C. \. ee if ' Basa | = \ ot » ae { 3 | “ey UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A p) a i s | ae ' SS UCENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. LAND “ sor a 4 He ces N/F ~ Jo SURVEYOR. ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE = e. 4 ees warrenty | WINDMILL FAMRS, LLC ~ GOCRAaNT LG Wine fey icesrons wri a “ —— “4 rat aes / DY — _—— 7 - * - ae | T.A# 037.03-1-44 \ A TERS THIS DOCUMENT 1S REQUIRED BY LAW ah Te IS! HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION ao [ _proposeo sir FENCE (TYP) l : LAKE ROAD \ Cramer ne De ara r, ! ss as as | LIBE \ SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE i j 307.5 | 307.71 a a s | \ ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT i EXISTING / “ | ee | ie \ 3 ! SITE INFORMATION AGRICULTURAL j FIELD / ei | \ \ 2 LAKE ROAD H / | , PROPOSED 36' x 76' FENCED \ \ x PROJECT ID: 17108195 | / / IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS | \ \ 3 [MDG LOCATION 1D: 5000940807 \ y | / COMPOUND 7 \ Fa H v4 \ D f ‘8 a ea oe ee \ : = / 1 eee —A-—— 7 \ 2 | TOWN OF WEBSTER \ / PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS / : COUNTY OF MONROE \ fi 125" MONOPOLE TOWER $ PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 3 8 STATE OF NEW YORK \ i LAT:43.268833°(43° 16’ 07.80"N) / 100' x 100’ LEASE PARCEL \ § . se A LONG:-77.376738°(77° 22" 36.26°W) / AREA- 0.23: ACRES \ Fa] | SHEETINIE \ —--__.-—___---- BASE ELEV= 308.5't AMSL / \ a ; {| ; j GRADING & EROSION Stal Brouanre ne aicreenus eoNe _—aae CONTROL PLAN ACCURACY OF THEIR LOCATION OR COMPLETENESS. THE 15 0 7.5 15 30 60 N Se get inp eT al ioe ee ee en a as PATH OF, OR CLOSELY PARALLEL TO, @ UDIG:- NY | @ CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CAI20, SCALE: 1° = 18° (22 x 34 SHEET) (IN FEET) DELAYS OR DAMAGES OCCURRING AS ARESULT OF INCORRECTLY 1" = 30° (11x 17 SHEET) Linch» 1S ft. 22" x 34" SHEET) 9 1 6 1 CA 1 20 NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTEITY OWNERS IN AMPLE TIME FOR THEM TO Linch = 30 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET) LOCATE AND MARK THEIR FACKITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO NOTIFY UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF COMMENCING ANY WORK.
PROPOSED 4' LIGHTNING ROD
129.0’
—- 125.0'— ~120.0°
109.0"
99.0"
PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY @ 120'AGL CENTERLINE
AREA RESERVED FOR FUTURE CARRIER | @ 109'AGL CENTERLINE
AREA RESERVED FOR | FUTURE CARRIER | @ 99' AGL CENTERLINE
CONTRACTORS MUST UTILIZE VERIZON WIRELESS APPROVED LOW-PIM CABLE SUPPORT FASTENERS AND RELATED ANCILLARY ATTACHMENT HARDWARE WITHIN 10 FEET OF VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS
| | | NOTE: |
PROPOSED VERIZON
WIRELESS 125’ MONOPOLE TOWER NOTES
1. THE TOWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH GALVANIZED STEEL.
WIRELESS UNLESS IT IS REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL
THE TOWER SUPPLIER.
4. TOWER SHALL BE DESIGNED/ CONSTRUCTED TO
OF THE GROUND OF ANY TOWER.
6. PROPOSED ANTENNAS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
SHEET SUPPLIED BY THE RF SYSTEMS ENGINEER.
, BASE ELEV = 0.0 AGL
+ \ TOWER ELEVATION
CA200/ scave:1* = 10° (22 x34 SHEET) 1° = 20' (11x 17 SHEET)
GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 40 (IN FEET)
linch= 10 ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) linch= 20 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)
BOOM MOUNT DESIGN OBTAINED FROM DRAWINGS BY ARMOR TOWER, TITLED "8' HD-UPNY FRAME" SHEET #S-1, DATED 4/20/2022 AND DRAWINGS TITLED "4" HD STANDOFF FRAME", DATED 01/31/2022
NSTD-445 CLASSIFICATION: M900R(1150)-4[6]
2. NO FAA OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING IS PROPOSED BY VERIZON AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OR THE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY.
3. ALL REFERENCES TO THE TOWER AND ITS FOUNDATION ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE DESIGN AND DETAIL DRAWINGS BY
ACCOMMODATE A TOTAL OF THREE WIRELESS CARRIERS.
5. THERE SHALL BE NO PERMANENT CLIMBING PEGS WITHIN 15°
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE SPECIFIC RF ANTENNA DESIGN
STANDOFF STIFFARM 2" SCH 40 PIPE (TYP)
STANDOFF STIFFARM ATTACHED TO ADJACENT STANDOFF RAIL (TYP)
STANDOFF SPACER, 1" SCH 40 PIPE
(2) 1 1/4" SCH 40
BETWEEN UPPER & LOWER ARM ASSEMBLY; PROVIDE GALVANIZING VENT HOLES AT LOWER BACKSIDE
GALVANIZING VENT HOLES AT UNDERSIDES OF HORIZONTAL PIPES - EACH END
2 1/2" SCH 40 5/8" U-BOLT
TOP PIPE TOP & BOTTOM
CLIP PLATES BOTH SIDES ROTATED IN 30°
PROPOSED MONOPOLE TRI COLLAR MOUNT NUDD P/N: A3MPCLAMP OR APPROVED EQUAL
(2) STANDOFF RAIL 2 1/2" SCH 40 (TOP & BOTTOM)
(2) CROSSING 3/4" RODS 2 1/2" SCH 40 END PIPE
/~ C3x4,1 WELDED TO UPPER / &LOWER ARMS
/ BOOM STIFFARM / : 1 1/2" SCH 40 PIPE
(FLAT BAR) 3x2x1/4 (TYP)
2" SCH 40 INTERMEDIATE PIPE
ALL LOWER END OF
INTERMEDIATE PIPE (2) 2” SCH 40 END PIPES /2\ BOOM MOUNT DETAIL \CA2007 scae:nts PROPOSED AWS/PCS RRH UNIT PROPOSED 700/850/PCS (TYP PER SECTOR) PANEL ANTENNA (TYP PER SECTOR) PROPOSED 8' BOOM (TYP PER SECTOR) SAMMA SECToR AZ = 2g9 ALPHA secTon PROPOSED C-BAND ANTENNA AZ= 80° (TYP PER SECTOR) PROPOSED 700/850/AWS J PANEL ANTENNA (TYP PER SECTOR) PROPOSED 700/850 RRH UNIT (TYP PER SECTOR) PROPOSED PROPOSED BOOM 12-CIRCUIT OVP UNIT STIFF ARM (TYP) PROPOSED STAND-OFF- STIFF ARM (TYP) &|o u" | eam QO = ° a GRAPHIC SCALE 3 fa) 15 3 6 12 (a> ANTENNA ORIENTATION — pg CA200, (IN FEET)
CA200/ SCALE: 1* = 3' (22 x 34 SHEET) * = 6 (11x 17 SHEET)
linch= 3 ft. (22"x 34" SHEET) linch= 6 ft.(11"x 17" SHEET)
— 811/16"
Zi
HSS3x3x3/16 UPPER & LOWER ARM ASSEMBLY. PROVIDE GALVANIZING VENT] HOLES AT UNDERSIDE (BOTH ENDS)
hy 2 1/2" SCH 40
BOTTOM PIPE
GALVANIZING VENT HOLES AT
NORTH
verizon
1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586
* CiviL ENGINEERING
* LAND SURVEYING
* LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
217 Lane Avenut Rocnestes. NY 14608 (585) 458-3020
COSTICH ENGINEERING
NO. DATE COMMENTS ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 jos/27/2025) TKW |p
1 AJK |LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS REVISED COMPOUND AND
2 AJK | FENCE GATE. IssuEO FINAL.
3 |r1252025| yp |YPOATED SURVEY PLAN:
RE-ISSUED FINAL
PROJECT MANAGER
D.A.W.
DRAWN BY
T.K.W.
COPYRIGHT 2025 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.
A VIOLATION OF LAW ANY IN, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. LANO SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS/ HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION “ALTERED BY", FOLLOWED BY HIS! HER SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.
SITE INFORMATION
17108195 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807,
TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK
SHEET THLE
TOWER ELEVATION AND
ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN
C.E. JOB NUMBER SHEET NUMBER
9161 ||CA200
UNIVERSAL PIPE ADAPTER KIT BY
SITEPRO OR EQUAL (TYP OF 2)
4" ALARM PVC CONDUIT (FROM GENERATOR)
1" POWER/ALARM EMT CONDUIT
PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 10' x 12' ICE CANOPY (SEE DETAILS)
PROPOSED VERIZON
PROPOSED GPS UNIT WIRELESS H-FRAME
SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR
PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE
| }-—PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE POST
|_ |—-PROPOSED P1000 UNISTRUT, LENGTH & SPACING TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD TO SUIT EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS
PROPOSED TRAP BOX H (SITE PRO 1 P/N: TRAP3 OR APPROVED EQUAL) (TYP)
: | }-PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS OVP
| PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINET
[7 (3) 2" LMFC CONDUITS FROM CABINET TO OVP
t — —— : ——} >
PROPOSED GPS UNIT PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 24"x24" PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PROPOSED 25W FLOOD LIGHT SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR FIBER BOX WITH LOCKABLE HASP 10° x 12' ICE CANOPY (LITHONIA OLFL14 PE BZ M4) (SEE DETAILS) MOUNTED ON H-FRAME 10.0" 4-4" 4-4" PROPOSED VERIZON al 3 WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE © 1 — PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PROPOSED LIGHT TIMER WITH S 200A INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER WEATHERPROOF COVER (4) 3° CONDUIT PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY. | PROPOSED P1000 UNISTRUT, LENGTH & BETWEEN CABINETS (COORDINATE FINAL SPACING TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD TO CONDUITS W/ VERIZON WIRELESS CE) SUIT EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS PSEA ES | e 5] EES PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS H-FRAME FUTURE VERIZON] | —---—, WIRELESS CABINET PROPOSED VERIZON—_| =e A 8 WIRELESS BATTERY = Sel £ 7 CABINET j | =: ' PROPOSED VERIZON—|__ wire.ess ||| -————___| PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINET 50kW DIESEL GENERATOR W/ PROPOSED VERIZON~|_| | i; -— / TERTIARY CONTAINMENT TANK ON WIRELESS 12.5'x 11.0' | [> PROPOSED 4'x8' CONCRETE PAD CONCRETE PAD | } N = —— y EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED COURTESY GFI RECEPTACLE WITH WEATHERPROOF cover! go \-2" POWER PVC CONDUIT (FROM GENERATOR) TRANSITION POINT FROM EMT CONDUIT TO LMFC CONDUIT (TYP) a 2" POWER PVC CONDUIT (FROM METER/DISC) 2 4" ALARM EMT CONDUIT Lo 1" HEATER/CHARGER PVC CONDUIT (FROM GENERATOR) 2" FIBER EMT CONDUIT: 4" CONTROL PVC CONDUIT (FROM GENERATOR)
(4) 1" POWER EMT CONDUITS 3/4" POWER EMT CONDUIT 2" FIBER PVC CONDUIT (FROM FIBER DEMARC)
“PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 12.5' x 11.0' CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 200A
INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER PROPOSED 18"@ CONCRETE PIER (TYP)
2\ SIDE ELEVATION
fa FRONT ELEVATION NOTES: CA500, SCALE:I"= 2 (22 x 34 SIZE) \CA500, a rea (iix 1 7 OTA hay each 1, GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND VERIZON WIRELESS SETUP VENDOR TO INSTALL PULL STRINGS IN ALL EQUIPMENT CONDUITS AS APPLICABLE (OVP, ALARM, POWER, FIBER, AND GENERATOR) 2. VERIZON WIRELESS SETUP VENDOR TO ADD PLYWOOD BACKING BOARD INSIDE HOFFMAN BOX. 3. VERIZON WIRELESS SETUP VENDOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL CAT6 ETHERNET CABLING FOR ALL ALARM POINTS REQUIRED BY VERIZON WIRELESS STANDARDS. 4. ALL CIVIL SITE WORK (CONDUITS, GROUNDING, CONCRETE) TO BE PERFORMED BY VERIZON WIRELESS GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ALL OTHER WORK TO BE DONE BY OTHERS. PROPOSED HYBRID CABLES: PROPOSED GPS UNIT PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ROUTED ALONG CABLE BRIDGE | SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR 10° x 12' ICE CANOPY WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE , 4-4" 4-4" | (TYP OF 2) a PROPOSED GPS UNIT PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ais ° ~~ ee CABLE BRIDGE POST = 5 Fx EROPOSED, LOWER PROPOSED PROPOSED P1000 UNISTRUT, PROPOSED 25W FLOOD LIGHT (LITHONIA S J 8° (MAX) fi CABLE BRIDGE LENGTH & SPACING TO BE v OLFL14 PE BZ M4) MOUNTED ON H-FRAME lV 15 DETERMINED IN FIELD TO SUIT PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS OVP [ EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS (4) 3" CONDUIT PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY PROPOSED VERIZON BETWEEN CABINETS (COORDINATE FINAL WIRELESS H-FRAME CONDUITS W/VERIZON WIRELESS CE) 1 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS. ay 200A INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER (ON OPPOSITE SIDE) | PROPOSED | HYBRID CABLE (TYP) S | s Loe CABLE GROUND BAR~ oo = UNIVERSAL GPS MOUNT BY A SITEPRO OR EQUAL (TYP OF 2) a crrares zi = z PROPOSED VERIZON = WIRELESS H-FRAME [id < CT wi ese a : 3 PROPOSED VERIZON atta oe 5 EXISTING we. EEE EEEE Eo - SREDaraeet oe R WIRELESS OVP | ; ‘ PROPOSED 18" | | La " CONCRETE PIER (TYP) PROPOSED/ | FUTURE VERIZON WIRELESS CABINET Snowe ender PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ° EQUIPMENT CABINET A912: MEG CONDUITS” 12.5' x 11.0’ CONCRETE PAD eH Ll — 2
FROM CABINET TO OVP
PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS BATTERY CABINET
/3\ REAR ELEVATION
\CAS0O) ScALe:1" = 2" (22 x 34 SIZE)
1° =4'(11x 17 SIZE)
\ paorosen TOWER
FOUNDATION
/@\ EQUIPMENT ELEVATION
\CA500/) scave: 1" = 2° (22x 34 SIZE) ¥* = 4 (11x 17 SIZE)
verizon
1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586
* Civit ENGINEERING
* LAND SURVEYING
* LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
COSTICH ENGINEERING
217 Lake AVENUE ROCHESTER. NY 14606 (585) 456-3020
NO. __DATE COMMENTS
ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW
°
05/27/2025] TKW
41 AJK | LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
TREVISED COMPOUND AND 2 |10/20/2025| AJK | FENCE GATE. ISSUED FINAL
UPDATED SURVEY PLAN; RE-ISSUED FINAL
ao
11/28/2025} JP
PROJECT MANAGER
D.A.W.
DRAWN BY
T.K.W.
COPYRIGHT 2025 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.
TT 15 A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY, ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS! HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION “ALTERED BY, FOLLOWED BY HIS! HER SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.
SITE INFORMATION
17108195 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807
TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK
SHEET TITLE
EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS
SHEET NUMBER
CAS500
CE. JOB NUMBER
9161
(3) INDUSTRIAL MALLEABLE IRON
BARBED WIRE 3 STRANDS GALVANIZED
1-0"
LINE POST SPACED @ NOT TO EXCEED 10'-0" 0.C. (SEE FENCING NOTES FOR DIAMETERS OF POSTS)
oe LINK FABRIC & ij oo 5 eine eM ~
TENSION WIRE 1/2" CROWN
GRADE
4'-0"
77 4500 PS! CONCRETE
+ \ FENCE DETAIL
NTS
ian YELLOW
, -6" DIA SCH 40 CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE GUARD POST
4'-0"
An". 4
4500 PSI CONCRETE
6"
8.
SUBGRADE
s \ BOLLARD DETAIL
CASOV) SCALE: 3/6" = 11-0" (22x34 SIZE
3 3/8" = 1-0" (11x17 SIZE
OFFSET PIN HINGES PER GATE PANEL ), (PAGE-WILSON M-6 OR EQUAL)
COMPACTED 3/4" CRUSHED STONE
‘COMPACTED
CAP (TYP ON ALL POSTS)
WELDED HEAVY DUTY HASP AND STAPLE / WIINTEGRAL DROP BAR AND PADLOCK
f 9" x 9" BANDED HAND HOLE (TYP) J / W/ CHAIN WELDED @ ONE SIDE / i
SEE FENCE DETAIL
11'-9"
3 STRANDS OF 3/8" DIA STEEL TRUSS / GALVANIZED BARBED / ROD AT GATE (TYP) / WIRE »—:—| Top RAIL -GATE FRAME 4" DIASCH 40 GATE POST 4 TENSION WIRE ; GRADE tien DROP 11 BAR ee 4 SLOTTED et MUSHROOM rt CAP 14 a | CONCRETE (SEE FENCE
2 DOUBLE GATE DETAIL
DETAIL)
CASO) SCALE: 1/2" = 11-0" (22x34 SIZE) 4/4" = 1'-0" (11x17 SIZE)
3/4" CRUSHED STONE CONFORMING WITH NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 703-AGGREGATE, SUB-SECTION 703-02-COURSE AGGREGATE, TABLE 703-4 NO. 2 STONE
WEED BARRIER SHALL BE TYPAR LANDSCAPE FABRIC OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL
a GRAVEL SURFACING T
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
REATMENT
CASOY) SCALE: NTS
3° 0.D. GA di LVANIZE
jf
/ POST SET IN CONCRETE
18' - 0" OPENING OD STEEL
2" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL FRAME Pad WELDED
CONSTRUCTION) |
4” DENSE GRADED AGGREGATE
ICE BRIDGE SITE PRO1 ICE BRIDGE SITE MODEL #1B8120-T3 PRO MODEL BOSTON ase #1B24D-T3 [———-: CS —p —r Beceoed § Os ceon) 666 fF] 66 TO GROUND- 5 SYSTEM REFER a ANTENNA CABLES TO GROUNDING P ercsorog ocosoen! ON SNAP-IN CABLE PLAN FOR Kg : HANGER (TYP) CONNECTION ; y - ee = Beoeoed F Oeoeon| re g lb ; ro = Fd =| o S ' AR t . 74500 PS!
+ > CONCRETE
ae
SECTION VIEW
24" WIDE - MODEL #1B24-D
lane
PLAN VIEW
3 \ CABLE BRIDGE / H-FRAME DETAIL
CASOY) SCALE: NTS
ACCESS DRIVE STONE TO BE ACQUIRED FROM N.Y.S.D.O.T. APPROVED QUARRY.
ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT RECEIVING STONE SHALL RECEIVE 4”
OF TOPSOIL AND BE SEEDED AS DIRECTED BY CELLULAR NETWORK REPRESENTATIVE. SLOPE STABILIZATION TECHNIQUES SUCH AS SURFACE
ROUGHENING (SEE NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR URBAN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL) SHALL BE UTILIZED ON ALL BLOPES
GREATER THAN 3:1.
| CENTERLINE OF / IMPROVEMENTS 6
| (DGA) ROLLED/COMPACTED ‘i is Solana aemeae 5 | 2:4 SLOPE(TYP,), || « | [ ROLLED AND COMPACTED 2 & ISTING G \ | Ext: TING 8 : . > : | | a AC ra Pes racpns oe one ee meceameem FV | LATCH-WELDED TO GATE KS ea ea Se OSES Ze | WITH LOCK & KEY ACIS CONE AC | ACA R2ODS L e PYOOSS TENAX 3D GRID HT. UscariFY AND COMPACT RANEY 5 INDUSTRIAL BOX WMMmMTE¥ TRIPLANAR GEOGRID W/ TOP 6" OF EXISTING GRADE “AK%* & HINGES (4) CLASS "ae “ee CLASS 4 GEOTEXTILE Zz 8 NOTE: CONCRETE RADE Oe. vy : PROPOSED OR EXISTING UTILITIES 8 IN AREA OF GATE INSTALLATION
SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
/e)\ A-FRAME GATE
CASOY SCALE:NTS
EARTH WORK SUBGRADE COMPACTION & SELECT GRANULAR FILL
41. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEARING & GRUBBING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND ROADWAY AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, AS PREPARED FOR THIS SITE, WHEN NECESSARY, FOR SITE WORK PREPARATION, & FOUNDATION WORK. AS A MINIMUM THE TOP 6" OF GRADE SHALL BE REMOVED, THE EXPOSED
SUBGRADE COMPACTED AND GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INSTALLED AS REQUIRED FOR UNSTABLE SOIL CONDITION.
2. ALL SELECT GRANULAR FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A 95% COMPACTION AT A MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY MODIFIED
PROCTOR TEST (ASTM D-1557) AND WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 3% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT.
3. CONTRACTOR TO ASSURE THAT EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS ARE MAINTAINED.
(7 GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD - FLATLANDS/RIDGETOP SITUATIONS
CAS01) SCALE: 1° = 2" (22x34 SIZE)
1" = 4' (11x17 SIZE)
REMOVE TOP 6" OF SOIL FROM SUBGRADE
verizon
1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586
* CIVIL ENGINEERING
+ LAND SURVEYING
* LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
COSTICH ENGINEERING
217 Lac Avenue ROCHESTER, NY 1461 (S85) 4563020
NO. _DATE COMMENTS
ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR © Josra7ro2s| TKW |SSUED!
1 AJK |LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
REVISED COMPOUND AND 2 |10/20/2025| AJK | FENCE GATE. ISSUED FINAL
UPDATED SURVEY PLAN; RE-ISSUED FINAL.
eo
11/26/2025] JP
PROJECT MANAGER
D.A.W.
DRAWN BY
T.K.W.
COPYRIGHT 2025 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.
SAV x UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR. ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS! HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION “ALTERED BY", FOLLOWED BY HIS! HER SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.
SITE INFORMATION
17108195 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000940807,
TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK
SHEET TITLE
SITE DETAILS
C.E. JOB NUMBER
9161
SHEET NUMBER
CAS501
NOTES:
USE 2" STONE, OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT.
4100’ MIN. GRAVEL DRIVE = z MAXIMUM DEPTH OF CONTAMINATED WATER IS 50% OF CONCRETE WASHOUT HEIGHT. ENTRANCE OF 5 aera 10 MIL IMPERMEABLE se pd $6 & 2x36" WOODEN MER — @ wi STAKES PLACED 5'0.C. \ 8' x 8 MINIMUM FILTREXX @ SOXX PLAN R=10' (TYP) MANUALLY COMPACTED 6" THICKNESS OF 2” BACKFILL TO 95% CRUSHED STONE STANDARD PROCTOR SECTION VIEW DENSITY ,2"x2"x36" WOODEN
MANUFACTURED BY CARTHAGE MILLS OR APPROVED EQUAL
LENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 100 FEET (COUNTY ROUTE)
THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN SIX INCHES
WIDTH - 12 FOOT MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR
EGRESS OF}
FILTER CLOTH - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE.
CCURS.
_— | STAKES PLACED 5’ 0.C. Fe e <2_-UNDISTURBED ; MATERIAL PUMP CONTAMINATED WATER PACTED SUBGRAD! ; CoM BORADE = = INTO CONCRETE WASHOUT SECTION A-A SAND PIPE BEDDING, 6" MIN, b INN 2 ™ a seeecta scents ADS N-12 CULVERT ane 8' MINIMUM FILTREXX @ SOXX 2. ADDITIONAL BEDDING MAY BE USED AS ORDERED BY ENGINEER. . a 3. ALL EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING SHALL MEET OSHA REQUIREMENTS. f B. 2 \ CULVERT TRENCH DETAIL CASO2/ scaLe: 1/2" = 1'-0" (11x17 SIZE) 1" = 1-0" (22x34 SIZE) Lice PLAN VIEW
ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH §:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED.
THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH SHALL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. IF ACCUMULATED SOIL DOES NOT COME OFF BY WAY OF STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KNOCK OFF ACCUMULATED SOIL BY MANUAL
METHODS UPSLOPE OF A SILT FENCE BARRIER.
SILT FENCE BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN SLOPE OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO CATCH ANY SEDIMENT THAT COULD POTENTIALLY FALL OFF OF CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMEN
PERIODIC INSPECTIONS AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN.
iT AND/OR VEHICLES.
48" MIN. FENCE POST (SPACING 10'-0" CENTER TO CENTER MAX.)
FILTER FABRIC AMOCO- CONSTRUCTION FABRIC STYLE 1380 OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL
GRADE SILT Sy
NATIVE SOIL of AY 6°]
EXCAVATED TRENCH
/-TAMPED BACKFILL
NOTES:
FOR ANY PROJECT ON WHICH CONCRETE WILL BE POURED OR OTHERWISE FORMED ON SITE, A SUITABLE WASHOUT FACILITY MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE CLEANING OF CHUTES, MIXERS, AND HOPPERS OF THE DELIVERY VEHICLES UNLESS SUCH A FACILITY WILL BE USED AT THE SOURCE OF THE CONCRETE.
1. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY WASH WATER FROM THESE VEHICLES BE ALLOWED TO ENTER ANY SURFACE WATERS. 2. CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL BE LINED WITH 10 MIL. THICK PLASTIC WHICH COVERS THE BOTTOM OF THE WASHOUT AND EXTENDS OVER THE TOP OF THE SIDES. MAKE SURE THAT PROPER SIGNAGE IS PROVIDED TO DRIVERS SO THAT THEY ARE AWARE OF THE PRESENCE OF WASHOUT FACILITIES. WASHOUT FACILITIES SHOULD NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 50 FEET OF STORM DRAINS, OPEN DITCHES OR SURFACE WATERS. INSTALL ON FLAT GRADE NOT TO EXCEED 2%. CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY BE STACKED IN A PYRAMIDAL CONFIGURATION FOR ADDED HEIGHT AND STABILITY. CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY BE DIRECT SEEDED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. THEY SHOULD BE IN A CONVENIENT LOCATION FOR THE TRUCKS, PREFERABLY NEAR THE PLACE WHERE THE CONCRETE IS BEING POURED. MINIMUM DIMENSIONS TO BE 8' (L) x 8' (W) x 2' (H) . LINER SHALL IS TO BE REPLACED EVERY TIME THE WASHOUT IS EMPTIED. . WASHOUT TO BE LOCATED 100’ (MIN.) FROM EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE
CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAIL
A502] SCALE: NTS
»
BN OF
330
1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SOIL /~\ STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL STABILIZATION PERIOD. \GA5«2) SCALE:NTS 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT SILT FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. eurevanen 3. EXCAVATE TRENCH 6" WIDE X 6" DEEP. BURY BOTTOM 12” OF FABRIC AND TAMP IN DEPENDING ON CHANNEL : [-fe} X= phe aia SLOPE SYMBOL 4. WHEN FENCE IS NO LONGER NEEDED, THE ACCUMULATED SILT, ALL THE POSTS AND Xx—] mas ded FABRIC SHALL BE REMOVED AND TRENCH BACK FILLED WITH TOPSOIL AND SEEDED. A CUTOFF j CREST 24" MAX («\ SILT FENCE DETAIL TRENCH 18" @ CENTER CASO) scarps
WIDE 6" DEEP
| -24" MAX @ ” CENTER 4-6" LEVELING ° AREA FILTER FABRIC. FILTER FABRIC CUTOFF TRENCH SECTIONA-A DESIGN BOTTOM SECTION B-B CENTERLINE OF ass | CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 5.5'+ 1. STONE WILL BE PLACED ON A FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATION TO THE LINES, GRADES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN IN THE PLAN. sak \ .25' 2. SET SPACING OF CHECK DAMS TO ASSUME THAT THE ELEVATIONS OF THE CREST OF THE DOWNSTREAM DAM IS AT THE VEGETATE ae § SAME. ELEVATION OF THE TOE OF THE UPSTREAM DAM. Ss XMS EDGE OF ACCESS DRIVE 3. EXTEND THE STONE A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FEET BEYOND THE DITCH BANKS TO PREVENT CUTTING AROUND THE DAM. 24 CRRA (WHEN ALONG DRIVEWAY) 4. PROTECT THE CHANNEL DOWNSTREAM OF THE LOWEST CHECK DAM FROM SCOUR AND EROSION WITH STONE OR LINER AS ZG Y, PRR APPROPRIATE. IAS YQ he ede XP, MT ai,
5. ENSURE THAT CHANNEL APPURTENANCES SUCH AS CULVERT ENTRANCES BELOW CHECK DAMS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO
DAMAGE OR BLOCKAGE FROM DISPLACED STONE. 6. MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA 2 ACRES.
s\ CHECK DAM DETAIL
CA502) SCALE:NTS
6 \ DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL
CA5O2) scare" = 2 (22x34 SIZE
) 1" = 4° (11x17 SIZE)
verizon
1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586
* Civit ENGINEERING * LAND SURVEYING * LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COSTICH aco LAKE AVENUE lOCHESTER, N" ENGINEERING © cesasesoze NO. DATE COMMENTS ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 Jos27/2025| TKW | Revew 4/05/2025} AJK |LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS REVISED COMPOUND AND 10/20/2025] AJK |FENCE GATE ISSUED FINAL 3 |11r25:2025| yp |UPOATEO SURVEY PLAN
RE-ISSUED FINAL.
PROJECT MANAGER
D.A.W.
DRAWN BY
T.K.W.
COPYRIGHT 2025
COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.
ITS AVIOLATH , UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A UCENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS! HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION “ALTERED BY”, FOLLOWED BY HIS! HER SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.
SITE INFORMATION
17108195
5000940807
TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK
SHEET TITLE
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C.E. JOB NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
9161 ||CAS502