Minutes

WEBSTER TOWN PLANNING BOARD MINUTES

Anthony Casciani, Chairman Mark Giardina, Secretary

Dave Malta, Vice Chairman

Derek Anderson

John Kosel

Peggy Maltman

Drazen Gasic

Frank Ciardi, Attorney-REMOTE

Katherine Kolich, Recording Secretary

Josh Artuso, Director of Community Planning & Development

Erika Corsi, Planner of Community Planning & Development

pretty lengthy agenda. If anyone ts here for that Sienna project, they have asked to be tabled so

they are not going to be here. So, I don’t know if there’s anyone here for that. They are tabled

this evening. That was item...first item for the scheduled matters. Okay, with that we can move

forward and get started.

Pledge of Allegiance/Roll Call.

Summary overview of outcome:

TABLED MATTERS

:

1. PROVIDENCE SECTION 9

2. KLEM ROAD POLE BARN

e Pole barn/ driveway must be drawn to scale on survey map prior to building

permit issuance

e No outdoor storage

Pole barn shall be used for personal storage only; not to be used for commercial

purposes

3. COBBLESTONE PLACE PHASE 2

Pg. 142 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

7

4. PARKING LOT EXPANSION

5. FINGER LAKES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION

Approvals are subject to revised drawings dated June 16, 2025

e Subject to Engineering Department comments

SCHEDULED MATTERS

:

6. SIENNA RESERVE

7. LOCKWOOD ELECTRIC

RG&E easement agreement shall be submitted to the Town with Final Plans

Dumpster enclosure shall be masonry

Elevations drawings, including color scheme to be incorporated into final plan

set.

(PEGGY MALTMAN READ EACH APPLICATION INTO THE RECORD)

(SEE ATTACHED SEQR

RESOLUTIONS

)

PROVIDENCE SECTION 9: Located at Abruzzi Drive. Applicant H.G. Builders is requesting

FINAL SUBDIVISION & SITE PLAN APPROVAL associated with the creation of 10-lots and

construction of 10 single family dwellings on a 5.36-acre lot having SBL#050.03-1-68.006 located

in the R-! Single Family Residential District under Sections 269-11, 296-19, and 350-10 of the

Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Ray Raimond and I’m with Costich Engineering. I am here tonight

on behalf of John Gasbarre and H.G. Builders, as you said, to request our final approval for the

last section of this development of Providence Estates. This section consists of 10 single family

homes along with the extension of the road and cul de sac and all the related utilities for the last

section.

We have previously met with the Town Engineer and PRC back in April and hoped to be

presenting this back in May, but we had some delays with the jurisdictional determination for the

wetlands, and the project was tabled both in May and June because of that and we are now finally

past the deadline. They have not responded so that exempts us for a 5-year period based on their

new rules. We also have already submitted it to the Monroe County Water Authority and the

Pg. 143 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

SEQR

RESOLUTIONS

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WEBSTER

1002 Ridge Road, VanIngen Court Building

July 1, 2025

RESOLUTIONS

SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION AND

APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING BOARD

1. PROVIDENCE ESTATES SECTION 9

SEQR completed as part of the preliminary, overall approval.

2. KLEM ROAD POLE BARN

Neighbor has concern about drainage from site. No grading shown on site plan.

The Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Angel

Lagares to construct a 1,920 SF pole barn on a 2.2-acre lot located at 1054 Klem Road

having SBL# 064.16-1-3.

The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section

617.5(c)(12) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not

subject to further review.

3. COBBLESTONE PLACE PHASE 2

SEQR completed as part of the preliminary, overall approval.

4. PARKING LOT EXPANSION

The Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Michael

Nuccitelli to construct a 20’ x 105” parking lot expansion to an existing office building

and self-storage facility located at 1050 Gravel Road on a 0.5-acre lot having

SBL#078.20-1-69.

The Planning Board classifies the proposed action to be a Type II Action under Section

617.5(c)(2) of the State Environmental Review (SEQR) Regulations and therefore is not

subject to further review.

SEQR

RESOLUTIONS

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WEBSTER

1002 Ridge Road, VanIngen Court Building

July 1, 2025

5. FINGERLAKES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION

Unlisted Action, See Attached.

SCHEDULED MATTERS

1. SIENNA RESERVE

SEQR completed as part of preliminary.

2. LOCKWOOD ELECTRIC

Unlisted Action due to size.

TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION

FINGERLAKES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - UNLISTED ACTION

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WEBSTER

1602 Ridge Road, VanIngen Court Building

July 1, 2025

MOTION FOR UNLISTED ACTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Jason Stanley to demolish

existing structures (two-story residential dwelling, barn and garage) and construct a new 2,600 SF

banking facility with internal site parking located at 711 and 715 Ridge Road on a proposed 2.26-acre

lot having SBL#s 079.17-1-78.111 and 079.17-1-79, and ina MC Medium Intensity Commercial

District.

The Planning Board determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action under Part 617: State

Environmental Quality Review (SEQR).

The Planning Board determined that the action is subject to a single agency review pursuant to Part

617.6(b)(1) of SEQR and that it is the most appropriate agency for making the determination of

significance. The Planning Board therefore designates itself lead agency for the proposed action.

The Planning Board has given consideration to the criteria for determining significance as set forth in

Section 617.7(c)(1) of SEQR, and has

1. considered the information contained in the Environmental Assessment Form Part | dated May

12, 2025,

2. considered public comments directed to the Planning Board during the Public Hearing on June 3,

2025 and July 1, 2025, and

3. completed Parts 2 and 3 of the Environmental Assessment Form.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD

hereby determines that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment

for the reasons set forth in the attached Notice of Determination of Non-Significance; be it further,

RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD is authorized to take all actions

reasonable and necessary to file the Negative Declaration and discharge the TOWN OF WEBSTER

PLANNING BOARD’S responsibility as lead agency for this action, be it further,

RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, based on the information and

analysis above, the referenced supporting documentation, and discussions of the action by the TOWN

OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD as documented by the Minutes for this meeting, that the proposed

action WILL NOT result in any significant environmental impacts, be it further,

RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, therefore makes a

DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, be it further,

RESOLVED, that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, based on the above reasons issues

a NEGATIVE DECLARATION as evidence of its determination.

TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION

FINGERLAKES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - UNLISTED ACTION

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WEBSTER

1002 Ridge Road, Vaningen Court Building

July 1, 2025

LOCHNER SUBDIVISON

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE

The Planning Board has reasonably concluded the following results from the proposed action, when

compared against the criteria in Section 617.7{c):

l.

2.

3. Mw

10.

11.

12.

13.

14. The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in air quality since it does not

include a regulated emission source.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in ground or surface water

quality or quantity since the proposed action connects to the public sewer system.

Water will be supplied by the Monroe County Water Authority which has adequate capacity to

support the action.

Wastewater will be treated by the Town of Webster.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in potential for erosion, flooding,

leaching or drainage problems. Development of individual parcels will conform to NYSDEC for

stormwater management and control.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in existing solid waste production

since the action is for the bank that will produce solid wastes in quantities typical of banking

facilities.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in existing noise, odor or light

since the action is being developed in accordance with Town of Webster standards. A temporary

increase in noise levels consistent with normal construction activities is anticipated when during

construction on the subdivided lots.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change, or cumulative change since the

proposed action creates new residential parcels from an existing residential parcel. Traffic

generated is anticipated to be minimal.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse impact on the criteria listed under

Section 617(c)(1)(ii) of SEQR because no habitats or threatened or endanger species were

identified on or contiguous to the proposed site.

The proposed action is not located in an area designated as a Critical Environmental Area by the

Town of Webster or New York State pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g) of SEQR.

The proposed action is not in material conflict with the Town of Webster 2008 Comprehensive

Plan.

The proposed action will not create an impairment of the criteria listed under Section

617(c)(1)(v) of SEQR since the action is not located in or adjacent to the listed resources and is

in character with the surrounding community.

The action will not result in a major change in the type or use of energy since the action is for the

construction of a single banking building that do not require an upgrade to existing power

distribution system infrastructure.

The action will not create a hazard to human health since it does not contain nor is it located

adjacent to an existing sources of hazardous substances or contaminants. The project does not

contemplate the use of hazardous substances or contaminants.

TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION

FINGERLAKES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION - UNLISTED ACTION

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WEBSTER

1002 Ridge Road, VanIngen Court Building

July 1, 2025

15. The action will not create a substantial change in use of the land since the action is consistent

with zoning for the land, the existing community character, and the Town of Webster 2008

Comprehensive Plan.

16. The action will not attract a large number of people for more than a few days when compared to

taking no action since the action involves the creation of nine new parcels and does not create

areas that will attract a large number of people.

17. The action will not create a cumulative impact on the environment as listed under 617(c)(1)(x),

(xi), and (xii) of SEQR.

TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION

LOCKWOOD ELECTRIC, 633 BASKET ROAD

UNLISTED ACTION

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WEBSTER

1002 Ridge Road, VanIngen Court Building

SEQR UNLISTED ACTION

JULY 1, 2025

MOTION FOR UNLISTED ACTION

Town of Webster Planning Board considered the request by Applicant, Lon Lockwood to construct

an 8,822 SF multi-tenant post-frame style building located at 633 Basket Road on a

1.48-acre lot having SBL# 066.03-1-9.11 and in the IN Industrial District.

The Planning Board determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action under Part 617: State

Environmental Quality Review (SEQR).

The Planning Board determined that the action is subject to a single agency review pursuant to Part

617.6(b)(1) of SEQR and that it is the most appropriate agency for making the determination of

significance. The Planning Board therefore designates itself lead agency for the proposed action.

The Planning Board has given consideration to the criteria for determining significance as set forth in

Section 617.7(c)(1) of SEQR, and has

1. considered the information contained in the Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 dated

March 14, 2025,

2. considered public comments directed to the Planning Board during concept review on May 4,

2025,

3. considered public comments directed to the Planning Board during the Public Hearing on July 1,

2025 and

4, completed Parts 2 and 3 of the Environmental Assessment Form.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD

hereby determines that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment

for the reasons set forth in the attached Notice of Determination of Non-Significance; be it further,

RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD is authorized to take all actions

reasonable and necessary to file the Negative Declaration and discharge the TOWN OF WEBSTER

PLANNING BOARD’S responsibility as lead agency for this action, be it further,

RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, based on the information and

analysis above, the referenced supporting documentation, and discussions of the action by the TOWN

OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD as documented by the Minutes for this meeting, that the proposed

action WILL NOT result in any significant environmental impacts, be it further,

RESOLVED that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, therefore makes a

DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, be it further,

RESOLVED, that the TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD, based on the above reasons issues

a NEGATIVE DECLARATION as evidence of its determination.

TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION

LOCKWOOD ELECTRIC, 633 BASKET ROAD

UNLISTED ACTION

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WEBSTER

1002 Ridge Road, VanIngen Court Building

SEQR UNLISTED ACTION

JULY 1, 2025

LOCKWOOD ELECTRICT - 633 BASKET ROAD

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE

The Planning Board has reasonably concluded the following results from the proposed action, when

compared against the criteria in Section 617.7(c):

1.

2.

3.

a

10. Ll.

12.

13

14. The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in air quality since it does not

include a regulated emission source.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in ground or surface water

quality or quantity since the proposed action connects to the public sewer system.

Water will be supplied by the Monroe County Water Authority which has adequate capacity to

support the action.

Wastewater will be treated by the Town of Webster.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in potential for erosion, flooding,

leaching or drainage problems. Development of individual parcels will conform to NYSDEC for

stormwater management and control.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in existing solid waste production

since the action is for the multiunit residential buildings that will produce solid wastes in

quantities typical of multi-use commercial structures.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change in existing noise, odor or light

since the action is being developed in accordance with Town of Webster standards. A temporary

increase in noise levels consistent with normal construction activities is anticipated when during

construction on the subdivided lots.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse change, or cumulative change since the

proposed action creates new residential parcels from an existing residential parcel. Traffic

generated is anticipated to be minimal.

The proposed action will not have a substantial adverse impact on the criteria listed under

Section 617(c)(1)(ii) of SEQR because no habitats or threatened or endanger species were

identified on or contiguous to the proposed site.

The proposed action is not located in an area designated as a Critical Environmental Area by the

Town of Webster or New York State pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g) of SEQR.

The proposed action is not in material conflict with the Town of Webster 2008 Comprehensive

Plan.

The proposed action will not create an impairment of the criteria listed under Section

617(c)(1)(v) of SEQR since the action is not located in or adjacent to the listed resources and is

in character with the surrounding community.

. The action will not result in a major change in the type or use of energy since the action is for the

construction of multi-use commercial structures that do not require an upgrade to existing power

distribution system infrastructure.

The action will not create a hazard to human health since it does not contain nor is it located

adjacent to an existing sources of hazardous substances or contaminants. The project does not

contemplate the use of hazardous substances or contaminants.

TOWN OF WEBSTER PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION

LOCKWOOD ELECTRIC, 633 BASKET ROAD

UNLISTED ACTION

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WEBSTER

1002 Ridge Road, VanIngen Court Building

SEQR UNLISTED ACTION

JULY 1, 2025

15. The action will not create a substantial change in use of the land since the action is consistent

with zoning for the land, the existing community character, and the Town of Webster 2008

Comprehensive Plan.

16. The action will not attract a large number of people for more than a few days when compared to

taking no action since the action involves the creation of nine new parcels and does not create

areas that will attract a large number of people.

17. The action will not create a cumulative impact on the environment as listed under 617(c)(1)(x),

(xi), and (xii) of SEQR.

Department of Health. We have heard back from the water authority and their requests and

changes are reflected in the plans that I sent the other day. We also have addressed and met all the

comments from the Town Engineer. We made all those changes and revisions.

Both SEQR and SWPPP for this subdivision are still in effect from the original other sections and

the additional requirement requested was that the owner cleaned and grubbed the pond area and

dredge it so that it gets a fresh start again. With that, we hope to kick off the final phase and get

this board’s approval. I am here to answer any questions you may have.

and that’s a pain in the neck I understand. Anybody have any questions on it. The project has

been here for several years. Actually, John’s father is the one that brought it in years ago. Any

questions on this project. Board: All agreed.

RESOLUTION 25-0043 Dave Malta made a motion for FINAL

APPROVAL Located at Abruzzi Drive.

Applicant H.G. Builders is requesting

FINAL APPROVAL associated with the

creation of 10-lots and construction of 10

single family dwellings on a 5.36-acre lot

having SBL# 050.03-1-68.006 located in

the R-1 Single Family Residential District

under Sections 269-11, 296-19, and 350-10

of the Code of the Town of Webster Which

was seconded by John Kosel.

FINAL APPROVAL CHECKLIST

1. Subject to PRC comments.

2. Subject to Parks and Recreation fees (if applicable)

3. Subject to Preliminary Approval Conditions.

4. Subject to all applicable governmental fees.

5. Subject to Department of Public Works approval

Pg. 144 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

6. Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning Board, to expire

on 7.1.26

7. The conditions of Preliminary and Final approval are depicted on the cover page of the final

designed plans.

8. The Engineer for the proposed project shall provide a Letter of Certification that all proposed

work was completed, as per Planning Board resolution of final approval before a Certificate of

Occupancy will be issued.

9. A Letter of Credit to the Town for the project shail include the fee for the Engineer’s final

certification inspection of the site.

10. All storm water facilities are to be constructed first

14. Subject to resolution of the final approved minutes.

12. Approvals are subject to Drawing No: AS PROVIDED

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

any parcel or land and the number of lots are constituted as a subdivision and a new site plan. So,

we have done the site plan.

RESOLUTION 25-0044 Anthony Cascian made a motion for

SUBDIVISION APPROVAL Located at

Abruzzi Drive. Applicant H.G. Builders is

requesting SUBDIVISION APPROVAL

associated with the creation of 10-lots and

construction of 10 single family dwellings

on a 5.36-acre lot having SBL# 050.03-1-

68.006 located in the R-1 Single Family

Residential District under Sections 269-11,

296-19, and 350-10 of the Code of the Town

of Webster Which was seconded by Dave

Malta.

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Pg. 145 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated with

the constniction of a 1,920 SF pole barn on a 2.2-acre lot having SBL# 064.16-1-3 located in the

R-2 Single Family Residential District under Sections 269-11, 350-11 and 350-36 of the Code of

the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Angel Lagares and wife, Sandy Lagares at 1054 Klem Road.

We are proposing to build a pole barn 32 x 60, 19.5 feet high and extended driveway to the pole

barn.

some information lacking. We couldn’t give an approval based on what you presented. Now I

guess it conforms a whole lot better. There’s still a few questions that might be asked, but um I

think we asked for side dimension You’ ve included that. That’s 15 feet elevation drawings we

asked for uh, material samples. I think you were going to have some samples or something. What

the materia! you were using. (APPLICANT HELD UP MATERIAL SAMPLES)

saying it’s 19 feet .

maybe...{ think you do have it 20.5. You’ve got it written with pencil on there. Alright, what is

immediately next to you. I know that you’re 15 feet from the line. There’s nothing else back

there, is there.

does anybody have any questions or anything.

plan, have the building drawn to scale on that plan and it was submitted and was not to scale on

there. It seems as if it was just indication pole barn and isometric or house view on the plan. I

also asked for the gravel or the access to the pole barn to be indicated. That doesn’t look like it’s

to scale there. For example, it says 35 width in one section and that’s not to scale if I was to use,

for example, the house dimensions compared to what 30 ft is, so I guess um I’ just looking for a

site plan layout that is dimensionally correct where this pole barn is going to be scale with

appropriate access to it as well. Uh, my other questions just downspouts. Is this going to be sure

discharged or collected on the ground just because it’s so close to the neighboring property within

Pg. 146 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

that 15 feet and....... MR. CASCIANI SPEAKING OVER.

side. There’s nothing next to it back there is there. What would you propose doing, running a

storm sewer back there for it.

wouldn’t be, it’s discharging to the woods there or to the west. So, ...

on it and I agree with that. Ok, anybody else have any concerns with this. He did basically

complete all the comments we did have the last time. If everyone is ok with it, then I would

suggest maybe what you need to do would be to...when you go to get your permit take your

drawing and just as he just stated, just make a building to square you know . You don’t have to

draw the building just put the outline of the building like your house. Where it is and how many

feet back it is and then put your driveway and show a driveway extension going back...so give

that...we can work with the approval. I’m sure everybody would be okay with that

provided...that you do that and give it before you get a permit. Would that work for you.

THE AUDIENCE. I know you’re in a hurry but let me finish with him first. The other thing we

asked for was samples of the materials and he has shown us the sample of the material. Do you

have any questions or anything for the board.

John Bustard at 1050 Kiem Road: We are the house that lives right next door.

didn’t close the public hearing. We left it open so you could speak.

are wrong. It doesn't add up. Alright, so I'm going to react quickly here. Okay, this is a very,

very big building and we don’t believe it fits within the character of the neighborhood, and we

also don’t believe that they gave adequate reasons to build it. Because we were told they have to

have a compelling reason, residential reason and the reasons they gave weren’t very good. They

Pg. 147 July 1,2025 Planning Meeting

told me they needed to plow to it, but then they only told you things that need to be stored for the

winter. No necessary to plow to. Next on the thing is I sent you a picture with our backyard.

Their yard goes like this and then drops off to ours. They want to build this 4 feet from our

backyard and that also means that it's going to drop right off on what we used to call the farmers

field is now full of trees but their property it’s going to drop right off and all the water’s going to

go there. This is relevant because in the past their sewage system was in the back and the previous

owners had five kids and the sewage just seeped over to our property. It didn't come on the

surface, it came underneath. So, the....then it seeped out and it smelled the whole works. They've

moved the septic lines to the front yard but that means their property doesn’t perk. So, we're

very interested in a drainage plan. The codes says they had to present a drainage plan. There

was no drainage plan presented today, so we think that’s a problem. Next, you asked them last

time what other buildings were there, and you said cross off the one’s that they were going to get

rid of. There’s a chicken coupe and the chickens were there today when I was mowing my lawn.

And you told him last time; they couldn't have the chickens and the chicken too. Now, there’s a

whole debate on whether a gazebo is or is not. Now, there was a questions on whether or not this

would devalue our property So, I called two real-estate people and one I couldn't get through

and then of course he called me back and they told me our price when we sell is up to supply and

demand but clearly demand will be down. So, I don't know if our price will be down, but demand

will be down. As people come, we would have seen this big building and gone, oh my gosh, I

don't want to live next to that. And I’ve always had trouble visualizing the size of this building,

so I sent you a picture of one from down in Penan. It’s enormous and to say they're going to put

golf carts, mowers, a tractor, and lawn furniture in 1920 square feet with 14 foot walls, doesn't

make any sense. Now, the other questions that is sitting there, and I don't know partially the

answer to this, but I’m suspecting that the garage doors are I2 feet and 14 feet high. So, I called

Feluca Garage, and I said, can you raise one of those doors without electricity...cuz, they told

you there’s no electricity in the beginning and they told me either you have to have electricity, or

you have to a pull chain. Well, where's the pull chain. Inside. Now the picture you saw last

time, and I asked, I wanted to come into the town, and I wanted to see the pictures and I was told

no... There’s no door. So, how do you get into this thing to open the garage doors or are they

going to build it without a garage door. So, in our mind and trying to be the 3 minutes that you

said, 2 + 2 doesn’t equal 4 and that’s a problem. Now, our real estate agents also told us and

the lawyer we talked to, doesn’t matter what anybody says, you just converted the property to

commercial. Because nobody is going to build that size of a building and it is not commercial.

And we know he’s running a business, and we don’t care he’s running the business today.

they've given for a residential use of that building.

question to you would be what you think we should be doing with it.

Pg. 148 July |, 2025 Planning Meeting

told. It has to be residential, not commercial.

have been built throughout the town and in the same category, thee same sizes. RESIDENT

TALKING OVER MR. CASCIANI. I am not interested in your real estate guy. He means

nothing to us here. We are basing it on what the code says this gentleman is allowed to do.

he’s got 2.22 areas. So, it’s 1920 square feet. The code says nothing about 19 feet high other

than it can be under the house.

be sold with a high demand of people and also so we don’t have to look at it.

it. He is conforming to what the code is. He’s allowed to build that size. And we’ve had this

before where neighbors are not happy with the way the code reads. Any suggestions.

use only, not for......

gentleman, if he’s got like you just said, Mr. Bustard, you said that he’s got tractors and

lawnmowers and stuff like that, at least he’s able to keep it inside and out of sight. We can put

stipulations on it. AUDIENCE MEMBER SPEAKING OUT LOUD. We can ask him to have no

outdoor storage on this site. Now, lets just get away from that for a second. What are the issues

with the chicken couple and stuff? J don’t understand what they all had there.

Pg. 149 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

enforcement on the chicken issue .

there when you move in.

think it would potentially be that 100 feet that was being request but again, we can’t tell just

because we can’t tell just because it’s not drawn to scale right now.

but he’s not asking for anything on this. I mean, he’s totally allowed to do what he’s requesting.

Is there anybody else wishing to speak either for or against this project. Not seeing anyone, it

will close the public hearing and bring it back to the board.

work along with you on it, but this is totally within his rights to do so. So, all right, Then with

that, we close the public hearing and bring it back up.

Pg. 150 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

TYPE II SEQR which was

[ RESOLUTION 25-0045 Derek Anderson made a motion for

seconded by John Kosel.

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

RESOLUTION 25-0046 Anthony Casciani made a motion for

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Located at

1054 Klem Road. Angel Lagares is

requesting PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

(

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated with the

construction of a 1,920 SF pole barn on a

2.2-acre lot having SBL# 064.16-1-3

located in the R-2 Single Family Residential

District under Sections 269-11, 350-11 and

350-36 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Which was seconded by Dave Malta.

zoning. The building conforms to the setbacks. I'm going to shorten this up but just get the

highlights of it.

It does conform to the setback.

It’s not placed anywhere near the front line of the house.

Accessory building is more than 500 square feet so he’s...he has come in for a variance.

It is no higher than the main structure which is I think he’s 19 ft.

The main structure is 20.5 feet, so he conforms with that. A plot plan he’s shown that.

The requirements of New York State uniform fire prevention code have, he’ll meet that. Shown

samples of what he’s proposing to use for construction materials.

I think you did present an estimated cost of your materials. I think I remember see that, right.

Okay, we got that.

There’s no more than one accessory structure and one shed will be allowed.

Now, you’ re going to have to work that out with the town if there’s anything more than that. This

would be your accessory building. If you’ ve got a shed or chicken coop or whatever it may be,

you’ ll have to work that out with the Engineering Department. We'll leave it at that.

Alright, and on that, Drazen brought up a couple points. You should draw the building to scale

on your site drawing that you present to the town; you want to show the driveway; the width of

it going back to the building.

i Pg. 151 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

There will be no outdoor storage. Everything is inside. No outdoor storage. Very important, we

got that and as far as the chicken coop, that has to be dealt with. Like I just stated, that'll be a

separate issue. You can deal with the town with that. Anything else, I think that covers it.

No electric going in EVERYONE SPEAKING..........

scratch that part there but it’s just for personal use.

That will do if for preliminary.

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr, Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

RESOLUTION 25-0047 Anthony Casciani made a motion for

FIANL APPROVAL Located at 1054

Kiem Road. Angel Lagares is requesting

FINAL APPROVAL (PUBLIC

HEARING) associated with the

construction of a 1,920 SF pole barn on a

2.2-acre jot having SBL# 064.16-1-3

located in the R-2 Single Family Residential

District under Sections 269-11, 350-11 and

350-36 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Which was seconded by Dave Malta.

FINAL APPROVAL CHECKLIST

1. Subject to Preliminary Approval Conditions.

2. Significant construction shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning Board, to expire

on 7.1.26.

3. Based on all the requirements of the preliminary approval.

Pg. 152 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

so, he’s got a copy of it just for the record before you get a building permit.

COBBLESTONE PLACE PHASE 2: Located at 1025 Ravenside Lane. Applicant Brickwood

Management is requesting PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

)

in association with the construction of a 3-story building containing 47 market rate apartment units

on a 5.0-acre lot having SBL# 079.15-1-8.003/SEN2 located in the MHR Medium High

Residential District under Sections 269-11 and 350-14 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Jake Calabrese (NEVR SIGNED IN) I am with Marathon

Engineering, and I am here with Luke VanEpps from Brickwood Management. We are

presenting the Cobblestone phase

2. Three story 24 unit market rate apartment facility., located

at 1025 Ravenside Lane. The prior meeting, June meeting, we explained the submitted plans and

whatnot and we couldn’t make any sort of motion due to the lack of a SWPPP so in the meantime

since then we have submitted a SWPPP to the town on June 20" and then before that received

comments back on June 20" and then met with town staff about those comments to confirm what

needs to be done. A little background on that. We are utilizing the existing SWPPP for the

entire....what was in that time, the webster golf tee development which was I think like a 100

acres of that whole area. We were using the water quantity for that SWPPP and then we designed

the water quality.

So, now after speaking with the town, we’re going to have to come back and we're just going to

review the water quantity calculations that Passero put together back in roughly 2010. We are

going to confirm that those are still acceptable in the sense of what they built is what’s....... or

what they designed is out there now. So, we will be getting that updated SWPPP back to the town

after the holiday. The board a few comments as well. We’ve added snow storage to snow storage

callouts to the site plan. Stop sign details and we added bike racks. I put those towards kind of

the north and south of the apartment building to kind of avoid having a ton of bikes right at the

main entrance but still a place to lock them up and keep them safe. Another one was the updated

dumpster detail to be masonry, and we’ ve now added two bio retention facilities both along the

parking lot to conform with the new updated regs from prior compared to the 2010 regs. As it

was Said, we are looking for preliminary approval tonight to assist Brickwood Management to be

able to start the process of purchasing the property and give us time to confirm the existing

Pg. 153 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

SWPPP and update ours to give a final package to hopefully for the August meeting for the final

approval.

page...bottom left which would be the east corner kind of right in front of the dumpster so you’ ll

be able to pull all that snow out of the parking spots that are obvisioyly not parked in and then

plow it right down as well as now with the bio retention facility that is now another....that’s on

the north of our parking or I guess plan...I’m sorry, west side of our parking lot and that would

be another area we could store some snow during the winter as well as, if available, which we

foresee being available is all the way to the north end of the parking lot to be able to push this

snow at one of those or two of those five parking spaces up top.

complex.

you have taken care of it all.

We just have to confirm that with the waste removal.

either for or against this proposal. Not seeing anyone close the public portion.

dumpster, It’s up a hill. I’m not sure if that’s going to be a viable location for snow storage and

then you are going to be blocking off your garbage pickup so maybe just consider some other

location for snow storage. The new landscaping on the south side that you’re indicating is going

into the tree line, the clearing limit. It’s actually going past the clearing limit plus the trees that

you’re proposing...you’re planting them in a hill, so I’m concerned about the viability or the

livelihood of, you know, are those trees going to survive where they are going to be planted.

plantings that would work out on a hill.

Pg. 154 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

this. This was done back when.

correct or not, but we would advise the board to not grant preliminary approval until the town has

had an opportunity to confirm that the SWPPP complies with today’s regulations.

SOMEONE SPEAKING.NOT USING MIC..CAMERA NOT ON HIM: Planning on storing

snow in the bio retention area and I’m not sure we’ll accept that either. Keith Mortimor: So, the

SWPPP is still outstanding and we’ve not and since the SWPPP is outstanding, we’ve not had a

chance to complete our review of their plans. Okay, that’s been made clear.

work that out.

provide to us after the holiday and from that we would move forward with review of the site plan

because we can’t move forward with a site plan review until we understand storm water.

Apparently not, okay.

Pg. 155 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

[

this stuff together, we can do the preliminary and final together, hopefully all in one night.

RESOLUTION 25-0048 John Kosel made a motion for

TABLED APPLICATION TO

AUGUST 5, 2025 which was

seconded by Dave Malta.

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

requesting PRELIMINARY/FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

)

associated with a 20’ x 105’ parking lot expansion to an existing office building and self-storage

facility on a 0.5-acre lot having SBL# 078.20-1-69 located in the MC Medium Intensity District

under Section 269-11 and 350-18 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Mike Nuccitelli. So, I did buy this. I was back in a few month

ago about a new sign. So, I bought this property last summer with the storage units and the

tenants in there now, I don’t think we need it for full-time parking, but I see the storage units

pulling onto the lawn, you know, kind of making it look like, you know what. And a few overflow

parking spots. Another concern I had was come the winter with the building fully rented, we will

need a space to put the snow without tearing up the lawn. I talked to Spallina Paving and they

think we can get about eight spots painted, but my main concern was the turnaround, two or three

cars of overflow and then snow.

didn’t want to mess with that or the green space. And then we also made sure we are aware of

the easement sewer further back. The area is pretty, you know, garden protected so I’m not

worried about the neighbors. Just trying to do what’s best for the tenants and the property.

okay too. Again, Spallina offered to do it. We're going to stripe eight spaces. We already do

Pg. 156 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

have handicap and again, at any given time there’s only one or two overflow cars, so I never

expect it to be fully full. The building is fully rented, and my personal office is there also. So, I

am there 5 or 6 days a week and I’ve seen that it’s fullest. There’s one or two overflow cars, it’

not going to be all eight.

outdoor storage.

when we approve something like that and then you see stuff parked out there and all kinds of

vehicles and so on all over the place. Doesn’t make it look good. Doesn’t make the town look

good.

building with you, guys. So, we are on the same team there.

additional paving because when I drove by it, you know it kind of slopes backwards and goes to

that northeast corner essentially as a drop off so I was just curious , you now, even if you pave it,

there’s not a concern you’re going to have all of a sudden ponding back there or something like

that of water.

it accordingly. You know, whatever you guys want to be done. I just don’t want the lawn torn

up.

either for or against this. I can’t se anyone. Okay, no one wishing we’ll close the public hearing

and bring it back to the board.

RESOLUTION 25-0049 Derek Anderson made a motion for a

TYPE YI SEQR which was

seconded by Dave Malta.

Pg. 157 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

RESOLUTION 25-0050 Dave Malta made a _ “motion for

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Located at

1050 Gravel Road. Applicant Michael

Nuccitelli is requesting PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

)

associated with a 20’ x 105° parking lot

expansion to an existing office building and

self-storage facility on a 0.5-acre lot having

SBL# 078.20-1-69 located in the MC

Medium Intensity District under Section

269-11 and 350-18 of the Code of the Town

of Webster. Which was seconded by John

Kosel.

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL CHECKLIST

1. Subject to PRC Comments

2. All the improvements shall be constructed according to the specification of the Town of

Webster.

3. All sitework is to be in compliance with the standards of the Town of Webster.

4. Comply with all requirements of any Federal, State, County, or Town agency.

5. Address drainage, lighting, signage, and landscaping, buffering, berming and snow storage.

6. Approvals are subject to Drawing No; AS PRESENTED

7. Not to be used for outdoor storage.

8. Proceed to Final Approval

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

Pg. 158 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

[

L

RESOLUTION 25-0051

FINAL APPROVAL CHECKLIST

1.

2.

4.

3

mn

e~

Subject to Preliminary Approval Conditions.

Subject to all applicable governmental fees.

Subject to Department of Public Works approval

. Significant constructions shall occur within one year, as deemed by the Planning Board, to expire

on 7.1.26

Dave Malta made a motion for FINAL

APPROVAL Located at 1050 Gravel Road.

Applicant Michael Nuccitelli is requesting

FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL

(

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated with a

20’ x 105’ parking lot expansion to an

existing office building and self-storage

facility on a 0.5-acre lot having SBL#

078.20-1-69 located in the MC Medium

Intensity District under Section 269-11 and

350-18 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Which was seconded by John Kosel.

The conditions of Preliminary and Final approval are depicted on the cover page of the final

designed plans.

Subject to resolution of the final approved minutes.

Approvals are subject to Drawing No: AS PRESENTED.

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani

Mr. Malta

Mr. Giardina

Mr. Anderson

Mr. Kosel

Mrs. Maltman

Mr. Gasic

AYE

AYE

ABSENT

AYE

AYE

AYE

AYE

Applicant Jason Stanley is requesting PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND SUBDIVISION

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) in association with the demolition of the existing structures

(two-story residential dwelling, barn and garage) and the construction of a new 2,600SF banking

facility with internal site parking on a proposed 2.26-acre lot having SBL#s 079.17-1-78.111 and

079.17-1-79 located in the MC Medium Intensity Commercial District under Section 269-5 and

350-18 of the Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Evan Gefell with Costich Engineering and Bob McFadden with

Fingerlakes Credit Union. So, we were in to present in June. There were some comments from

the board, and they pertain to the landscaping along Ridge Road to add some plantings and

Pg. 159 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

screening; the undulating berms and then there were also comments from Mr. Gasic that I think

I believe we incorporated added the details; added the split rail fence back in; the fencing around

the AC generator and then we had received additional comments from conservation board, and

we submitted a response to those comments. The comment made is basically, I think the thought

was to clear cut the site for visibility to the bank and that was not the case. Actually, we want

to kind of screen from Country Max. So, we took it a step further and we’ re proposing to kind

of recreate that buffer on that corner, the western portion of the property line with some native

species. Also, with treating some of what we had originally depicted as lawn in the rear with

the slopes to do a no mo. grass mix to help. You know, there’s no reason to keep that manicured

and maintain that and this low grow mix you know will grow to a certain height and kind of flop

over and that will be that. We also worked with engineering staff to work through the SWPPP

review, and we received the engineering comments regarding site plans. We don’t have any

issues with any of those comments. I’m addressing them for final.

road, we’ ve gone through the building. We’ve done over and over that, but the landscaping

along Ridge Road. I know there’s salt and I’ve heard all those stories before over the years. But

there are ways and you’ve done it. So, that’s good.

back. I hear this from people. What, Why aren’t these guys doing this or that and so on and so

forth, so I think that’s a good attraction to it. Anybody, again it’s a public hearing so. Anybody

in the audience here wish to speak either for or against this, Ok, no one. Will bring it back to

the board and close the public hearing.

standard there. Were all the SWPPP comments addressed via the PRC for engineering in order

for us to do preliminary.

RESOLUTION 25-0052 Derek Anderson made a motion for

UNLISTED ACTION which was

seconded by John Kosel.

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Pg. 160 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

RESOLUTION 25-0053 Dave Malta made a motion for

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Located at

900 Holt Road. Applicant Kim Goergen, of

Wegmans Food Market Inc. is requesting

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL (PUBLIC

HEARING) associated with enclosing a

portion of the existing former Chase-Pitkin

outdoor space, to create a new tenant space

on a 28.7-acre lot having SBL# 079.12-01-

06.211 located in the HC High Intensity

Commercial District under Section 269-11

and 350-19 of the Code of the Town of

Webster. Which was seconded by John

Kosel.

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL CHECKLIST

Subject to PRC Comments

Subject to a Letter of Credit posted with the Town of Webster.

Subject to Conservation Board comments

Subject to Monroe County Water Authority comments

All the improvements shall be constructed according to the specification of the Town of

Webster.

6. All! sitework is to be in compliance with the standards of the Town of Webster.

7. Comply with all requirements of any Federal, State, County, or Town agency.

8. Address drainage, lighting, signage, and landscaping, buffering, berming and snow storage.

9

|

ae ee i)

. Approvals are subject to Drawing No: CA120 Dated: MAY 12, 2025.

0. Proceed to Final Approval

drawings. Just for the record, maybe to include that one.

be the drawing date. It would probably be on the front page of the drawing which is dated because that

would encompass the whole set. So, May 12", revised 6.16.25, set

616. Anthony Casciani: You may want to put in there that there was an extensive review in this case with the

trees and this is a big issue lately. You might want to put in there that the comments from the conservation

board be included in that. (SEE ATTACHED)

Pg. 161 July 1,2025 Planning Meeting

E

COSTICH Project No. 9444

NYS Women-Owned Business Enterprise (VW BE)

' Monroe County Women-Owned Business Enterprise (VBE)

June 16, 2025

Josh Artuso, Director of Community Development ,

Erika Corsi, Planner R E Cc E IVE D

Town of Webster

Webster, New York 14580 TOWn UF WEBSTER

DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Response to Comments

Dear Ms. Corsi:

The following are responses to written comments for the above referenced project. These comments are

as enumerated in your letter dated June 13, 2025.

Engineering Department Comments

Routing Diagram and associated drawings for pond designations are not consistent. These

inconsistencies are also apparent on the calculation sheets in the appendix.

The SWPPP has been revised to ensure consistency. Attached are two full copies of the revised

SWPPP. Also attached is a summary sheet identifying the location of changes.

The Design Engineer shall confirm pond size calculations after correcting Routing Diagrams

and associated drawings.

The size calculations have been verified.

Per the current permit the project needs to be identified as a low or high prioritization site.

This site would be identified as a high prioritization site.

Describe construction phasing and sequencing in the SWPPP.

The construction phasing and sequencing has been added to the SWPPP

Our review of the SWPPP largely ended when we realized the inconsistency between the

Routing Diagram, associated drawings and calculation sheets. Therefore, these comments do

not reflect a complete review. Please update and resubmit the SWPPP.

Conservation Board Comments

Lo

The new plans propose clear cutting more than 75% of the property. A portion of this clearing

appears intended to increase business visibility from Ridge Road.

Costich Engineering, DPC + 217 Lake Avenue + Rochester, New York 14608

Office (585) 458-3020 - www.costich.com

L

Project No.

DATE

Page 2

The rational for the removal of a portion of the existing western buffer is due to the grading

required to accommodate the site design. The clearing and grading of the buffer area is not

intended to create sightlines to the business but rather to enhance drainage patterns, aesthetics,

and safety. It should also be noted that Finger Lakes Federal Credit Union is investing

significantly in the site and aims to achieve a polished, professional appearance upon completion

which will enhance the site and the Ridge Road corridor.

Portions of the existing buffer along the western property line are currently overgrown and

unsightly. We propose to utilize the ‘A’ rated soils in this area for infiltration, which is the

preferred method endorsed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

(DEC). The site naturally slopes from north to south, and sufficient grading and space are needed

to divert stormwater runoff and properly treat impervious surfaces using appropriate green

infrastructure practices as required by the DEC.

Additionally, the western portion of the site is proposed for snow storage, strategically located

away from Ridge Road and Hatch Road. This placement will allow for natural filtration and

infiltration of snowmelt.

* Itis recommended to maintain more natural vegetation along the western edge of the

property to preserve existing buffers.

To restore and maintain the western buffer, we are proposing the addition of native plantings.

Screening from the neighboring Country Max property is also important to the Credit Union.

Along the southern portion of the site, where grades drop off, we propose the use of a no-

mow seed mix. This area does not require a manicured lawn, and the plantings will

contribute to runoff filtration to the depressed area which was left over from the creek

redirection associated with the Country Max development.

* Given the significant grade of the site, a berm will be necessary to protect the on-site

wetlands from runoff.

We do not support the creation of a berm along the southern portion of the property. All

impervious areas are currently designed to be captured and directed to appropriately sized and

placed green infrastructure practices. The only area that sheet-flows to the depressed zone is a

small portion of the western lawn. Runoff from this area will naturally infiltrate and be filtered

along the flow path. Additionally, we are proposing supplemental native plantings and no-mow

seeding to further aid in filtration.

Installing a berm could interrupt the natural drainage pattern to the depressed area.

Finger Lakes Federal Credit Union currently does not use fertilizers or herbicides at its other

locations for routine lawn maintenance.

e Several large, mature trees are located within the proposed construction area and are at risk

of removal.

Project No.

DATE

Page 3

Some mature trees will need to be removed to facilitate site development. A comprehensive

landscape plan has been developed for the site which includes several large deciduous trees

are proposed along the site perimeter and along the drive-thru route to replace lost vegetation

and to comply with the Town's Landscape Guidelines.

© Pavement salt and lawn fertilizer used on the site will likely drain into the wetlands,

potentially impacting their health.

Finger Lakes Federal Credit Union currently does not use fertilizers or herbicides at its other

locations for routine lawn maintenance.

Runoff containing deicing operations will be conveyed to appropriately sized stormwater

management facilities for treatment.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact our office.

Evan Gefell, R.L.A.

ERG/erw

h:\job\ documents\ correspondence’ 2025-06-16 response to town of webster engineering and conservation board comments.docx

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

requesting FINAL SITE PLAN AND SUBDIVISION APPROVAL associated with the

creation of ten (10) singie- family lots on a 5.94-acre parcel having SBL# 080.05-2-2.1 located in

the R-3 Single Family Residential District under Section 269-10, 296-27, and 350-12 of the Code

of the Town of Webster.

APPLICANT REQUESTED TO TABLE APPLICATION TO AUGUST 5, 2025 MEETING.

requesting PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

) associated with

the construction of an 8,822SF multi-tenant post-frame style building on a 1.48-acre lot having

SBL# 066.03-1-9.11 located in the IN Industrial District under Section 269-11 and 350-22 of the

Code of the Town of Webster.

Appearing before the board was Greg McMahon and I am with McMahon LaRue. We are here

tonight presenting the plan for Lon Lockwood, Lockwood Electric for their parce! on Basket

Road. It’s located on the west side of Basket Road approximately between Tebor and Schlegel.

It’s 1.4 acres. It has an existing driveway to a metal building and a small stone structure currently

on the property. The development will retain the existing metal building and in addition there

will be an 8,822 foot industrial business building built on the property. It is zoned industrial.

We have appeared before the Town Board for the necessary approval and also last month we

were before the Zoning Board of Appeals and obtained the variances that were required. So, we

area here tonight for site plan for the structure. We’ve got parking located both in the front and

in the rear of the building. The disturbance is proposed to be less than one acre. We do have a

bio retention swell around the south and east side of the property. The existing metal building

will be connected to the new structure and one of the proposed tenants for this is a doggy daycare

center. This may involve some additional special use permit approvals from the Town Board.

We’ ll be pursuing those once the developer is able to start construction on this building. He’ll be

occupying a good portion of the building, but I think leasing one or two of the spaces to other

small businesses.

There is a berm proposing along the portion of the frontage on Basket Road which would be

planted with evergreens. There is an existing and pretty significant existing evergreen barrier

Pg. 162 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

along the west property line and to the north of this is just an access roadway to an industrial

facility that lies further to the west of this building. So, with that, I’d be happy to answer any

questions.

You were talking about being in an ag. District. That was basically it right.

instead of concrete or masonry. I think we would want that to be masonry since it’s industrial

use. Colors of the exterior building. I don’t know if we saw...I know the rendering on the front

page is black and white, but I just didn’t know what the colors were or the materials being

proposed on the outside of the building. There is proposed work within the 20 foot wide RG&E

easement. Has that been approved by RG&E or verified with them that can be performed there.

So, looking at the plans, it’s on the north side closer to Rock Properties, there’s an existing

easement there that RG&E has where there’s proposed fencing; proposed sanitary line; clean out;

within that easement. I just want to make sure that it is okay to be put in that RG&E utility

easement there.

would typically go to RG&E.

easement. There was an existing lateral was installed on the sanitary sewer when it was

constructed. So, it’s just going to be an easement to cross their driveway and serve this property.

come back for.

Lockwood facility is not where customers would be driving into. This is their facility.

example.

Pg. 163 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

size of the structure.

be taken outside.

play area but if that is a use that they are proposing, they would have...I believe, when they

come to the town board they would have to address things like dogs outside, not overnight, It’s

not boarding but that would be up to the tenant to present that information.

basis.

rest of the board.

added onto the plans. Most of them are just comments for stuff. There’s not modifications to the

building. (GAVE THE SHEET TO MR. MCMAHON WITH COMMENTS ON THEM) That

way you have a copy, and you can address it on your final drawings.

screening, and this is proposing just evergreens. Is that something that we would want. I know

there’s residential neighbors right across the street, Maybe just get their perspective on what

would be preferred that they see if it’s evergreens as just screening sure or maybe something

else.

in the front there.

I’tl see if that is noted on the plan.

trees in there....

them in my yard and they’re like 60-90 feet tall.

Pg. 164 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

about a 3 foot berm.

it from the residential. I think that’s good. Better than sticking a couple of petunias out there,

that’s for sure. I guess were good with that. So, want to move forward with this then. Is there

anyone wishing to speak. Seeing none we’ll close the public hearing.

RESOLUTION 25-0054

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani

Mr. Malta

Mr. Giardina

Mr. Anderson

Mr. Kosel

Mrs. Maltman

Mr. Gasic

RESOLUTION 25-0055

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL CHECKLIST

Derek Anderson made a motion to

UNLISTED ACTION which was

seconded by John Kosel.

AYE

AYE

ABSENT

AYE

AYE

AYE

AYE

Dave Malta made a _ “motion for

PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN

APPROVAL Located at 633 Basket Road.

Applicant Lon Lockwood is requesting

PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN

APPROVAL (

PUBLIC HEARING

)

associated with the construction of an

8,822SF multi-tenant post-frame style

building on a 1.48-acre lot having SBL#

066.03-1-9.11 located in the IN Industrial

District under Section 269-11 and 350-22 of

the Code of the Town of Webster. Which

was seconded by John Kosel.

All the improvements shall be constructed according to the specification of the Town of

1. Subject to PRC Comments

2. Subject to a Letter of Credit posted with the Town of Webster.

3. Subject to Monroe County Water Authority comments

4. Subject to the determination of the ZBA for requested variances.

5. Webster.

6.

by the Town of Webster.

All roadway construction to be in accordance with the specification and regulations set forth

7. All sitework is to be in compliance with the standards of the Town of Webster.

Pg. 165 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting

8. Comply with all requirements of any Federal, State, County, or Town agency.

9. Address drainage, lighting, signage, and landscaping, buffering, berming and snow storage.

10. Approvais are subject to Drawing No: Dated: C200

11. Proceed to Final Approval

the colors should be put in there or samples of what material they’re using for the structure.

directed just on the site. Nothing casting out toward the road.

VOTE:

Mr. Casciani AYE

Mr. Malta AYE

Mr. Giardina ABSENT

Mr. Anderson AYE

Mr. Kosel AYE

Mrs. Maltman AYE

Mr. Gasic AYE

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM:

e No Planning Board meting minutes were approved.

With no other applications before the Board this evening Anthony Casciani concluded tonight’s

meeting at 8:15 PM.

Respectfully Submitted,

Signed

Dated Z- 5 "A535

AUG 8°95 awG:01

_FILED WEBSTER THN CLK

CYorencnl Wenn

Pg. 166 July 1, 2025 Planning Meeting