Vzw Webster North Town of Webster Pdf Application to Planning Board 1 31126

Nixon Peabody LLP 211 High Point Drive, Suite 110 Victor, NY 14564-1061

Robert W. Burgdorf Partner

T / 585.263.1333 rburgdorf@nixonpeabody.com

March 10, 2026 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Webster 1000 Ridge Rd Webster, NY 14580 ATTN: Josh Artuso, Director of Community Planning & Development RE:

Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon’s application (the “Application”) to the Town of Webster (the “Town”) for site plan approval, special permit approval, and an area variance to construct and operate a 135ʹ wireless telecommunications facility (with 4ʹ lightning rod) on property located near 1222 Wildflower Drive (Tax Parcel No. 065.05-1-48) in the Town of Webster, Monroe County, New York (Verizon Wireless’ “Webster North” site)

Dear Members of the Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon (“Verizon”) is a public utility and wireless telecommunications licensee of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). To remedy service inadequacies in and around the northern central area of the Town of Webster (the “Town”), Verizon makes this Application to construct and operate a wireless telecommunications facility (the “Project”) near 1222 Wildflower Drive, Monroe County, New York, Tax Parcel No. 065.05-1-48 (the “Site”). The Site consists of an 80ʹ x 125ʹ parcel leased from Robby and Dina Villa (the “Landowner”). The Project would consist of the construction of a 135ʹ monopole tower (with an additional 4ʹ lightning rod) and wireless telecommunications antennas, associated exterior equipment cabinets, together with other site improvements, all as shown on the enclosed site plan prepared by Costich Engineering (the “Site Plan”). The Site is located in the Town’s Single Family Residential (“R-3”) zoning district. Pursuant to Local Law No. 8-1996, as amended and codified in Chapter 130, Communications Installations, Energy Towers, Antennas and Flagpoles of the Town of Webster (the “Code”), telecommunications facilities are permitted in the R-3 zoning district upon the issuance of site plan approval from the Planning Board and a tower special permit from the Town Board. (Code § § 130-8 ). Additionally, as the tower exceeds the maximum height limit for a new telecommunication tower stated in Section § 130-10 , an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals is necessary.

4916-7430-2096.1

Town Board, Planning Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Webster March 10, 2026 Page 2

Accordingly, please accept this letter and the following exhibits and enclosures as Verizon’s application for site plan approval, area variance for tower height, and a special permit: Exhibit A:

Town-supplied application forms;

Exhibit B:

Project description;

Exhibit C:

Applicable legal standards;

Exhibit D:

Proof of the Project’s compliance with the applicable site plan and special permit review requirements set forth in § § 130-8 through 130-13 of the Code;

Exhibit E:

Proof of the Project’s compliance with the applicable area variance review requirements set forth in § 130-24 of the Code;

Exhibit F:

Radio frequency search ring justification (“RF Justification”), with propagation studies setting forth the need for the Project;

Exhibit G:

Site selection analysis;

Exhibit H:

Long environmental assessment form (“Long EAF”), with visual addendum;

Exhibit I:

Verizon’s co-location policy;

Exhibit J:

Proof of the Landowner’s consent to this Application;

Exhibit K:

Photosimulation report;

Exhibit L:

Structural design letter;

Exhibit M:

Tower removal letter and removal cost estimate;

Exhibit N:

Verizon’s FCC licenses for Monroe County;

Exhibit O:

Proof of compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding RF emissions; and

Exhibit P:

11ʺ x 17ʺ copy of the site plan.

Also included with this Application are: 

Twenty (20) copies of this Application book; and



A check payable to the Town of Webster in the amount of $1,050.00 for the applicable fees for this Application.

4916-7430-2096.1

Town Board, Planning Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Webster March 10, 2026 Page 3



Three full-size (34ʺ x 22ʺ) copies of the Site Plan will be sent separately from the offices of Costich, the Project Site Engineer.

We respectfully request that this Application be placed on the agenda for the next available Planning Board meeting. In the meantime, should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely,

Robert W. Burgdorf RWB/jcm Enclosures cc: Kathy Pomponio, Verizon Nico Facey, Network Building + Consulting

4916-7430-2096.1

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT B

EXHIBIT B PROJECT DESCRIPTION Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon (“Verizon”) is a public utility, and federally licensed wireless telecommunications provider. It currently has service inadequacies in the Town of Webster (the “Town”). To remedy this service inadequacy, Verizon is proposing to construct and operate a new wireless telecommunications facility (the “Project”) near 1222 Wildflower Drive on property owned by Robby and Dina Villa and identified as Tax Parcel No. 065.05-1-48 (the “Project Site”). This application consists of a request for Site Plan Approval, a Special Permit from the Planning Board, and an Area Variance for additional height to permit the Project to provide adequate and reliable wireless telecommunications service to emergency services, businesses and individuals in and around the Town. The Project would consist of the construction and operation of a 135’ tower (plus a 4’ lightning rod), exterior equipment cabinets and other associated improvements, all as shown on the enclosed site plan prepared by Costich Engineering. Essentially, wireless telecommunication devices operate by transmitting a very low power radio signal between the wireless telecommunication devices and an antenna mounted on a tower, pole, building or other structure. The antenna feeds the signal to electronic apparatus located near the antenna (the “base station”), where it is connected to traditional telephone systems, and is then routed anywhere in the world. The antennas and base station are known as a “cell site.” Because of the low power, a cell site is capable of transmitting to and from wireless telecommunication devices only within a limited geographic area. This limited geographic area is called a “cell.” A cell site must be located within a prescribed area in order to provide coverage for the entire cell. Wireless telecommunications technology requires that cells overlap somewhat in order to provide uninterrupted service. When the wireless telephone user moves into a new cell, the transmission is automatically transferred to the cell site in the new cell. If there is no cell site in the new cell, there is no wireless telecommunications service.

4916-7430-2096.1

-2Because each cell site must be placed in such a manner as to provide service within a particular cell, and so as to provide overlapping (but not duplicate) coverage with the existing or planned cells around it, there is limited flexibility as to where a cell site can be placed. Wireless telecommunications providers conduct a thorough engineering study, including using an elaborate computer program known as a “propagation study.” A propagation study shows, based on cell boundaries, topography and other factors, where a cell site needs to be located in order to provide wireless telecommunications coverage in a particular cell. The wireless telecommunication companies and RF engineers identify technologically feasible locations for the cell site. In this case, the proposed site was identified by Verizon as being an appropriate site to remedy the service deficiencies. The Project Site was located within that area and was available to Verizon to meet the technological requirements. As set forth in this application, Verizon meets the legal standards necessary for the requested approvals. Moreover, the Project will not pollute, will not create noise or vibration, will not create any significant increase in traffic, will not create any environmental problems, will not increase population density, and will not create any demand on governmental facilities. Thus, the Project will not create any detriment to adjoining properties or change the character of the neighborhood. Instead, the Project will enhance governmental facilities and promote the public welfare by providing a modern, more efficient system of communications for police, fire and other emergency services, as well as provide modern wireless telecommunication service to business, industry and individuals in and around the Webster North Cell.

4916-7430-2096.1

EXHIBIT C

EXHIBIT C APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS In Cellular Tel. Co. v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 364 (1993), the New York Court of Appeals determined that wireless telephone facilities are public utilities. The Court held that proposed wireless telephone installations are to be reviewed by zoning boards pursuant to the traditional standard afforded to public utilities, rather than the standards generally required for the necessary approvals. ‘It has long been held that a zoning board may not exclude a utility from a community where the utility has shown a need for its facilities.’. . . Application of our holding in Matter of Consolidated Edison to sitings of wireless telephone companies, such as Wireless One, permits those companies to construct structures necessary for their operation which are prohibited because of existing zoning laws and to provide the desired services to the surrounding community. . . . Moreover, the record supports the conclusion that Cellular One sustained its burden of proving the requisite public necessity. Cellular One established that the erection of the cell site would enable it to remedy gaps in its service area that currently prevent it from providing adequate service to its customers in the Dobbs Ferry area. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d at 372-74 (citing Consolidated Edison Co. v. Hoffman, 43 N.Y.2d 598 (1978)). This special treatment of a public utility stems from the essential nature of its service, and because a public utility transmitting facility must be located in a particular area in order to provide service. For instance, water towers, electric switching stations, water pumping stations and telephone poles must be in particular locations (including within residential districts) in order to provide the utility to a specific area: [Public] utility services are needed in all districts; the service can be provided only if certain facilities (for example, substations) can be located in commercial and even in residential districts. To exclude such use would result in an impairment of an essential service.

4916-7430-2096.1

-2Salkin, New York Zoning Law Practice, 4th ed., § 7:12 (2013) (hereafter “Salkin”). See also, Wireless Tel. Co. v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 364 (1993); Payne v. Taylor, 178 A.D.2d 979 (4th Dep’t 1991). Accordingly, the law in New York is that a municipality may not prohibit facilities, including towers, necessary for the transmission of a public utility. In Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d at 371, the court found that “the construction of an antenna tower . . . to facilitate the supply of cellular telephone service is a ‘public utility building’ within the meaning of a zoning ordinance.” See also Long Island Lighting Co. v. Griffin, 272 A.D. 551 (2d Dep’t 1947) (a municipal corporation may not prohibit the expansion of a public utility where such expansion is necessary to the maintenance of essential services). In the present case, Verizon is suffering from inadequate service coverage in the northern central part of the Town of Webster. The Project is needed to remedy this service problem and to provide wireless telecommunications service coverage to this area. Therefore, Verizon satisfies the requisite showing of need for the facility under applicable New York law.

4916-7430-2096.1

EXHIBIT D

EXHIBIT D PROOF OF THE PROJECT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE COMMUNICATION TOWER SITE PLAN AND SPECIAL PERMIT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN § § 130-7 OF THE CODE

ARTICLE II Communications Towers § 130-7. Communications towers in industrial and commercial districts. A.

Communications towers and accessory facilities/structures shall be permitted in any of the following nonresidential districts upon the issuance of final site plan approval by the Town of Webster Planning Board under the procedures set forth in Chapter 269 of the Code of the Town of Webster and consistent with New York State Town Law § 274a: I-N Industrial District HC High-Intensity Commercial District MC Medium-Intensity Commercial District LC Class II Low-Intensity Commercial District CO Commercial Outdoor Storage District OP Core Area North - Office Park No response necessary.

B.

In addition for communications towers and accessory facilities/structures located in an I-N Industrial District, the issuance of an industrial use permit by the Town Board under the procedures set forth in § 350-22D of the Code of the Town of Webster shall be required. Not applicable.

§ 130-8. Communications towers permitted in other districts. Communications towers and accessory structures are permitted in the following districts, other than those identified in § 130-7 above, only upon the issuance of a conditional or special use permit by the Town Board as set forth in § § 130-11 , 130-12 and 130-13 and upon the issuance of final site plan approval by the Town of Webster Planning Board under the procedures set forth in Chapter 269 of the Code of the Town of Webster and consistent with New York State Town Law § 274-a: R-1 Single-Family Residential District

4916-7430-2096.1

R-2 Single-Family Residential District R-3 Single-Family Residential District LL Large-Lot Single-Family Residential District MHR Medium-High Residential District LMR Low-Medium Residential District LC Class I Neighborhood Commercial WD Waterfront Development District The Site is located in the R-3 Single-Family Residential District. Special permit and site plan approval are hereby requested by this application in conformance with the above requirements. § 130-9. Communications towers prohibited in certain districts. Regardless of the provisions of § § 130-7 and 130-8, communications towers and accessory structures are not permitted in the following Environmental Protection Overlay Districts: EPOD (2) Steep Slopes Protection District EPOD (3) Woodlot Protection District Not applicable. § 130-10. Height. The maximum height for communications towers permitted under this chapter, including any antennas, extensions or other devices extending above the structure of the tower, measured from the ground surface immediately surrounding the site, shall be 100 feet. The Project is 135’ with a 4’ lightning rod, the minimum necessary to solve the coverage discrepancies. An area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals allowing the Project to exceed the maximum permitted height is hereby requested. § 130-11. Procedure for special use permit. A special use permit shall be obtained as follows: A.

The owner/applicant shall submit to the Town Board a completed application and site plan under the provisions of § 130-12 herein. Upon receipt of such application, the Town Board shall refer such application, together with all supporting documents, to the Planning Board for its review and recommendation as to the special use permit and for site plan approval procedures as set forth in Chapter 269 of the Code of The Town of Webster and consistent with New York State Town Law § 274-a. No response necessary.

B.

Within 62 days of receipt of both the recommendation of the Planning Board and final

site plan approval of the Planning Board, the Town Board shall hold a public hearing and shall comply with all the requirements of Town Law § 274-b for the approval of a special use permit. The Town Board shall review the application for compliance with the provisions of this chapter and shall determine that the location of the proposed communications tower is in accordance with the principles and requirements stated herein. No response necessary. § 130-12. Special use permit and site plan standards. Prior to the issuance of a special use permit by the Town Board or site plan approval by the Planning Board, the following requirements shall be complied with: A.

Application and site plan. All applications for a special use permit and site plan approval shall be by written application on forms provided by the Town of Webster Department of Public Works. The application shall include a site plan setting forth specific site data on a map, acceptable in form and content to the Town Board or Planning Board, which shall be prepared to scale and in sufficient detail and accuracy and which shall show the following: (1) The location of property lines and permanent easements. See Exhibit P, site plan. (2) The location of the communications tower, together with guy wires and guy anchors, if applicable. See Exhibit P, site plan. (3) A side elevation or other sketch of the tower showing the proposed antennas. See Exhibit P, site plan. (4) The location of all structures on the property and all structures on any adjacent property within 10 feet of the property lines, together with the distance of these structures to the communications tower. See Exhibit P, site plan. (5) The names of adjacent landowners as appears on the Town of Webster Assessor's records. See Exhibit P, site plan, Sheet VA100 for a map and list of adjacent landowners. (6) The location, nature and extent of any proposed fencing, landscaping and/or screening. See Exhibit P, site plan. (7) The location and nature of proposed utility easements and access road, if applicable. See Exhibit P, site plan.

(8) Inventory of other communications towers within a two-mile radius of the proposed site. See Exhibit G, Site Selection Analysis. (9) A completed visual environmental assessment form (visual EAF) and a landscaping plan addressing other standards listed within this section with particular attention to visibility from key viewpoints within and outside of the municipality as identified in the visual EAF. A board may require submittal of a more detailed visual analysis based on the results of the visual EAF. See Exhibit H, Long Environmental Assessment Form with Visual Addendum; (10) A grid or map of all of the owner's/applicant's existing communications tower site areas in the Town of Webster and site areas proposed or projected by the owner/applicant for installations for a period of two years. See Exhibit F, RF Justification, for the applicant’s existing communications tower sites. B.

Preference for higher-intensity use districts. The Town Board or Planning Board may express a preference that the proposed facility be located in a higher-intensity use district or on higher-intensity use property, provided that there is a technologically feasible and available location. A guideline for the preference, from most favorable to least favorable district/ property, is as follows: (1) Property with an existing structure suitable for colocation. (2) Commercial districts. (a) I-N Industrial District. (b) HC High-Intensity Commercial District. (c) CO Commercial Outdoor Storage District. (d) MC Medium-Intensity Commercial District. (e) LC Class II Low-Intensity Commercial District. (f)

LC Class I Neighborhood Commercial District.

(3) Municipal- or government-owned property. (4) Residential districts. (a) MHR Medium-High Residential District. (b) LMR Low-Medium Residential District. (c) R-3 Single-Family Residential District. (d) R-2 Single-Family Residential District.

(e) R-1 Single-Family Residential District. (f)

LL Large-Lot Single-Family Residential District.

(5) WD Waterfront Development District. (6) Environmental Protection Overlay Districts. (a) EPOD (2) Steep Slopes Protection District. (b) EPOD (3) Woodlot Protection District. NOTE: Any request by the Town Board or Planning Board for information on a preferred alternate site shall not unreasonably delay the application. The Site is located in the R-3 Single-Family Residential District. See Exhibit F, RF Justification, and Exhibit G, Site Selection Analysis for detailed site selection information. C.

Shared use. (1) At all times, shared use of existing towers shall be preferred to the construction of new towers. Additionally, where such shared use is unavailable, location of antenna on preexisting structures shall be considered. An applicant shall be required to present an adequate report inventorying existing towers within reasonable distance of the proposed site and outlining opportunities for shared use of existing facilities and use of other preexisting structures as an alternative to a new construction. See Exhibit G, Site Selection Analysis. No existing towers or preexisting structures are suitable to accommodate Verizon’s coverage needs. (2) An applicant intending to share use of an existing tower shall be required to document intent from an existing tower owner to share use. The applicant shall pay all reasonable fees and costs of adapting an existing tower or structure to a new shared use. Those costs include but are not limited to structural reinforcement, preventing transmission or receiver interference, additional site screening and other changes, including real property acquisition or lease required to accommodate shared use. Not applicable. (3) In the case of new communications towers, the applicant shall be required to submit a report demonstrating good-faith efforts to secure share use from existing towers. Copies of written requests and responses for shared use shall be provided. No existing towers are suitable for co-location. (4) The applicant must examine the feasibility of designing a proposed commercial communication tower to accommodate future demand for commercial broadcasting and reception facilities. The scope of this analysis shall be determined by the Town Board for special use permits or the Planning Board for site plan approvals. This requirement may be waived, provided that the applicant

demonstrates that the provisions of future shared usage of the facility is not feasible and an unnecessary burden, based upon: (a) The number of FCC licenses foreseeably available for the area; (b) The kind of tower site and structure proposed; (c) The number of existing and potential licenses without tower spaces/sites; (d) Available spaces on existing and approved towers; and (e) Potential adverse visual impact by a tower designed for shared usage. The Project so complies. See Exhibit I, Verizon’s Co-Location Policy. D.

Aesthetics. In order to minimize any adverse aesthetic effect on neighboring properties to the extent possible, a board may impose reasonable conditions on the applicant, including the following: (1) All communications towers and accessory facilities or structures shall be sited to have the least practical adverse visual effect on the environment. (2) A monopole or guyed tower (if sufficient land is available to applicant) instead of a freestanding communications tower shall be used. (3) Reasonable landscaping consisting of trees or shrubs to screen the base of the communications tower and/or to screen the tower to the extent possible from adjacent residential property shall be used. Existing on-site trees and vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. (4) The applicant shall show that it has made good-faith efforts to colocate on existing towers or other available and appropriate structures and/or to construct new towers near existing towers in an effort to consolidate visual disturbances. However, such request shall not unreasonably delay the application. (5) Towers should be designed and sited so as to avoid, whenever possible, application of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) lighting and painting requirements. Towers shall not be artificially lighted except as required by the FAA. Towers shall be painted a galvanized finish or matte gray unless otherwise required by the FAA. (6) No communication tower shall contain any signs or advertising devices, except those signs containing emergency contact information are permitted. (7) Accessory facilities and structures shall maximize use of building materials, colors and textures designed to blend with the natural surroundings. The project so complies. See Exhibit P, Site Plan, and Exhibit K, Photosimulation Report.

E.

Setbacks. (1) All communication towers and accessory structures shall be set back from abutting residential parcels, public property or right-of-way lines a distance sufficient to

contain on-site substantially all ice-fall or debris from tower failure and preserve the privacy of adjoining residential properties. (2) All communication tower bases must be located at a minimum setback from any property line at a distance at least equal to the tower height, or the distance between the tower base and guy wire anchors, or the minimum setback of the underlying zoning district, or a minimum setback at a distance which shall be established at the discretion of the Planning Board as part of the site plan approval procedures based on the unique characteristics of the site, whichever of the foregoing is greater. The minimum setback requirement of this subsection may be increased at the discretion of Planning Board as part of the site plan approval procedures or it may be decreased in those instances where the owner/applicant has submitted plans for a tower design in such a manner as to collapse within a smaller area. Such tower design and collapse zone must be acceptable to the Town Commissioner of Public Works or his/her division heads or agents or designees and the Town Building Inspector. (3) All accessory structures must comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zoning district. The project so complies. See Exhibit P, Site Plan. F.

Radio-frequency effects. It is recognized that federal laws [Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104, Section 704 (February 8, 1996)] prohibits the regulation of cellular and personal communication services communications towers based on the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions where those emissions comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standards for those emissions. A board may, however, impose a condition on the applicant that the communications antennas be operated only at FCC-designated frequencies and power levels. The Project so complies. See Exhibit O, Proof of compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding RF emissions.

G.

Traffic, access and safety. (1) All road and parking will be provided to assure adequate emergency and service access. Maximum use of existing roads, public or private, shall be made. Road construction shall be consistent with standards for private roads and shall at all times minimize ground disturbance and vegetation cutting to within the toe of fill, top of cuts or no more than 10 feet beyond the edge of any pavement. Road grades shall closely follow natural contours to assure minimal visual disturbance and reduce soil erosion potential. Public road standards may be waived in meeting the objective of this subsection. The Project so complies. See Exhibit P, Site Plan. (2) All communications towers and guy anchors, if applicable, shall be enclosed by a fence not less than eight feet in height or otherwise sufficiently protected from trespassing or vandalism.

The Project so complies. See Exhibit P, Site Plan. (3) The applicant must comply with all applicable state and federal regulations, including but not limited to FAA and FCC regulations. The project so complies. See Exhibit O, Proof of compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding RF emissions. H.

Existing vegetation. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible, and no cutting of trees exceeding four inches in diameter (measured at a height of four feet off the ground) shall take place prior to approval of the special use permit. Clear-cutting of all trees in single contiguous areas exceeding 20,000 square feet shall be prohibited. The Project will so comply.

I.

Screening. Deciduous or evergreen tree plantings may be required to screen portions of the tower from nearby residential property as well as from public sites known to include important views or vistas. Where the site abuts residential or public property, including streets, the following vegetation screening shall be required. For all communication towers, at least one row of native evergreen shrubs or trees capable of forming a continuous hedge at least 10 feet in height within two years of planting shall be provided to effectively screen the tower base and accessory facilities. In the case of poor soil conditions, planting may be required on soil berms to assure plant survival. Plant height in these cases shall include the height of any berm. The Project Site is screened by existing mature trees. To the extent that the Planning Board or Town Board reasonably requires additional screening, the Project will so comply.

J.

Bond/security. The applicant and the owner of record of the premises may be required to execute and file with the Town Clerk of the Town of Webster a bond or other form of security acceptable to the Town Attorney and Town Director of Finance as to form and manner of execution, in an amount sufficient for the faithful performance of the terms and conditions of this chapter, the conditions of the permit or approval issued hereunder, for the observation of all Town local laws or ordinances, to cover the maintenance of the tower during its lifetime and provide for its removal. The amount required shall be determined by the Town Board in its special use permit procedure or the Planning Board in its site plan approval procedure if no special use permit is required. In the event of default upon the performance of any of such conditions or any of them, the bond or security shall be forfeited to the Town of Webster, which shall be entitled to maintain an action thereon. The bond or security shall remain in full force and effect until the removal of the transmission tower, telecommunication tower, communication installation, freestanding tower, satellite dish, antenna, pole, accessory facility/structure and site restoration. See Exhibit M, Verizon’s Tower removal letter and removal cost estimate. To the extent required by law, the Project will so comply.

K.

Expiration. The special use permit and site plan approval shall expire upon:

(1) The failure to commence active operation of the transmission tower, telecommunication tower, communication installation, freestanding tower, satellite dish, antenna, pole, accessory facility/structure within 12 months of the issuance of a special use permit by the Town Board or final site plan approval by the Planning Board; or (2) The discontinuance of the active and continuous operation of the transmission tower, telecommunication tower, communication installation, freestanding tower, satellite dish, antenna, pole or accessory facility/structure for a continuous period of 12 months, regardless of any reservation of an intent not to abandon or discontinue the use or of an intent to resume active operations. (3) From time to time, the Town Board or the Planning Board, at the Town Board's direction, may review the special use permit or site plan approval to ascertain if the requirements, conditions and restrictions of this chapter are being substantially complied with in good faith. In the event that, upon review, the Town Board finds that site is not in accordance with the approved building and site plans, and the requirements, conditions and/or restriction of this chapter or of the special use permit are not being substantially complied with, the enforcement procedures under § 130-25 shall be invoked and/or the special use permit shall be canceled or terminated within a specified period of time unless the requirements, conditions and restrictions are complied with after reasonable notice. No response necessary. L.

Conditions. A board may impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed transmission tower, telecommunication tower, communication installation, freestanding tower, satellite dish, antenna and/or pole, special use permit or site plan. No response necessary.

§ 130-13. Removal of obsolete/unused facilities. Approval of a new commercial communications tower facility or the expansion or modification of any existing commercial tower facility shall be conditioned upon the owner's and applicant's agreement to remove such facility once it is no longer used. Removal of such obsolete and/or unused commercial communication tower facilities shall take place within 12 months of cessation of use. The Project will so comply. See Exhibit M, Tower removal letter and removal cost estimate.

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT E PROOF OF THE PROJECT’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE AREA VARIANCE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN § § 130-24 OF THE CODE As discussed in Exhibit C, the legal standard applicable to Verizon is the standard afforded to public utilities, rather than the standard to be generally applied. Nevertheless, as demonstrated below, the Project also complies with the Town of Webster’s requirements and standards for the requested zoning variance(s). The following Town review criteria are set forth in Code Section 130-24 (the Town’s requirements are outlined below in bold italicized type with Verizon’s response in regular type). § 130-24. Variances. A.

Use variances. Application for any use variance from the provisions of § 130-9 shall be made to the Town of Webster Zoning Board of Appeals. A use variance may be granted, after public hearing, only upon the establishment of public necessity in that the use variance is required to render safe and adequate service and that there are compelling reasons, economic or otherwise, which make the site more feasible for the proposed use than alternative sites as might be provided or available. Not applicable.

B.

Area variances. Application for any area variance where the requirements of the provisions of § 130-10 cannot be met shall be made to the Town Board if a special use permit is required by § 130-11 , and an application for any other area variance where the requirements of any other provision of this chapter cannot be met shall be made to the Webster Zoning Board of Appeals. An area variance may be granted, after public hearing, upon the Town Board and Zoning Board of Appeals taking into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted, as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community. The Town Board and Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider: (1)

Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by granting of the area variance; As outlined in Exhibit B, neither the Project nor the granting of variance, for the height of the tower will result in an undesirable change in the neighborhood and will therefore, not be a detriment to nearby properties. The Project will not pollute, will not create noise or vibration, will not increase population density, will not create any demand on governmental services, and will not create any increase in traffic. It is an inert facility and, as such, is in harmony with the orderly development of the area as well as the nationwide wireless telecommunications system.

(2)

Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance;

As outlined in Exhibit F, Verizon must be granted the requested height variance or it will be unable to provide adequate and reliable wireless telecommunications service in Verizon’s Webster North cell, as it is required to do pursuant to its FCC licenses and entitled to do under Federal and state law. (3)

Whether the requested area variance is substantial; While the tower is moderately taller than the maximum 100′ permitted height, it is the minimum height necessary to deliver reliable service to the Webster North cell. Varying the height limitation imposed by the Zoning Ordinance, as set forth above, is the least intrusive means by which the applicant can provide reliable wireless telecommunications coverage to the Webster North Cell and surrounding area.

(4)

Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district; and This Project will enhance the public health, safety, welfare and convenience by providing a more efficient system of wireless telecommunications service for police, fire and other emergency services, as well as provide modern wireless telecommunications service to business, industry and individuals in the Webster North Cell in the Town of Webster.

(5)

Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the Town Board or Zoning Board of Appeals, but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area variance. The Town Board and Zoning Board of Appeals, in its consideration of area variances, shall grant only the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate and, at the same time, preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. The hardship is not self-created but a function of the need to install a wireless telecommunications facility in an appropriate location (and height) to meet coverage and capacity needs, and provide reliable wireless telecommunications service to Verizon Wireless’ Webster North Cell.

C.

Imposition of conditions. The Town Board, in its consideration of an area variance, and the Zoning Board of Appeals, in its consideration of both use variances and area variances, shall have the authority to impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed use of the property and/or the period of time such variance shall be in effect. Such conditions shall be consistent with the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance[1] or local law and shall be imposed for the purpose of minimizing any adverse impact such variance may have on the neighborhood or community. [1]: Editor’s Note: See Ch. 350, Zoning. No response necessary.

§ 130-25. Enforcement; penalties for offenses. A.

Any violation of this chapter or of any order, requirement decision or determination issued by the Commissioner of Public Works, his/her agent or designee pursuant to this chapter is hereby declared to be an offense punishable by a fine not exceeding $350 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six months, or both, upon conviction for a first offense; upon conviction for a second offense, both of which offenses were committed within a period of five years, punishable by a fine not less than $350 nor more than $700 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six months, or both; and upon a conviction for a third or subsequent offense, all of which offenses were committed within a period of five years, punishable by a fine of not less than $700 nor more than $1,000 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six months, or both. However, for the purpose of conferring jurisdiction upon courts and judicial officers generally, violations of this chapter or any order, requirement, decision or determination issued by the Commissioner of Public Works, his/her agent or designee, pursuant to this chapter, shall be deemed misdemeanors, and for such purpose only all provisions of law relating to misdemeanors shall apply to such violations. Each day (twenty-fourhour period) of violation shall constitute a separate violation of this chapter. No response necessary.

B.

In addition to the penalties provided above, the Town Board may also maintain an action or proceeding to prevent, correct or restrain any violation of this chapter. No response necessary.

§ 130-26. Fees. Fees for applications and permits under this chapter shall be established by resolution of the Webster Town Board. No response necessary. § 130-27. Validity, savings and severability. Should any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, word, part or provision of this chapter be declared void, invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of any other part of this chapter which can be given effect without the part(s) declared void, invalid or unenforceable. No response necessary. § 130-28. Effective date. This chapter shall take effect on January 1, 1997. No response necessary.

EXHIBIT F

Verizon Wireless Communications Facility

Engineering Necessity Case

“Webster North” Four Mile Creek Site

Webster Park Site Search Area Project Location WEBSTER NORTH

Webster Rd/Rt. 250 Webster Site Xerox Site Holt Rd

Prepared by

Michael R. Crosby, Principal RF Engineer, Verizon Wireless Timothy Zarneke, Senior RF Engineer, Verizon Wireless Project: The project is the installation and operation of a new tower co-located wireless telecommunications site in the Town of Webster, NY (the “Project Facility”). Feb 26th, 2026

Introduction The purpose of this subsequent analysis is to summarize and communicate the technical radio frequency (RF) information used in the justification of this new site. Coverage and/or capacity deficiencies are the two primary driving conditions that typically prompt the need for a new wireless communications facility/site. All wireless customers depend on their wireless provider’s ability to provide adequate and reliable coverage where needed. In areas where coverage does not exist the user can not make a connection which is categorized as a “Gap in Service” lacking adequate and reliable coverage. Where coverage exists but is over utilized, this can also result with the user not being able to successfully use the connection which is also a “Gap in Service” and categorized as lacking adequate and reliable coverage. The service deficiencies sought to be remedied by this proposed cell site include a significant number of failed calls, resulting in users being unable to connect and/or maintain a connection capable of supporting a reasonably uninterrupted communication. •

Coverage can be defined as the existence of radio frequency signal of usable strength and quality/capacity in an area, including but not limited to in-vehicles or inbuildings. The need for improved coverage is identified by RF Engineers that are responsible for developing and maintaining the network. RF Engineers utilize both theoretical and empirical data sets (propagation maps and real world coverage measurements or other data). Historically, coverage improvements have been the primary justification of new sites.

•

Capacity can be defined as the amount of traffic (voice and data) a given site can process before significant performance degradation occurs.

When traffic volume exceeds the capacity limits of a site serving a given area, network reliability and user experience degrades. Ultimately this prevents customers from making/receiving calls, applications cease functioning, internet connections time out and data speeds fail. This critical condition is more important than just a simple nuisance for some users. Degradation of network reliability and user experience can affect emergency responders and to persons in a real emergency situation can make the difference between life and death.

*Note that, while Verizon Wireless provides sufficient evidence to establish the existence of a coverage gap and capacity need in this case, the FCC has confirmed that federal law does not require a provider to establish the existence of a coverage/capacity gap to establish the need for a site. There are several ways by which an applicant can establish site need. See Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment,” FCC 18-133, 85 FR 51867, at ¶ 37 (October 15, 2018) (confirming that the test for establishing an effective prohibition is whether “a state or local legal requirement materially inhibits a provider’s ability to engage in any of a variety of activities related to its provision of a covered service,” and this test is met “not only when filling a coverage gap but also when densifying a wireless network, introducing new services or otherwise improving service capabilities”) (emphasis added).

Project Need Overview The project area, located in the northern portion of the Town of Webster is currently served by three distant sites. These sites are overloaded requiring capacity relief or otherwise unable to adequately serve the project area from these relatively distant locations. Specifically, the project area is subject to significant terrain and or foliage challenges for RF (signal) propagation. This terrain and or foliage combined with long distance prevent effective propagation of Verizon’s RF signals into this area compounding the capacity issue with areas of variable coverage creating significant gaps in service.

•

The first serving site is Webster, located in the Town of Webster, is approximately 1.75 miles south west (of the project location) situated on an existing tower (195’ ACL) located off Picture Parkway. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity.

•

The second serving site is Four Mile Creek, located in the Town of Webster, is approximately 1.75 miles north east (of the project location) on an existing tower (146’ ACL) off Phillips Rd. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity.

•

The third serving site is Webster Park, located in the Town of Webster, is approximately 2 miles west-north west (of the project location) situated on an existing tower (121’ ACL) off Lake Rd near Pellet Rd. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity.

Available (mid band) carriers at these and other area sites are not capable of effectively serving/offloading the project area due to inherent propagation losses from distance, challenging terrain and or in building coverage losses negatively impacting mid band coverage and capacity offload capabilities. There are other Verizon sites in this general area but due to distance and terrain/foliage they also do not provide any significant overlapping coverage in the area in question that could allow for increased capacity and improved coverage from other sources. The primary objectives for this project are to increase capacity and provide and or improve coverage throughout the north central portion of the Town of Webster, more specifically portions of Holt Rd, Webster Rd, Wall Rd, Schlegal Rd, Wall Rd, Shoemaker Rd, Joseph Circle, Appian Dr, Brooktree Ln, Hidden Valley Trail, Woodsboro Farms, Severn Ridge Rd, Stockbridge Rd, Woodhull Rd, Sagebrook Way, Providence Dr, Wildflower Dr, Imperial Dr, Klem Rd, Nestwood Ln, Licia Ln, Sherborne Rd, Marigold Dr, Ohstrom Park as well as neighboring residential and commercial/public areas along and near these roads including portions of Webster Park. In order to offload capacity from Webster, Four Mile Creek and Webster Park sites, a new dominant server must be created. This new dominant coverage will effectively offload the existing overloaded sites/cells as well as provide improved coverage where significant gaps exist today. Following the search for co-locatable structures to resolve the aforementioned challenges and finding none available, Verizon proposes to attach the necessary antenna(s) to a new tower located at 1222 WILDFLOWER DRIVE, WEBSTER, NY 14580. Verizon’s antennas will utilize 130’ ACL (Antenna Center Line) with a top of antenna height of 134’. This solution is the minimum height necessary to provide the coverage and capacity improvements needed.

Wireless 4G/5G Safety and Growth

More wireless traffic needs more wireless facilities just like more vehicle traffic needs more lanes. • Many wireless users share each cell site and congestion may result when too many try to use it at the same time. • Wireless coverage may already exist in an area, but with data usage growth increasing exponentially each year,more capacity is needed. • To meet capacity demands, we need to add more sites closer to users and strategically spaced with other cell sites to provide the reliable service customers have come to expect from Verizon. The monthly data traffic in North America is projected to amount to 19.53 exabytes (the equivalent of over four billion DVD’s) by 2027. In 2021, the average data traffic amounted to almost 5 EB per month.*

Reliable and Critical Communications

Explanation of Wireless Capacity Capacity in this analysis is evaluated with up to three metrics further explained below. These metrics assist Verizon traffic planning and RF Engineers in determining actual usage for a given site as well as can be used to project when a site is expected to run out of capacity (i.e. reach a point of exhaustion where it can no longer process the volume of voice and data requested by local wireless devices, thus no longer providing adequate service). Unfortunately capacity exhaustion has already occurred which presents an urgent need to deliver the capacity relief necessary in an effort to provide adequate and reliable coverage to this project area.

•

Forward Data Volume (“FDV”), is a measurement of usage (data throughput) on a particular site over a given period of time.

•

Average Schedule Eligible User (“ASEU”), is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site.

•

Average Active Connections (“AvgAC”) is a measurement of the number of devices actively connected to a site in any given time slot.

Verizon Wireless uses proprietary algorithms developed by a task force of traffic planning engineers to monitor each site in the network and accurately project and identify when sites will approach it’s capacity limits. Using a rolling two-year window for projected exhaustion dates allows enough time, in most cases, to develop and activate a new site. It is critical that these capacity approaching sectors are identified early and the site development process is started and completed in time for new solutions (sites) to be on air before network issues impact the customers. As mentioned previously, actual utilization for the last year indicates several KPI’s have already exceeded 100% utilization creating a more urgent need in this project area.

Capacity Utilization (Webster Alpha)

FDV (Forward Data Volume), shown above is a measurement of the customer data usage that this sector currently serves. As this limit is approached, data rates slow to unacceptable levels, potentially causing unreliable service for Verizon Wireless customers.

ASEU (Average Schedule Eligible User), shown above is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site. The ASEU load is heavily impacted by distant users or those in poor RF conditions.

AvgAC (Average Active Connections), shown above is utilization by carrier showing a measurement of max active connection capacity per sector in any given time slot. When this limit is reached, no additional devices will be able to connect to the site, resulting in connection failures and dropped calls.

In each graph above, the purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line represents the daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the Webster site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple and/or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Capacity exhaustion can create the same customer experience as a coverage gap. Ideally, capacity relief should be implemented prior to reaching exhausted conditions. In this case the site/sector shown has already exceeded its capability to support one or more of these capacity KPI’s. In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Webster North and the surrounding project area, network densification is required. 7

Capacity Utilization (Four Mile Creek Beta)

In each graph above, the purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line represents the daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Beta sector of the Four Mile Creek site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple and/or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Capacity exhaustion can create the same customer experience as a coverage gap. Ideally, capacity relief should be implemented prior to reaching exhausted conditions. In this case the site/sector shown has already exceeded its capability to support one or more of these capacity KPI’s. In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Webster North and the surrounding project area, network densification is required. 8

Capacity Utilization (Webster Park Alpha)

In each graph above, the purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line represents the daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the Webster Park site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple and/or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Capacity exhaustion can create the same customer experience as a coverage gap. Ideally, capacity relief should be implemented prior to reaching exhausted conditions. In this case the site/sector shown has already exceeded its capability to support one or more of these capacity KPI’s. In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Webster North and the surrounding project area, network densification is required. 9

Explanation of Wireless Coverage Generic Coverage Example See color explanations below:

Coverage is best conveyed via coverage maps. RF engineers use computer simulation tools (in this case Verizon uses Forsk Atoll) which takes into account terrain, foliage, building types, and other site/network specifics to model the RF environment. This propagation model is used to simulate the real world network which assists RF Engineers in evaluating the impact of a proposed site (along with industry experience and other tools). Modern network complexity, exponential traffic growth and wide reaching customer utilization areas have evolved the coverage justification discussion far beyond the ability of antiquated justification methods including drive test data and dropped call records. For many years drive data and dropped call data have simply not been able to comprehensively articulate the gaps (need) in coverage or capacity capability for 4 and 5G networks. Upstate NY Verizon Wireless sites provide customers service using several FCC licensed frequencies including 700 and 850MHz. To resolve capacity congestion for these coverage layers higher frequency (and bandwidth) PCS (1900 MHz), AWS (2100 MHz) and C-Band (3700MHz) mid band carriers are added however due to differences in propagation characteristics, many gaps in coverage and capacity still remain requiring network densification to resolve. In some mountaintop or long distance situations the mid band (higher frequency) AWS, PCS and C-Band carriers are either not or not fully effective due to excessive distance (path loss). This is because the site is located too far from the user population to provide adequate and reliable service. Although exclusively regulated by the FCC and subject to market adjustment as needed, it is worth noting that all of the propagation slides in this RF Justification are generated using the max power of the LB and MB Samsung radio capabilities.

Signal strength throughout a given site’s coverage area is subject to the limitations of the frequencies used. Lower frequencies with narrower bandwidth propagate further distance, and **Dark Green >/= -75dBm RSRP, typically serves dense urban areas as well as areas of are less attenuated by clutter than higher frequencies with wider bandwidth. Unfortunately due to substantial construction (colleges, hospitals, dense multi family etc.) relatively narrow spectrum available these low bands can become quickly overloaded especially Green >/= -85dBm RSRP, typically serves suburban single family residential and light where similar signal strength from mid band carriers are not available. Similar coverage levels commercial buildings from mid band carriers are needed to resolve capacity issues (including the ability to make and Yellow >/= -95dBm RSRP, typically serves most rural/suburban-residential and in car applications receive voice calls). In order to provide similar coverage levels using the higher capacity/higher Orange >/= -105dBm RSRP, rural highway coverage, subject to variable conditions including frequencies, a denser network of sites is required (network densification). Modern 4 and 5G fading and seasonality gaps networks are designed and intended to combine or use more than one frequency band at a time. White = <-105dBm RSRP, variable to no reliable coverage gap area This is called carrier aggregation which is not effective when the mid band signal is too weak or nonexistent. This means that site justification including ACL requirements must be derived from More detailed, site-specific coverage slides are later in the presentation mid band capabilities. It is critical to understand the relationship between low band capacity and mid band coverage especially when reviewing the need for new suburban and rural morphology *Signal strength requirements vary as dictated by market and conditions sites. ** Not displayed in example map, layer not used in all site justifications 10

Explanation of the Webster North Search Area A Search Area is the geographical area within which a new site is targeted to solve a coverage and or capacity deficiency. Three of the factors taken into consideration when defining a search area are topography, user density, and the existing network. •

Topography must be considered to minimize the obstacles between the proposed site and the target coverage area. For example, a site at the bottom of a ridge will not be able to cover the other side from a certain height.

•

In general, the farther from a site the User Population is, the weaker the RF conditions are and the worse their experience is likely to be. These distant users also have an increased impact on the serving site’s capacity. In the case of a multi sector site, centralized proximity is essential to allow users to be evenly distributed and allow efficient utilization of the site’s resources.

•

The existing Network Conditions also guide the design of a new site. Sites placed too close together create interference due to overlap and are an inefficient use of resources. Sites that are too tall or not properly integrated with existing sites cause interference and degrade service for existing users.

•

Existing co-locatable structures inside the search area as well as within a reasonable distance of the search area are submitted by site acquisition and reviewed by RF Engineering. If possible, RF will make use of existing or nearby structures before proposing to build new towers.

PROJECT LOCATION

Webster North Search Area To resolve the coverage and capacity deficiencies previously detailed, Verizon Wireless is seeking to add one new cell facility within this area to improve wireless service capacity and coverage. By providing a new dominant signal area and offloading weak and distant traffic from Webster, Four Mile Creek and Webster Park sites with the proposed site, adequate and reliable service will be restored. The new Webster North site will provide dominant and dedicated signal to the identified portions of the Town of Webster. This helps to improve not only the Webster North project area but will also result with significant improvements to the above mentioned overloaded sites ultimately improving community wide areas in and around the Webster North project area. 11

Existing Low Band (700/850MHz) Best Server -105dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites dominant signal area.

Lake Rd (Future)

Holt & Lake (Future SC)

Four Mile Creek

Webster Park

WEBSTER NORTH Klem Rd

On Air Coverage 195’ Webster Alpha 146’ Four Mile Creek Beta 121’ Webster Park Alpha Search Area

East Webster

Xerox Webster

The map above represents coverage from existing sites, with the sites in need of capacity offload detailed in the legend above. Blue coverage is from other on air (Low Band) sites. Notice the lack of a dominant server throughout the Webster North project area. This reveals several sites that are stretching their coverage capabilities excessively which results with poor coverage and performance capabilities. 12

Proposed Low Band (700/850MHz) Best Server -105dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites dominant signal area.

Lake Rd (Future)

Holt & Lake (Future SC)

Four Mile Creek

Webster Park

WEBSTER NORTH

On Air Coverage 195’ Webster Alpha 146’ Four Mile Creek Beta 121’ Webster Park Alpha 130’ Proposed Coverage Search Area

East Webster

Xerox Webster

The map above adds the footprint of the proposed Webster North site with a 130’ ACL coverage in green. The green best server footprint provides improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap area. This will improve service to users in the green area as well as help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting the existing overloaded sectors identified in the image above. 13

Existing Low Band (700/850MHz) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how weak the RF conditions are in portions of the Town of Webster and surrounding area. Refer to slide 10 for further explanation of these color thresholds

Lake Rd (Future)

Holt & Lake (Future SC)

Four Mile Creek

Webster Park

WEBSTER NORTH Klem Rd

East Webster

Xerox Webster

The map above represents low band signal strength coverage from existing sites. While low band generally serves this project area it is subject to overloading as shown in the capacity slides. This overloading in part is due to gaps in adequate and reliable mid band coverage as shown in the following slides. Network densification is needed to resolve these coverage and capacity issues. Compare to p12 to better understand the LB best server footprint

*PRO TIP Compare to p15 to visualize the proposed site LB impact

Proposed Low Band (700/850MHz) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how improved the RF conditions will be in portions of the Town of Webster and surrounding area. Refer to slide 10 for further explanation of these color thresholds

Lake Rd (Future)

Holt & Lake (Future SC)

Four Mile Creek

Webster Park

WEBSTER NORTH Klem Rd

East Webster

Xerox Webster

The map above adds low band of the Webster North site at 130’ ACL to the existing coverage map. The significantly improved signal strength corresponds to improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap areas. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting portions of the Town of Webster. Compare to p13 to better understand the LB best server footprint

*PRO TIP Compare to p14 to visualize the proposed site LB impact

Existing Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Best Server -105dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites dominant signal area.

Lake Rd (Future)

Holt & Lake (Future SC)

Four Mile Creek

Webster Park

WEBSTER NORTH

On Air Coverage 147’ Webster Alpha 31’ Four Mile Creek Beta 118’ Webster Park Alpha Search Area

East Webster

Xerox Webster

The map above represents coverage from existing sites, with the sites in need of capacity offload detailed in the legend above. Blue coverage is from other on air (Mid Band) sites. Notice the lack of signal or where there is signal, a dominant server throughout the Webster North project area. This reveals several sites that are stretching their mid band coverage capabilities which results with unacceptable coverage and performance. 16

Proposed Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Best Server -105dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites dominant signal area.

Lake Rd (Future)

Holt & Lake (Future SC)

Four Mile Creek

Webster Park

WEBSTER NORTH

On Air Coverage 147’ Webster Alpha 31’ Four Mile Creek Beta 118’ Webster Park Alpha 120’ Proposed Coverage Search Area

East Webster

Xerox Webster

The map above adds the mid band footprint of the proposed Webster North site with a 130’ ACL in green. The green best server footprint provides improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap area. This will improve service to users in the green area as well as help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting the existing overloaded sectors identified in the image above. 17

Existing Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how weak the RF conditions are in portions of the Town of Webster and surrounding area. Refer to slide 10 for further explanation of these color thresholds

Lake Rd (Future)

Holt & Lake (Future SC)

Four Mile Creek

Webster Park

WEBSTER NORTH Klem Rd

East Webster

Xerox Webster

The map above represents mid band coverage from existing sites. This mid band signal is very weak to non existent throughout the project area. Additional mid band network densification is required to resolve these conditions. Notice the large orange and blank coverage areas near the proposed Webster North site that are subject to overloaded low band as well as variable coverage conditions including fading and seasonality gaps. Compare to p16 to better understand the MB best server footprint

*PRO TIP Compare to p19 to visualize the proposed site MB impact

Proposed Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how improved the RF conditions will be in portions of the Town of Webster and surrounding area. Refer to slide 10 for further explanation of these color thresholds

Lake Rd (Future)

Holt & Lake (Future SC)

Four Mile Creek

Webster Park

WEBSTER NORTH Klem Rd

East Webster

Xerox Webster

The map above adds mid band of the Webster North site at 130’ ACL to the existing coverage map. The significantly improved signal strength corresponds to improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap areas. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting portions of the Town of Webster. Compare to p17 to better understand the MB best server footprint

*PRO TIP Compare to p18 to visualize the proposed site MB impact

RF Justification Summary

The network was analyzed to determine whether there is sufficient RF coverage and capacity in the Town of Webster. It was determined that there are significant gaps in adequate LTE service for Verizon Wireless in the Low and Mid Band LTE 4G and 5G frequencies. In addition to the coverage deficiencies, Verizon Wireless’ network does not have sufficient capacity (low band or mid band) to handle the existing and projected LTE voice and data traffic in the area near and neighboring the proposed facilities (“targeted service improvement area”). Based on the need for additional coverage and capacity while considering the topography and specific area requiring service, any further addition of capacity to distant existing sites does not remedy Verizon’s significant gap in reliable service. Therefore, the proposed facility is also needed to provide “capacity relief” to the existing nearby Verizon Wireless sites, allowing the proposed facility and those neighboring sites to adequately serve the existing and projected capacity demand in this area.

Gap Area

With the existing network configuration there are significant gaps in service which restricts Verizon Wireless customers from originating, maintaining or receiving reliable calls and network access. It is our expert opinion that the proposed site will satisfy the coverage and capacity needs of Verizon Wireless and users on it’s network in these portions of the Town of Webster and this project area. The proposed location depicted herein satisfies the identified service gaps and is proposed at the minimum height necessary for adequate and reliable service.

The proposed site resolves the substantial and significant gaps in coverage and capacity impacting this portion of the Town of Webster. These gaps are shown above: The green shaded area represent the gaps in coverage and capacity that the proposed Webster North site with a 130’ ACL will resolve.

Michael R. Crosby

Timothy Zarneke

Principal Engineer– RF Design 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 Verizon Wireless

Senior Engineer– RF Design 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 Verizon Wireless

EXHIBIT G

BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS LLC d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS

1222 Wildflower Drive, Webster NY

SITE SELECTION REPORT FEBURARY 4, 2026

SITE SELECTION REPORT

Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street, Suite #100 West Henrietta, New York 14586

Verizon Wireless proposes to install and operate a new wireless telecommunications facility, including a new tower structure, associated antennas and equipment and related appurtenances located at 1222 Wildflower Drive, in the Town of Webster, Monroe County, New York. The property is a 14.2-acre parcel within the R-3 Single Family Residential District zoning district. It is mostly wooded land with a residential home and accompanying structures. The Town of Webster permits wireless telecommunications facilities in this zoning district upon the issuance of a special use permit from the Town Board and site plan approval from the Planning Board.

1. (a)

NEED FOR FACILITY Problem

The process of identifying a technologically appropriate location, as well as the need for this communications facility are as provided in the Radio Frequency (“RF”) Engineering Necessity Case report (“RF Justification”) prepared by Verizon Wireless’ RF Design Engineer. As indicated in that report, when a Verizon Wireless RF Engineer identifies coverage gaps in the system or sites that have or will reach data capacity exhaustion or lack of coverage, they issue a “search area” or “search ring”. A search area is a geographical area located within the inadequately serviced area, and it is designed such that if a wireless telecommunications facility is located within the search area, and installed at an appropriate height, it will likely provide the required coverage. For the most part, locations outside of the search area will fail to provide adequate service to the cell. Due to technological constraints and existing topography, there is limited flexibility as to where a new facility can be located and still function properly within the existing wireless network. The goal of the search area is to define the general locations for placement of a cell site that will provide adequate service in the subject cell and work properly as part of the overall network. (b)

Solution

A search area was developed for this portion of the Webster area to address certain network deficiencies identified in the accompanying RF Justification. As shown in Figure 1, the search area is centered on a few neighborhoods between Holt Road to the west, Webster Road to the east, and Wall Road to the south. The search ring is depicted by the red circle in Figure 1. The goal of the search area is to define the permissible location for placement of a cell site that will provide adequate coverage to users of Verizon Wireless’ services in the target cell, and work properly as part of the overall network.

Page 2 of 13

2. SEARCH RING ANALYSIS (a)

Geography & Topography

The Webster North search area is in Monroe County in the Town of Webster. The search area consists of heavily wooded suburban residential properties and some wetlands. Topography varies throughout the search area, with potential candidate properties ranging from 328’ to 410’ AMSL; this variation was factored into the candidate selection. Figure 2 depicts an overlay of the Search Area on an aerial tax map for the area. (b)

Land Use

The Search Area is made up of mostly suburban residential and a few town owned properties, some are heavily wooded and many consist largely of wetlands. The Search Area is in Monroe County in the Town of Webster. (c)

Description of Figures

The following figures are provided to illustrate the different characteristics which exist within the Search Area relative to the identification of a location for a new wireless communications facility. Figure 1 - Depicts the Search Area. Figure 2 – Depicts an overlay of the Search Area with candidates and Tax Map and Wetlands/Floodplains overlay. Figure 3- Depicts a three-mile radius from the proposed tower location and existing towers or tall structures identified.

ZONING CONSIDERATIONS

(a)

Collocation

Verizon Wireless routinely seeks to install its antennas and equipment on an existing communication towers or other tall structures, including municipally owned properties (“colocation”), whenever feasible. Local communities universally favor co-location because they can minimize the number of wireless telecommunications towers in an area and many municipalities even provide a streamlined application review process. Co-location is often listed as the highest siting priority in a local municipality’s Zoning Law. In addition to the streamlined zoning application process, co-location is preferred by wireless providers because it is generally a less expensive and more timely option, compared to the installation of a new tower facility. Page 3 of 13

Unfortunately, there are no suitable towers or tall structures in the surrounding area viable for the installation of Verizon Wireless’ antennas and equipment. The closest existing cell tower from the proposed site, located approximately 1.2 miles southwest toward the Xerox campus, would not meet Verizon’s RF objective since it is too far away from where the new cellular facility is needed. After carefully investigating the properties within the Search Area, it was evident that there are no structures or buildings tall enough to provide the relief needed. Based on the foregoing, colocation is not a viable option, and a new tower facility is necessary. (b)

New Structure on Municipally owned Property

As its next priority, Verizon Wireless generally seeks to locate wireless telecommunication facilities on municipally owned property. These locations are often preferred by municipalities as the second preference behind co-location as it allows municipalities to benefit from a rental stream for the leased premises. Verizon sought, and was invited and encouraged by the Town, to place the facility on the only viable/available municipal property, at 1209 Creekside Trail. Verizon worked with the Town for two years on this site, but ultimately the Town Board declined to lease the property. (c)

New Structure on Privately-owned Property

When it is not feasible to co-locate on an existing tower or tall structure, Verizon Wireless must find an appropriate site that can accommodate a new communications structure. In doing so, the Site Acquisition Specialist attempts to identify properties in the search area large enough to accommodate the facility and any required bulk area requirements such as set back and fall zones that may exist in the local zoning law. In addition, other characteristics such as existing compatible land use and existing mature vegetation that can screen the facility are considered. Access, land use, the presence of wetlands, floodplains and other contributing factors are also examined, as well as construction-related issues.

CANDIDATE/ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

After a comprehensive investigation of the Search Area, no existing towers or tall structures were identified and/or suitable for co-location within or near the limits of the search area. To accommodate the zoning requirements of the town, a total of eleven (11) parcels were identified in or immediately outside the Webster North Search Area as being potential candidates for a new communications facility. All the parcels considered within the Search Area are substantial, ranging from 5 to 42.3 acres. The properties consist of mostly rural residential structures, some raw land, Town and Village sewage stations, and farmland. The parcels in the Search Area are concentrated on or near the neighborhoods between Holt Road to the west, Webster Road to the east, and Wall Road to the south. Coverage within the Webster North area is the primary objective for this site, where terrain and environmental conditions like wetlands were major factors for determining the primary location. The locations are identified in Figure 2. A summary of the properties is detailed below. Page 4 of 13

Candidate A

Tax Parcel: 065.05-1-47 7.4 acres 1209 Creekside Trail Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: Sewage Treatment and Water Pollution Control Owner: Town of Webster Candidate A is a 7.4-acre parcel within the search area to the northeast. Located west of a residential neighborhood, this parcel supports a Town pump station but has extensive wetlands weaved throughout the property. Verizon sought, and was invited and encouraged by the Town, to place the facility on the only viable/available municipal property, at 1209 Creekside Trail. Verizon worked with the Town for two years on this site, but ultimately the Town Board declined to lease the property.

Candidate B

Tax Parcel: 050.03-1-33.001 Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: Park Owner: Town of Webster

29.05 acres

Providence Dr

Candidate B is a 29.05-acre parcel that encompasses both sides of the north-northeast edge of the search area. Zoned as a park, most of this property is covered in wetlands, including a stream that runs north to south through its center. Additionally, Parkland cannot be used for non-park purposes without NYS Legislative approval, which we believe is unlikely given other viable non-park candidates.

Candidate C

(Selected Candidate) Tax Parcel: 065.05-1-48 14.2 acres 1222 Wildflower Dr Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: R-3 Single Family Residential District Owner: Robby & Dina Villa This parcel was identified as the primary candidate by Verizon Wireless’ RF Engineer due to the property’s elevation and ability to resolve the existing network issues in this portion of the area, including the north central portion of the Town of Webster, more specifically portions of Holt Rd, Webster Rd, Wall Rd, Schlegal Rd, Wall Rd, Shoemaker Rd, Joseph Circle, Appian Dr, Brooktree

Page 5 of 13

Ln, Hidden Valley Trail, Woodsboro Farms, Severn Ridge Rd, Stockbridge Rd, Woodhull Rd, Sagebrook Way, Providence Dr, Wildflower Dr, Imperial Dr, Klem Rd, Nestwood Ln, Licia Ln, Sherborne Rd, Marigold Dr, Ohstrom Park as well as neighboring residential and commercial/public areas along and near these roads including portions of Webster Park. There is adequate space for an 80’ x 125’ lease area for a telecommunications tower and compound located in the western portion of the parcel that has an approximate elevation of 348’ AMSL. As shown on the site plans, the location of a 135’ tall tower will meet 100% tower setbacks from the nearby property boundaries. This property was selected by RF as the primary candidate because it satisfies the RF coverage requirements.

Candidate D

Tax Parcel: 064.08-3-65.1 5.26 acres Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: R-3 Single Family Residential Owner: Kimberly & Nicholas Avery

546 Holt Road

Candidate D is a 5.26-acre parcel at the southwest edge of the search area. It is sparsely wooded with a residential home and other associated structures. Some tree clearing would be required and setback requirements could be met depending on location. Owner is not interested.

Candidate E

Tax Parcel: 065.09-2-63 5.8 acres Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: R-3 Single Family Residential Owner: Kenneth & Rebecca Rondo

1204 Wall Road

Candidate E is a 5.8-acre parcel within the southeast portion of the search area. It is heavily wooded with a residential home. Significant tree clearing would be required and setback requirements may be difficult to meet. Owner is not interested.

Candidate F

Tax Parcel: 065.09-2-66.1 6 acres Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: R-3 Single Family Residential Owner: Deborah A. Lawler

1194 Wall Rd

Candidate F is a 6-acre parcel within the center-south portion of the search area. It is heavily wooded with a residential home. Significant tree clearing would be required. A portion of the Page 6 of 13

property is covered in wetlands; tower location would be a challenge which would make setback requirements difficult to meet. Owner is not interested.

Candidate G

Tax Parcel: 064.12-2-15.1 7.2 acres Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: R-3 Single Family Residential Owner: Thomas & Michelle Klem

1164 Wall Road

Candidate G is a 7.2-acre parcel within the center-south portion of the search area. It is heavily wooded with a residential home. Significant tree clearing would be required though setback could be difficult to meet. Owner is not interested.

Other properties considered

Candidate H: Tax Parcel: 065.10-1-13./WEB 10.1 acres 613 Webster Road Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: Sewage Treatment and Water Pollution Control Owner: Village of Webster Disposal Candidate H is a 10.1-acre parcel slightly outside of the search area to the southeast. This location supports a Village sewage treatment plant. This location was vetted by our RF engineer; it is not within the range of our search area and will not provide adequate solution to the coverage and capacity deficiency within the network.

Candidate I

Tax Parcel: 064.12-1-90.1 42.3 acres Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: R-3 Single Family Residential Owner: David N. Maier, Jeffrey Maier

623 Holt Road

Candidate I is a 42.3-acre parcel outside the search area to the southwest. This large property is used for agriculture on its eastern portion along Holt Road, which also has a residential home. Its western section is heavily wooded. This location was vetted by our RF engineer; it is not within the Page 7 of 13

range of our search area and will not provide adequate solution to the coverage and capacity deficiency within the network.

Candidate J

Tax Parcel: 065.09-2-49 6.3 acres Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: R-3 Single Family Residential Owner: 1310 Wall Road LLC

1310 Wall Road

Candidate J is a 6.3-acre parcel outside the search area to the southeast. It is heavily wooded with a residential home and a barn. Significant tree clearing would be required though setback requirements should be met. This location was vetted by our RF engineer; it is not within the range of our search area and will not provide adequate solution to the coverage and capacity deficiency within the network.

Candidate

K Tax Parcel: 065.09-2-73.1 5.8 acres Town of Webster | Monroe County Zoning District: R-3 Single Family Residential Owner: Heritage Christian Srvcs Inc.

1189 Wall Road

Candidate K is a 5.8-acre parcel outside the search area just south of its southern edge. It is heavily wooded with a residential home and a barn. Significant tree clearing would be required though setback requirements should be met. The owner was interested. This location was vetted by our RF engineer; it is not within the range of our search area and will not provide adequate solution to the coverage and capacity deficiency within the network.

SUMMARY

After canvassing this Search Area, it has been determined that Candidate C provides the most viable location for the site after a thorough investigation of alternatives. The RF Engineer has verified that this property will adequately meet RF coverage and capacity objectives for a new Macro Facility. The property is currently being used as a residential property. The property is also large enough to accommodate the proposed facility while meeting setback requirements. The owner and Verizon have entered into a ground lease agreement for the Facility, and a favorable site design has been completed and approved by both parties. This macro site is intended to provide increased wireless Page 8 of 13

telecommunications coverage in an area where Verizon Wireless’ existing macro cell network is overburdened by demand and is lacking coverage for its 4th Generation LTE Network. Thank you,

Nico Facey Project Manager NETWORK BUILDING + CONSULTING 1777 Sentry Parkway W | VEVA 17, Suite 400 | Blue Bell, PA | 19422

Page 9 of 13

FIGURE 1 Verizon Wireless Webster North Search Area

Page 10 of 13

FIGURE 2 Verizon Wireless Webster North Search Area with Candidates and Tax Map

Page 11 of 13

Webster North Search Area with Candidates and Wetlands/Floodplains Overlay

Page 12 of 13

FIGURE 3 Three Mile Radius from Proposed Tower Location Showing Existing Towers/Tall Structures

Page 13 of 13

EXHIBIT H

Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless - Webster North

Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Near: 1222 Wildflower Drive, Webster, NY, 14580 (Town of Webster, Monroe County) (T.A.#065.05-1-48, 14.2 Acres per County GIS)

Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless is proposing the construction of a wireless telecommunications facility. The facility will consist of a 135' monopole tower (with proposed 4' lightning rod) that will support a Verizon Wireless antenna array at 130' AGL and two future carriers below; ground based improvements include outdoor equipment cabinets on a 11'x12.5' concrete slab with ice canopy over it, a 50kw diesel generator with a tertiary containment tank on a 4'x8' concrete slab, H-frame and cable bridge, enclosed by a 34'x77', 7' tall chain link fence with a 1' barbed wire top. The compound, proposed tower, wireless telecommunications equipment, generator, transformer and meter board are all to be located within a 80'x125' lease area. Access to the proposed site will utilize 900' +/- of existing asphalt driveway off of Wildflower Drive, with 360' +/- of proposed 12' wide gravel access driveway.

Name of Applicant/Sponsor:

Telephone

585-943-2623

Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless

E-Mail

kathy.pomponio@verizonwireless.com

Address

1275 John Street, Suite 100 City/PO: West Henrietta

State

Zip Code

14586

Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role):

Telephone

585-263-1333

Nixon Peabody-Robert Burgdorf, Esq.

E-Mail

rburgdorf@nixonpeabody.com

Address

211 High Point Drive, Suite 110

City/PO:

State:

Zip Code:

Victor

NY

14564

Property Owner (if not same as sponsor):

Telephone:

Robby C. & Dina M. Villa

E-Mail:

Address

1222 Wildflower Drive

City/PO: Webster

State

Page 1 of 13

Zip Code:14580

B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity a. City Counsel, Town Board, 9 Yes 9 No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village 9 ✔ Yes 9 No Planning Board or Commission ✔ Yes 9 No c. City, Town or 9 Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies 9 Yes 9 No e. County agencies

9 Yes 9 No

f. Regional agencies

9 Yes 9 No

g. State agencies

✔ Yes 9 No 9

h. Federal agencies

9 Yes 9 No

If Yes

Identify Agency and Approval(s) Required

Town of Webster

Planning Board - Site Plan Approval; Special Use Permit

Application Date (Actual or projected)

March 2026

Town of Webster

Zoning Board of Appeals - Area March 2026 Variance

NYSDEC Basic Wetlands General Permit, GP-0-25-003, DECID: 8-2654-00684/00001

Permit Coverage 12/22/25-12/31/27, Permit for disturbance within 100' wet adj area

i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?

✔ No 9 Yes 9

ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?

✔ 9 Yes 9 No 9 Yes ✔ 9 No

C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. • If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1

9 Yes 9 ✔ No

C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site 9 Yes ✔ 9 No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action 9 Yes 9 No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; 9 Yes 9 No ✔ Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): NYS Heritage Areas:West Erie Canal Corridor _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 2 of 13

C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. 9 Yes 9 No ✔ If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? R-3 (Single Family Residential) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit?

✔ 9 Yes 9 No

c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located?

Webster Central School District ________________________________________________________________

b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Webster Police Department, Monroe County Sheriff's Department, NYS Police _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Webster Fire Dept, North East Joint Fire District; Penfield Webster Emergency Medical Services __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. What parks serve the project site? D'Amico Park __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Wireless Telecommunications Facility _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor?

_____________ 14.2 ± acres _____________ 0.39 ± acres _____________ 1.13 ± acres

c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ ✔ No d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? 9 Yes 9 If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? 9 Yes 9 No iii. Number of lots proposed? ________ iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________

9 Yes ✔ 9 No e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? 3 months _____ i. If No, anticipated period of construction: ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated _____ • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) _____ month _____ year • Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 3 of 13

f. Does the project include new residential uses? If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. Two Family One Family Initial Phase At completion of all phases

9 Yes ✔ 9 No Three Family

Multiple Family (four or more)

___________

____________

________________________

___________

____________

________________________

g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? If Yes, 1 i. Total number of structures ___________ 135' ± ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ N/A square feet

9 ✔ Yes 9 No

h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any 9 Yes 9 ✔ No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: 9 Ground water 9 Surface water streams 9 Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ • Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? 9 Yes 9 No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? 9 Yes 9 No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment 9 Yes 9 ✔ No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): Wetland Delineation performed by Costich Engineering November ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 17, 2025 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 4 of 13

ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: Limits of disturbance for proposed access road within the 100' NYSDEC wetland adjacent area = 0.08± acres. Proposed gravel _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ driveway with addition of geo-synthetic matting and rip-rap inlet stabilization (6.5 square yards). NYSDEC wetland permit obtained _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 12/22/2025. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes 9 ✔ No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Yes ✔ 9 No iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: ___________________________________________________________ • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:________________________________________ • purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ Restoration of any disturbed area with top soil and seed. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? 9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district? 9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes 9 No • Do existing lines serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If, Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ • Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ • Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. ✔ No d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? 9 Yes 9 If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ • Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? 9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district? 9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes 9 No

Page 5 of 13

• •

9 Yes 9 No Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ • Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point 9 Yes 9 ✔ No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ • If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? 9 Yes 9 No iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? 9 Yes 9 No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel 9 ✔ Yes 9 No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Construction equipment ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) N/A ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Standby 50KW Diesel Generator with tertiary containment tank g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)

Page 6 of 13

9 Yes 9 ✔ No 9 Yes 9 No

h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as 9 Yes ✔ 9 No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial 9 Yes ✔ 9 No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: Evening Weekend i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): _____________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Parking spaces: Existing ___________________ Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________________ iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? 9 Yes 9 No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric 9 Yes 9 No or other alternative fueled vehicles? 9 Yes 9 No viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand 9 ✔ Yes 9 No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ 70,000 kwh _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): Local Utility ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Yes ✔ 9 No iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation? l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: • Monday - Friday: _________________________ 7am - 6pm • Saturday: ________________________________ 7am - 6pm • Sunday: _________________________________ N/A • Holidays: ________________________________ N/A

ii. During Operations: • Monday - Friday: ____________________________ 24 Hours • Saturday: ___________________________________ 24 Hours • Sunday: ____________________________________ 24 Hours 24 Hours • Holidays: ___________________________________

Page 7 of 13

✔ m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, 9 Yes 9 No operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: During construction _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ✔ No ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? 9 Yes 9 Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? 9 Yes 9 No ✔ If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: (1) 25W flood light mounted on H-frame activated with spring wound timer, 8' +/- above grade _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ✔ No ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? 9 Yes 9 Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) 9 Yes 9 ✔ No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) iii. Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, 9 Yes 9 ✔ No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? 9 Yes 9 No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal 9 Yes 9 ✔ No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) • Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 8 of 13

s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • ________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or • ________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous 9 Yes 9 ✔ No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. 9 Urban 9 Industrial 9 Commercial ✔ 9 Residential (suburban) 9 Rural (non-farm) 9 Forest 9 Agriculture 9 Aquatic 9 Other (specify): ____________________________________ ✔ ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site.

• • • • • • • •

Land use or Covertype Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces Forested Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (nonagricultural, including abandoned agricultural) Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) Other Describe: Lawn _______________________________ ________________________________________

Current Acreage

Acreage After Project Completion

Change (Acres +/-)

0.45 ±

0.64 ±

+ 0.19

11.05 ±

10.89 ±

- 0.16

0.18 ±

0.00

1.22 ±

0.00

1.30 ±

1.27 ±

- 0.03

Page 9 of 13

✔ No c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? 9 Yes 9 i. If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________

d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed 9 Yes ✔ 9 No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: _________________________________ feet • Dam length: _________________________________ feet • Surface area: _________________________________ acres • Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, 9 Yes ✔ 9 No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? 9 Yes 9 No • If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin 9 Yes ✔ 9 No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any 9 Yes ✔ 9 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site 9 Yes ✔ 9 No Remediation database? Check all that apply: 9 Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 10 of 13

v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No • If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ • Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ • Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ • Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? 9 Yes 9 No • Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site?

________________ >7 feet 9 Yes 9 ✔ No

b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site:

CoD3 - Colonie Loamy Fine Sand ___________________________

__________% 47 __________% 26 __________% 12

___________________________ Mn - Minoa Very Fine Sandy Loam ____________________________ CoB - Colonie Loamy Fine Sand 0.5-7 feet d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________

e. Drainage status of project site soils: ✔ 9 Well Drained: 9 Moderately Well Drained: ✔ 9 Poorly Drained ✔

_____% of site 59 _____% of site 6 of site _____% 35

f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ✔ 9 0-10%: 9 10-15%: ✔ ✔ 9 15% or greater:

_____% of site 53 _____% of site 18 _____% of site 29

g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. ✔ Yes 9 No i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, 9 ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? 9 ✔ Yes 9 No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. ✔ iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, 9 Yes 9 No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: C Name 845-2 _______Mill Creek___________________________ Classification _______________________ • Streams: Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ Federal Waters,... • Wetlands: Name Federal Waters, Federal Waters, ____________________________________________ Approximate Size .64, .39, .19 ___________________ acres • Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ ✔ v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired 9 Yes 9 No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ Name - Pollutants - Uses:Mill Creek and tribs - Fecal Coliforms;Total Phosphorus;Dissolved Oxygen ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

•

i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway?

9 ✔ Yes 9 No

j. Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain?

9 ✔ Yes 9 No

k. Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain?

9 ✔ Yes 9 No

✔ No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? 9 Yes 9 If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 11 of 13

m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: small mammals birds ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________

______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________

n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat: ______________________ acres • Currently: • Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres • Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as 9 Yes ✔ 9 No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? If Yes: i. Species and listing (endangered or threatened):______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of special concern?

9 Yes ✔ 9 No

If Yes

i. Species and listing:____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to 9 Yes 9 ✔ No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? 9 Yes 9 ✔ No i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National 9 Yes 9 ✔ No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: 9 Biological Community 9 Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? 9 Yes ✔ 9 No If Yes: i. CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________

Page 12 of 13

EAF Mapper Summary Report

Wednesday, January 28, 2026 9:54 AM

Disclaimer

The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources to confirm data provided by the Mapper or to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.

B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area]

B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area]

Yes

C.2.b. [Special Planning District]

Yes

Digital mapping data are not available for all Special Planning Districts. Refer to EAF Workbook.

C.2.b. [Special Planning District - Name]

NYS Heritage Areas:West Erie Canal Corridor

E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site Potential Contamination History]

Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.

E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site Listed]

Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.

E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site Environmental Site Remediation Database]

Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.

E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site]

E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features]

E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features]

Yes

Digital mapping information on local, New York State, and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to the EAF Workbook.

E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features]

Yes

Digital mapping information on local, New York State, and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to the EAF Workbook.

E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features]

Yes

Digital mapping information on local, New York State, and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to the EAF Workbook.

E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Name]

845-2

E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Classification]

C

E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Federal Waters Name]

Full Environmental Assessment Form

EAF Mapper Summary Report

E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies]

Yes

E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies - Name and Basis for Listing]

Name - Pollutants

Uses:Mill Creek and tribs - Fecal Coliforms;Total Phosphorus;Dissolved Oxygen

E.2.i. [Floodway]

Yes

E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain]

Yes

E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain]

Yes

E.2.l. [Aquifers]

E.2.n. [Natural Communities]

E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species]

E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals]

E.3.a. [Agricultural District]

E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark]

E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area]

E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites]

Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.

E.3.f. [Archeological Sites]

E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor]

Full Environmental Assessment Form

EAF Mapper Summary Report

14-14-11 (9/95)-9c

SEQR

617.20 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review

Webster North Project No 9159.01 2/16/2026

Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from:

0-1/4

1/4-1/2

1/2-3

3-5

A.)A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities?



B.)An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or manmade scenic qualities?



C.)A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places?



D.)State Parks?



E.)The State Forest Preserve?



F.)National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges?



G.)National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features?



H.)National Park Service lands?



J.)Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational?



K.)Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak?



L.)A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation?



M.)A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic?



N.)Municipal park, or designated open space?



P.)County road? *



R.)State? *



◼



S.)Local road? *

◼



2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e. screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons?  Yes ◼ No 3. Are any of the resources checked in questions 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ◼ Yes  No

DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in questions 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *1/4 mile

* 1 mile

◼

Essentially undeveloped Forested

•

Agricultural

•

Suburban residential

•

Industrial

•

Commercial

•

Urban

•

River, Lake, Pond

•

Cliffs, Overlooks

•

Designated Open Space

•

Flat

•

Hilly

•

Mountainous

•

Other (Solar Array)

•

Note

add attachments as needed

◼

•



•

◼

•



•



•



•

◼

•



•



•

◼ 

•



•



•

◼  ◼    ◼  ◼ ◼   

5. Are there visually similar projects within: * 1/4 mile  Yes ◼ No * * 1 mile  Yes ◼ No * * 1 ½ miles ◼ Yes  No * * 3 miles ◼ Yes  No * * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate.

83,950*

CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Activity Daily

Weekly

Holidays/ Weekends

Seasonally

Travel to and from work

◼



Involved in recreational activities

◼



Routine travel by residents

◼



At a residence

◼



At worksite ___________________________ Other



*Refer to attached sheet

Webster North Project No 9159.01 2/16/2026

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA FOR VISUAL EAF ADDENDUM

1R.)

State Roads State Road(s) SR 250, Webster Rd.

1S.)

Distance Between Project & Resource (Miles) 0.46 – 0.66

State Road(s)

Distance Between Project & Resource (Miles)

Local Roads Local Road(s)

Creekside Trail Thyme Dr. Scenic Circle Joseph Cir. La Baron Cir.

Distance Between Project & Resource (Miles) 0.17 – 0.25 0.49 – 0.51 0.12 – 0.23 0.26 – 0.3 0.32 – 0.36

Local Road(s) Wildflower Dr. Providence Dr. Brooktree Ln. Appian Dr. Meadowwood Dr.

Distance Between Project & Resource (Miles) 0.26 – 0.33 0.29 – 0.5 0.13 – 0.3 0.15 – 0.35 0.28 – 0.4

6. Established by assuming a percentage of travelers within the viewshed who will actually observe the project. AADT information taken from NYSDOT Traffic Data Viewer.

Area Estimate daily traffic SR 250 .

5753 x 4%

= Est. # of Viewers = 230

Total Average Daily Viewers

= 230 X 365 days per year

Total Estimated Viewers per Year

= 83,950/ year

EXHIBIT I

Network Engineering

UPNY 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586

CO-LOCATION POLICY Verizon’s co-location policy is as follows: Verizon encourages and promotes co-location, both by allowing other providers to locate on its towers, and by attempting to locate its facilities on other providers’ towers. Verizon maintains the following requirements for other wireless telecommunication providers who desire to locate on Verizon’s facilities:

4913-4463-0318.1

The other provider must pay Verizon appropriate and fair compensation reflecting Verizon’s investment in the engineering, legal, construction, material, and related costs for the site and facility;

The co-location must be technologically feasible both in terms of radio frequency transmissions and structural integrity of the tower; and

The other provider must have a similar policy of co-location for Verizon and its affiliated/related companies.

EXHIBIT J

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

LAND LEASE AGREEMENT This Land Lease Agreement (the "Agreement") is made by and between Robby C. Villa and Dina M. Villa (together, “Lessor”), with a mailing address of 1222 Wildflower Drive, Webster, New York 14580 and Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Lessee”), with a mailing address of One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920. Lessor and Lessee are at times collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Parties" or individually as the "Party." WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. GRANT. Lessor hereby grants to Lessee the right to install, maintain, replace, add and operate communications equipment (“Use”) upon a portion of that real property owned, leased or controlled by Lessor located at 1222 Wildflower Drive, Webster, New York 14580 in the Town of Webster, Monroe County, New York, Tax Map No. 065.05-1-48 (the “Property”). The Property is legally described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof. The portion of the Property Lessee has rights to for its Use is approximately 10,000 square feet and is more particularly described and/or depicted on Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof (together with the Easements granted pursuant to Paragraph 5, collectively referred to herein as the “Premises”). 2. INITIAL TERM. This Agreement shall be effective as of the date of execution by both Parties (“Effective Date”). The initial term of the Agreement shall be for 5 years beginning on the first day of the month after Lessee begins construction on the Premises (the “Commencement Date”) and will be acknowledged by the Parties in writing, including electronic mail. Construction shall be deemed to have begun when Lessee or its employees, contractors or agents perform any activities that are directly related to construction of Lessee’s improvements, such as site work, clearing, staging or delivery of materials or equipment; however, construction shall not be deemed to have begun by reason of any preliminary investigation activities related to evaluating the condition and/or suitability of the Property for Lessee’s proposed improvements, including but not limited to surveys, environmental testing, geotechnical engineering or radio propagation studies, even if any of such preliminary investigations include activities that affect the Property, such as soil borings or clearing. 3. EXTENSIONS. The initial term of this Agreement shall automatically be extended for 4 additional 5-year terms unless Lessee gives Lessor written notice of its intent to terminate at least 3 months prior to the end of the initial term or then current extension term, as applicable. The initial term and any extension terms shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Term”. 4.

RENT.

a. Rent payments shall begin on the Commencement Date and be due at a total annual rent of , to be paid in equal monthly installments on the first day of 1 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

the month, in advance, to Lessor, or to such other person, firm, or place as Lessor may, from time to time, designate in writing at least 30 days in advance of any rent payment due date by notice given in accordance with Paragraph 4.d below. Rent shall accrue starting on the Commencement Date; however, the initial rent payment(s) will be delivered no later than 90 days after: (i) Lessee’s receipt of the Rental Documents (as defined in Paragraph 4.c), or (ii) the written acknowledgement confirming the Commencement Date, whichever is later. Upon agreement of the Parties, Lessee may pay rent by electronic funds transfer and in such event, Lessor agrees to provide to Lessee bank routing information for such purpose upon request of Lessee. Effective as of the start of each renewal term, annual rent shall increase by over the rent for the immediately preceding initial term or renewal term. b. As additional consideration for this Agreement, Lessee shall pay Lessor a one-time, non-refundable, lump-sum signing bonus of (“Signing Bonus”) no later than 90 days after: (i) Lessee’s receipt of the Rental Documents (as defined in Paragraph 4.c), or (ii) the Effective Date, whichever is later. The Signing Bonus shall be considered additional rent for the Premises for the period from the Effective Date until the Commencement Date (the “Due Diligence Period”). Lessor agrees that the Signing Bonus is fair and adequate consideration for the Due Diligence Period, and Lessor recognizes that Paragraph 2 of this Agreement governs the Commencement Date. This paragraph does not impact whether or not Lessee chooses to install Lessee’s communications equipment on the Premises and commence the Term. c. For any party to whom rent payments are to be made, Lessor or any successor in interest of Lessor hereby agrees to provide to Lessee (i) a completed, current version of Internal Revenue Service Form W-9, or equivalent; (ii) complete and fully-executed state and local withholding forms if required; (iii) Lessee’s payment direction form, and (iv) other documentation to verify Lessor’s or such other party’s right to receive rental as is reasonably requested by Lessee (collectively, the “Rental Documents”). If the Rental Documents are not provided by Lessor, or there is a change to the Lessor payee, rent shall accrue in accordance with this Agreement, but Lessee shall have no obligation to deliver rent payments to Lessor or its designee or successor in interest, as applicable, until 30 days after Lessee receives the required Rental Documents. Thereafter, Lessee shall deliver the accrued rent payments in accordance with the Rental Documents. d. Lessor must register in the Verizon Landlord Connect portal (“VLC Portal”) at https://landlordconnect.verizon.com and shall utilize the VLC Portal to submit changes to Lessor’s account information (e.g. notice address, ownership information, banking details, email address), provide Rental Documents, view rental payments, submit an invoice/bill (e.g. utilities) for payment, and to access this Agreement or certificates of insurance. 5. ACCESS/UTILITIES. Lessee shall have the non-exclusive right of ingress and egress from a public right-of-way, 7 days a week, 24 hours a day, over the Property to and from the Premises for the purpose of installation, operation and maintenance of Lessee’s communications equipment over or along one or more rights-of-way (“Easements”) shown or described on Exhibit “B”. Lessee may use the Easements for the installation, operation and maintenance of wires, cables, conduits and pipes for all necessary electrical, telephone, fiber and other similar support services as deemed necessary or appropriate by Lessee for the operation of its communications equipment. In the event it is necessary, Lessor agrees to grant Lessee or the service provider the right to install such services on, through, over 2 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

and/or under the Property, provided the location of such services shall be reasonably approved by Lessor. In the event of any power interruption at the Premises, Lessee shall be permitted to install, maintain and/or provide access to and use of a temporary power source to be located on the Property, including related equipment and appurtenances, such as conduits connecting the temporary power source to the Premises. 6. CONDITION OF PROPERTY. Lessor shall deliver the Premises to Lessee in a condition ready for Lessee’s Use and clean and free of debris. Lessor represents and warrants to Lessee that as of the Effective Date, the Property is in compliance with all Laws (as defined in Paragraph 26), including EH&S Laws (as defined in Paragraph 23). 7. IMPROVEMENTS. The communications equipment including, without limitation, the tower structure, antennas, conduits, fencing and other screening, and other improvements shall be at Lessee’s expense and installation shall be at the discretion and option of Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to replace, repair, add to or otherwise modify its communications equipment, tower structure, antennas, conduits, fencing and other screening, or other improvements or any portion thereof and the frequencies over which the communications equipment operates, at no additional cost to Lessee, whether or not any of the communications equipment, antennas, conduits or other improvements are listed on any exhibit. Lessee shall only be required to obtain Lessor consent for modifications that increase the square footage of Lessee’s Premises. Lessor shall respond in writing to any Lessee consent request within 30 days of receipt or Lessor’s consent shall be deemed granted, provided, any increase to the Premises shall be memorialized by the Parties in writing. Lessor is not entitled to a rent increase associated with any Lessee modification unless it is increasing its Premises, in which case, any rent increase shall be proportionate to the additional square footage of ground space included in the Premises. 8. GOVERNMENT APPROVALS. Lessee’s Use is contingent upon Lessee obtaining all of the certificates, permits and other approvals (collectively the “Government Approvals”) that may be required by any Federal, State or Local authorities (collectively, the “Government Entities”) as well as a satisfactory soil boring test, environmental studies, or any other due diligence Lessee chooses that will permit Lessee’s Use. Lessor shall cooperate with Lessee in its effort to obtain and maintain any Government Approvals. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, Lessor hereby agrees to allow Lessee to install any radio frequency signs as are necessary to ensure Lessee’s compliance with Laws (as defined herein). 9. TERMINATION. Lessee may, unless otherwise stated, immediately terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Lessor in the event that (i) any applications for such Government Approvals should be finally rejected; (ii) any Government Approval issued to Lessee is canceled, expires, lapses or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by any Government Entity; (iii) Lessee determines that such Government Approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner; (iv) Lessee determines any structural analysis is unsatisfactory; (v) Lessee, in its sole discretion, determines the Use of the Premises is obsolete or unnecessary; (vi) with 3 months prior notice to Lessor, upon the annual anniversary of the Commencement Date; or (vii) at any time before the Commencement Date for any reason or no reason, in Lessee’s sole discretion.

3 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

10. INDEMNIFICATION. Subject to Paragraph 11, each Party and/or any successor and/or assignees thereof, shall indemnify and hold harmless the other Party, and/or any successors and/or assignees thereof, against all third party claims of liability or loss (including reasonable attorney’s fees, expenses, and defense costs incurred by the indemnified Party) from bodily injury or property damage resulting from or arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnifying Party, its employees, contractors or agents, except to the extent such claims or damages may be due to or caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the other Party, or its employees, contractors or agents. The indemnified Party will provide the indemnifying Party with prompt, written notice of any claim that is subject to the indemnification obligations in this paragraph. The indemnified Party will cooperate appropriately with the indemnifying Party in connection with the indemnifying Party’s defense of such claim. The indemnifying Party shall defend any indemnified Party, at the indemnified Party’s request, against any claim with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the indemnified Party. The indemnifying Party shall not settle or compromise any such claim or consent to the entry of any judgment without the prior written consent of each indemnified Party and without an unconditional release of all claims by each claimant or plaintiff in favor of each indemnified Party. All indemnification obligations shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 11. INSURANCE. The Parties agree to maintain during the term of this Agreement the following insurance policies:

Commercial general liability in the amount of per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage and general aggregate. Each Party shall be included as an additional insured as their interest may appear under this Agreement on the other Party’s insurance policy.

b. “All-Risk” property insurance on a replacement cost basis insuring their respective property with no coinsurance requirement. Where legally permissible, each Party agrees to waive subrogation against the other Party and to ensure said waiver is recognized by the insurance policies insuring the property. c. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessor hereby acknowledges that all portions of the Property within three hundred feet (300') of the Premises (hereinafter referred to as the "Insurance Buffer") are currently being used solely for agricultural, forestry or non-commercial purposes. In the event that the current use of the Insurance Buffer changes during the Term, Lessor agrees that at such time and in the future, and at its own cost and expense, it will maintain the insurance as described above. 12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Except for indemnification pursuant to Paragraphs 10 and 23, a violation of Paragraph 28, or a violation of law, neither Party shall be liable to the other, or any of their respective agents, representatives, or employees for any lost revenue, lost profits, diminution in value of business, loss of technology, rights or services, loss of data, or interruption or loss of use of service, incidental, punitive, indirect, special, trebled, enhanced or consequential damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages, whether such damages are claimed for breach of contract, tort (including

4 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

negligence), strict liability or otherwise, unless applicable law forbids a waiver of such damages. 13.

INTERFERENCE.

a. Lessee agrees that Lessee will not cause interference that is measurable in accordance with industry standards to Lessor’s equipment. Lessor agrees that Lessor and other occupants of the Property will not cause interference that is measurable in accordance with industry standards to the then existing communications equipment of Lessee. b. Without limiting any other rights or remedies, if interference occurs and continues for a period in excess of 48 hours following notice to the interfering party via telephone to Lessee’s Network Management Center (at 1-800-264-6620 or 1-800-6212622) or to Lessor at ((585) 303-6197), the interfering party shall or shall require any other user to reduce power or cease operations of the interfering equipment until the interference is cured. c. The Parties acknowledge that there will not be an adequate remedy at law for noncompliance with the provisions of this Paragraph and therefore the Parties shall have the right to equitable remedies such as, without limitation, injunctive relief and specific performance. 14.

REMOVAL/HOLDOVER.

a. Within 90 days of the expiration or earlier termination of the Agreement, Lessee shall remove Lessee’s communications equipment (except footings and foundations) and restore the Premises to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear and casualty damage excepted. Lessor agrees and acknowledges that the communications equipment shall remain the personal property of Lessee and Lessee shall have the right to remove the same at any time during the Term, whether or not said items are considered fixtures and attachments to real property under applicable laws. b. If the Parties are negotiating an amendment or new lease at the time of the expiration of the Term, Lessee may remain on the Premises until the amendment or new lease has been executed, provided Lessee shall pay rent at the then existing monthly rate, or on the existing monthly pro-rata basis if based upon a longer payment term, until the removal of the communications equipment is completed. 15. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. If at any time after the Effective Date, Lessor receives an offer or letter of intent from any person or entity that is in the business of owning, managing or operating communications facilities or is in the business of acquiring landlord interests in agreements relating to communications facilities, to purchase fee title, an easement, a lease, a license, or any other interest in the Property or any portion thereof or to acquire any interest in this Agreement, or an option for any of the foregoing, Lessor shall provide written notice to Lessee of said offer (“Lessor’s Notice”). Lessor’s Notice shall include the prospective buyer’s name, the purchase price being offered, any other consideration being offered, the other terms and conditions of the offer, a description of the portion of and interest in the Property and/or this Agreement which will be conveyed in the 5 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

proposed transaction, and a copy of any letters of intent or form agreements presented to Lessor by the third party offeror. Lessee shall have the right of first refusal to meet any bona fide offer of sale or transfer on the terms and conditions of such offer or by effectuating a transaction with substantially equivalent financial terms. If Lessee fails to provide written notice to Lessor that Lessee intends to meet such bona fide offer within 60 days after receipt of Lessor’s Notice, Lessor may proceed with the proposed transaction in accordance with the terms and conditions of such third party offer, in which event this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and the right of first refusal described in this Paragraph shall survive any such conveyance to a third party. If Lessee provides Lessor with notice of Lessee’s intention to meet the third party offer within 60 days after receipt of Lessor’s Notice, then if Lessor’s Notice describes a transaction involving greater space than the Premises, Lessee may elect to proceed with a transaction covering only the Premises and the purchase price shall be prorated on a square footage basis. Further, Lessor acknowledges and agrees that if Lessee exercises this right of first refusal, Lessee may require a reasonable period to conduct due diligence and effectuate the closing of a transaction on substantially equivalent financial terms of the third party offer. Lessee may elect to amend this Agreement to effectuate the proposed financial terms of the third party offer rather than acquiring fee simple title or an easement interest in the Premises. For purposes of this Paragraph, any transfer, bequest or devise of Lessor's interest in the Property as a result of the death of Lessor, whether by will or intestate succession, or any conveyance to Lessor’s family members by direct conveyance or by conveyance to a trust for the benefit of family members shall not be considered a sale for which Lessee has any right of first refusal. 16. RIGHTS UPON SALE. Should Lessor, at any time during the Term, decide (i) to sell or otherwise transfer all or any part of the Property, or (ii) to grant to a third party by easement or other legal instrument an interest in and to any portion of the Premises, such sale, transfer, or grant of an easement or interest therein shall be under and subject to this Agreement and any such purchaser or transferee shall recognize Lessee's rights hereunder. In the event that Lessor completes any such sale, transfer, or grant described in this Paragraph without executing an assignment of the Agreement whereby the third party agrees in writing to assume all obligations of Lessor under this Agreement, then Lessor shall not be released from its obligations to Lessee under this Agreement, and Lessee shall have the right to look to Lessor and the third party for the full performance of the Agreement. 17. LESSOR’S TITLE. Lessor covenants that Lessee, on paying the rent and performing the covenants herein, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Premises. Lessor represents and warrants to Lessee as of the Effective Date and covenants during the Term that Lessor has full authority to enter into and execute this Agreement and that there are no liens, judgments, covenants, easements, restrictions or other impediments of title that will adversely affect Lessee’s Use. 18. ASSIGNMENT/SUBLETTING. Without any approval or consent of the other Party, this Agreement may be sold, assigned or transferred by either Party to (i) any entity in which the Party directly or indirectly holds an equity or similar interest; (ii) any entity which directly or indirectly holds an equity or similar interest in the Party; or (iii) any entity directly or indirectly under common control with the Party. Lessee may assign this Agreement to: (a) any entity which acquires all or substantially all of Lessee's assets in the market defined by the Federal Communications Commission in which the Property is located by reason of a 6 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

merger, acquisition or other business reorganization without any notice to, or approval or consent of, Lessor; or (b) a company that is engaged in the business of owning and/or operating communications towers (a "Tower Company") without prior written approval or consent of Lessor, provided Lessee shall provide Lessor written notice of any Tower Company assignment. As to other parties, this Agreement may not be sold, assigned or transferred without the written consent of the other Party, which such consent will not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. No change of stock ownership, partnership interest or control of Lessee or transfer upon partnership or corporate dissolution of either Party shall constitute an assignment hereunder. Lessee may sublease any portion of the Premises at its sole discretion, upon notice to Lessor. Any sublease that is entered into by Lessee shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement and shall be binding upon the successors, assigns, heirs and legal representatives of the respective Parties hereto. The term “Sublease”, “Sublet”, “Sublessee” and any other similar term shall apply to any situation by which Lessee allows a third party use of the Premises for co-location, whether it be by formal sublease, license or other agreement. All rights and responsibilities of Lessee set forth in this Agreement shall be enjoyed by and binding on any Sublessee. a. In the event Lessee subleases any portion of the Premises in accordance with this Agreement, Sublessee(s) shall pay ( ) per month to Lessor. Any Sublessee shall be instructed to pay the foregoing amount directly to Lessor. Lessee shall not be responsible to Lessor for the collection or payment of rents by the Sublessee to Lessor, and Lessee shall have no liability to Lessor in the event of failure of payment by Sublessee. In this event: (i) Lessee shall have no liability of any nature to Lessor for failure to sublet all or any part of the Premises to any or all potential Sublessee(s); and (ii) at Lessor’s request, Lessee will provide Lessor with a tri-party agreement to be executed by Lessee, Sublessee, and Lessor to confirm the direct payment obligation from Sublessee to Lessor and to indicate Lessor has been notified of the Sublease. b. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Lessee shall not be required to obtain approval from the Lessor for Subletting the Premises or part thereof. Lessee shall have the sole right to determine whether it will Sublet any portion of the Premises or whether it will Sublease to any specific Sublessee. c. If Lessee assigns this Agreement to a Tower Company which subsequently subleases any portion of the Premises, no sublease fee as described above shall be due and payable from the original Lessee for such Sublease(s). d. The rental provisions of this section shall not apply to any subletting for public emergency and/or safety systems purposes (i.e. police, ambulance and/or fire), that may be required or ordered by any governmental authority having jurisdiction over Lessee or the Premises. Lessee shall not be required to pay any amount to Lessor in connection with the subletting for public emergency and/or safety system purposes that may be required or ordered by any governmental authority having jurisdiction. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Lessee shall not be required to obtain any approval from Lessor for the subletting for public emergency and/or safety system purposes. 7 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

19. NOTICE. Except for notices permitted via telephone in accordance with Paragraph 13 or via electronic mail in accordance with Paragraph 2, all notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested or by commercial courier, provided the courier's regular business is delivery service and provided further that it guarantees delivery to the addressee by the end of the next business day following the courier's receipt from the sender, addressed as follows (or any other address that Lessee may have designated to Lessor by like notice, or that the Lessor may have designated to Lessee in the VLC Portal):

LESSOR:

Robby C. Villa Dina M. Villa 1222 Wildflower Drive Webster, New York 14580

LESSEE:

Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless Attn: Network Real Estate 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, New Jersey 07921

With a copy to:

Basking Ridge Mail Hub Attn

Legal Intake One Verizon Way Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920

Notice shall be effective upon actual receipt or refusal as shown on the receipt obtained pursuant to the foregoing. 20. SUBORDINATION AND NON-DISTURBANCE. Within 15 days of the Effective Date, Lessor shall obtain a Non-Disturbance Agreement (as defined below) and/or any required consent from existing mortgagee(s), ground lessors and master lessors, if any, of the Property. At Lessor's option, this Agreement shall be subordinate to any future master lease, ground lease, mortgage, deed of trust or other security interest (a “Mortgage”) by Lessor which from time to time may encumber all or part of the Property; provided, however, as a condition precedent to Lessee being required to subordinate its interest in this Agreement to any future Mortgage covering the Property, Lessor shall obtain for Lessee's benefit a non-disturbance and attornment agreement for Lessee's benefit in the form reasonably satisfactory to Lessee, and containing the terms described below (the “NonDisturbance Agreement”), and shall recognize Lessee's rights under this Agreement. The Non-Disturbance Agreement shall include the encumbering party's (“Lender's”) agreement that, if Lender or its successor-in-interest or any purchaser of Lender’s or its successor’s interest (a “Purchaser”) acquires an ownership interest in the Property, Lender or such successor-in-interest or Purchaser will honor all of the terms of the Agreement. Such NonDisturbance Agreement must be binding on all of Lender's participants in the subject loan (if any) and on all successors and assigns of Lender and/or its participants and on all Purchasers. In return for such Non-Disturbance Agreement, Lessee will execute an 8 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

agreement for Lender's benefit in which Lessee (i) confirms that the Agreement is subordinate to the Mortgage or other real property interest in favor of Lender, (ii) agrees to attorn to Lender if Lender becomes the owner of the Property, and (iii) agrees to accept a cure by Lender of any of Lessor's defaults, provided such cure is completed within the deadline applicable to Lessor. In the event Lessor defaults in the payment and/or other performance of any Mortgage or other real property interest encumbering the Property, Lessee, may, at its sole option and without obligation, cure or correct Lessor's default and upon doing so, Lessee shall be subrogated to any and all rights, titles, liens and equities of the holders of such Mortgage or other real property interest and Lessee shall be entitled to deduct and setoff against all rents or fees that may otherwise become due under this Agreement the sums paid by Lessee to cure or correct such defaults. 21. DEFAULT. It is a “Default” if (i) either Party fails to comply with this Agreement and does not remedy the failure within 30 days after written notice by the other Party or, if the failure cannot reasonably be remedied in such time, if the failing Party does not commence a remedy within the allotted 30 days and diligently pursue the cure to completion within 90 days after the initial written notice, or (ii) Lessor fails to comply with this Agreement and the failure interferes with Lessee’s Use and Lessor does not remedy the failure within 5 days after written notice from Lessee or, if the failure cannot reasonably be remedied in such time, if Lessor does not commence a remedy within the allotted 5 days and diligently pursue the cure to completion within 15 days after the initial written notice. The cure periods set forth in this Paragraph 21 do not extend the period of time in which either Party has to cure interference pursuant to Paragraph 13 of this Agreement. 22. REMEDIES. In the event of a Default, without limiting the non-defaulting Party in the exercise of any right or remedy which the non-defaulting Party may have by reason of such default, the non-defaulting Party may terminate this Agreement and/or pursue any remedy now or hereafter available to the non-defaulting Party under the laws or judicial decisions of the state in which the Property is located. Further, upon a Default, the nondefaulting Party may at its option (but without obligation to do so), perform the defaulting Party’s duty or obligation. The costs and expenses of any such performance by the nondefaulting Party shall be due and payable by the defaulting Party upon receipt of an itemized invoice. If Lessee undertakes any such performance on Lessor's behalf and Lessor does not pay Lessee the full undisputed amount within 30 days of its receipt of an itemized invoice setting forth the amount due, Lessee may offset the full undisputed amount due against all fees due and owing to Lessor under this Agreement until the full undisputed amount is fully reimbursed to Lessee. 23. ENVIRONMENTAL. Lessee shall conduct its business in compliance with all applicable laws governing the protection of the environment or employee health and safety (“EH&S Laws”). Lessee shall indemnify and hold harmless the Lessor from claims to the extent resulting from Lessee’s violation of any applicable EH&S Laws or to the extent that Lessee causes a release of any regulated substance to the environment. Lessor shall indemnify and hold harmless Lessee from all claims resulting from the violation of any applicable EH&S Laws or a release of any regulated substance to the environment except to the extent resulting from the activities of Lessee. The Parties recognize that Lessee is only leasing a small portion of the Property and that Lessee shall not be responsible for any environmental condition or issue except to the extent resulting from Lessee’s specific activities and responsibilities. In the event that Lessee encounters any hazardous substances 9 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

that do not result from its activities, Lessee may relocate its facilities to a mutually agreeable location to avoid such hazardous substances. Lessee may also, at its option (but without obligation to do so), remove at its own cost all or some of the hazardous substances or materials (such as soil) containing those hazardous substances, in which case, Lessor agrees to sign any necessary waste manifest associated with the removal, transportation and/or disposal of such substances. 24. CASUALTY. If a fire or other casualty damages the Property or the Premises and impairs Lessee’s Use, rent shall abate until Lessee’s Use is restored. If Lessee’s Use is not restored within 45 days, Lessee may terminate this Agreement. 25. CONDEMNATION. If a condemnation of any portion of the Property or Premises impairs Lessee’s Use, Lessee may terminate this Agreement. Lessee may on its own behalf make a claim in any condemnation proceeding involving the Premises for losses related to Lessee’s communications equipment, relocation costs and, specifically excluding loss of Lessee’s leasehold interest, any other damages Lessee may incur as a result of any such condemnation. 26. APPLICABLE LAWS. During the Term, Lessor shall maintain the Property in compliance with all applicable laws, EH&S Laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, directives, covenants, easements, consent decrees, zoning and land use regulations, and restrictions of record, permits, building codes, and the requirements of any applicable fire insurance underwriter or rating bureau, now in effect or which may hereafter come into effect (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act and laws regulating hazardous substances) (collectively “Laws”). Lessee shall, in respect to the condition of the Premises and at Lessee’s sole cost and expense, comply with (i) all Laws relating solely to Lessee’s specific and unique nature of use of the Premises; and (ii) all building codes requiring modifications to the Premises due to the improvements being made by Lessee in the Premises. It shall be Lessor’s obligation to comply with all Laws relating to the Property, without regard to specific use (including, without limitation, modifications required to enable Lessee to obtain all necessary building permits). 27. TAXES. If Lessor is required by law to collect any federal, state, or local tax, fee, or other governmental imposition (each, a “Tax”) from Lessee with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, then Lessor shall bill such Tax to Lessee in the manner and for the amount required by law, Lessee shall promptly pay such billed amount of Tax to Lessor, and Lessor shall remit such Tax to the appropriate tax authorities as required by law; provided, however, that Lessor shall not bill to or otherwise attempt to collect from Lessee any Tax with respect to which Lessee has provided Lessor with an exemption certificate or other reasonable basis for relieving Lessor of its responsibility to collect such Tax from Lessee. Except as provided in this Paragraph 27, Lessor shall bear the costs of all Taxes that are assessed against or are otherwise the legal responsibility of Lessor with respect to itself, its property, and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Lessee shall be responsible for all Taxes that are assessed against or are otherwise the legal responsibility of Lessee with respect to itself, its property, and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 28. NON-DISCLOSURE. The Parties agree that this Agreement and any information exchanged between the Parties regarding the Agreement are confidential. The 10 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

Parties agree not to provide copies of this Agreement or any other confidential information to any third party without the prior written consent of the other Party or as required by law. If a disclosure is required by law, prior to disclosure, the disclosing Party shall notify the nondisclosing Party and cooperate with the non-disclosing Party to take lawful steps to resist, narrow, or eliminate the need for that disclosure. 29. SIMILAR TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Lessor represents and warrants that the rent, benefits and terms and conditions granted to Lessee by Lessor hereunder are now and shall be, during the Term, no less favorable than the rent, benefits and terms and conditions for substantially the same or similar tenancies or licenses granted by Lessor to other parties. If at any time during the Term Lessor shall offer more favorable rent, benefits or terms and conditions for substantially the same or similar tenancies or licenses as those granted hereunder, then Lessor shall, within 30 days after the effective date of such offering, notify Lessee of such fact and offer Lessee the more favorable offering. If Lessee chooses, the Parties shall then enter into an amendment that shall be effective retroactively to the effective date of the more favorable offering, and shall provide the same rent, benefits or terms and conditions to Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to decline to accept the offering. Lessor’s compliance with this requirement shall be subject, at Lessee’s option, to independent verification. 30. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement contains all agreements, promises and understandings between Lessor and Lessee regarding this transaction, and no oral agreement, promises or understandings shall be binding upon either Lessor or Lessee in any dispute, controversy or proceeding. This Agreement may not be amended or varied except in a writing signed by all Parties. This Agreement shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns hereto. The failure of either Party to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to exercise any of its rights hereunder shall not waive such rights and such Party shall have the right to enforce such rights at any time. The performance of this Agreement shall be governed, interpreted, construed and regulated by the laws of the state in which the Premises is located without reference to its choice of law rules. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, nothing in this Agreement shall grant, suggest or imply any authority for one Party to use the name, trademarks, service marks or trade names of the other for any purpose whatsoever. Lessor agrees to execute a Memorandum of this Agreement, which Lessee may record with the appropriate recording officer. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, including written and electronic forms. All executed counterparts shall constitute one Agreement, and each counterpart shall be deemed an original. [Signature page follows]

11 4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAUDATE: NP/ September 2025

(Signature page to Land Lease Agreement)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is entered into by the Parties as of the Effective Date.

LESSOR:

Robby C. Villa Da Dina M. Villa Date:_....... /0 _ /2 _t ...;.+ '{/_2t:J _ U~--

I

LESSEE

Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Name:

-------------

Its

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

12 4927-9923-0570. l

- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - ·

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

4927-9923-0570.2

SITE NAME

Webster North (Candidate #2) MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317 LEGAL/DATE: NP / October 2025

EXHIBIT "B" PREMISES DESCRIPTION

4927-9923-0570.2

NORTH

100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN

FEDERAL WETLAND LIMITS (TYP) 100 YEAR FLOOD LIMIT LINE N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-43 BRESNAHAN, DANIEL M & MARY LYNNE

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-47 TOWN OF WEBSTER

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-77 MAYNARD, KAREN A

EXISTING BUILDING (TYP)

EXISTING 24" DIA. CULVERT

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-42

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-35

EXISTING 7'± DIA. CULVERT

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-34

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-33

NYSDEC WETLAND 100' BUFFER

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-32

APPROX. EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT

EXISTING SWALE

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-48 VILLA, ROBBY C & DINA M

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-31

NYSDEC INFORMATIONAL WETLANDS

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-30

NYSDEC WETLAND 100' BUFFER

N/F T.A. # 065.05-1-56

N/F T.A. # 065.09-1-7

N/F T.A. # 065.09-1-24

N/F

N/F T.A. # 065.09-1-8

APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY POLE RG&E 8R (POWER SOURCE) NOTES: 1. LESSOR SHALL GRANT THE NECESSARY LEASE PARCEL; INGRESS/ EGRESS AND UTILITY CABLING EASEMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED LESSEE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. THIS SITE LAYOUT (LEASE PARCEL AND EASEMENT LOCATIONS) MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT OF BOTH PARTIES (LESSEE & LESSOR), OR AS REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THE ZONING APPROVAL PROCESS.

GRAPHIC SCALE NO.

OWNER APPROVAL

SIGNATURE

DATE

Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture

Costich Engineering

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

THIS PLAN IS FOR EXHIBIT PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.

100

200

DATE 08/26/2025

COMMENT ISSUED FINAL

BY J.P.

( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 200 ft.

COPYRIGHT © 2025 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY . ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS/HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY", FOLLOWED BY HIS/HER SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.

TITLE OF PROJECT:

WEBSTER NORTH T/A #: 065.05-1-48 (TOWN OF WEBSTER, MONROE COUNTY) SITE ADDRESS: 1222 WILDFLOWER DRIVE WEBSTER, NEW YORK, 14580 PROPERTY OWNER: ROBBY C VILLA & DINA M VILLA 1222 WILDFLOWER DRIVE WEBSTER, NEW YORK 14580 TITLE OF DRAWING:

SCHEMATIC LEASE EXHIBIT C.E. JOB NUMBER:

9159.01

SHEET NUMBER:

LE001

EXHIBIT K

Webst erNor t h Phot o1 43. 23991200°N,77. 43068500°W

Vi ew t owar dssi t e bal l oonsat135’and155’ Vi ew W f r om MeadowwoodDr . 1756’f r om si t e

2/16/2026

9159. 01 Pr oj ectI D:

17592198

Webst erNor t h Phot o1 43. 23991200°N,77. 43068500°W

Phot osi mul at i onofpr oposed 135’monopol e Vi ew W f r om MeadowwoodDr . 1756’f r om si t e

2/16/2026

9159. 01 Pr oj ectI D:

17592198

Webst erNor t h Phot o2 43. 24223200°N,77. 43174800°W

Vi ew t owar dssi t e bal l oonsat135’and155’ Vi ew SW f r om Wi l df l owerDr . 1521’f r om si t e

2/16/2026

9159. 01 Pr oj ectI D:

17592198

Webst erNor t h Phot o2 43. 24223200°N,77. 43174800°W

Phot osi mul at i onofpr oposed 135’monopol e Vi ew SW f r om Wi l df l owerDr . 1521’f r om si t e

2/16/2026

9159. 01 Pr oj ectI D:

17592198

Webst erNor t h Phot o3 43. 24137600°N,77. 43934000°W

Vi ew t owar dssi t e bal l oonsat135’and155’ Vi ew SE f r om Br ookt r eeLn. 674’f r om si t e

2/16/2026

9159. 01 Pr oj ectI D:

17592198

Webst erNor t h Phot o3 43. 24137600°N,77. 43934000°W

Phot osi mul at i onofpr oposed 135’monopol e Vi ew SE f r om Br ookt r eeLn. 674’f r om si t e

2/16/2026

9159. 01 Pr oj ectI D:

17592198

Webst erNor t h Phot o4 43. 24041600°N,77. 44350800°W

Vi ew t owar dssi t e bal l oonsat135’and155’ Vi ew E f r om Appi anDr . 1668’f r om si t e

2/16/2026

9159. 01 Pr oj ectI D:

17592198

Webst erNor t h Phot o4 43. 24041600°N,77. 44350800°W

Phot osi mul at i onofpr oposed 135’monopol e Vi ew E f r om Appi anDr . 1668’f r om si t e

2/16/2026

9159. 01 Pr oj ectI D:

17592198

EXHIBIT L

EXHIBIT M

Network Engineering

UPNY 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 March 10, 2026 Town Board, Planning Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Webster 1000 Ridge Rd Webster, NY 14580 RE:

Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon’s application (the “Application”) to the Town of Webster (the “Town”) for site plan approval, special permit approval, and an area variance to construct and operate a 135ʹ wireless telecommunications facility (with 4ʹ lightning rod) on property located near 1222 Wildflower Drive (Tax Parcel No. 065.05-148) in the Town of Webster, Monroe County, New York (Verizon Wireless’ “Webster North” site)

Dear Members of the Town Board, Planning Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon (“Verizon”) agrees to remove the proposed wireless telecommunication facility and related improvements installed as part of the abovereferenced project within ninety (90) days if the facility becomes obsolete, damaged beyond use or ceases to be used for its intended purpose for a period of twelve (12) consecutive months. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (585) 321-5435. Sincerely, /s/ Kathleen Pomponio Kathleen Pomponio

4917-8827-3046.2

EXHIBIT N

Page 1 of 1 ULS License

AWS-3 (1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, and 2155-2180 MHz) License WQVN927 - Cellco Partnership Call Sign

WQVN927

Radio Service

AWS-3 (1695-1710 MHz, 17551780 MHz, and 2155-2180 MHz)

Status

Active

Auth Type

Regular

Market

BEA007 - Rochester, NY-PA

Channel Block

J

Submarket

Associated Frequencies (MHz)

001770.00000000-001780.00000000 002170.00000000-002180.00000000

Grant

04/08/2015

Expiration

04/08/2027

Effective

11/01/2016

Cancellation

04/08/2021

2nd

Market

Dates

Buildout Deadlines 1st

04/08/2027

Notification Dates 1st

2nd

Licensee FRN

0003290673

Type

General Partnership

Licensee Cellco Partnership 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory

Contact Cellco Partnership Licensing Manager 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory

Ownership and Qualifications Radio Service Type

Mobile

Regulatory Status

Common Carrier

Interconnected

Yes

Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits.

Demographics Race Ethnicity

Gender

4/4/2017

ULS License - PCS Broadband License - KNLH270 - Cellco Partnership

Page 1 of 1

ULS License

PCS Broadband License

KNLH270 - Cellco Partnership This license has pending applications: 0007966578 Call Sign

KNLH270

Radio Service

PCS Broadband

Status

Active

Auth Type

Regular

Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Service Provider (RSP) bidding credit?

Reserved Spectrum Reserved Spectrum

Market Market

BTA379 - Rochester, NY

Channel Block

F

Submarket

Associated Frequencies (MHz)

001890.00000000-001895.00000000 001970.00000000-001975.00000000

Grant

06/02/2017

Expiration

06/27/2027

Effective

06/02/2017

Cancellation

06/27/2002

2nd

06/04/2002

2nd

0003290673

Type

Dates

Buildout Deadlines 1st Notification Dates 1st

Licensee FRN

Joint Venture

Licensee Cellco Partnership 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory

Contact Cellco Partnership Licensing

Manager 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory

Ownership and Qualifications Radio Service Type

Mobile

Regulatory Status

Common Carrier

Interconnected

Yes

Alien Ownership Is the applicant a foreign government or the representative of any foreign government?

Is the applicant an alien or the representative of an alien?

Is the applicant a corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government?

Is the applicant a corporation of which more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned of record No or voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country? Is the applicant directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than oneYes fourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country? The Alien Ruling question is not answered.

Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits.

Demographics Race Ethnicity

Gender

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=10439&printable

11/16/2017

ULS License

700 MHz Upper Band (Block C) License - WQJQ689 - Cellco Partnership Page 1 of 1 ULS License

700 MHz Upper Band (Block C) License - WQJQ689 - Cellco Partnership This license has pending applications: 0008657811 Call Sign

WQJQ689

Radio Service

700 MHz Upper Band (Block C)

Status

Active

Auth Type

Regular

Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Service Provider (RSP) bidding credit?

Reserved Spectrum Reserved Spectrum

Market Market

REA001 - Northeast

Channel Block

C

Submarket

Associated Frequencies (MHz)

000746.00000000-000757.00000000 000776.00000000-000787.00000000

Grant

09/11/2019

Expiration

06/13/2029

Effective

09/11/2019

Cancellation

06/13/2013

2nd

06/13/2019

06/20/2013

2nd

06/17/2019

0003290673

Type

General Partnership

Dates

Buildout Deadlines 1st Notification Dates 1st

Licensee FRN Licensee Cellco Partnership 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory

Contact Verizon Wireless Licensing Manager 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory

Ownership and Qualifications Radio Service Type

Mobile

Regulatory Status

Common Carrier

Interconnected

Yes

Demographics Race Ethnicity

Gender

https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3060316&printable

9/30/2019

EXHIBIT O

Verizon Wireless Site Compliance Report Site name - Webster North Site Name: Site Address: Structure Type:

Report Date

Report Generated by: Customer Contact:

Webster North 1222 Wildflower Dr, Webster, NY, 14580 Monopole

Feb 01, 2026 Mamta Verma Tim Zarneke

Report Information

Compliance Statement Verizon Compliance Statement: Verizon wireless is compliant with FCC rules and regulations in all publicly accessible areas.

1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422

Contents 1.

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 3

Antenna Inventory................................................................................................................................................... 4

Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Appendix A

Reference Information ......................................................................................................................... 6

1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422

1. Executive Summary Verizon Wireless has contracted with Circet USA, an independent Radio Frequency consulting firm, to determine if the proposed telecommunications facility is in compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules and regulations regarding RF exposure as defined in 47 CFR § 1.1307(b) and 1.1310. This document and the conclusions herein are based on the information provided by representatives of Verizon Wireless which is assumed to be true and correct. All information used in this report was analyzed to determine compliance in publicly accessible areas, in particular at ground level. The analysis evaluates the telecommunications facility with respect to the General Population/Uncontrolled Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Circet USA has taken into consideration the Verizon Wireless antenna system as well as any existing antenna systems at the subject location. Verizon Wireless final antenna count is (12) antenna. Based on the analysis, Circet USA has determined that: Verizon Wireless is compliant in all publicly accessible areas with the FCC rules and regulations governing human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields as described in 47 CFR § 1.1307(b) and 1.1310. With the proposed Verizon Wireless antenna configuration in service, the composite exposure from this facility in all areas at ground level will be less than 1% of the General Population MPE limit, or over 100 times less than the maximum allowed exposure in publicly accessible areas.

1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422

2. Antenna Inventory The table below contains data provided by Verizon Wireless representatives and/or gathered by Circet USA personnel. This data was used to perform the RF exposure analysis. Antenna manufacturer

Antenna model

Verizon

Samsung

MT6413-77A UE Beam Envelope

132.8

4GHz

21.3

254.2

23.35

54973.07

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 700

9.3

15.05

2559.12

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 850

8.4

15.45

2806.01

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

PCS1900

4.5

160

17.85

9752.59

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 700

9.3

15.05

2559.12

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 850

8.4

15.45

2806.01

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 2100

4.5

235.2

17.85

14336.31

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

WCDMA2100

4.5

160

17.85

9752.59

Verizon

Samsung

RT4423-48AB

133.6

3.5GHz

18.2

15.89

10.37

172.99

Verizon

Samsung

MT6413-77A UE Beam Envelope

130

132.8

4GHz

21.3

254.2

23.35

54973.07

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 700

9.3

15.05

2559.12

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 850

8.4

15.45

2806.01

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

PCS1900

4.5

160

17.85

9752.59

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 700

9.3

15.05

2559.12

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 850

8.4

15.45

2806.01

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

LTE 2100

4.5

235.2

17.85

14336.31

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

130

WCDMA2100

4.5

160

17.85

9752.59

Verizon

Samsung

RT4423-48AB

130

133.6

3.5GHz

18.2

15.89

10.37

172.99

Verizon

Samsung

MT6413-77A UE Beam Envelope

250

132.8

4GHz

21.3

254.2

23.35

54973.07

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

250

130

LTE 700

9.3

15.05

2559.12

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

250

130

LTE 850

8.4

15.45

2806.01

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

250

130

PCS1900

4.5

160

17.85

9752.59

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

250

130

LTE 700

9.3

15.05

2559.12

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

250

130

LTE 850

8.4

15.45

2806.01

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

250

130

LTE 2100

4.5

235.2

17.85

14336.31

Verizon

JMA Wireless

MX06FHG865-HG

250

130

WCDMA2100

4.5

160

17.85

9752.59

Verizon

Samsung

RT4423-48AB

250

133.6

3.5GHz

18.2

15.89

10.37

172.99

Ant ID

Owner

1 2

Mech. Tilt (°) Azimuth (°) Height (ft) Frequency band

Elec. Tilt Total power HBW (°) VBW (°) Gain (dBd) ERP (Watts) (°) (Watts)

Notes

Each row with the same number in the Antenna ID column references the same physical antenna. Power values provided by the client and used in the analysis may be greater than what is initially deployed. 80% TDD Duty Cycle and 100% FDD Duty Cycle are used.

1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422

3. Analysis Circet USA has included the Verizon Wireless antenna system at the subject location in the analysis. All existing and proposed antennas are listed in the antenna table above. Engineering assumptions were used when specific antenna or operating parameter information was not available for the other existing collocated antennas (if applicable). Using this data, software modeling using IXUS software was performed for all transmitting antennas located at the site. Circet USA has assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to determine the maximum potential RF energy density at ground level. Circet USA believes this to be a worst‐case analysis based on the best available data. As stated previously, based on this analysis, the calculated ground level exposure from the Verizon Wireless antenna system alone is less than 1% of the General Population MPE limit. Keep in mind that the FCC did not arbitrarily establish their own standards but rather adopted the recommendations of national and international organizations such as the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). These recommendations were developed by expert scientists and engineers following extensive evaluation of the potential biological effects from RF exposure. The FCC MPE limits are based on thresholds for known adverse effects, and they were designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. There is a safety factor of 50 built into the General Public MPE limits, and the predicted Verizon Wireless exposure levels are over 100 times below these very conservative limits. In cases where such compliance exists, the subject of electromagnetic field safety is preempted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which states: “No state or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the (Federal Communication) Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.” The graph below provides a visual depiction of the rather insignificant electromagnetic field exposure contribution from the Verizon Wireless antenna system out to a distance of 500’ from the base of the structure. This portrays how low the Verizon Wireless contribution is when compared to the General Population MPE limit.

1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422

4. Appendix A: Reference Information FCC Rules & Regulations All information used in this report was analyzed as a percentage of the MPE limits as detailed in 47 CFR § 1.1310. The calculated power density at each sample point divided by the limit at each calculated frequency provides a result in % MPE. Summing the calculated % MPE from all contributors provides accumulative % MPE at a particular sample point. Wireless carriers use different frequency bands with varying MPE limits; therefore, it is useful to report results in terms of % MPE as opposed to power density. All results were compared to the FCC radio frequency exposure rules as detailed in 47 CFR § 1.1307(b) to determine compliance with the MPE limits for General Population/Uncontrolled environments as defined below: Two Classifications for Exposure Limits Occupational – Applies to situations in which persons are “exposed as a consequence of their employment” and are “fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure”.

Environment Classification Controlled

Applies to environments that are restricted or “controlled” in order to prevent access from members of the General Population classification.

General Population

Applies to situations in which persons are “exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure”. Generally speaking, those without significant and documented RF Safety & Awareness training would be in the General Population classification.

Uncontrolled

Applies to environments that are unrestricted or “uncontrolled” that allow access from members of the General Population classification.

1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422

The MPE limits defined in 47 CFR § 1.1310 and utilized in this analysis are outlined in the table and diagram below: Frequency Range (MHz) 0.3-3.0 3.0-30 30-300 300-1500 1500-100,000 Frequency Range (MHz) 0.3-1.34 1.34-30 30-300 300-1500 1500-100,000

Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Electric Field Magnetic Field Power Density Strength Strength (S) (E) (V/m) (H) (A/m) (mW/cm2) 614 1.63 (100)* 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 61.4 0.163 1.0 ‐‐f/300 ‐‐5 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure Electric Field Magnetic Field Power Density Strength Strength (S) (E) (V/m) (H) (A/m) (mW/cm2) 614 1.63 (100)* 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 27.5 0.073 0.2 ‐‐f/1500 ‐‐1.0 f = frequency in MHz * = Plane‐wave equivalent power density

Averaging Time |E|2, |H|2, or S (minutes) 6 6 6 6 6 Averaging Time |E|2, |H|2, or S (minutes) 30 30 30 30 30

1777 Sentry Parkway W. Building 11 • Suite 201 Blue Bell • PA • 19422

EXHIBIT P

BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS LLC d/b/a

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture

Costich Engineering

SITE NAME

WEBSTER NORTH ZONING DRAWINGS

NO.

TAX MAP NUMBER:

065.05-1-48 (14.2 ACRES PER COUNTY GIS)

ZONING DISTRICT

TOWER SETBACK REQ.:

R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) HEIGHT OF TOWER = 139'± (185'± PROVIDED)

LATITUDE

LONGITUDE: BASE ELEVATION:

43.240323° (N43° 14' 25.16") -77.437244° (W77° 26' 14.08") 348.8'±

STRUCTURE HEIGHT & TYPE:

PER REF. #9

135'± MONOPOLE TOWER

PROPOSED ANT. CENTERLINE

130' ± AGL PROPOSED ANT. TIP HEIGHT: 134' ± AGL HIGHEST APPURTENANCE:

139' ± AGL (PROPOSED LIGHTNING ROD)

PROPERTY OWNER:

ROBBY C. & DINA M. VILLA 1222 WILDFLOWER DRIVE WEBSTER, NEW YORK 14580

APPLICANT:

BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS, LLC d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS 1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE 100 WEST HENRIETTA, NY 14586 CONTACT: KATHY POMPONIO PHONE: (585) 236-3307

IMPERIAL DRIVE MILL CREEK

}

LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE

DISTURBANCE IN NYSDEC WETLAND ADJACENT AREA:

VA100 VA101 VA110

SCHEMATIC TOTAL HOLDINGS SURVEY PLAN SURVEY NOTES AND DESCRIPTIONS

2 2 2

01/22/2026 01/22/2026 01/22/2026

CA100 CA110 CA120 CA200

OVERALL SITE PLAN COMPOUND PLAN GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN TOWER ELEVATION AND ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN

2 2 2 2

01/22/2026 01/22/2026 01/22/2026 01/22/2026

CA500 CA501 CA502 CA503

EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS SITE DETAILS GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL DETAILS GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL DETAILS

2 2 2 2

01/22/2026 01/22/2026 01/22/2026 01/22/2026

Before You Dig, Drill Or Blast!

Dig Safely. New York UNDERGROUND FACILITIES PROTECTIVE ORGANIZATION CALL US TOLL FREE 1-800-962-7962 NY industrial code rule 753 requires no less than two working days notice, but not more than ten days notice.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 22"x34" FULL SIZE AND 11"x17" HALF SIZE. OTHER SIZED VERSIONS ARE NOT PRINTED TO THE SCALE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS, EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME.

SCOPE OF WORK 1.

0.08± ACRES

C

ER

D.A.W.

PR

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

T.K.W.

COPYRIGHT 2026 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

DIG SAFELY - NEW YORK

0.39± ACRES

HA

I NE

TBD TBD TBD

TE EL O R I T Y

NG

FIBER PROVIDER

PLANNER: FIBER CONTACT:

A

01/22/2026 01/22/2026 01/22/2026

RG&E TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

C

2 2 2

ELECTRIC PROVIDER

NOTIFICATION #: ACCOUNT #: WORK ORDER #: PLANNER: PHONE:

ST

MONROE

REVISION DATE

MI

COUNTY:

TITLE SHEET GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES

REV NO

E

NORTH

GA001 GA002 GA003

DESCRIPTION

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

K OR I E

TOWN OF WEBSTER

ISSUED FINAL

ED

MUNICIPALITY:

2 01/22/2026 EGF

NS

WILDFLOWER DRIVE

SHEET #

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

L I CE

WEBSTER ROAD (ROUTE 250)

SITE

NEAR 1222 WILDFLOWER DRIVE WEBSTER, NEW YORK 14580

1 01/08/2026 EGF

UTILITY PROVIDERS

SHEET INDEX

SITE ADDRESS:

COMMENTS

H

SITE INFORMATION N

DATE

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

VICINITY MAP

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

THE PROPOSED WORK CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF AN UNMANNED WIRELESS FACILITY WITH ASSOCIATED UTILITIES.

IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS/ HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY", FOLLOWED BY HIS/ HER SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.

SITE INFORMATION

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

TITLE SHEET C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 GA001

WALL ROAD Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Microsoft, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map layer by Esri Powered by Esri

EXISTING WATER MAIN, VALVE, & HYDRANT.

W

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, & MANHOLE.

S

EXISTING DRAINAGE SEWER, FIELD INLET, INLET MANHOLE, MANHOLE, & END SECTION.

D OH

OH

EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES

T

EXISTING TELEPHONE

UG

G

EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES EXISTING GAS

E

EXISTING ELECTRIC

W

EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING ELEC & TELE

CATV

EXISTING CABLE TV

F

EXISTING FIBER

LC

EXISTING LIGHT CONTROL

DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FINISH SURFACES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SPACING BETWEEN EQUIPMENT IS REQUIRED CLEARANCE. THEREFORE, IT IS CRITICAL TO FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS. SHOULD THERE BE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, EXISTING CONDITIONS AND/OR DESIGN INTENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING A CLARIFICATION FROM THE CARRIER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT JOB DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS, AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE WORK.

410

BARBED WIRE,STOCKADE, CHAIN LINKED FENCE EXISTING CONTOUR

x 420.4

EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION @ X

CONCRETE PAD/ CONCRETE SIDEWALK

H

WV

W

D

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE. PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB Y

W

S D OH

OH

UG

PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

G

PROPOSED GAS SERVICE

E

PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE

E&F

PROPOSED ELECTRIC AND FIBER

SF

PROPOSED SILT FENCE

OS

PROPOSED ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE

LOD

PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE

CFS

PROPOSED COMPOST FILTER SOCK

ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES.

CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK USING THE BEST CONSTRUCTION SKILLS AND ATTENTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, PROCEDURES, AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER CONTRACT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ERECTION SHALL BE DONE IN A WORKMANLIKE MANNER BY COMPETENT EXPERIENCED WORKMEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND THE BEST ACCEPTED PRACTICE. ALL MEMBERS SHALL BE LAID PLUMB AND TRUE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.

THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, FERTILIZED, SEEDED, AND COVERED WITH MULCH. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STATE GUIDELINES AND ANY LOCAL REGULATIONS.

11. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO RETAIN NATURAL GROWTH AND PREVENT DAMAGE TO TREES WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIFIED WORK AREAS CAUSED BY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS. ANY DAMAGE TO THIS NATURAL GROWTH SHALL BE RESTORED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR.

MAP ENTITLED "MILL CREEK ESTATES - SECTION VII", PREPARED BY HERSHEY, MALONE & ASSOCIATES, DATED MARCH 30, 1977, AND IS ON FILE AT THE MONROE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE AS LIBER 203 OF MAPS PAGE 90.

15. MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING SURFACES, EQUIPMENT, IMPROVEMENTS, PIPING, ANTENNA AND ANTENNA CABLES. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURS DURING CONSTRUCTION.

COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE PREPARED BY STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DATED OCTOBER 15, 2025, HAVING TITLE NO. 71345660.

PER THE NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAPS, THERE ARE FEDERAL WETLANDS NEAR THE PROJECT AREA IN ASSOCIATION WITH MILL CREEK (CLASS C STREAM).

TOP RAIL AND BRACE RAIL SHALL BE 1 5/8" NOMINAL O.D. PIPE CONFORMING WITH ASTM F-1083.

"WETLAND AND WATERBODIES DELINEATION REPORT" PREPARED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C., SITE NAME: WEBSTER NORTH, THERE ARE FEDERAL WETLANDS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA.

PER THE ERSI/FEMA PROJECT IMPACT HAZARD INFORMATION AND AWARENESS SITE MAP, THERE IS A 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN IN ASSOCIATION WITH MILL CREEK (CLASS C STREAM) IN THE PROJECT AREA, WITH AN ELEVATION OF 326'± AMSL.

1A CERTIFICATION PREPARED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C., PROJECT NO. 9159.01, SITE NAME: WEBSTER NORTH, DATED NOVEMBER 24, 2025.

TENSION WIRE SHALL BE 7 GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL.

THE GATE LATCH SHALL BE THE MALLEABLE IRON FORK TYPE AS MANUFACTURED BY PAGE WILSON AS THEIR TYPE 75 GATE LATCH ASSEMBLY, OR EQUAL. PAD LOCKS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER.

FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F-567 AND GATES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F-900.

19. CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE ALL NECESSARY BUILDING PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS AND PAY ALL REQUIRED FEES.

23. RIGGING OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY REGULATIONS (OSHA). COSTICH ENGINEERING, CARRIER AND THE OWNER SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT FOLLOW SUCH SAFETY REGULATIONS. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE SITE AND ASSIST THE RADIO EQUIPMENT VENDOR AND THE ANTENNA INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR AS THEY MAY REQUIRE.

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

2 01/22/2026 EGF

ISSUED FINAL

10. ANTENNAS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SITE SPECIFIC RF ANTENNA DESIGN SHEET SUPPLIED BY VERIZON WIRELESS: PROJECT ID: 17592198, DATED 10/21/2025. 11. "CULVERT RETROFIT" PLAN PREPARED BY HERRICK-SAYLOR ENGINEERS D.P.C., DATED 12/19/2025. 12. NYSDEC BASIC WETLANDS GENERAL PERMIT, GP-0-25-003 DEC ID:8-2654-00684/00001 DATED 12/22/2025; (PERMIT FOR DISTURBANCE WITHIN 100' WETLANDS ADJACENT AREA); PERMIT COVERAGE 12/22/2025 - 12/31/2027

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

TE EL O R I T Y

ED

PER THE NYSDEC ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MAPPER, THERE ARE POTENTIALLY WETLANDS LOCATED NEAR THE PROJECT AREA. THE INFORMATIONAL FRESHWATER WETLAND MAPPING LAYER IS ONLY INTENDED TO BE USED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES IN IDENTIFYING THE GENERAL LOCATION AND EXTENT OF FRESHWATER WETLAND AREAS OF ANY SIZE THROUGHOUT THE STATE. INFORMATIONAL FRESHWATER WETLAND MAPPING IS NOT REGULATORY.

1 01/08/2026 EGF

HA

C

NS

BOUNDARY SURVEY HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING. BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS APPROXIMATE AND DETERMINED BY LIMITED FIELD LOCATION OF BOUNDARY EVIDENCE, REVIEW OF TITLE COMMITMENT, IF PROVIDED, AND OVERLAY OF COUNTY TAX MAPS AND/OR COUNTY GIS MAPPING.

16. REPAIR ALL EXISTING SURFACES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SUCH THAT THEY MATCH AND BLEND WITH ADJACENT SURFACES.

22. COMPLETE JOB SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY CARRIER. ANY WORK, MATERIALS, OR EQUIPMENT FOUND TO BE DEFECTIVE DURING THAT PERIOD SHALL BE CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY UPON WRITTEN NOTIFICATION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO CARRIER.

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

L I CE

18. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF ANY MATERIAL. ANY UNUSUAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER.

TIE WIRE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: a) AT POSTS, RAILS, AND WHERE NECESSARY ON GATE FRAMES: MINIMUM 11 GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL SPACED AT NOT LESS THAN 14" ON CENTER. b) AT TENSION WIRES: BY HOG RINGS SPACED AT NOT LESS THAN 24" ON CENTER.

COMMENTS

H

14. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE.

LINE POSTS SHALL BE 2" NOMINAL O.D. SCHEDULE 40 STEEL PIPE CONFORMING WITH ASTM F-1083.

DATE

PITTSFORD CORS STATION -LATITUDE

43-05-35.48461 (N) NAD 83 (CORS) -LONGITUDE: 077-31-31.11244 (W) -ELLIP HEIGHT: 113.481 METERS NAVD 88 (CORS)

13. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN LIABILITY INSURANCE TO PROTECT THE OWNER AND CARRIER.

21. ALL BROCHURES, OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS, CATALOGS, SHOP DRAWINGS AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE TURNED OVER TO CARRIER AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.

NO.

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN FROM A FIELD SURVEY BY COSTICH ENGINEERING ON 11/4/2025 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DATA OBTAINED THROUGH NYSDOT CORS NETWORK REFERENCED TO THE FOLLOWING MONUMENT:

FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE 9 GAUGE WIRE SIZE, 2" MESH CHAIN LINK FENCE CONFORMING WITH ASTM A-392.

Costich Engineering

REFERENCES

Landscape Architecture

13. IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGES AN EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE CAUSING AN INTERRUPTION IN SAID SERVICE, HE SHALL IMMEDIATELY COMMENCE WORK TO RESTORE SERVICE AND MAY NOT CONTINUE HIS WORK OPERATION UNTIL SERVICE IS RESTORED.

12. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING HIS WORK WITH THE WORK OF OTHERS AS IT MAY RELATE TO RADIO EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS AND ANY OTHER PORTIONS OF THE WORK.

20. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-A/10-BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE BUILDOUT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION.

Land Surveying

12. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION SHALL BE RESTORED BY THE CONTRACTOR.

17. KEEP CONTRACT AREA CLEAN, HAZARD FREE, AND DISPOSE OF ALL DEBRIS AND RUBBISH. EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER SHALL BE REMOVED. LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL ITEMS UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.

GATE FRAMES SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM 1 1/2" NOMINAL O.D. PIPE CONFORMING WITH ASTM F-1083.

Civil Engineering

ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER.

CORNER POSTS, PULL POSTS, AND END POSTS SHALL BE 3" NOMINAL O.D., SCHEDULE 40, STEEL PIPE CONFORMING WITH ASTM F-1083. GATE POSTS SHALL BE 4" NOMINAL O.D., SCHEDULE 40, STEEL PIPE CONFORMING WITH ASTM F-1083 AND MAY BE UTILIZED FOR SINGLE GATE OPENING WIDTHS OF 6 FEET OR LESS AND FOR DOUBLE GATE OPENING WIDTHS OF 12 FEET OR LESS.

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

K OR I E

FENCING NOTES 1.

PROPOSED OVERHEAD UTILITIES

UG

THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION.

10. ALL RESTORATION ISSUES SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK ACTIVITY OR WITHIN A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME AS DIRECTED BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/ENGINEER.

11. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK AND SCHEDULE HIS ACTIVITIES AND WORKING HOURS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER.

PROPOSED FIBER

CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ALL PRODUCTS OR ITEMS NOTED AS "EXISTING" WHICH ARE NOT FOUND TO BE IN THE FIELD.

PROPOSED DRAINAGE SEWER, FIELD INLET, INLET MANHOLE, MANHOLE, & END SECTION. F

NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT.

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, & MANHOLE.

F

10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF THE WORK AREA, ADJACENT AREAS, AND BUILDING OCCUPANTS THAT ARE LIKELY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS.

PROPOSED WATER MAIN, VALVE, & HYDRANT.

THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE PROPOSED PLATFORM.

CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE CLARIFICATION IN WRITING, AND SHALL RECEIVE IN WRITING AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED BEFORE STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEMS NOT CLEARLY DEFINED OR IDENTIFIED BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.

EXISTING SWALE ,

EXISTING GUARD RAIL TREE,HEDGE,EDGE OF WOODS

PLANS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED. THESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE A DIAGRAMMATIC OUTLINE ONLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR NECESSARY TO EFFECT ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.

RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY.

D.A.W.

ER

WV

W

I NE

EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXIST. EDGE OF GRAVEL

ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.

PR

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

NG

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE. EXIST. CONCRETE CURB

CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE AND FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED WORK AND MAKE PROVISIONS AS TO THE COST THEREOF. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FAMILIARIZING HIMSELF WITH ALL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, FIELD CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AND CONFIRMING THAT THE WORK MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.

E

ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC), 2020 BUILDING CODE OF NEW YORK STATE, THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC SAFETY CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL CODES..

A

C

SECTION/PARCEL BOUNDARY MIN. BUILDING SETBACK CENTER LINE EXIST. RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE

SITE NOTES

ST

GENERAL NOTES

MI

LEGEND

T.K.W.

COPYRIGHT 2026 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C. IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LAND SURVEYOR, ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS/ HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY", FOLLOWED BY HIS/ HER SIGNATURE AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION, TO THE DOCUMENT.

SITE INFORMATION

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

STRUCTURAL NOTES 1.

PROPOSED TOWER AND FOUNDATION TO BE ANALYZED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

THE VERIFICATION OF STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY AND DESIGN OF THE ATTACHMENTS MUST BE PERFORMED, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ANTENNA SUPPORTS SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI/TIA-222-H-2017 "STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES, ANTENNAS AND SMALL WIND TURBINE SUPPORT STRUCTURES".

GENERAL NOTES C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 GA002

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES

SOIL AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION ENTRAPMENT AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT KEY LOCATIONS TO INTERCEPT AND CLARIFY SILT LADEN RUNOFF FROM THE SITE.

GENERAL MEASURES:

SILT FENCES AND COMPOST FILTER SOCKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND ALL STOCKPILES OF FILL, TOPSOIL AND EXCAVATED OVERBURDEN THAT ARE TO REMAIN FOR PERIODS LESS THAN 30 DAYS. SILT FENCES AND COMPOST FILTER SOCKS SHALL BE ANCHORED AND MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME AS STOCKPILES ARE REMOVED AND STOCKPILING AREAS ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.

7. DISTANCES SHOWN FROM THE WETLANDS IF ANY ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM SEPARATION PERMITTED BETWEEN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND BOUNDARY OF THE WETLANDS.

TOPSOIL AND FILL THAT IS TO REMAIN STOCKPILED ON-SITE FOR PERIODS GREATER THAN 30 DAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SEEDING. PRIOR TO THE SEEDING OPERATION, THE STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE GRADED AS NEEDED AND FEASIBLE TO PERMIT THE USE OF CONVENTIONAL EQUIPMENT FOR SEEDBED PREPARATION, SEEDING, MULCH APPLICATION AND MULCH ANCHORING.

6. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SILT FENCE OR COMPOST FILTER SOCKS DOWNSLOPE OF ALL UTILITY TRENCHES.

7.1.

7.2.

IN NO CASE SHALL ERODIBLE MATERIALS BE STOCKPILED WITH 25 FEET OF ANY DITCH, STREAM, OR OTHER SURFACE WATER BODY.

AREA OF DISTURBANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY INSTALLING ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND THE ENTIRE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AREA. EXCEPT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE MITIGATION PLANTINGS, NO ENCROACHMENT BEYOND THESE LIMITS BY WORKERS OR MACHINERY SHALL BE PERMITTED. GRADING AND CLEARING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACTIVITIES SHALL TAKE PLACE ONLY WITHIN THE DELINEATED AREA OF DISTURBANCE LINES. THESE AREAS OF DISTURBANCE LINES REPRESENT THE MAXIMUM LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EVERY ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE TO FURTHER REDUCE GRADING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE LINES BY MAINTAINING NATURAL VEGETATION AND TOPOGRAPHY WHEREVER PRACTICABLE.

PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES 7.3. 1.

PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER

IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OR WHERE WORK IS DELAYED AND WILL NOT BE DISTURBED FOR 21 DAYS OR MORE IN ANY PORTION OF THE SITE. PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY VEGETATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN 14 DAYS ON ALL EXPOSED SOILS. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SOON AS PRACTICAL FOLLOWING DISTURBANCE TO STABILIZE BARE SOIL AND PROMOTE THE PROMPT RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION. A. AN ADEQUATE SEEDBED SHALL BE PREPARED BY SCARIFYING COMPACTED SOIL AND REMOVING SURFACE DEBRIS AND OBSTACLES.

THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL RETAINED BY THE APPLICANT SHALL, ON AT LEAST A WEEKLY BASIS, PRIOR TO ANY PREDICTED RAIN EVENT AND AFTER RUNOFF-PRODUCING RAIN EVENT, INSPECT THE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES TO ENSURE THEIR PROPER FUNCTIONING.

D. DISTURBED AREAS WHICH WILL REMAIN TEMPORARILY FALLOW FOR PERIODS GREATER THAN 14 DAYS SHALL BE SEEDED AT THE FOLLOWING RATE TO PRODUCE TEMPORARY GROUND COVER: 30 LBS RYEGRASS (ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL) PER ACRE. DURING THE WINTER, USE 100 LBS CERTIFIED "AROOSTOCK" WINTER RYE (CEREAL RYE) PER ACRE.

7.7.

ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND ANY OTHER REQUIRED UTILITY APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED BY TOWN SPECIFICATIONS AND AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.

E. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED ON 4" MIN. TOPSOIL AT THE FOLLOWING RATE FOR ROUGH OR OCCASIONAL MOWING AREAS: 8 LBS EMPIRE BIRDSFOOT TIREFOIL OR COMMON WHITE CLOVER PER ACRE. 20 LBS TALL FESCUE PER ACRE PLUS 2 LBS REDTOP OR 5 LBS RYEGRASS (PERENNIAL) PER ACRE

7.8.

IF THE APPLICANT, DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, ENCOUNTERS SUCH CONDITIONS AS FLOOD AREAS, UNDERGROUND WATER, SOFT OR SILTY AREAS, IMPROPER DRAINAGE, OR OTHER UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS THAT WERE NOT FORESEEN IN THE ORIGINAL PLANNING, THEY SHALL REPORT SUCH CONDITIONS IMMEDIATELY TO THE TOWN ENGINEER. THE APPLICANT MAY SUBMIT, IF THEY SO DESIRE, THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AS THE SPECIAL TREATMENT TO BE GIVEN SUCH AREAS TO SECURE ADEQUATE, PERMANENT AND SATISFACTORY CONSTRUCTION. THE TOWN ENGINEER, WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY, SHALL INVESTIGATE THE CONDITION OR CONDITIONS, AND SHALL EITHER APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S RECOMMENDATION TO CORRECT THE CONDITIONS, ORDER A MODIFICATION THEROF, OR ISSUE THEIR OWN SPECIFICATION FOR THE CORRECTION OF THE CONDITIONS. IN THE EVENT OF THE APPLICANT'S DISAGREEMENT WITH THE DECISION OF THE TOWN ENGINEER, OR IN THE EVENT OF A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE RESULTING TO THE SITE PLAN OR ANY CHANGE THAT INVOLVES WETLAND REGULATED AREAS, THE MATTER SHALL BE DECIDED BY THE PLANNING BOARD. ANY SUCH CONDITIONS OBSERVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD OR ITS AGENTS SHALL BE SIMILARLY TREATED.

FOR MOWED AREAS

65 LBS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS PER ACRE 65 LBS RYEGRASS (PERENNIAL) PER ACRE F. ALL SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING THE BROADCAST METHOD OR HYDROSEEDING, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. G. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED SUBSEQUENT TO SEEDING BY APPLYING 2 TONS OF STRAW MULCH PER ACRE. STRAW MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED BY APPLYING 750 LBS OF WOOD FIBER MULCH PER ACRE WITH A HYDROSEEDER, OR TUCKING THE MULCH WITH SMOOTH DISCS OR OTHER MULCH ANCHORING TOOLS TO A DEPTH OF 3". MULCH ANCHORING TOOLS SHALL BE PULLED ACROSS SLOPES ALONG TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS. 2.

ALL UNNECESSARY REMOVAL OF HEALTHY TREES SHALL BE AVOIDED. MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE STORED NOR MACHINERY OPERATED WITHIN THE DRIP-LINE OF THE TREES TO REMAIN.

MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES: 1.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ON A DAILY BASIS INSPECT AND MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY AND FUNCTION OF ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.

TO ASSURE PROPER FUNCTION, SILTATION BARRIERS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION AND REINFORCED, EXTENDED, REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS NECESSARY. WASHOUTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPAIRED, RE-SEEDED AND PROTECTED FROM FURTHER EROSION.

SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES ABOUT 0.5 FEET DEEP AT THE FENCE AND FROM BEHIND THE COMPOST FILTER SOCKS ONCE IT REACHES 1/2 THE FILTER SOCK HEIGHT. THE SEDIMENT FENCE AND COMPOST FILTER SOCKS SHALL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN BARRIER.

ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE VEGETATIVE PLAN IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A VIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER.

DATE

COMMENTS

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

1 01/08/2026 EGF

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

2 01/22/2026 EGF

ISSUED FINAL

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

TE EL O R I T Y H

7.6.

NO.

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

HA

C

K OR I E

ALL SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY SITE WORK. THE TOWN ENGINEER SHALL HAVE INSPECTED THE INSTALLATION OF ALL REQUIRED SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO THE AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH ANY PHASE OF THE SITE WORK (IF REQUIRED).

Costich Engineering

ED

7.5.

Landscape Architecture

NS

PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK, THE APPLICANT SHALL STAKE THE LOCATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR INSPECTION AND APPROVAL BY THE TOWN ENGINEER (IF REQUIRED).

Land Surveying

L I CE

7.4.

B. LIME SHALL BE APPLIED SUFFICIENTLY TO ATTAIN A SOIL ACIDITY pH OF 6.0 TO 7.0. C. FERTILIZER (5-10-10 MIXTURE OR EQUIVALENT) SHALL BE APPLIED PER SOIL TEST RESULTS OR AT A RATE OF 600 LBS PER ACRE.

ALL CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED-ACTIVITIES OCCURRING ON THIS SITE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NEW YORK STATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.

Civil Engineering

D.A.W.

ER

5. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCE AND/ OR COMPOST FILTER SOCKS) AROUND AREAS BEING DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AS NECESSARY.

I NE

DRAINAGE DITCH SEDIMENT FILTERS

DITCHES, SHALL RECEIVE CHECK DAMS WITH 2-9 INCH STONE MEETING NYS-DOT LIGHT STONE FILL REQUIREMENTS SO AS TO EFFECTIVELY TRAP SEDIMENT AND MINIMIZE ITS RELEASE OFF-SITE. CHECK DAMS SHALL HAVE A 9" MINIMUM WEIR AND BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN EACH DITCH BEGINNING AT ITS DOWNSTREAM TERMINUS. CHECK DAMS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE CHANNEL SO THAT THE CREST OF THE DOWNSTREAM DAM IS AT THE ELEVATION OF THE TOE OF THE UPSTREAM DAM.

PR

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

NG

4. ALL SEDIMENTATION ENTRAPMENT STRUCTURES WILL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED ON A REGULAR BASIS.

E

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

A

PARTICULAR MEASURES:

3. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE AFFECTED AREAS REGRADED, OR TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED SITE PLANS.

C

SITE PREPARATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PLANNED TO MINIMIZE THE SCOPE AND DURATION OF SOIL DISRUPTION.

2. SILT THAT LEAVES THE SITE IN SPITE OF THE REQUIRED PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE COLLECTED AND REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY APPROPRIATE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES.

ST

AS MUCH AS IS PRACTICAL, EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BE PRESERVED. FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN ANY PORTION OF THE SITE, PERMANENT VEGETATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL EXPOSED SOILS.

MI

T.K.W.

SITE INFORMATION

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

GENERAL NOTES C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 GA003

FLOOD NOTE:

NORTH

N

N/F JEFFREY T. GAGLIO & LORI M. GAGLIO T.A.# 065.05-1-42 1224 SCENIC CIRCLE LIBER 11075 PAGE 16

Civil Engineering Land Surveying

ZONED R-1: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED R-3: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS

FOUND N/F 1" PIPE MICHAEL A. HELLER & KAREN HELLER T.A.# 065.05-1-33 DRAINAGE POND EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF WEBSTER PER LIBER 5179 PAGE 69

205'±

FOUND 5/8" REBAR

FOUND REBAR W/CAP

N/F JARASLAW KOWAL & KATHRYN KOWAL T.A.# 065.09-1-6 1208 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 9545 PAGE 581

N/F WALTER B. STUBER & GENEVIEVE A. STUBER T.A.# 065.09-1-2 1200 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 10174 PAGE 184

N/F STEVEN FOTI & MARTHA FOTI T.A.# 065.05-1-32

N/F RONALD S. REILLEY & DEBRA R. LOTT T.A.# 065.05-1-31 PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

N/F MARCUS VENO & MARY VENO T.A.# 065.05-1-30

HA

C

D.A.W.

ER

FOUND 1/2" PIPE

TE EL O R I T Y

PR

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

T.K.W.

COPYRIGHT 2026 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS N/F RONALD F. ZIOLO & NINA R. ZIOLO T.A.# 065.09-1-5 1206 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 11600 PAGE 403

FOUND 3/4" PIPE

N/F RACHEL R. HOLMES T.A.# 065.09-1-4 1204 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 10503 PAGE 87

N/F JOHN J. BURNS & REBECCA J. BURNS T.A.# 065.09-1-3

ISSUED FINAL

ED

FOUND 2-1/2" PIPE

2 01/22/2026 EGF

NS

N/F ROBBY C. VILLA & DINA M. VILLA T.A.# 065.05-1-48 1222 WILDFLOWER DRIVE LIBER 11101 PAGE 435

APPROXIMATE LOCATION 30' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF WEBSTER PER LIBER 3909 PAGE 139

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

H

DS

N/F ROBERT E. MAREFKA & JILL L. MAREFKA T.A.# 065.05-1-56 1191 SCANDIA DRIVE LIBER 11295 PAGE 666

1 01/08/2026 EGF

K OR I E

LAT

43.240323° (N43° 14' 25.16") LONG: -77.437244° (W77° 26' 14.08") BASE ELEV. = 348.8'±

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

I NE

30' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF WEBSTER PER LIBER 3945 PROPOSED 135' MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 489

COMMENTS

L I CE

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS

PROPOSED 30' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT W/ PROPOSED TEMPORARY 10' WIDE GRADING & CLEARING EASEMENTS ON EITHER SIDE

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUN

N/F KAREN A. FAUTH T.A.# 065.05-1-77 1175 APPIAN DRIVE LIBER 7767 PAGE 77

DATE

NG

143'±

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

E

143'±

NO.

(60' WIDE)

185'±

146'± PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 80' x 125' LEASE AREA = 0.23± ACRES

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING NYSDEC WETLAND

N/F CLAIRE BOLLIN & RYAN ELLIS T.A.# 065.05-1-34

WILDFLOWER DRIVE

FOUND 1/2" REBAR IN PIPE

Costich Engineering

A

FOUND 1" PIPE

Landscape Architecture

C

20' WIDE EASEMENT TO EAST WEBSTER SEWER DISTRICT NO. 1 PER LIBER 203 OF MAPS, PAGE 90 FOUND 2-1/2" PIPE

N/F CLAUDETTE V. LOWERY T.A.# 065.05-1-35 1224 WILDFLOWER DRIVE LIBER 12596 PAGE 325

ST

N/F DANIEL M. BRESNAHAN & MARY LYNNE BRESNAHAN T.A.# 065.05-1-43 1225 SCENIC CIRCLE LIBER 11984 PAGE 152

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING NYSDEC WETLAND

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

N/F JEREMY D. CATALINO & BETH CATALINO T.A.# 065.05-1-41 1222 SCENIC CIRCLE LIBER 12436 PAGE 299

MI

N/F TOWN OF WEBSTER T.A.# 065.05-1-47 1209 CREEKSIDE TRAIL LIBER 3432 PAGE 245

MB

BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY, THIS PROPERTY IS IN ZONE AE & ZONE X OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NOS. 36055C0227G & 36055C0231G COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 360436, TOWN OF WEBSTER, WHICH BEAR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 8/28/2008, NO FIELD SURVEYING WAS PERFORMED TO DETERMINE THIS ZONE AND AN ELEVATION CERTIFICATE MAY BE NEEDED TO VERIFY THIS DETERMINATION OR APPLY FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.

N/F LYUBOMIR TSYUPA T.A.# 065.09-1-7 1210 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 12685 PAGE 242

FOUND 1/2" REBAR

N/F GESUALDO MONTALTO T.A.# 065.09-1-8 1212 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 12457 PAGE 65

N/F SUSAN A. MILLER REVOCABLE TRUST T.A.# 065.09-1-24 1222 CROWN POINT DRIVE LIBER 9359 PAGE 4

SITE INFORMATION

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

GRAPHIC SCALE 60 1 VA100

120

SCHEMATIC TOTAL HOLDINGS SCALE

1" = 60' (22 x 34 SHEET) 1" = 120' (11 x 17 SHEET)

240

SCHEMATIC TOTAL HOLDINGS C.E. JOB NUMBER

( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 60 ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) 1 inch = 120 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 VA100

325 345

EC D S D NY AN T ' L 0 10 ET CEN W JA A AD ARE

W1-3

W1-2

FOUND 1/2" PIPE

N/F MARCUS VENO & MARY VENO T.A.# 065.05-1-30

W1-1

APPROX. LOCATION OF MILL CREEK

FOUND 1/2" REBAR

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS N/F LYUBOMIR TSYUPA T.A.# 065.09-1-7 1210 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 12685 PAGE 242

EXISTING ONE STORY HOUSE

N/F SUSAN A. MILLER REVOCABLE TRUST T.A.# 065.09-1-24 1222 CROWN POINT DRIVE LIBER 9359 PAGE 4

N/F GESUALDO MONTALTO T.A.# 065.09-1-8 1212 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 12457 PAGE 65

HA

C

ER

D.A.W.

I NE PR

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

NG

6 E& F

OH

W1-10

TE EL O R I T Y

ED

E

OH

N/F WALTER B. STUBER & GENEVIEVE A. STUBER T.A.# 065.09-1-2 1200 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 10174 PAGE 184

WETLANDS #1 DELINEATED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

E

W1-4

MB

N/F RONALD S. REILLEY & DEBRA R. LOTT T.A.# 065.05-1-31

A

347

W1-9

WITH PROPOSED 8" THICK 12'X20' CONCRETE SLAB OVERTOP

N/F JARASLAW KOWAL & KATHRYN KOWAL T.A.# 065.09-1-6 1208 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 9545 PAGE 581

APPROXIMATE LOCATION 6" WATER MAIN

NS

E

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RGE 8T

APPROXIMATE LOCATION CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS

C

8 34

3 33 337 338 39 3 3 33 35 6 33 332 33 4 1

3 34344

E&F

345 343 344 341 3 340 42 338 33 337 9

EXISTING 78"X144" ARCH CMP N INV=321.36 S INV=321.03 CL OF DRIVE=328.7

N/F ROBBY C. VILLA & DINA M. VILLA T.A.# 065.05-1-48 1222 WILDFLOWER DRIVE LIBER 11101 PAGE 435

N/F N/F RONALD F. ZIOLO & RACHEL R. HOLMES NINA R. ZIOLO T.A.# 065.09-1-4 T.A.# 065.09-1-5 1204 IMPERIAL DRIVE 1206 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 10503 PAGE 87 LIBER 11600 PAGE 403

ISSUED FINAL

L I CE

E

OH

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RGE 8T1

APPROXIMATE LOCATION 30' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF WEBSTER PER LIBER 3909 PAGE 139

FOUND REBAR W/CAP

OH

WOODS

2 01/22/2026 EGF

W1-5

30' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF WEBSTER PER LIBER 3945 PAGE 489

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OPTION 1 WITHIN 10' WIDE UTILITIES EASEMENT (564'±)

N/F STEVEN FOTI & MARTHA FOTI T.A.# 065.05-1-32

W1-8

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

APPROXIMATE LOCATION FRONTIER

W1-6 W1-7

1 01/08/2026 EGF

ST

33 4

0 34

5 E&F

EXISTING BLOCK WALL

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

H

F

W2-6

PROPOSED 30' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT W/ PROPOSED TEMPORARY 10' WIDE GRADING & CLEARING EASEMENTS ON EITHER SIDE

EXISTING TWO STORY HOUSE #1222

FOUND 5/8" REBAR

W2-7

COMMENTS

K OR I E

E&

322 32 5 325

DATE

T

DS

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING WOODS TRAIL

DRAINAGE POND EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF WEBSTER PER LIBER 5179 PAGE 69

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

T

34 7

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OPTION 2 WITHIN 10' WIDE UTILITIES EASEMENT (547'±)

WETLANDS #2 DELINEATED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

NO.

MI

94'±

144'±

LOD

W2-9

RIM=347.41 EXISTING CONCRETE WALL

EXISTING PROPANE TANK

N/F MICHAEL A. HELLER & KAREN HELLER T.A.# 065.05-1-33

(60' WIDE)

W2-4

Costich Engineering

W

348

FOUND 1" PIPE

W2-1

Landscape Architecture

T

33 9

EXISTING LOG PILE

EXISTING TREE (TYP)

N/F CLAIRE BOLLIN & RYAN ELLIS T.A.# 065.05-1-34

Land Surveying

T

34 0

EXISTING TWO STORY HOUSE

EXISTING CONCRETE GUTTER

Civil Engineering

W

EXISTING LOG PILE

EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE

T

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUN

WOODS

349

WOODS

T

EXISTING BIRDHOUSE W2-2

W2-5 S

FOUND348 1/2" REBAR IN PIPE

W2-3

W2-8

337 338

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS

W

OH

FOUND 3/4" PIPE

325

S

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS

T

348

FOUND 2-1/2" PIPE EXISTING UTILITY POLE RTCP 5M

340

OH

T

348

347

143'±

336 335 334 333 332

344

N/F ROBERT E. MAREFKA & JILL L. MAREFKA T.A.# 065.05-1-56 1191 SCANDIA DRIVE LIBER 11295 PAGE 666

340 339 337

342

12"-24" TREES

E&F

6 34

331

348

EXISTING TREE FORT

343

EXISTING STONE WALL

EXISTING SHED

LOD

348

347

347 345

330

0 34

143'±

EXISTING METAL BARN FF=329.33

EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING DRIVE STONE 12"-18" TREES WALL

335

345 346

347

348

34 9 OH

W

34 4

W3-2

68'±

34 0 34 1 342 34 3

EXISTING CONCRETE WALL EXISTING PAVILION

OH

347

W3-3

W3-4

335

146'±

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 80' x 125' LEASE AREA = 0.23± ACRES

N/F KAREN A. FAUTH T.A.# 065.05-1-77 1175 APPIAN DRIVE LIBER 7767 PAGE 77

325

OH

EXISTING SHED

WILDFLOWER DRIVE

330

346 347 OH

EXISTING BENCH

T

W3-5

EXISTING UTILITY POLE NO #

EXISTING STONE N/F COLUMN W/ CLAUDETTE V. LOWERY LIGHT (TYP.) T.A.# 065.05-1-35 1224 WILDFLOWER DRIVE LIBER 12596 PAGE 325

T

100' NYSDE C WETLAND ADJACENT AREA

N/F JEFFREY T. GAGLIO & LORI M. GAGLIO T.A.# 065.05-1-42 1224 SCENIC CIRCLE LIBER 11075 PAGE 16

ZONED R-3: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

W3-1 W3-7 WETLANDS #3 DELINEATED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

W3-6

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RGE 2F

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

1 RIM=347.4

ZONED R-1: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RGE 9

348

FOUND 1" PIPE

20' WIDE EASEMENT TO EAST WEBSTER SEWER DISTRICT NO. 1 PER LIBER 203 OF MAPS, PAGE 90

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RTC 9

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS

EXISTING 24" HDPE NE INV=325.77 SW INV=326.56

PROPOSED 135' MONOPOLE TOWER LAT: 43.240323° (N43° 14' 25.16") LONG: -77.437244° (W77° 26' 14.08") BASE ELEV. = 348.8'±

FOUND 2-1/2" PIPE

APPROXIMATE FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION @ 326'± AMSL

348

100' WIDE NYSDEC WETLAND ADJACENT AREA DISTURBANCE AREA = 0.08± ACRES

N/F DANIEL M. BRESNAHAN & MARY LYNNE BRESNAHAN T.A.# 065.05-1-43 1225 SCENIC CIRCLE LIBER 11984 PAGE 152

OH

N/F TOWN OF WEBSTER T.A.# 065.05-1-47 1209 CREEKSIDE TRAIL LIBER 3432 PAGE 245

N/F JEREMY D. CATALINO & BETH CATALINO T.A.# 065.05-1-41 1222 SCENIC CIRCLE LIBER 12436 PAGE 299

NORTH

N

T.K.W.

SITE INFORMATION

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

N/F JOHN J. BURNS & REBECCA J. BURNS T.A.# 065.09-1-3

SURVEY PLAN

EXISTING TWO STORY HOUSE

GRAPHIC SCALE 50 1 VA101

100

SURVEY PLAN SCALE

1" = 50' (22 x 34 SHEET) 1" = 100' (11 x 17 SHEET)

( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) 1 inch = 100 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)

C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

200

9159.01 VA101

ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRIPTION

SURVEY REFERENCES

2. THE DEED FOR THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST (T.A.# 065.05-1-56) APPEARS TO HAVE AN OVERLAP ONTO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT IS 2.49' WIDE BY 206.4'. 3. THE DESCRIPTION FOR DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED IN LIBER 3909 OF DEEDS, PAGE 139 APPEARS TO HAVE INCORRECT BEARINGS AND IS PLOTTED PER MAP REFERENCE NO. 1.

S89°01'14"W, ALONG THE SAID ASSUMED COMMON LINE AND CONTINUING ALONG AN EXTENSION OF SAID LINE; A DISTANCE OF 212.09 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

A. S89°01'14"W, ALONG THE SAID ASSUMED COMMON LINE, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

S85°39'22"W, A DISTANCE OF 172.01 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

B.

S68°49'24"W, A DISTANCE OF 32.82 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

S47°38'17"W, A DISTANCE OF 29.77 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

N87°54'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

S67°41'45"W, A DISTANCE OF 48.85 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

S71°10'04"W, A DISTANCE OF 112.07 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE

S02°05'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.230 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.

WESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 73°01'22", A RADIUS OF 105.00 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 133.82 FEET, SAID CURVE ALSO HAVING A CHORD OF N72°19'15"W 124.95 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

11. WESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 86°48'05", A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 68.17 FEET, SAID CURVE ALSO HAVING A CHORD OF N79°12'37"W 61.84 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

AT THE TIME OF SURVEY THERE WAS NO SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION OR EVIDENCE OF STREET WIDENING.

13. WESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 28°48'24", A RADIUS OF 101.00 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 50.78 FEET, SAID CURVE ALSO HAVING A CHORD OF S71°47'33"W 50.25 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

AT THE TIME OF SURVEY THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE SITE IS OR WAS USED AS A SOLID WASTE DUMP OR SANITARY LANDFILL.

14. S02°05'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 49.05 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

AT THE TIME OF SURVEY THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF CEMETERIES OR GRAVE SITES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

PER NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP THERE ARE FEDERAL WETLANDS IN THE PROJECT AREA.

17. S87°54'44"W, ALONG THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE PARCEL; THENCE

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS HAS DIRECT ACCESS TO WILDFLOWER DRIVE A PUBLIC DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY.

18. N02°05'16"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

Landscape Architecture

Costich Engineering

NO.

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

DATE

COMMENTS

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

1 01/08/2026 EGF

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

2 01/22/2026 EGF

ISSUED FINAL

PROJECT MANAGER

19. N87°54'44"E, A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 20. S02°05'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 30.94 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE

C

L I CE NS

ED

21. EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 28°04'50", A RADIUS OF 71.00 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 34.80 FEET, SAID CURVE ALSO HAVING A CHORD OF N71°25'48"E 34.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

HA

K OR I E

TE EL O R I T Y H

OF NEW

D.A.W.

PR

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

T.K.W.

22. N57°23'21”E, A DISTANCE OF 5.02 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE 23. EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 86°48'05", A RADIUS OF 75.00 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 113.62 FEET, SAID CURVE ALSO HAVING A CHORD OF S79°12'37"E 103.06 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE; 24. S35°48'34"E, A DISTANCE OF 44.47 FEET TO A POINT

18. EASEMENT GRANTED BY AND BETWEEN THE TOWN OF WEBSTER AND KRAUTWURST BROTHERS, INC. FORMERLY, KRAUTWURST & LITTLE, INC., DATED NOVEMBER 23, 1976 AND RECORDED FEBRUARY 24, 1977 IN LIBER 5179 OF DEEDS, PAGE 69. EASEMENT GRANTS THE RIGHT FOR THE TOWN OF WEBSTER TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A DETENTION POND FOR STORM SEWER DRAINAGE PURPOSES AND TO MAINTAIN THE SAME ON THE PREMISES OF THE OWNER. THE FILED EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE MAP. THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ACCESS EASEMENT WILL CROSS THE FILED EASEMENT LIBER 5179 OF DEEDS, PAGE 69

Land Surveying

16. N02°05'16"W, ALONG THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE PARCEL; THENCE

PER N.Y.S.D.E.C. FRESHWATER WETLANDS MAP THERE ARE D.E.C. WETLANDS IN THE PROJECT AREA.

17. EASEMENT AND RESTRICTIONS ON A SUBDIVISION MAP DATED MARCH 30, 1977 AND FILED IN LIBER 203 AT PAGE 90. LIBER 3909 OF DEEDS, PAGE 139 IS A PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT. LIBER 3945 OF DEEDS, PAGE 489 IS A PERMANENT SANITARY EASEMENT BOTH SHOWN ON THE FILED SUBDIVISION MAP. THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ACCESS EASEMENT WILL CROSS BOTH FILED EASEMENTS LIBER 3909 OF DEEDS, PAGE 139 AND LIBER 3945 OF DEEDS, PAGE 489.

Civil Engineering

15. S87°54'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE PARCEL; THENCE

PER TITLE REPORT PROVIDED BY STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HAVING TITLE NUMBER:71345660, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2025; SURVEY PERTINENT DETERMINATIONS ARE:

N02°05'16"W, A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

S51°29'33"W, A DISTANCE OF 37.58 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

TITLE REVIEW

12. S57°23'21”W, A DISTANCE OF 5.02 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE

THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON IS THE SAME AS THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE PREPARED BY STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DATED OCTOBER 15, 2025, HAVING TITLE NO. 71345660. EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT OR APPARENT FROM PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE SITE OR OTHERWISE KNOWN TO ME HAVE BEEN PLOTTED HEREON OR OTHERWISE NOTED AS TO THEIR EFFECT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FORMS A MATHEMATICALLY CLOSED FIGURE.

S87°54'44"W, A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

S38°31'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 129.12 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

AT THE TIME OF SURVEY THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF EARTHWORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS.

10. N35°48'34"W, A DISTANCE OF 44.47 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE

GENERAL NOTES

S75°10'59"W, ALONG A TIE LINE AND THROUGH LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY ROBBY C. & DINA M. VILLA (T.A.# 065.05-1-48), A DISTANCE OF 810.24 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE

ER

PITTSFORD CORS STATION -LATITUDE

43-05-35.48461 (N) NAD 83 (CORS) -LONGITUDE: 077-31-31.11244 (W) -ELLIP HEIGHT: 113.481 METERS NAVD 88 (CORS)

I NE

TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN FROM A FIELD SURVEY BY COSTICH ENGINEERING ON 11/4/2025 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DATA OBTAINED THROUGH NYSDOT CORS NETWORK REFERENCED TO THE FOLLOWING MONUMENT

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

NG

COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE ASSUMED WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE (60' R.O.W.) SAID POINT BEING THE ASSUMED COMMON LINE OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY CLAIRE BOLLIN & RYAN ELLIS (T.A.# 065.05-1-34) TO THE SOUTH AND LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY ROBBY C. & DINA M. VILLA (T.A.# 065.05-1-48) TO THE NORTH; THENCE

E

SURVEY NOTES

BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE ASSUMED WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE (60' R.O.W.) SAID POINT BEING THE ASSUMED COMMON LINE OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY CLAIRE BOLLIN & RYAN ELLIS (T.A.# 065.05-1-34) TO THE SOUTH AND LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY ROBBY C. & DINA M. VILLA (T.A.# 065.05-1-48) TO THE NORTH; THENCE

A

COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE PREPARED BY STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DATED OCTOBER 15, 2025, HAVING TITLE NO. 71345660.

ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF WEBSTER, COUNTY OF MONROE, STATE OF NEW YORK, ALL AS SHOWN ON A MAP ENTITLED "SCHEMATIC TOTAL HOLDINGS ", PREPARED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C., HAVING DRAWING NUMBER 9159.01, SHEET NUMBER VA100, LAST REVISED 11/24/2025, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

C

ST

MAP ENTITLED "MILL CREEK ESTATES - SECTION VII", PREPARED BY HERSHEY, MALONE & ASSOCIATES, DATED MARCH 30, 1977, AND IS ON FILE AT THE MONROE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE AS LIBER 203 OF MAPS PAGE 90.

MI

LEASE PARCEL DESCRIPTION

25. EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 73°01'22", A RADIUS OF 75.00 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 95.59 FEET, SAID CURVE ALSO HAVING A CHORD OF S72°19'15"E 89.25 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

26. N71°10'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 111.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

SITE INFORMATION

27. N67°41'45"E, A DISTANCE OF 43.67 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

28. N51°29'33"E, A DISTANCE OF 29.91 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 29. N38°31'54"E, A DISTANCE OF 128.10 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 30. N47°38'17"E, A DISTANCE OF 37.77 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 31. N68°49'24"E, A DISTANCE OF 42.87 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 32. N85°39'22"E, A DISTANCE OF 177.33 FEET TO A POINT BEING ON THE ASSUMED COMMON LINE OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY CLAUDETTE V. LOWERY (T.A.#065.05-1-35) TO THE NORTH AND LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY ROBBY C. & DINA M. VILLA (T.A.# 065.05-1-48) TO THE SOUTH; THENCE 33. N89°01'14"E, ALONG THE SAID ASSUMED COMMON LINE, A DISTANCE OF 212.97 FEET TO A POINT BEING ON THE ASSUMED WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE (60' R.O.W.); THENCE 34. S00°58'46"E, ALONG THE ASSUMED WESTERLY BOUNDS OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING.

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

SURVEY NOTES AND DESCRIPTIONS C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 VA110

24"

F E&

WITH PROPOSED 8" THICK 12'X20' CONCRETE SLAB OVERTOP

W1-4

E& F E

E

FOUND REBAR W/CAP

FOUND REBAR W/CAP OH

OH

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RGE 8T

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RGE 8T1 OH

N/F WALTER B. STUBER & GENEVIEVE A. STUBER T.A.# 065.09-1-2 1200 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 10174 PAGE 184

EC D S D NY AN T ' L 0 10 ET CEN W JA A AD ARE

N/F ROBBY C. VILLA & DINA M. VILLA T.A.# 065.05-1-48 1222 WILDFLOWER DRIVE LIBER 11101 PAGE 435

OH

W1-3

FOUND 1/2" PIPE

N/F JARASLAW KOWAL & KATHRYN KOWAL T.A.# 065.09-1-6 1208 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 9545 PAGE 581

N/F LYUBOMIR TSYUPA T.A.# 065.09-1-7 1210 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 12685 PAGE 242

W1-1 FOUND 1/2" REBAR

EXISTING ONE STORY HOUSE

C

D.A.W.

PR

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

T.K.W.

MB

SITE INFORMATION

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

N/F SUSAN A. MILLER REVOCABLE TRUST T.A.# 065.09-1-24 1222 CROWN POINT DRIVE LIBER 9359 PAGE 4

N/F GESUALDO MONTALTO T.A.# 065.09-1-8 1212 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 12457 PAGE 65

HA

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS

N/F N/F RONALD F. ZIOLO & RACHEL R. HOLMES NINA R. ZIOLO T.A.# 065.09-1-4 T.A.# 065.09-1-5 1204 IMPERIAL DRIVE 1206 IMPERIAL DRIVE LIBER 10503 PAGE 87 LIBER 11600 PAGE 403

TE EL O R I T Y

COPYRIGHT 2026 COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

N/F MARCUS VENO & MARY VENO T.A.# 065.05-1-30

W1-2

APPROX. LOCATION OF MILL CREEK

DEAD 24" 18"

OH

APPROXIMATE LOCATION 30' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF WEBSTER PER LIBER 3909 PAGE 139

W1-10

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

ED

E

18"

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OPTION 2 WITHIN 10' WIDE UTILITIES EASEMENT (547'±) 18"

WOODS

WETLANDS #1 DELINEATED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

N/F RONALD S. REILLEY & DEBRA R. LOTT T.A.# 065.05-1-31

NS

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OPTION 1 WITHIN 10' WIDE UTILITIES EASEMENT (564'±)

24"

FOUND 2-1/2" PIPE EXISTING UTILITY POLE RTCP 5M

W1-9

30' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF WEBSTER PER LIBER 3945 PAGE 489

24"

20"

EXISTING 78"X144" ARCH CMP N INV=321.36 S INV=321.03 CL OF DRIVE=328.7

K OR I E

DS

EXISTING TREE (TYP)

EXISTING TWO STORY HOUSE #1222

W1-5

L I CE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING WOODS TRAIL

APPROXIMATE LOCATION 6" WATER MAIN

H

40"

20"

OH

FOUND 3/4" PIPE

EXISTING PROPANE TANK

W1-8

ER

28"

EXISTING LOG PILE

N/F STEVEN FOTI & MARTHA FOTI T.A.# 065.05-1-32

APPROXIMATE LOCATION CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS

I NE

24"

APPROXIMATE LOCATION FRONTIER

W1-6 W1-7

ISSUED FINAL

NG

E&F

32"

27"

28"

EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP)

EXISTING BLOCK WALL

PROPOSED 30' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT W/ PROPOSED TEMPORARY 10' WIDE GRADING & CLEARING EASEMENTS ON EITHER SIDE

2 01/22/2026 EGF

E

29"

26"

EXISTING LOG PILE

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

A

32" 27"

20"

27"

29" 29"

W2-6

RIM=347.41 EXISTING CONCRETE WALL

1 01/08/2026 EGF

C

26"

FOUND 5/8" REBAR

W2-7

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

T

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUN

32"

20"

S

COMMENTS

T

23"

24"

20"

00 36" STUMP

WOODS

30"

48"

31"

WOODS

20"

25"

W2-5

DATE

ST

20"

29"

12"

17"

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

W

E&F

24"

28"

20"

E&F

18" 30" 11" 14"

NO.

MI

(ILC) INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER

20"

29"

26" 25"

DRAINAGE POND EASEMENT TO THE TOWN OF WEBSTER PER LIBER 5179 PAGE 69

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS

94'±

144'±

X

20"

24"

18" W/ TREE STAND 22" TO BE REMOVED

N/F ROBERT E. MAREFKA & JILL L. MAREFKA T.A.# 065.05-1-56 1191 SCANDIA DRIVE LIBER 11295 PAGE 666

E&F

LOD

143'±

X

W2-8

Costich Engineering

T

22"

36" 30" 12" 22"

Landscape Architecture

T

24" 22" 28"

26"

29"

20"

WETLANDS #2 DELINEATED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

Land Surveying

W

22"

19"

22"

40" 20"

N/F MICHAEL A. HELLER & KAREN HELLER T.A.# 065.05-1-33

W2-9

R=92.0'

30"

X

EXISTING TREE FORT

W2-4

36"

24"

23"

20"

22"

24"

EXISTING TWO STORY HOUSE

FOUND 1" PIPE

W2-1 00

EXISTING CONCRETE GUTTER

N/F CLAIRE BOLLIN & RYAN ELLIS T.A.# 065.05-1-34

W2-3

36"

EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE

WILDFLOWER DRIVE

20"

EXISTING BIRDHOUSE W2-2

2+0

32"

12"-24" TREES

Civil Engineering

1 RIM=347.4

22"

LOD

28"

3+00

FOUND 1/2" REBAR IN PIPE

T

26" 22" 3+60

36"

EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING DRIVE STONE 12"-18" TREES WALL

T

143'±

20"

R=70.0'

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS

EXISTING STONE WALL

EXISTING SHED

S

W

22"

29" 27"

EXISTING METAL BARN FF=329.33

OH

APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS

(60' WIDE)

24"

26"

24"

30" 24" STUMP 30"

30" 30"

OH

T

26"

W3-2

EXISTING SHED

EXISTING SHED OH

OH

EXISTING BENCH

T

20"

R=68.0'

68'±

20"

EXISTING UTILITY POLE NO #

EXISTING STONE N/F COLUMN W/ CLAUDETTE V. LOWERY LIGHT (TYP.) T.A.# 065.05-1-35 1224 WILDFLOWER DRIVE LIBER 12596 PAGE 325

W

146'±

48"

EXISTING CONCRETE WALL EXISTING PAVILION

W3-3

W3-4

N/F JEFFREY T. GAGLIO & LORI M. GAGLIO T.A.# 065.05-1-42 1224 SCENIC CIRCLE LIBER 11075 PAGE 16

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

T

W3-5

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RGE 2F

ZONED R-3: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

W3-1 W3-7 WETLANDS #3 DELINEATED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

W3-6

100' NYSDE C WETLAND ADJACENT AREA

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 80' x 125' LEASE AREA = 0.23± ACRES

N/F KAREN A. FAUTH T.A.# 065.05-1-77 1175 APPIAN DRIVE LIBER 7767 PAGE 77

ZONED R-1: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RGE 9

T

FOUND 1" PIPE

20' WIDE EASEMENT TO EAST WEBSTER SEWER DISTRICT NO. 1 PER LIBER 203 OF MAPS, PAGE 90

EXISTING UTILITY POLE RTC 9

OH

EXISTING 24" HDPE NE INV=325.77 SW INV=326.56

PROPOSED 135' MONOPOLE TOWER LAT: 43.240323° (N43° 14' 25.16") LONG: -77.437244° (W77° 26' 14.08") BASE ELEV. = 348.8'±

FOUND 2-1/2" PIPE

N/F DANIEL M. BRESNAHAN & MARY LYNNE BRESNAHAN T.A.# 065.05-1-43 1225 SCENIC CIRCLE LIBER 11984 PAGE 152

N/F TOWN OF WEBSTER T.A.# 065.05-1-47 1209 CREEKSIDE TRAIL LIBER 3432 PAGE 245

100' WIDE NYSDEC WETLAND ADJACENT AREA DISTURBANCE AREA = 0.08± ACRES

N/F JEREMY D. CATALINO & BETH CATALINO T.A.# 065.05-1-41 1222 SCENIC CIRCLE LIBER 12436 PAGE 299

NORTH

N

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

N/F JOHN J. BURNS & REBECCA J. BURNS T.A.# 065.09-1-3

OVERALL SITE PLAN

EXISTING TWO STORY HOUSE

GRAPHIC SCALE 50 1 CA100

100

OVERALL SITE PLAN SCALE

1" = 50' (22 x 34 SHEET) 1" = 100' (11 x 17 SHEET)

( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) 1 inch = 100 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)

C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

200

9159.01 CA100

NORTH

N

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 80' x 125' LEASE AREA = 0.23± ACRES

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

Civil Engineering

3+00

PROPOSED GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE/ TURNAROUND

7.0' X

X

35.0'

Land Surveying

PROPOSED (2) 6' WIDE SWING GATES BARBED WIRE TOP (TYP) 23.0'

X

X X

X

4.0'

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 50kW DIESEL GENERATOR W/ TERTIARY CONTAINMENT TANK ON PROPOSED 4'x8' CONCRETE PAD

E

DATE

COMMENTS

1 01/08/2026 EGF

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

2 01/22/2026 EGF

ISSUED FINAL

X

INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER (ILC)

X

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT H-FRAME

X

PROPOSED 135' MONOPOLE TOWER LAT: 43.240323° (N43° 14' 25.16") LONG: -77.437244° (W77° 26' 14.08") BASE ELEV. = 348.8'±

4.0'

E&

F

PROPOSED 2' WIDE CABLE BRIDGE (18'±) E&

X

PROPOSED STONE YARD, TO EXTEND 1' PAST FENCE LINE

PROPOSED BOLLARD @ 5' O.C. (TYP)

X

F

X

10.0'

E&F

F

E&F

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 12.5'x11' CONCRETE SLAB W/ 12'x10' ICE CANOPY & EQUIPMENT CABINETS

PROPOSED UTILITY BACKBOARD

E&F

PROPOSED TRANSFORMER

A

C

PR

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

T.K.W.

E&F

PROPOSED 7' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ 1' BARBED WIRE TOP

E&F

ED

PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES CENTERED WITHIN PROPOSED 10' WIDE UTILITIES EASEMENT

E&F

NS

77.0' 79.0' E&F

X

20.0'

ER

X

F

X

I NE

X

D.A.W.

NG

X

C

E

X

HA

L I CE

X

TE EL O R I T Y H

X

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

K OR I E

3.0'

X

7.7'

E

ST

X

AREA RESERVED FOR FUTURE CARRIER (TYP)

MI

34.0' 36.0'

X

7.7'

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED TOWER FOUNDATION

E&F

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

F

E&F

Costich Engineering

7.0'

8.9'

9.3'

X

PROPOSED VERZION WIRELESS 16.0'x22.5' EQUIPMENT AREA

E&

E&F

Landscape Architecture

NO.

E&

12.0'

3+60

SITE INFORMATION

E&F

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

E&F

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

EXISTING UTILITIES (LOCATION, SIZES AND INVERTS) SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THEIR LOCATION OR COMPLETENESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF ALL UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IN THE PATH OF, OR CLOSELY PARALLEL TO, OR UNDER, THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR DAMAGES OCCURRING AS A RESULT OF INCORRECTLY LOCATED UTILITIES. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTILITY OWNERS IN AMPLE TIME FOR THEM TO LOCATE AND MARK THEIR FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO NOTIFY UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF COMMENCING ANY WORK.

COMPOUND PLAN

GRAPHIC SCALE 1 CA110

COMPOUND PLAN SCALE

1" = 5' (22 x 34 SHEET) 1" = 10' (11 x 17 SHEET)

2.5

20 C.E. JOB NUMBER

( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 5 ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) 1 inch = 10 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 CA110

N

WETLANDS #3 DELINEATED BY COSTICH ENGINEERING, D.P.C.

100'

REA

325

NORTH

ETL EC W

AND

A ADJ

TA CEN

APPROX. LOCATION OF MILL CREEK APPROXIMATE FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION @ 326'± AMSL

330

D NYS

335 1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

EXISTING 24" HDPE NE INV=325.77 SW INV=326.56

CL OF DRIVE=329.7 34

Civil Engineering

342

100' WIDE NYSDEC WETLAND 34 ADJACENT AREA DISTURBANCE 4 AREA = 0.08± ACRES

Land Surveying

343 4 33

0 34

LOD

5 34

331 D

D LO

LOD LOD

LOD

X

X (ILC)

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING WOODS TRAIL

D

X INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER

ISSUED FINAL

LO

CFS

LO

345

D SF

LO

D

X

SF

A

ER

D

I NE

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

NG

C

ST

PR

DRAWN BY

T.K.W.

LOD

MI

338

D.A.W.

E

LO

D

343 LOD

LOD

LOD E&F

SF H

ED

EXISTING LOG PILE

NS

EXISTING PROPANE TANK

C

L I CE

PROPOSED RIP-RAP INLET BANK STABILIZATION (6.5 SQUARE YARDS)

HA

K OR I E

TE EL O R I T Y

D

348

33 5

348

WOODS

EXISTING LOG PILE

337

338

E&F

PROPOSED 30' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT W/ PROPOSED TEMPORARY 10' WIDE GRADING & CLEARING EASEMENTS ON EITHER SIDE

34 6

EXISTING TREE (TYP)

LO

347.9

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

LO D

PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE= 0.39± ACRES

339

D

LO

LOD

347

SF

334

LO

LOD

L

LOD

2 01/22/2026 EGF

LO

LOD

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

LOD

PROPOSED GEOSYNTHETIC MATTING

X

348

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 80' x 125' LEASE AREA = 0.23± ACRES

PROPOSED 135' MONOPOLE TOWER LAT: 43.240323° (N43° 14' 25.16") LONG: -77.437244° (W77° 26' 14.08") BASE ELEV. = 348.8'±

33 34

33 1

34 8

2 33

WOODS

EXISTING TWO STORY HOUSE #1222

347

E&F

1 01/08/2026 EGF

X

E&F

X

347

PROPOSED SILT FENCE (TYP)

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

LO D

LOD

347.65

COMMENTS

D

SF

X X

X

E&F

LOD

OD

SF

DATE

LO

7 34

X

348

X

E&F

LOD

D LO

LOD

EXISTING METAL BARN FF=329.33

D

348.07

E& F

348.82

EXISTING TREE FORT

LOD

347.81 348

347.67

348

PROPOSED FENCED IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPOUND

2+0

LOD

3+00 CFS

348.99

D LO1

LOD

345

3+60

LOD

SF

SF LOD

348

348.86

NO. SF

LO

LOD

LO

D

LOD LOD

SF

LO D

LOD

SF

LOD

LOD SF

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

LO D

SF

D LO

LOD

SF

335

PROPOSED CONCRETE WASHOUT LOD

Costich Engineering

LOD

346

LOD

EXISTING PAVILION LOD

345

Landscape Architecture

SITE INFORMATION

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

SLOPE STABILIZATION LEGEND EXISTING UTILITIES (LOCATION, SIZES AND INVERTS) SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THEIR LOCATION OR COMPLETENESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF ALL UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IN THE PATH OF, OR CLOSELY PARALLEL TO, OR UNDER, THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR DAMAGES OCCURRING AS A RESULT OF INCORRECTLY LOCATED UTILITIES. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTILITY OWNERS IN AMPLE TIME FOR THEM TO LOCATE AND MARK THEIR FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO NOTIFY UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF COMMENCING ANY WORK.

GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN

GRAPHIC SCALE PROPOSED GEOSYNTHETIC MATTING. 1 CA120

NOTE

ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL RECEIVE EITHER GEO-SYNTHETIC MATTING OR RIP-RAP SLOPE STABILIZATION (SEE PLAN).

GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SCALE: 1" = 15' (22 x 34 SHEET) 1" = 30' (11 x 17 SHEET)

7.5

60 C.E. JOB NUMBER

( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 15 ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) 1 inch = 30 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 CA120

PROPOSED MONOPOLE TRI COLLAR MOUNT NUDD P/N: A3MPCLAMP OR APPROVED EQUAL

BOOM MOUNT DESIGN OBTAINED FROM DRAWINGS BY ARMOR TOWER, TITLED "8' HD-UPNY FRAME" SHEET #S-1, DATED 4/20/2022 AND DRAWINGS TITLED "4' HD STANDOFF FRAME", DATED 01/31/2022 NSTD-445 CLASSIFICATION: M900R(1150)-4[6]

(2) STANDOFF RAIL 2 1/2" SCH 40 (TOP & BOTTOM) (2) CROSSING 3/4" RODS 2 1/2" SCH 40 END PIPE

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

C3x4.1 WELDED TO UPPER & LOWER ARMS

STANDOFF STIFFARM 2" SCH 40 PIPE (TYP)

BOOM STIFFARM 1 1/2" SCH 40 PIPE HSS3x3x3/16 UPPER & LOWER ARM ASSEMBLY. PROVIDE GALVANIZING VENT HOLES AT UNDERSIDE (BOTH ENDS)

PROPOSED 4' LIGHTNING ROD STANDOFF STIFFARM ATTACHED TO ADJACENT STANDOFF RAIL (TYP)

STANDOFF SPACER, 1" SCH 40 PIPE

Land Surveying

3/16

3/ 8"

Landscape Architecture

Costich Engineering

1 15/1 6"

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY @ 130' AGL CENTERLINE

" 18 3/4

(2) 1 1/4" SCH 40 PIPE - BETWEEN UPPER & LOWER ARM ASSEMBLY; PROVIDE GALVANIZING VENT HOLES AT LOWER BACKSIDE

36 1/

35 1/2"

2 1/2" SCH 40 TOP PIPE

AREA RESERVED FOR FUTURE CARRIER @ 100' AGL CENTERLINE

NO.

5/8" U-BOLT TOP & BOTTOM

DATE

COMMENTS

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

Ø11/16"

2" SCH 40 INTERMEDIATE PIPE

GALVANIZING VENT HOLES AT UNDERSIDES OF HORIZONTAL PIPES EACH END

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

CLIP PLATE (FLAT BAR) 3x2x1/4 (TYP)

AREA RESERVED FOR FUTURE CARRIER @ 115' AGL CENTERLINE

Civil Engineering

1 01/08/2026 EGF

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

2 01/22/2026 EGF

ISSUED FINAL

48"

2 1/2" SCH 40 BOTTOM PIPE

(2) 2" SCH 40 END PIPES

BOOM MOUNT DETAIL

100.0'

PROPOSED AWS/PCS RRH UNIT (TYP PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL)

PROPOSED 12-CIRCUIT OVP UNIT

PROPOSED STAND-OFF STIFF ARM (TYP) PROPOSED BOOM STIFF ARM (TYP)

ALL REFERENCES TO THE TOWER AND ITS FOUNDATION ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE DESIGN AND DETAIL DRAWINGS BY THE TOWER SUPPLIER.

A

C

ST

HA

C

ER

D.A.W.

I NE

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

E

PR

DRAWN BY

NG

NORTH

ALPHA

SECTO R

115.0'

135.0'

130.0'

FAA OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING IS NOT PROPOSED BY VERIZON WIRELESS UNLESS IT IS REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OR THE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY.

H

PROPOSED CBRS ANTENNA/RRH (TYP PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL)

PROPOSED 700/850 RRH UNIT (TYP PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL)

TE EL O R I T Y

ED

PROPOSED 700/850/AWS PANEL ANTENNA (TYP PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL) PROPOSED 8' BOOM (TYP PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL)

PROPOSED C-BAND ANTENNA/RRH (TYP PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL)

THE TOWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH GALVANIZED STEEL.

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

NS

PROPOSED 700/850/PCS PANEL ANTENNA (TYP PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL)

TOWER NOTES

N

L I CE

NOTE

CONTRACTORS MUST UTILIZE VERIZON WIRELESS APPROVED LOW-PIM CABLE SUPPORT FASTENERS AND RELATED ANCILLARY ATTACHMENT HARDWARE WITHIN 10 FEET OF VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS

SCALE

NTS

K OR I E

139.0'

2 CA200

GALVANIZING VENT HOLES AT ALL LOWER END OF INTERMEDIATE PIPE

AZ = 1 0°

PROPOSED 135' MONOPOLE

96"

48"

MI

CLIP PLATES BOTH SIDES ROTATED IN 30°

T.K.W.

SITE INFORMATION

TOWER SHALL BE DESIGNED/ CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE A TOTAL OF THREE WIRELESS CARRIERS.

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

BE

THERE SHALL BE NO PERMANENT CLIMBING PEGS WITHIN 15' OF THE GROUND OF ANY TOWER.

AZ

OR ECT

PROPOSED ANTENNAS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE SPECIFIC RF ANTENNA DESIGN SHEET SUPPLIED BY THE RF SYSTEMS ENGINEER.

0°

AS

M GAM

TA

SE CT O

R

0°

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK

25 Z=

A

SHEET TITLE

GRAPHIC SCALE

GRAPHIC SCALE 10 1 CA200

TOWER ELEVATION SCALE

1" = 10' (22 x 34 SHEET) 1" = 20' (11 x 17 SHEET)

( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) 1 inch = 20 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)

TOWER ELEVATION AND ANTENNA ORIENTATION PLAN

40 3 CA200

2.5

ANTENNA ORIENTATION SCALE

1" = 5' (22 x 34 SHEET) 1" = 10' (11 x 17 SHEET)

( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 5 ft. (22" x 34" SHEET) 1 inch = 10 ft. (11" x 17" SHEET)

C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 CA200

PROPOSED 25W FLOOD LIGHT (LITHONIA OLFL14 PE BZ M4) MOUNTED ON H-FRAME

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 10' x 12' ICE CANOPY (SEE DETAILS)

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 24"x24" FIBER BOX WITH LOCKABLE HASP

10.0' 4'-4"

4'-4"

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS H-FRAME

PROPOSED GPS UNIT SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 200A INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER

PROPOSED LIGHT TIMER WITH WEATHERPROOF COVER (4) 3" CONDUIT PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN CABINETS (COORDINATE FINAL CONDUITS W/ VERIZON WIRELESS CE)

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE

PROPOSED P1000 UNISTRUT, LENGTH & SPACING TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD TO SUIT EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE POST PROPOSED P1000 UNISTRUT, LENGTH & SPACING TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD TO SUIT EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS H-FRAME FUTURE VERIZON WIRELESS CABINET

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS OVP

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINET

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 50kW DIESEL GENERATOR W/ TERTIARY CONTAINMENT TANK ON PROPOSED 4'x8' CONCRETE PAD

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 12.5' x 11.0' CONCRETE PAD

Land Surveying

PROPOSED TRAP BOX (SITE PRO 1 P/N: TRAP3 OR APPROVED EQUAL) (TYP)

10.0'

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS BATTERY CABINET

Civil Engineering

Landscape Architecture

Costich Engineering

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINET NO.

EXISTING GRADE

1" CONTROL PVC CONDUIT (FROM GENERATOR) (4) 1" POWER EMT CONDUITS 3/4" POWER EMT CONDUIT 2" FIBER PVC CONDUIT (FROM FIBER DEMARC)

SCALE

1" = 2' (22 x 34 SIZE) 1" = 4' (11 x 17 SIZE)

GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND VERIZON WIRELESS SETUP VENDOR TO INSTALL PULL STRINGS IN ALL EQUIPMENT CONDUITS AS APPLICABLE (OVP, ALARM, POWER, FIBER, AND GENERATOR)

VERIZON WIRELESS SETUP VENDOR TO ADD PLYWOOD BACKING BOARD INSIDE HOFFMAN BOX.

VERIZON WIRELESS SETUP VENDOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL CAT6 ETHERNET CABLING FOR ALL ALARM POINTS REQUIRED BY VERIZON WIRELESS STANDARDS.

ALL CIVIL SITE WORK (CONDUITS, GROUNDING, CONCRETE) TO BE PERFORMED BY VERIZON WIRELESS GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ALL OTHER WORK TO BE DONE BY OTHERS. PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 10' x 12' ICE CANOPY (SEE DETAILS)

8' (MAX)

PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 200A INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER (ON OPPOSITE SIDE)

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

T.K.W.

10.0'

PROPOSED HYBRID CABLE (TYP) CABLE GROUND BAR

7' CLEAR (MIN)

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS H-FRAME

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS OVP

SITE INFORMATION

10.0'

UNIVERSAL GPS MOUNT BY SITEPRO OR EQUAL (TYP OF 2)

PROPOSED 18"Ø CONCRETE PIER (TYP)

PR

DRAWN BY

(4) 3" CONDUIT PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN CABINETS (COORDINATE FINAL CONDUITS W/VERIZON WIRELESS CE)

EXISTING GRADE

D.A.W.

1.5'

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS OVP

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS H-FRAME

C

I NE

ED

PROPOSED 25W FLOOD LIGHT (LITHONIA OLFL14 PE BZ M4) MOUNTED ON H-FRAME

HA

NS

PROPOSED TOWER

PROPOSED P1000 UNISTRUT, LENGTH & SPACING TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD TO SUIT EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS

TE EL O R I T Y

ER

PROPOSED GPS UNIT SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR

PROPOSED CABLES

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE POST

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

H

4'-4"

SCALE

1" = 2' (22 x 34 SIZE) 1" = 4' (11 x 17 SIZE)

K OR I E

10.0'

SIDE ELEVATION

L I CE

4'-4"

2 CA500

NOTES:

PROPOSED GPS UNIT SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR UNIVERSAL PIPE ADAPTER KIT BY SITEPRO OR EQUAL (TYP OF 2)

ISSUED FINAL

PROPOSED 18"Ø CONCRETE PIER (TYP)

FRONT ELEVATION

PROPOSED HYBRID CABLES ROUTED ALONG CABLE BRIDGE

2 01/22/2026 EGF

A

1" ALARM PVC CONDUIT (FROM GENERATOR)

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

C

1" POWER/ALARM EMT CONDUIT

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 12.5' x 11.0' CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 200A INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER

1 01/08/2026 EGF

ST

2" FIBER EMT CONDUIT

1 CA500

(3) 2" LMFC CONDUITS FROM CABINET TO OVP

1" HEATER/CHARGER PVC CONDUIT (FROM GENERATOR)

1" ALARM EMT CONDUIT

COMMENTS

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

2" POWER PVC CONDUIT (FROM GENERATOR) 2" POWER PVC CONDUIT (FROM METER/DISC)

TRANSITION POINT FROM EMT CONDUIT TO LMFC CONDUIT (TYP)

DATE

MI

PROPOSED COURTESY GFI RECEPTACLE WITH WEATHERPROOF COVER

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

NG

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 10' x 12' ICE CANOPY (SEE DETAILS)

PROPOSED GPS UNIT SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR

E

UNIVERSAL PIPE ADAPTER KIT BY SITEPRO OR EQUAL (TYP OF 2)

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

PROPOSED GROUND BAR (3) 2" LMFC CONDUITS FROM CABINET TO OVP

3 CA500

REAR ELEVATION SCALE

1" = 2' (22 x 34 SIZE) 1" = 4' (11 x 17 SIZE)

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINET

FUTURE VERIZON WIRELESS CABINET

EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 12.5' x 11.0' CONCRETE PAD

C.E. JOB NUMBER

PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS BATTERY CABINET

PROPOSED TOWER FOUNDATION 4 CA500

EQUIPMENT ELEVATION SCALE

1" = 2' (22 x 34 SIZE) 1" = 4' (11 x 17 SIZE)

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 CA500

WELDED HEAVY DUTY HASP AND STAPLE W/ INTEGRAL DROP BAR AND PADLOCK

(3) INDUSTRIAL MALLEABLE IRON OFFSET PIN HINGES PER GATE PANEL (PAGE-WILSON M-6 OR EQUAL) EXTENSION ARM

BARBED WIRE 3 STRANDS GALVANIZED

9" x 9" BANDED HAND HOLE (TYP) W/ CHAIN WELDED @ ONE SIDE

CAP (TYP ON ALL POSTS)

3 STRANDS OF GALVANIZED BARBED WIRE

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

TOP RAIL

TENSION WIRE GRADE

TENSION WIRE

CENTER DROP BAR SLOTTED MUSHROOM CAP

10'-0"±

4500 PSI CONCRETE

24" WIDE - MODEL #IB24-D

12"

SECTION VIEW

PLAN VIEW

3 CA501

FENCE DETAIL SCALE

NTS

COMPACTED SUBGRADE

VEGETATE SLOPE 3 1 MAX.

2.0'±

6.0' 4%

6 1 MAX.

1'-6" LEVELING AREA

THEORETICAL GRADE LINE (T.G.L.) 6.0' 4%

6 1 MAX.

6 MAX. 1

VEGETATE SLOPE 3 MAX. 1

GRADE NOTE

SWALE TO BE 9" MIN. DEEP

4'-0"

6 CA501

6" N.Y.S.D.O.T. PAY ITEM NO. 304.12, MATERIAL DESIGNATION 733.0402 SUBBASE COURSE TYPE 2, COMPACTED WITH A 12 TON SMOOTH DRUM VIBRATORY ROLLER

15"

12" N.Y.S.D.O.T. PAY ITEM NO. 623.12 SIZE DESIGNATION #4 CRUSHED STONE (12" MINIMUM WITH 2-6" COMPACTED LIFTS COMPACTED WITH A 12 TON SMOOTH DRUM VIBRATORY ROLLER). THE CELLULAR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER MAY SPECIFY ADDITIONAL STONE BASE AS FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT.

DRIVEWAY DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL SCALE

N.T.S

4500 PSI CONCRETE 1'-6" LEVELING AREA

CENTERLINE OF SWALE

COMPACTED 3/4" CRUSHED STONE 6"

5.5'±

COMPACTED SUBGRADE

5 CA501

BOLLARD DETAIL SCALE

3/4" = 1'-0" (22x34 SIZE) 3/8" = 1'-0" (11x17 SIZE)

NOTE

SWALE TO BE 1.5' - 2' DEEP

7 CA501

6 1 MAX.

2 MAX. 1

2'-0" DIA.

EARTH WORK SUBGRADE COMPACTION & SELECT GRANULAR FILL

4.0'±

VEGETATE SLOPE

2 1 MAX.

EDGE OF COMPOUND (WHEN ALONG COMPOUND)

15"

COMPOUND AREA DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S

TE EL O R I T Y HA

C

D.A.W.

PR

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

T.K.W.

EDGE OF ACCESS DRIVE (WHEN ALONG DRIVEWAY)

2 1 MAX.

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

ED

3.5'±

CENTERLINE OF IMPROVEMENTS

NOTE

ACCESS DRIVE STONE TO BE ACQUIRED FROM N.Y.S.D.O.T. APPROVED QUARRY. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT RECEIVING STONE SHALL RECEIVE 4" OF TOPSOIL AND BE SEEDED AS DIRECTED BY CELLULAR NETWORK REPRESENTATIVE. SLOPE STABILIZATION TECHNIQUES SUCH AS SURFACE ROUGHENING (SEE NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR URBAN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL) SHALL BE UTILIZED ON ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1.

H

1'-6" LEVELING AREA

2 MAX. 1

ISSUED FINAL

K OR I E

1'-6" LEVELING AREA

SCALE

NTS

VEGETATE SLOPE

2 01/22/2026 EGF

NS

4'-0"

STONE YARD DETAIL

CENTERLINE OF SWALE

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

L I CE

6" DIA SCH 40 CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE GUARD POST

1 01/08/2026 EGF

SCALE

NTS

4 CA501

COMMENTS

CABLE BRIDGE DETAIL

1'-0" DIA

PAINTED YELLOW

DATE

ER

3/4" CRUSHED STONE CONFORMING WITH NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 703-AGGREGATE, SUB-SECTION 703-02-COURSE AGGREGATE, TABLE 703-4 NO. 2 STONE WEED BARRIER SHALL BE TYPAR LANDSCAPE FABRIC OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL

1 CA501

NO.

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

SCALE

1/2" = 1'-0" (22x34 SIZE) 1/4" = 1'-0" (11x17 SIZE)

4500 PSI CONCRETE 6"

12" WIDE - MODEL #IB12-D

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

I NE

3" MIN.

DOUBLE GATE DETAIL

Costich Engineering

NG

2 CA501

CONCRETE (SEE FENCE DETAIL)

Landscape Architecture

A

1'-0" DIA

Land Surveying

4'-0" VERIFY LOCAL FROST LINE DEPTH

GRADE

Civil Engineering

ST

1'-6"

1/2" CROWN

ANTENNA CABLES ON SNAP-IN CABLE HANGER (TYP)

7'-0" CLEAR (MIN)

4'-0" VERIFY LOCAL FROST LINE DEPTH

OUTSIDE

4" DIA SCH 40 GATE POST

SEE FENCE DETAIL

7'-0"

CHAIN LINK FABRIC

TO GROUND SYSTEM REFER TO GROUNDING PLAN FOR CONNECTION

GATE FRAME

LINE POST SPACED @ NOT TO EXCEED 10'-0" O.C. (SEE FENCING NOTES FOR DIAMETERS OF POSTS)

E

X

3/8" DIA STEEL TRUSS ROD AT GATE (TYP)

C

POST CAP

MI

X X

1'-0"

POST CAP

ICE BRIDGE SITE PRO1 MODEL #IB24D-T3

11'-9"

TOP RAIL

INSIDE

ICE BRIDGE SITE PRO1 MODEL #IB12D-T3

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIRAFI 500X OR APPROVED EQUAL PROOF-ROLL ROADWAY SUBGRADE AREAS USING A 12 TON SMOOTH DRUM VIBRATORY ROLLER. AREAS THAT SHOW PUMPING OR WHICH ARE OTHERWISE UNSATISFACTORY SHALL BE UNDERCUT AND REPLACED WITH COMPACTED FILL, OR STABILIZED IN PLACE. SUBGRADE AREAS THAT CANNOT BE STABILIZED OR RESULT IN REMOVAL OF ALL ORGANICS UTILIZING A MAXIMUM OF 1.0' OF UNDERCUT SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER SHALL RECOMMEND THE APPROPRIATE BRIDGING TECHNIQUE THAT MAY INCLUDE UTILIZATION OF STONE FILLING, ADDITIONAL FABRIC AND/OR GEOGRID MATERIALS.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEARING & GRUBBING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND ROADWAY AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, AS PREPARED FOR THIS SITE, WHEN NECESSARY, FOR SITE WORK PREPARATION, & FOUNDATION WORK. AS A MINIMUM THE TOP 3" OF GRADE SHALL BE REMOVED, THE EXPOSED SUBGRADE COMPACTED AND GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INSTALLED AS REQUIRED FOR UNSTABLE SOIL CONDITION.

ALL SELECT GRANULAR FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A 95% COMPACTION AT A MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY MODIFIED PROCTOR TEST (ASTM D-1557) AND WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 3% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT.

CONTRACTOR TO ASSURE THAT EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS ARE MAINTAINED. 8 CA501

GRAVEL DRIVE CROSS SECTION SCALE

1" = 2' (22x34 SIZE) 1" = 4' (11x17 SIZE)

SITE INFORMATION

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

SITE DETAILS C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 CA501

MAXIMUM DEPTH OF CONTAMINATED WATER IS 50% OF CONCRETE WASHOUT HEIGHT.

50' MIN

ROAD WIDTH PER PLAN

ENTRANCE ROAD

A-A

PLAN 6" THICKNESS OF 2" CRUSHED STONE

10 MIL IMPERMEABLE TM LINER 8' x 8' MINIMUM FILTREXX R SOXX

2"x2"x36" WOODEN STAKES PLACED 5' O.C.

SECTION VIEW

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

2"x2"x36" WOODEN STAKES PLACED 5' O.C.

R=10' (TYP)

PUMP CONTAMINATED WATER INTO CONCRETE WASHOUT POLY-FILTER X FILTER CLOTH AS MANUFACTURED BY CARTHAGE MILLS OR APPROVED EQUAL

COMPACTED SUBGRADE

Civil Engineering

SECTION A-A

8' x 8' MINIMUM FILTREXX R SOXX

NOTES:

Landscape Architecture

STONE SIZE

USE 2" STONE, OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT.

LENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET

THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN SIX INCHES

WIDTH

12 FOOT MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS.

SURFACE WATER

ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED.

MAINTENANCE

THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH SHALL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.

WASHING

WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. IF ACCUMULATED SOIL DOES NOT COME OFF BY WAY OF STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KNOCK OFF ACCUMULATED SOIL BY MANUAL METHODS UPSLOPE OF A SILT FENCE BARRIER.

SEDIMENT TRAPPING

SILT FENCE BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN SLOPE OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO CATCH ANY SEDIMENT THAT COULD POTENTIALLY FALL OFF OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND/OR VEHICLES.

1. 2.

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY WASH WATER FROM THESE VEHICLES BE ALLOWED TO ENTER ANY SURFACE WATERS. CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL BE LINED WITH 10 MIL. THICK PLASTIC WHICH COVERS THE BOTTOM OF THE WASHOUT AND EXTENDS OVER THE TOP OF THE SIDES. 3. MAKE SURE THAT PROPER SIGNAGE IS PROVIDED TO DRIVERS SO THAT THEY ARE AWARE OF THE PRESENCE OF WASHOUT FACILITIES. 4. WASHOUT FACILITIES SHOULD NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 50 FEET OF STORM DRAINS, OPEN DITCHES OR SURFACE WATERS. 5. INSTALL ON FLAT GRADE NOT TO EXCEED 2%. 6. CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY BE STACKED IN A PYRAMIDAL CONFIGURATION FOR ADDED HEIGHT AND STABILITY. 7. CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY BE DIRECT SEEDED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. 8. THEY SHOULD BE IN A CONVENIENT LOCATION FOR THE TRUCKS, PREFERABLY NEAR THE PLACE WHERE THE CONCRETE IS BEING POURED. 9. MINIMUM DIMENSIONS TO BE 8' (L) x 8' (W) x 2' (H) 10. LINER SHALL IS TO BE REPLACED EVERY TIME THE WASHOUT IS EMPTIED. 11. WASHOUT TO BE LOCATED 100' (MIN.) FROM EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE 2 CA502

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

DATE

COMMENTS

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

1 01/08/2026 EGF

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

2 01/22/2026 EGF

ISSUED FINAL

CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAIL SCALE

NTS

PERIODIC INSPECTIONS AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN.

STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL

NOTES:

A

C

ST

C

EXCAVATED TRENCH

TAMPED BACKFILL

ER

D.A.W.

I NE PR

NG

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

E

ED

SILT

NATIVE SOIL

HA

NS

FILTER FABRIC AMOCO CONSTRUCTION FABRIC STYLE 1380 OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL

GRADE

TE EL O R I T Y

L I CE

48" MIN. FENCE POST (SPACING 10'-0" CENTER TO CENTER MAX.)

H

SCALE

NTS

K OR I E

1 CA502

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

MI

10.

NOTES

FOR ANY PROJECT ON WHICH CONCRETE WILL BE POURED OR OTHERWISE FORMED ON SITE, A SUITABLE WASHOUT FACILITY MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE CLEANING OF CHUTES, MIXERS, AND HOPPERS OF THE DELIVERY VEHICLES UNLESS SUCH A FACILITY WILL BE USED AT THE SOURCE OF THE CONCRETE.

4'-0"

FILTER CLOTH - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE.

NO.

PLAN VIEW

2'-0" MIN

Costich Engineering

Land Surveying

TM

T.K.W.

SITE INFORMATION

SILT FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SOIL STABILIZATION PERIOD.

CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT SILT FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS.

EXCAVATE TRENCH 6" WIDE X 6" DEEP. BURY BOTTOM 12" OF FABRIC AND TAMP IN PLACE.

WHEN FENCE IS NO LONGER NEEDED, THE ACCUMULATED SILT, ALL THE POSTS AND FABRIC SHALL BE REMOVED AND TRENCH BACK FILLED WITH TOPSOIL AND SEEDED. 3 CA502

SILT FENCE DETAIL SCALE

NTS

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

GRADING & EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 CA502

12" (30 CM)

12" (30CM)

2" - 5" (5 CM - 12.5 CM)

6" (15CM) 6" (15CM)

6" (15 CM)

2 6" (15 CM)

2 3b

1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE #100 WEST HENRIETTA, NEW YORK 14586

3" (7.5 CM)

6" (15CM) 3a

4" 1

4" (10CM)

7 1

Civil Engineering 2" - 5" (5CM - 12.5CM)

PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS (RECP'S), INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEED.

Land Surveying

BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE RECP'S IN A 6" (15 CM) DEEP x 6" (15 CM) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) OF RECP'S EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE RECP'S WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/ STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" (30 CM) PORTION OF RECP'S BACK OF SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE RECP'S OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/ STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE RECP'S.

Landscape Architecture

4" - 6" (10CM - 15CM)

6" (15CM)

4 8 PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED.

BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" (15CM) DEEP x 6" (15CM) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30CM) OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/ STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30CM) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" (30CM) PORTION OF THE BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACT SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/ STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30CM) ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. ROLL CENTER BLANKET IN DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW IN BOTTOM OF CHANNEL. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/ STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING THE DOT SYSTEM TM , STAPLES/ STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN. PLACE CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH A 4" - 6" (10CM - 15CM) OVERLAP. USE A DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED 4" (10CM) APART AND 4" (10 CM) ON CENTER TO SECURE BLANKETS.

FULL LENGTH EDGE OF BLANKETS AT TOP OF SIDE SLOPES MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/ STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30CM) APART IN A 6" (12CM) DEEP x 6" (15CM) WIDE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING.

ADJACENT BLANKETS MUST BE OVERLAPPED APPROXIMATELY 2" - 5" (5CM - 12.5CM) (DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE) AND STAPLED.

IN HIGH FLOW CHANNEL APPLICATIONS, A STAPLE CHECK SLOT IS RECOMMENDED AT 30 TO 40 FOOT (9M - 12M) INTERVALS. USE A DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED 4" (10CM) APART AND 4" (10CM) ON CENTER OVER ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE CHANNEL.

217 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 458-3020

ROLL THE RECP'S (A.) DOWN OR (B) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. RECP'S WILL ROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL RECP'S MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/ STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING THE DOT SYSTEM TM , STAPLES/ STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN.

NO.

THE EDGES OF PARALLEL RECP'S MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2" - 5" ( 5 CM - 12.5 CM) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON RECP'S TYPE.

ISSUED PRELIMINARY FOR 0 11/24/2025 TKW REVIEW

CONSECUTIVE RECP'S SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3" (7.5 CM) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART ACROSS ENTIRE RECP'S WIDTH.

DATE

COMMENTS

1 01/08/2026 EGF

ADDED SURVEY NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS & CONCRETE SLAB

2 01/22/2026 EGF

ISSUED FINAL

* IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OS STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15 CM) MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE RECP'S. 2 CA503

EROSION CONTROL BLANKET

BANK STABILIZATION SCALE: NTS

1 CA503

EROSION CONTROL BLANKET

CHANNEL INSTALLATION SCALE: NTS

GRADATION RIP-RAP SHALL MEET N.Y.S.D.O.T. ITEM NO. 623.03 LIGHT GRADATION SPECIFICATION (SEE N.Y.S.D.O.T. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS TABLE 733-21A). d50 = 8", dMAX = 12" PER NEW YORK STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.

QUALITY STONE OR RIP-RAP SHOULD BE HARD, DURABLE FIELD OR QUARRY MATERIALS. THEY SHOULD BE ANGULAR AND NOT SUBJECT TO BREAKING DOWN WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR WEATHERING. THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2.5. REFERENCE: NEW YORK STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, PAGE 5.57-5.59. 3 CA503

RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION DETAIL SCALE: NTS

A

C

D.A.W.

ER

MI

C

ST

SS

I NE PR

NG

0 9 6 1 84 OF E AL S S I ON

DRAWN BY

E

CK NE TH I

6" GRAVEL FILTER (OR GEOTEXTILE)

2' MIN.

NOTE

* IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLES OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15CM) MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY ANCHOR THE BLANKETS. NOTE: A * HORIZONTAL SPACING SHOULD BE ALTERED IF CRITICAL POINTS B C NECESSARY TO ALLOW STAPLES TO SECURE THE A. OVERLAPS AND SEAMS NECESSARY CRITICAL POINTS ALONG THE CHANNEL SURFACE. B. PROJECTED WATER LINE ** IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE C. CHANNEL BOTTOM/ OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15CM) MAY BE SIDE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY ANCHOR THE BLANKETS. SLOPE VERTICES

H

ED

3' MIN.

HA

K OR I E

N.Y.S.D.O.T. ITEM NO. 623.03 LIGHT GRADATION SPECIFICATION d50 = 8"

TE EL O R I T Y

NS

THE TERMINAL END OF THE BLANKETS MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/ STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30CM) APART IN A 6" (15CM) DEEP x 6" (15CM) WIDE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING.

PROJECT MANAGER

OF NEW

L I CE

Costich Engineering

T.K.W.

SITE INFORMATION

WEBSTER NORTH PROJECT ID

17592198 MDG LOCATION ID: 5000928317

TOWN OF WEBSTER COUNTY OF MONROE STATE OF NEW YORK SHEET TITLE

GRADING & EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C.E. JOB NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

9159.01 CA503

End of document