Town Board Meeting
Town Board Minutes 2026.05.07

Minutes

May 7, 2026 · 46 min read · extracted text · View original

Webster Town Board

May 7, 2026

A regular meeting of the Webster Town Board was called to order by Supervisor Scialdone at

7:30 p.m. at the Webster Town Board Meeting Room, 1002 Ridge Road, Webster, New York,

with the following officials present:

Supervisor ......................................................................... Alexander B. Scialdone

Councilman....................................................................................... John J. Cahill

Councilwoman...........................................................................Jennifer S. Wright

Councilman.............................................................................. Nicholas E. Hunter

Councilman................................................................................ Garrett J. Wagner

Attorney for the Town .........................................................................Kyle Taylor

Town Clerk .................................................................................. Danene M. Marr

Department Heads Present:

Finance Director ..................................................................................Paul Adams

Community Development Director ................................................. Joshua Artuso

Town Engineer .............................................................................. Keith Mortimer

Also in attendance was Maria Dewar, Administrative Assistant for the Director of Community

Planning and Development.

***

Supervisor Scialdone led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

***

Supervisor Scialdone invited attending Town staff members, Kris Lombardo and Maria Dewar

up to the podium and read the following proclamation:

Proclamation in Recognition of Public Service Recognition Week

WHEREAS, the role of a public servant is to operate with dignity, pride, and determination to

achieve the best outcomes for community members. These individuals are responsible for

upholding the highest standards in their work; and

WHEREAS, Public Service Recognition Week is an annual initiative that celebrates the

dedicated work of employees at the federal, state, county, and local levels of government. This

week highlights the essential contributions of public service professionals, who often go above

and beyond their job requirements. Their commitment is fueled by the residents and their

families who call the community home; and

WHEREAS, each department within the Town of Webster embodies the best of public service

and consists of many people from diverse backgrounds and professions. They intentionally

sought careers with the Town and remain united in their purpose to support the community they

cherish; and

WHEREAS, The Town of Webster is fortunate to have public servants through organizations

like the Village, Town, fire districts, and more. The contributions of these employees over the

years have had a significant impact, shaping Webster's history for generations to come; and

1

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

WHEREAS, the work of a public servant is rarely easy, but always necessary; the dedication of

Webster’s public workforce is evident in the pristine parks, cleared roads, functioning sewer

systems, thriving local businesses, and desirable living conditions enjoyed by residents every

day. The primary goal of our Webster team is to provide residents with the best possible

conditions and services. Our Town can continue to expect the high-quality standards of work

delivered consistently by our public servants; and

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: On this seventh day of May in the year 2026, on

behalf of the Webster Town Supervisor’s office and the entire Webster community, we celebrate

Public Service Recognition Week and commend the hard work and commitment to community

shown by all public servants, especially Town employees.

Alexander B. Scialdone, Town Supervisor

***

The meeting was open to the floor for public comment and the following Webster residents

appeared before the Town Board.

Carl Fitzsimmons, a Webster resident, came before the Board and urged the Town Board to

approve the Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) proposal, emphasizing that the decision is required

in June. He stated that RNG would serve as the foundation for creating a Town of Webster

Energy Department and provide a dedicated revenue stream to reduce energy costs for residents

and businesses. Referencing Towns across the country, as well as Fairport and Spencerport

locally, Mr. Fitzsimmons highlighted the benefits of community-owned energy systems,

including significantly lower utility rates. He also noted that acquiring local electric

infrastructure is a well-defined process and would allow Webster to retain more economic value.

Mr. Fitzsimmons warned of increasing energy demand driven by emerging AI technologies and

cited examples such as the Greenidge facility in Dresden and RG&E’s foreign ownership model

as concerns. To position Webster for long-term benefits, he recommended approving the RNG

proposal, establishing an energy department, pursuing municipal ownership of electric

infrastructure, offering an opt-in/opt-out renewable energy program for residents, and adopting

the Climate Smart Community designation.

Rebecca Collins, a Webster resident, and a member of Color Webster Green, addressed the

Board regarding the proposal to register as a Climate Smart Community (CSC). She noted that a

slide deck had been shared earlier in the week to address Board concerns and reported learning

more about the program through discussions with leaders in neighboring CSC communities. She

emphasized that CSC status significantly improves a municipality’s ability to secure grant

funding for a wide range of projects, helping offset costs and reduce the financial burden on

taxpayers. Ms. Collins also highlighted that participating communities view the program as a

long-term investment in residents’ quality of life and community resilience.

2

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Ms. Collins reviewed examples of grant-funded projects in nearby communities and explained

that, unlike the now-closed Clean Energy Communities (CEC) Program, CSC registration is

currently the available pathway to remain competitive for future funding. She noted that the

CSC Program provides technical support for both registration and grant applications, and that

local volunteer groups, including Color Webster Green, are eager to assist. To conclude, Ms.

Collins stated that adopting the CSC Resolution would demonstrate the Town’s commitment to

environmental stewardship and a sustainable future for Webster residents.

Geri McMahon, a Webster resident, came before the Board in support of the Climate Smart

Communities initiative, first thanking those who serve and run for office, acknowledging the

commitment such service requires. As a longtime member of Color Webster Green and Friends

of Webster Trails, she emphasized their dedication to environmental stewardship and noted that

CSC-related grant opportunities could benefit Webster’s trail system and broader community

infrastructure. She highlighted how other municipalities have used grant funds for projects such

as sidewalks, tree planting, and solar installations that reduce costs for taxpayers. She reiterated

that local volunteers are committed to assisting with the initiative, including grant work, and

expressed strong belief in the program’s value.

Sven Vetter, a Webster resident, spoke in support of the Climate Smart Communities initiative,

sharing a professional background in environmental sustainability, including serving as Director

of Environmental Sustainability for Nestlé and more than two decades in health, safety, and

environmental work at Kodak. He emphasized that their career has focused on environmental

stewardship paired with operational efficiency and cost reduction, noting that what benefits the

environment often benefits businesses and communities as well. Mr. Vetter outlined key

advantages of the CSC certification framework, including lowering operating costs, improving

eligibility for grants and low-interest loans, attracting environmentally conscious businesses, and

signaling responsible long-term planning to residents.

Mr. Vetter highlighted that many program elements—such as energy, water, and waste

reduction—can be implemented gradually as Town systems reach end-of-life. He offered

examples such as transitioning to LED lighting, incorporating heat pumps where appropriate, and

updating purchasing policies to prioritize energy-efficient products. Acknowledging the Town’s

past grant successes, he cautioned that future funding will likely become more competitive due

to expiring pandemic-related programs and tightened budgets, making CSC certification a

strategic advantage. He concluded that adopting the initiative is a logical and responsible step

toward reducing environmental impact, strengthening Webster’s appeal, and lowering long-term

community costs.

Monica Gorlick, a Webster resident, encouraged the Town Board to approve the Climate Smart

Community (CSC) Program, expressing hope for unanimous support or, if needed, for one

deciding member to demonstrate leadership by joining those in favor. She emphasized that the

CSC Program would benefit both the Town of Webster and its residents and noted that no tax

dollars would be required to participate.

Ms. Gorlick thanked the Board and the Supervisor for considering the statement and urged

members to act responsibly and in the best interest of the community by voting in favor of the

CSC Program.

3

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Edwin and Roberta Przybylowicz, Webster residents, emailed the following:

During the past two weeks, we reviewed Verizon’s “North” proposal for a new cell tower in our

densely populated residential neighborhood, and we are deeply concerned by several significant

issues that we believe warrant careful reconsideration:

• The visual and environmental impact on one of Webster’s most scenic residential areas.

• The potential for future expansion of the cell tower to handle up to three carriers which

would add to the visible hardware atop the tower.

• The lack of transparency and community engagement in the proposal process.

We offer the following comments on each of these concerns.

Visual and Neighborhood Impact

The proposed tower would be located in a particularly scenic and well-established residential

area of Webster. While Verizon has provided photographic simulations, these understate the

day-to-day visual impact on nearby residents.

There are at least seventeen homes immediately adjacent to the proposed site whose residents

would experience a direct and continuous view of this structure. Many additional homes in the

surrounding neighborhood would also be affected. For these residents, this is not an abstract

concern-it represents a permanent alteration of their living environment and, potentially, their

property values.

The cumulative impact on neighborhood character and visual quality should be given substantial

weight in your deliberations.

Potential Expansion to Additional Carriers

While the proposal contemplates accommodating up to two additional carriers, it does not

adequately address the resulting increase in equipment and associated appurtenances. Such

additions would expand the visible mass and complexity of the structure in ways that are not

clearly defined in the current submission.

This uncertainty further amplifies the potential long-term visual and environmental impact of the

tower.

Process and Community Engagement

Equally concerning is the way this proposal was introduced to the community. Many nearby

residents became aware of the project only shortly before its initial presentation to the Town

Board.

A more proactive and transparent outreach effort by Verizon and/or the property owner could

have fostered a more constructive dialogue with affected residents. Instead, the process had

created a perception that this proposal was advanced without adequate consideration for those

most directly impacted.

That perception undermines public trust and is inconsistent with the values of a community such

as Webster.

4

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Conclusion

This proposal closely follows a similar cell tower initiative considered less than a year ago in

nearly the same location. Many residents had hoped that prior experience would lead to a more

balanced and community-sensitive approach.

Webster’s motto, “Where Life Is Worth Living?” reflects a commitment to preserving the quality

of life for its residents. Decisions such as this one should carefully balance infrastructure needs

with the character and well-being of established neighborhoods.

We respectfully urge you to take these concerns seriously and to reconsider whether this

proposal, in its current form and location, serves the best interests of the Town of Webster and its

residents. Based on the issues outlined above, we urge the Planning Board and the Town Board

to deny the application as currently proposed.

Marcy Veno, a Webster resident, emailed the following:

I am requesting the Board review the pictures and video I provided to Supervisor Scialdone of

the Mill Creek Watershed that boarders 1222 Wildflower Drive, the proposed site of a Verizon

cell tower.

Construction of a cell tower at 1222 Wildflower Drive will have a direct negative impact on the

watershed and the ecosystems supporting diverse life forms adapted to flowing water, including

fish (salmon & trout), macroinvertebrates (aquatic insects), salamanders, frogs, tadpoles, turtles,

and various algae, moss, rooted plants (like waterweed).

Cell towers can impact these ecosystems through high-frequency radiofrequency radiation (RF),

which studies suggest may also increase mortality in nearby insects, reduce bird reproduction,

and disrupt the orientation of creatures using magnetic fields.

During adverse weather acts of Mother Nature, Mill Creek floods. The flooding results in Mill

Creek’s fast-rising water to topple its banks and flood all the bordering properties of the

Wildflower neighborhood, including 1222 Wildflower Drive, the proposed cell tower

construction.

I would ask the Town Board to carefully consider the impact of placing a cell tower near Mill

Creek and the adverse effects on Mill Creek’s ecosystem, which flows into Lake Ontario.

Allowing cell tower construction on 1222 Wildflower Drive will have long-term consequences

for Webster and the surrounding lake communities.

***

Resolution No. 158: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

approve the April 16, 2026 Town Board Workshop Meeting Minutes as submitted by the Town

Clerk.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner ........... Aye

Motion carried ................... 5-0

***

5

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Resolution No. 159: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilwoman Wright,

to approve the April 16, 2026 Town Board Meeting Minutes as submitted by the Town Clerk.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner ........... Aye

Motion carried ................... 5-0

***

Resolution No. 160: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

approve the bills as submitted in Warrant #0526 by the Director of Finance.

Fund

General (A,B) #1380-1675

Highway (C,D)

Sewer (G)

Library (L)

Drainage Districts (M)

Park Districts (P)

Special Districts (N,Q,S)

Trust & Agency (T/A,N/SF,T/T, WEMS)

Debt Svc (v)

Capital Projects (H) #026-032

H229 Vosburg Pump Station

H231 WWTP Upgrade Phase II

H232 Highway Garage Building

H238 Boulter Ind Parkway Rd Ext

TOTAL

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Wagner ........... Aye

Inside

139,067.77

410,527.19

19,232.05

12,221.59

2,637.10

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Outside

410,798.18

90,672.63

93,662.07

23,383.14

2,092.32

72.13

3,875.72

442,886.45

8,365.08

12,829.05

1,422,994.44

4,095.32

8,512.23

2,032,116.74

0.00

1,233.57

0.00

0.00

1,077,041.29

Card/ACH

3,922.19

10,332.49

3,859.52

416.71

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Total

553,788.14

511,532.31

116,753.64

36,021.44

4,729.42

72.13

3,875.72

442,886.45

8,365.08

0.00

12,829.05

0.00 1,424,228.01

0.00

4,095.32

0.00

8,512.23

18,530.91 3,127,688.94

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Motion carried ................... 5-0

***

Resolution No. 161: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

approve the prepaid vouchers included in Warrant #0526 by the Director of Finance in the

amount of $1,077,041.29. [Included in the summary of vouchers approved in Resolution #160]

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner ........... Aye

Motion carried ................... 5-0

***

Resolution No. 162: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

approve purchase orders as submitted by the Director of Finance.

6

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Wagner ........... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Motion carried ................... 5-0

***

Keith Mortimer, Town Engineer, presented the following Fill Permit Application for 1628 Lake

Road, a single-family property undertaking shoreline armoring along Lake Ontario to address

significant erosion. The coastal work has already been reviewed and approved by the New York

State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), with permits issued.

The project requires substantial excavation, generating approximately 4,800 cubic yards of

material. Following Engineering reviews, the applicant will keep and repurpose about 2,400

cubic yards on-site to level the front yard, while the remaining 2,400 cubic yards will be

transported off-site to a resident in the Town of Phelps. This represents a change from the

original plan to retain all spoils onsite. Town Engineering staff reviewed the revised plan with

the applicant and expressed support.

Board Members asked whether these changes would alter environmental impacts or SEQR

requirements. It was clarified that although such permits were historically treated as Type II

actions, this project should be classified as an Unlisted Action, requiring a standalone Resolution

for SEQR. The Board, acting as lead agency, must determine whether the project will have

significant environmental impacts. If not, a Negative Declaration would be issued, concluding

SEQR review.

Resolution No. 163: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to

classify the Fill Permit at 1628 Lake Road, Tax ID No. 036.04-1-17.31, as an unlisted action.

WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board considered the request by applicant, Paull Beldham,

located at 1628 lake Road, for a Fill Permit; and

WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted

Action under Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR); and

WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board has determined that the action is subject to a single

agency review pursuant to Part 617.6(b)(1) of SEQR and that it is the most appropriate agency

for making the determination of significance; and

WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board therefore designates itself as lead agency for the proposed

action; and

WHEREAS, the Webster Town Board has given consideration to the criteria for determining

significance as set forth in Section 617.7(c)(1) of SEQR, and has considered the information

contained in the Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1, dated March 7, 2025 and

completed Parts 2 and 3 of the Environmental Assessment:

7

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

1. Webster Town Board hereby determines that the proposed action will not have a significant

adverse effect on the environment for the reasons set forth in the attached Notice of

Determination of Non-Significance; and

2. Webster Town Board is authorized to take all actions reasonable and necessary to file the

Negative Declaration and discharge the Webster Town Board’s responsibility as lead agency

for this action.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Hunter................... Aye

Councilman Cahill .............. Aye

Councilman Wagner ................. Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Motion carried .......................... 5-0

***

Resolution No. 164: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

approve the issuance of a Fill Permit pursuant to Section 201 of the Webster Town Code for

property owned by Mr. Paul Beldham located at 1628 Lake Road, Tax ID No. 036.04-1-17.31

with the following conditions:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

All grading work is to be completed on the applicant’s property only and not alter grades

and/or drainage on adjoining properties.

If the project appears to adversely affect surrounding properties, they are to stop work

and contact the Town to reevaluate the plan.

Material brought to the site as fill is to be rough graded within 14 days of arrival.

The area must be final graded, stabilized and vegetated immediately after completion of

rough grading. Grass should be established at approximately 80% coverage within 30

days.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation “Best Management

Practices” as needed to prevent erosion and sedimentation; this can include but not be

limited to straw matting, silt fence, and silt socks. If additional measures are deemed

necessary by the Town, the property owner shall comply.

Clean the roadway/common driveway immediately if it becomes dirty.

Comply with the Town of Webster Noise Ordinance.

Allow Town access during the project to review site and progress.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

That the applicant be granted a Fill Permit at 1628 Lake Road Tax ID No. 036.04-1-17.31.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

8

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Josh Artuso, Director of Community Planning and Development, recapped that the Climate

Smart Communities Program includes a wide range of actions, many of which the Town is

already implementing as part of routine operations. All Department Heads were consulted and

unanimously support moving forward with adopting the pledge. It was noted that the program

can be managed using existing staff resources, and the Town retains full control over which

actions to pursue. Participation may also strengthen upcoming grant applications, particularly

following the Comprehensive Plan update. Based on professional review and discussion with

counterparts in other municipalities that have already adopted the pledge, Mr. Artuso

recommended proceeding, characterizing the decision as straightforward and beneficial.

Maria Dewar, Administrative Assistant for the Director of Community Planning and

Development and Grant Liaison, spoke in strong support of the Town becoming a registered

Climate Smart Community. She explained that this designation would improve the

competitiveness of future grant applications, including DEC funding, Water Infrastructure

Improvement Act (WIIA) grants, and Consolidated Funding Applications, all of which award

additional points to municipalities holding this status. She noted that while the Town has had

past grant successes, competition has increased, and the Town has not secured a WIIA grant

since 2017—funding typically used for sewer infrastructure projects such as the Vosburg Pump

Station. Ms. Dewar also referenced data presented earlier showing that the Town has already

completed nearly enough actions to achieve Bronze Certification. She concluded that not

pursuing this designation would be a missed opportunity and strongly recommended that the

Town move forward with the Climate Smart Communities program.

Resolution No. 165: MOTION by Councilman Hunter, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to

approve the Town of Webster becoming a Climate Smart Community.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Hunter................... Aye

Councilman Cahill .............. Nay

Councilman Wagner ................. Nay

Councilwoman Wright ....... Nay

Motion denied .......................... 2-3

***

Resolution No. 166: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to

accept the Agreed Upon Procedures Report for the Justice Accounts for the year ended

December 31, 2025 and report dated April 6, 2026.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Resolution No. 167: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to

accept the Agreed Upon Procedures Report for the Town Clerk and the Receiver of Taxes

Accounts for the year ended December 31, 2025 and report dated April 6, 2026.

9

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

The Board discussed the next agenda item, which was a proposal to engage with Connard HR for

the Blue-Collar Union negotiations, not to exceed $35,000.00. The matter was discussed

informally, and no motion was offered.

***

Supervisor Scialdone presented the following Resolution. He reviewed the history of department

head compensation changes implemented three years prior, noting that step increases and COLA

adjustments were applied to departments overseeing the White- and Blue-Collar Unions, but not

to the Police Department. For three years, police leadership was advised the issue would be

revisited. The Finance and HR departments have since developed a framework to address the

pay compression between the two non-union positions within the Police Department, though

additional work remains.

Supervisor Scialdone stated that the Police Chief is deserving of the associated salary adjustment

but emphasized the Board’s responsibility to conduct due diligence in structuring the changes

appropriately. To that end, a budget transfer was proposed. Under the recommended

adjustment—setting the Chief’s salary at 10% above the Captain’s base salary—the increase

totals $5,900 for 2026. A motion was made to reduce the Town Supervisor’s salary by $5,900

for the 2026 fiscal year and reallocate those funds to the Police Chief’s base salary through

December 31, 2026.

Councilman Cahill stated that, prior to proceeding with the vote, both they and another Council

member had extensive discussions with the Police Chief regarding the proposed salary

adjustment. The speaker noted personal reservations about the process being used, expressing

concern that the approach could set an unintended precedent. They emphasized that the Chief is

entitled to appropriate compensation but felt the matter should be addressed through additional

discussion and a full review of the past three years of compensation decisions. The speaker also

remarked that the Chief had been treated unfairly when initially hired and reiterated the

importance of handling the matter properly through continued dialogue.

Supervisor Scialdone explained that the proposed budget adjustment would not restrict the Board

from continuing discussions on Police Department compensation and that a full review could

still occur over the coming year. He emphasized that the only budget line affected would be his

own salary and expressed willingness to make this contribution because he believes the Chief has

not been fairly compensated over the past three years. Supervisor Scialdone noted that previous

administrations repeatedly postponed resolving the issue and stated that reallocating funds now

would allow the Board a full year to hold comprehensive discussions without a deadline.

Councilman Cahill felt that this could be resolved by the next Town Board meeting.

10

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Councilman Hunter agrees that the Police Chief’s concerns regarding compensation must be

addressed, emphasizing the importance of equity and retaining strong leadership within the

department. Councilman Hunter highlighted the Chief’s ethical conduct, recent incidents

demonstrating the department’s value to the community, and the Chief’s strong budgeting skills

that prioritize taxpayer interests.

Councilman Cahill suggested that he was supportive of ensuring the Chief is made whole, he

cautioned that the current Resolution does not follow what he believes to be the proper process.

Resolution No. 168: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

adjust the Police Chief’s salary by transferring $5,900.00 from the Town Supervisor salary for

the 2026 fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Nay

Councilwoman Wright ....... Nay

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Nay

Motion denied .................. 2-3

***

Resolution No. 169: MOTION by Councilman Cahill, seconded by Councilman Hunter, to

authorize the Town Supervisor to sign a renewal agreement with Securitas Technologies for

service and support for the Town Hall, Police, and Town Court buildings, not to exceed

$13,500.00.

[Renewal agreement to be filed in Town Clerk’s Office]

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Resolution No. 170: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

authorize the Town Supervisor to approve the payment for a settlement with MRB for $6,300.00.

[Agreement to be filed in Town Clerk’s Office]

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Resolution No. 171: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to set

a joint Public Hearing with the Village of Webster for Tuesday June 2, 2026 at 7:00 p.m.

WHEREAS, the Town of Webster was presented with a petition by Xerox Corporation for the

annexation of territory known as Tax ID #065.03-1-41, which parcel is bounded on the east by

Phillips Rd., on the north by Chiyoda Dr., and the west by Panama Dr.; and

11

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

WHEREAS, it is both in the public interest and required by General Municipal Law Article 17

that a Public Hearing be held to consider the proposed annexation to the Village of Webster; and

WHEREAS, the Village of Webster Board of Trustees has agreed to conduct a joint Public

Hearing on the proposed annexation:

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

1. A joint Public Hearing with the Village of Webster Board of Trustees and the Town Board of

the Town of Webster shall be scheduled and conducted at the Village Board Meeting Room,

29 South Ave., in the Village of Webster on Tuesday, June 2, 2026 at 7:00 p.m., to consider

the annexation petition brought by Xerox Corporation.

2. The Village Clerk and/or Town Clerk provide notice of the time and place of such joint

Public Hearing by publication once on or before the 13th day of May, 2026 in the Webster

Herald, the official newspaper of the Village of Webster and the Town of Webster and a

newspaper of general circulation in the Village and Town of Webster.

3. By publishing a notice on the Town Clerk’s Bulletin Board located at 1000 Ridge Road,

Webster, New York.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Resolution No. 172: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

approve a license agreement to allow a fence within a Town stormwater easement, located at

1194 Scandia Drive, Tax ID# 065.05-1-49.

WHEREAS, a stormwater drainage easement running through and on the property at 1194

Scandia Dr., Webster, NY 14580 recorded in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office; and

WHEREAS, Melissa Gambino and Peter D. Gambino are the owners of the property located at

1194 Scandia Dr., Webster, NY 14580, Tax ID #065.05-1-49; and

WHEREAS, Melissa Gambino has applied to install a 6 foot tall wooden privacy fence upon,

within and through the aforesaid easement, and that in the event the placement and/or height of

such fence is not in such conformance, such fence shall not be constructed unless the proper

variance(s) is/are received from the Town of Webster Zoning Board of Appeals; and

WHEREAS, the applicants have requested relief from the Webster Town Board to permit the

aforesaid privacy fence to exist upon and encroach within said easement; and

WHEREAS, the Town of Webster has the authority to grant the relief requested, and the public

good will not be harmed thereby:

12

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

1. Pursuant to application of Melissa and Peter D. Gambino as the owners of the property

located at 1194 Scandia Dr., Webster, NY, Tax ID #065.05-1-49 and in recognition of the

hardship created if the relief sought herein is not granted, the limited detriment to the Town

of Webster, and upon consideration of all relevant factors, the Webster Town Board hereby

allows the construction of the aforesaid privacy fence which will exist upon and encroach

upon the easement affecting 1194 Scandia Dr., Webster, NY 14580.

2. This Resolution in no way applies to any other encroachment, violations or relief sought by

the owners, their successors, grantees or assigns from any other building, structure or zoning

violation which may exist on such premises.

3. This relief is granted upon the following conditions:

A. The proposed fence shall encroach upon the said easement as proposed as drawn on the

survey map prepared by Ronald W. Staub and dated August 30, 2006.

B. The fence shall not be expanded to further encroach on or in the easement, nor will it be

moved from its permitted places within the easement as shown on the Instrument Survey

Map presented to the Town Board, and as referenced above.

C. Upon the destruction or demolition of the aforesaid fence or any part thereof, through

natural causes or otherwise, the Owners of the fence will not reconstruct it without a

specific Resolution of the Town Board authorizing its replacement or reconstruction.

D. The Owners of the fence shall be solely responsible for any damage caused by or to the

fence as a result of the Town’s maintenance of said easement, and the Owners, their

successors and assigns further agree to indemnify, defend and hold the Town harmless

from any and all loss or damage caused to or by the fence as a result of work done by the

Town within said easement.

E. In the event of an emergency, or if the Town deems it necessary or imperative, the Town

will have the right to remove or take down all or any part of said fence, without recourse

by the Owners or their successors or assigns to such removal or taking down.

F. This Resolution shall in no way affect the rights, if any, of any other public entities or

public utilities in or to said easement.

4. The record Owners of the fence and the Town of Webster will enter into a licensing

agreement incorporating all the conditions of this Resolution in form and substance as

approved by the Town Attorney, and which will further provide that the Owner, at their

expense, will record the licensing agreement in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

13

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Resolution No. 173: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilwoman Wright, to

approve acceptance of credit cards as a form of payment for services at Webster Town Hall and on

the Town website.

WHEREAS, residents of the Town of Webster have expressed an interest in the Town of

Webster accepting credit card payments for various transactions conducted at the Town Clerk’s

Office; and

WHEREAS, the Town Board has determined card processing services would be a convenience

for residents; and

WHEREAS, the Town Board has the authority to authorize acceptance of payments by financial

transaction devices (e.g. credit cards, debit cards); and

WHEREAS, the Town Board has determined that continuing and expanding the current contract

with CSG FORTE Payments, Inc., for credit card processing is the most efficient and costeffective means for the Town to accept credit cards; and

WHEREAS, the Town Board has determined that by applying a Service Fee Model approach,

where the Town resident pays a modest service fee for processing their transaction and the Town

would not absorb the cost:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

That the Town Board authorizes the Supervisor to enter into agreement with CSG FORTE

Payments, Inc. to provide additional credit card payment processing services.

[Contract to be filed in the Town Clerk’s Office]

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Danene Marr, Webster Town Clerk and Receiver of Taxes, presented the following Resolution.

She informed the Board that the Town’s full-time Tax Clerk suffered a serious medical

emergency in early January and remains out on extended medical leave, with an anticipated

return in early summer. Due to this absence, the Receiver of Taxes Office expects to be

significantly understaffed during the upcoming School Tax collection period, which is typically

the busiest and most demanding time of year.

During the Town and County Tax collection period, other Town Hall employees with relevant

experience assisted when available, and their support was appreciated. However, this assistance

will not be feasible during School Tax collection. Additional temporary staffing is therefore

being requested to support current employees, prevent burnout, and maintain reasonable service

levels for residents.

Councilman Cahill expressed appreciation for the clear explanation of duties, hour tracking, and

resource use, and acknowledged the cooperation and cross-training demonstrated by staff.

14

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Ms. Marr also noted that residents felt the impact of being down a full-time employee—longer

lines, increased wait time for callbacks, and longer wait times—and the goal is to avoid similar

issues during School Tax collection.

Resolution No. 174: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

approve the addition of one temporary part-time Office Clerk position to the 2026 list of

authorized positions.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner .......... Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Paul Adams, Director of Finance, presented a proposal for the Town to open an investment

account with the Empire Public Investment Cooperative (EPIC), an investment vehicle similar to

a mutual fund for government entities and invested in U.S. Treasury bills. The account offers

competitive rates and daily liquidity. The Town has successfully maintained a similar

investment account with New York Class since 1991, and EPIC would serve as an additional

option rather than a replacement.

Two Resolutions were introduced

one to authorize opening the EPIC account and another to

amend the Town’s investment policy to include EPIC. In response to a question from the Board,

the Director of Finance stated that while the policy allows for investments up to $25 million, the

Town would likely begin with approximately $5 million. The Town currently holds higher-thanusual cash reserves due to borrowing for major projects, including the wastewater treatment plant

and the highway building. Earnings from these investments are deposited into the debt service

fund to help offset future principal and interest costs.

Resolution No. 175: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone and seconded by Councilman Hunter,

to authorize the Town of Webster to participate in the Empire Public Investment Cooperative

Fund of New York.

WHEREAS, New York General Municipal Law, Article 5-G, Section 119-o (“Section 119-o”)

empowers municipal corporations, such as the Town of Webster, to enter into agreements for the

performance of their respective functions, powers and duties on a cooperative or contract basis,

with other municipal corporations; and

WHEREAS, the Town of Webster is considering investing portions of its available investment

funds in cooperation with other municipal corporations and/or districts pursuant the EPIC Fund

NY Municipal Cooperation Agreement (the “EPIC Fund NY MCA”) and the EPIC Fund NY

Information Statement (the “Information Statement”); and

WHEREAS, the Town of Webster wishes to assure the safety and liquidity needs of their funds:

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

That the Town Supervisor acting on behalf of the Town of Webster is hereby authorized to

participate in the EPIC Fund NY program under the terms of the EPIC Fund NY MCA and

Information Statement.

15

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Wagner .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Resolution No.176: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone and seconded by Councilwoman

Wright, to revise the Town’s Investment Policy to add the Empire Public Investment

Cooperative Fund of New York.

WHEREAS, the Town of Webster adopted a revised Investment Policy by Resolution dated

November 6, 2025; and

WHEREAS, the Town of Webster has elected to participate in the Empire Public Investment

Cooperative Fund of New York:

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

The Town Board amend Section VII, Designation of Depositaries, of the Town’s Investment

Policy to include the Empire Public Investment Cooperative Fund of New York.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner .......... Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Resolution No. 177: MOTION by Councilman Wagner, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

approve the following item for recycling from the Town Clerk’s Office:

• 3 Shelf Bookcase

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Asset Tag #3129

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Resolution No. 178: MOTION by Councilman Hunter, seconded by Supervisor Scialdone, to

approve the following items for transfer/surplus from the Police Department:

• Glock 47COA

• Patrol Vehicle Roof Lights

• Lot- Weapon Accessories

• Mobile License Plate Reader

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Asset Tag #890922

Asset Tage #4101

Asset Tag #5140

Asset Tag #5122

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

16

05-07-2026

Webster Town Board

Resolution No. 179: MOTION by Councilwoman Wright, seconded by Councilman Wagner, to

approve the following items for destruction:

• 1005 Picture Parkway Original Garage

Asset Tag #528

• Highway Garage Improvements

Asset Tag #933

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

At 8:27 p.m. Supervisor Scialdone called for an Executive Session.

Resolution No. 180: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

enter into Executive Session pursuant to New York State Public Officer’s Law §105(1)(d) to

discuss matters regarding proposed, pending, or current litigation.

WHEREAS, New York State Public Officers Law provides that the Town Board may enter into

Executive Session to discuss certain subjects or matters:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

That the Town Board enter into an Executive Session pursuant to New York State Public

Officer’s Law §105(1)(d) to discuss matters regarding proposed, pending, or current litigation.

That the following persons were authorized to attend: Kyle Taylor, Attorney for the Town,

Joshua Artuso, Director of Community Planning and Development, Anthony Casciani, Planning

Board Chairman, Kelsey Feeney, Personnel Director, and Danene Marr, Town Clerk.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

Resolution No. 181: MOTION by Supervisor Scialdone, seconded by Councilman Cahill, to

return to regular session at 8:57 p.m.

Vote on motion:

Supervisor Scialdone .......... Aye

Councilman Cahill ............ Aye

Councilwoman Wright ....... Aye

Councilman Hunter ........... Aye

Councilman Wagner………Aye

Motion carried .................. 5-0

***

There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at

8:57 p.m.

____________________________________

Danene M. Marr, Town Clerk

17

05-07-2026

End of document